Once again, if you have
[format]
headers = "Origamization: EvilEmpire\n"
format-patch will add these headers just after the "Subject:" line.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If a curl handle is configured with special options, they may reference
information that is freed after the request is complete which can cause
a segfault if the curl handle is reused for a different type of request.
This patch resets these options to a safe state when a transfer slot is
assigned to a new request.
Signed-off-by: Nick Hengeveld <nickh@reactrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This was proposed by Eric Wong and fixes the test. (Of course, git-send-email
does not work, if there is no Net::SMTP here, but it will say what is wrong
when you actually try to use send-email.)
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I find it very convenient to be able to supply multiple paragraphs
of text on the command line with a single git-commit call. This
change permits multiple -m/--message type options to be supplied
to git-commit with each message being added as its own paragraph
of text in the commit message.
The -m option is still not permitted with -c/-C/-F nor are multiple
occurrences of these options permitted.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The regexes detecting merges (while still relying on the commit messages,
though) have been improved to catch saner (and hopefully more) messages. The
old regex was so generic that it often matched something else and missed the
actual merge-message.
Also, the regex given with the `-M' commandline-option is checked first:
Explicitely given regexes should be considered better than the builtin ones,
and should therefore be given a chance to match a message first.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
While trying to implement a pack reader in Java I was mislead by
some facts listed in this documentation as well as found a few
details to be missing about the pack header.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This adds a "tree_entry()" function that combines the common operation of
doing a "tree_entry_extract()" + "update_tree_entry()".
It also has a simplified calling convention, designed for simple loops
that traverse over a whole tree: the arguments are pointers to the tree
descriptor and a name_entry structure to fill in, and it returns a boolean
"true" if there was an entry left to be gotten in the tree.
This allows tree traversal with
struct tree_desc desc;
struct name_entry entry;
desc.buf = tree->buffer;
desc.size = tree->size;
while (tree_entry(&desc, &entry) {
... use "entry.{path, sha1, mode, pathlen}" ...
}
which is not only shorter than writing it out in full, it's hopefully less
error prone too.
[ It's actually a tad faster too - we don't need to recalculate the entry
pathlength in both extract and update, but need to do it only once.
Also, some callers can avoid doing a "strlen()" on the result, since
it's returned as part of the name_entry structure.
However, by now we're talking just 1% speedup on "git-rev-list --objects
--all", and we're definitely at the point where tree walking is no
longer the issue any more. ]
NOTE! Not everybody wants to use this new helper function, since some of
the tree walkers very much on purpose do the descriptor update separately
from the entry extraction. So the "extract + update" sequence still
remains as the core sequence, this is just a simplified interface.
We should probably add a silly two-line inline helper function for
initializing the descriptor from the "struct tree" too, just to cut down
on the noise from that common "desc" initializer.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Ignoring empty environment variables is good common practice.
Ignoring --exec-path with empty argument won't harm, too:
if user means current directory, there is a "--exec-path=."
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Do not open mailbox file as fopen(..., "rt")
as this strips CR characters from the diff,
thus breaking the patch context for changes
in CRLF files.
Signed-off-by: Salikh Zakirov <Salikh.Zakirov@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* master:
send-email: do not pass bogus address to local sendmail binary
Add a basic test case for git send-email, and fix some real bugs discovered.
Fix a bug in email extraction used in git-send-email.
Add support for --bcc to git-send-email.
git-send-email: Add References: headers to emails, in addition to In-Reply-To:
git-clean fails on files beginning with a dash
git-svn: remove assertion that broke with older versions of svn
git-svn: t0001: workaround a heredoc bug in old versions of dash
Documentation: fix a tutorial-2 typo
Documentation: retitle the git-core tutorial
documentation: add brief mention of cat-file to tutorial part I
documentation: mention gitk font adjustment in tutorial
Fix some documentation typoes
svn < 1.3.x would display changes to keywords lines as modified
if they aren't expanded in the working copy. We already check
for changes against the git tree here, so checking against the
svn one is probably excessive.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The dash installed on my Debian Sarge boxes don't seem to like
<<'' as a heredoc starter. Recent versions of dash do not need
this fix.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Give the git-core tutorial a name that better reflects its intended
audience.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I'd rather avoid git cat-file so early on, but the
git-cat-file -p old-commit:/path/to/file
trick is too useful....
Also fix a nearby typo while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Kind of silly, but the font I get by default in gitk makes it mostly
unusable for me, so this is the first thing I'd want to know about.
(But maybe there's a better suggestion than just Ctrl-='ing until
satisfied.)
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* jc/lt-tree-n-cache-tree:
adjust to the rebased series by Linus.
Remove last vestiges of generic tree_entry_list
Convert fetch.c: process_tree() to raw tree walker
Convert "mark_tree_uninteresting()" to raw tree walker
Remove unused "zeropad" entry from tree_list_entry
fsck-objects: avoid unnecessary tree_entry_list usage
Remove "tree->entries" tree-entry list from tree parser
builtin-read-tree.c: avoid tree_entry_list in prime_cache_tree_rec()
Switch "read_tree_recursive()" over to tree-walk functionality
Make "tree_entry" have a SHA1 instead of a union of object pointers
Make "struct tree" contain the pointer to the tree buffer
Make git-diff-tree indicate when it flushes
Remove unnecessary output from t3600-rm.
* jc/lt-tree-n-cache-tree:
adjust to the rebased series by Linus.
Remove "tree->entries" tree-entry list from tree parser
Switch "read_tree_recursive()" over to tree-walk functionality
Make "tree_entry" have a SHA1 instead of a union of object pointers
Add raw tree buffer info to "struct tree"
This results as if an "ours" merge absorbed the previous "next"
branch change into the 10-patch series, but it really is a result
of an honest merge.
nothing to commit
The old tree_entry_list is dead, long live the unified single tree
parser.
Yes, we now still have a compatibility function to create a bogus
tree_entry_list in builtin-read-tree.c, but that is now entirely local
to that very messy piece of code.
I'd love to clean read-tree.c up too, but I'm too scared right now, so
the best I can do is to just contain the damage, and try to make sure
that no new users of the tree_entry_list sprout up by not having it as
an exported interface any more.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This leaves only the horrid code in builtin-read-tree.c using the old
interface. Some day I will gather the strength to tackle that one too.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
That was a hack, only needed because 'git fsck-objects' didn't look at
the raw tree format. Now that fsck traverses the tree itself, we can
drop it.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Prime example of where the raw tree parser is easier for everybody.
[jc: "Aieee" one-liner fix from the list applied. ]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Instead, just use the tree buffer directly, and use the tree-walk
infrastructure to walk the buffers instead of the tree-entry list.
The tree-entry list is inefficient, and generates tons of small
allocations for no good reason. The tree-walk infrastructure is
generally no harder to use than following a linked list, and allows
us to do most tree parsing in-place.
Some programs still use the old tree-entry lists, and are a bit
painful to convert without major surgery. For them we have a helper
function that creates a temporary tree-entry list on demand.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is preparatory work for further cleanups, where we try to make
tree_entry look more like the more efficient tree-walk descriptor.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This allows us to avoid allocating information for names etc, because
we can just use the information from the tree buffer directly.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
There are times when gitk needs to know that the commits it has sent
to git-diff-tree --stdin did not match, and it needs to know in a
timely fashion even if none of them match. At the moment,
git-diff-tree outputs nothing for non-matching commits, so it is
impossible for gitk to distinguish between git-diff-tree being slow
and git-diff-tree saying no.
This makes git-diff-tree flush its output and echo back the
input line when it is not a valid-looking object name. Gitk, or
other users of git-diff-tree --stdin, can use a blank line or
any other "marker line" to indicate that git-diff-tree has
processed all the commits on its input up to the echoed back
marker line, and any commits that have not been output do not
match.
[jc: re-done after a couple of back-and-forth discussion on the list.]
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Junio C Hamano