The rewrite of "git branch --list" using for-each-ref's internals
that happened in v2.13 regressed its handling of color.branch.local;
this has been fixed.
* kn/ref-filter-branch-list:
ref-filter.c: drop return from void function
branch: set remote color in ref-filter branch immediately
branch: use BRANCH_COLOR_LOCAL in ref-filter format
branch: only perform HEAD check for local branches
We normally try to avoid having two auto-gc operations run
at the same time, because it wastes resources. This was done
long ago in 64a99eb47 (gc: reject if another gc is running,
unless --force is given, 2013-08-08).
When we do a detached auto-gc, we run the ref-related
commands _before_ detaching, to avoid confusing lock
contention. This was done by 62aad1849 (gc --auto: do not
lock refs in the background, 2014-05-25).
These two features do not interact well. The pre-detach
operations are run before we check the gc.pid lock, meaning
that on a busy repository we may run many of them
concurrently. Ideally we'd take the lock before spawning any
operations, and hold it for the duration of the program.
This is tricky, though, with the way the pid-file interacts
with the daemonize() process. Other processes will check
that the pid recorded in the pid-file still exists. But
detaching causes us to fork and continue running under a
new pid. So if we take the lock before detaching, the
pid-file will have a bogus pid in it. We'd have to go back
and update it with the new pid after detaching. We'd also
have to play some tricks with the tempfile subsystem to
tweak the "owner" field, so that the parent process does not
clean it up on exit, but the child process does.
Instead, we can do something a bit simpler: take the lock
only for the duration of the pre-detach work, then detach,
then take it again for the post-detach work. Technically,
this means that the post-detach lock could lose to another
process doing pre-detach work. But in the long run this
works out.
That second process would then follow-up by doing
post-detach work. Unless it was in turn blocked by a third
process doing pre-detach work, and so on. This could in
theory go on indefinitely, as the pre-detach work does not
repack, and so need_to_gc() will continue to trigger. But
in each round we are racing between the pre- and post-detach
locks. Eventually, one of the post-detach locks will win the
race and complete the full gc. So in the worst case, we may
racily repeat the pre-detach work, but we would never do so
simultaneously (it would happen via a sequence of serialized
race-wins).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Without this change, the sample hook does not pass a syntax check
(sh -n):
$ sh -n hooks--pre-rebase.sample
hooks--pre-rebase.sample: line 101: syntax error near unexpected token `('
hooks--pre-rebase.sample: line 101: ` merged into it again (either directly or indirectly).'
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Convert code that divides and rounds up to use DIV_ROUND_UP to make the
intent clearer and reduce the number of magic constants.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A few tests that tried to verify the contents of push certificates
did not use 'git rev-parse' to formulate the line to look for in
the certificate correctly.
* js/t5534-rev-parse-gives-multi-line-output-fix:
t5534: fix misleading grep invocation
The Makefile rule in contrib/subtree for building documentation
learned to honour USE_ASCIIDOCTOR just like the main documentation
set does.
* aw/contrib-subtree-doc-asciidoctor:
subtree: honour USE_ASCIIDOCTOR when set
The split index code did not honor core.sharedrepository setting
correctly.
* cc/shared-index-permfix:
t1700: make sure split-index respects core.sharedrepository
t1301: move modebits() to test-lib-functions.sh
read-cache: use shared perms when writing shared index
Fix a recent regression to "git rebase -i" and add tests that would
have caught it and others.
* pw/rebase-i-regression-fix-tests:
t3420: fix under GETTEXT_POISON build
rebase: add more regression tests for console output
rebase: add regression tests for console output
rebase -i: add test for reflog message
sequencer: print autostash messages to stderr
"git add -p" were updated in 2.12 timeframe to cope with custom
core.commentchar but the implementation was buggy and a
metacharacter like $ and * did not work.
* jk/add-p-commentchar-fix:
add--interactive: quote commentChar regex
add--interactive: handle EOF in prompt_yesno
The code to pick up and execute command alias definition from the
configuration used to switch to the top of the working tree and
then come back when the expanded alias was executed, which was
unnecessarilyl complex. Attempt to simplify the logic by using the
early-config mechanism that does not chdir around.
* js/alias-early-config:
alias: use the early config machinery to expand aliases
t7006: demonstrate a problem with aliases in subdirectories
t1308: relax the test verifying that empty alias values are disallowed
help: use early config when autocorrecting aliases
config: report correct line number upon error
discover_git_directory(): avoid setting invalid git_dir
The pretty-format specifiers like '%h', '%t', etc. had an
optimization that no longer works correctly. In preparation/hope
of getting it correctly implemented, first discard the optimization
that is broken.
* rs/pretty-add-again:
pretty: recalculate duplicate short hashes
An example in documentation that does not work in multi worktree
configuration has been corrected.
* ah/doc-gitattributes-empty-index:
doc: do not use `rm .git/index` when normalizing line endings
"git mergetool" learned to work around a wrapper MacOS X adds
around underlying meld.
* da/mergetools-meld-output-opt-on-macos:
mergetools/meld: improve compatibiilty with Meld on macOS X
The 'diff-highlight' program (in contrib/) has been restructured
for easier reuse by an external project 'diff-so-fancy'.
* jk/diff-highlight-module:
diff-highlight: split code into module
After "git branch --move" of the currently checked out branch, the
code to walk the reflog of HEAD via "log -g" and friends
incorrectly stopped at the reflog entry that records the renaming
of the branch.
* jk/reflog-walk-maint:
reflog-walk: include all fields when freeing complete_reflogs
reflog-walk: don't free reflogs added to cache
reflog-walk: duplicate strings in complete_reflogs list
reflog-walk: skip over double-null oid due to HEAD rename
The "collission-detecting" implementation of SHA-1 hash we borrowed
from is replaced by directly binding the upstream project as our
submodule. Glitches on minority platforms are still being worked out.
* ab/sha1dc:
sha1collisiondetection: automatically enable when submodule is populated
sha1dc: optionally use sha1collisiondetection as a submodule
Code refactoring.
* pw/unquote-path-in-git-pm:
t9700: add tests for Git::unquote_path()
Git::unquote_path(): throw an exception on bad path
Git::unquote_path(): handle '\a'
add -i: move unquote_path() to Git.pm
An old message shown in the commit log template was removed, as it
has outlived its usefulness.
* ks/commit-assuming-only-warning-removal:
commit-template: distinguish status information unconditionally
commit-template: remove outdated notice about explicit paths
Sun's C compiler errors out on this pattern:
void foo() { ... }
void bar() { return foo(); }
Signed-off-by: Alejandro R. Sedeño <asedeno@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reported-by: Andre Hinrichs <andre.hinrichs@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The undefined behavior sanitizer complains about unaligned
loads, even if they're OK for a particular platform in
practice. It's possible that they _are_ a problem, of
course, but since it's a known tradeoff the UBSan errors are
just noise.
Let's quiet it automatically by building with
NO_UNALIGNED_LOADS when SANITIZE=undefined is in use.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The ASan manual recommends disabling this optimization, as
it can make the backtraces produced by the tool harder to
follow (and since this is a test-debug build, we don't care
about squeezing out every last drop of performance).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
You can already build and test with ASan by doing:
make CFLAGS=-fsanitize=address test
but there are a few slight annoyances:
1. It's a little long to type.
2. It override your CFLAGS completely. You'd probably
still want -O2, for instance.
3. It's a good idea to also turn off "recovery", which
lets the program keep running after a problem is
detected (with the intention of finding as many bugs as
possible in a given run). Since Git's test suite should
generally run without triggering any problems, it's
better to abort immediately and fail the test when we
do find an issue.
With this patch, all of that happens automatically when you
run:
make SANITIZE=address test
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
By default, ASan will exit with code 1 when it sees an
error. This means we'll notice a problem when we expected
git to succeed, but not in a test_must_fail block.
Let's ask it to actually raise SIGABRT instead. That will
give us a signal death that test_must_fail will notice. As a
bonus, it may also leave a coredump, which can be handy for
digging into a failure.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We turn off ASan's leak detection by default in the test
suite because it's too noisy. But we don't do so until
part-way through test-lib. This is before we've run any
tests, but after we do our initial "./git" to see if the
binary has even been built.
When built with clang, this seems to work fine. However,
using "gcc -fsanitize=address", the leak checker seems to
complain more aggressively:
$ ./git
...
==5352==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 2 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f120e7afcf8 in malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.3+0xc1cf8)
#1 0x559fc2a3ce41 in do_xmalloc /home/peff/compile/git/wrapper.c:60
#2 0x559fc2a3cf1a in do_xmallocz /home/peff/compile/git/wrapper.c:100
#3 0x559fc2a3d0ad in xmallocz /home/peff/compile/git/wrapper.c:108
#4 0x559fc2a3d0ad in xmemdupz /home/peff/compile/git/wrapper.c:124
#5 0x559fc2a3d0ad in xstrndup /home/peff/compile/git/wrapper.c:130
#6 0x559fc274535a in main /home/peff/compile/git/common-main.c:39
#7 0x7f120dabd2b0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202b0)
This is a leak in the sense that we never free it, but it's
in a global that is meant to last the whole program. So it's
not really interesting or in need of fixing. And at any
rate, mentioning leaks outside of the test_expect blocks is
certainly unwelcome, as it pollutes stderr.
Let's bump the setting of ASAN_OPTIONS higher in test-lib.sh
to catch our initial "can we even run git?" test. While
we're at it, we can add a comment to make it a bit less
inscrutable.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The first illustration of the "RECOVERING FROM UPSTREAM REBASE"
section in the 'git-rebase' documentation meant to depict that
there are number of commits on the 'master' branch, but it is
longer than the 'master' branch in the following illustrations
by one commit, even though there is no resetting of 'master' to
lose that commit.
Correct it.
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Store the pointer to the string allocated by shorten_unambiguous_ref in
a dedicated variable, short_base, and keep base unchanged. A non-const
variable is more appropriate for such an object. It avoids having to
cast const away on free and stops redefining the meaning of base, making
the code slightly clearer.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When doing a reflog walk, we use the commit's date to
do any date limiting. In earlier versions of Git, this could
lead to nonsense results, since a skipped commit would
truncate the traversal. So a sequence like:
git commit ...
git checkout week-old-branch
git checkout -
git log -g --since=1.day.ago
would stop at the week-old-branch, even though the "git
commit" entry further back is still interesting.
As of the prior commit, which uses a parent-less traversal
of the reflog, you get the whole reflog minus any commits
whose dates do not match the specified options. This is
arguably useful, as you could scan the reflogs for commits
that originated in a certain range.
But more likely a user doing a reflog walk wants to limit
based on the reflog entries themselves. You can simulate
--until with:
git log -g @{1.day.ago}
but there's no way to ask Git to traverse only back to a
certain date. E.g.:
# show me reflog entries from the past day
git log -g --since=1.day.ago
This patch teaches the revision machinery to prefer the
reflog entry dates to the commit dates when doing a reflog
walk. Technically this is a change in behavior that affects
plumbing, but the previous behavior was so buggy that it's
unlikely anyone was relying on it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The reflog-walk system works by putting a ref's tip into the
pending queue, and then "traversing" the reflog by
pretending that the parent of each commit is the previous
reflog entry.
This causes a number of user-visible oddities, as documented
in t1414 (and the commit message which introduced it). We
can fix all of them in one go by replacing the fake-reflog
system with a much simpler one: just keeping a list of
reflogs to show, and walking through them entry by entry.
The implementation is fairly straight-forward, but there are
a few items to note:
1. We obviously must skip calling add_parents_to_list()
when we are traversing reflogs, since we do not want to
walk the original parents at all. As a result, we must call
try_to_simplify_commit() ourselves.
There are other parts of add_parents_to_list() we skip,
as well, but none of them should matter for a reflog
traversal:
- We do not allow UNINTERESTING commits, nor
symmetric ranges (and we bail when these are used
with "-g").
- Using --source makes no sense, since we aren't
traversing. The reflog selector shows the same
information with more detail.
- Using --first-parent is still sensible, since you
may want to see the first-parent diff for each
entry. But since we're not traversing, we don't
need to cull the parent list here.
2. Since we now just walk the reflog entries themselves,
rather than starting with the ref tip, we now look at
the "new" field of each entry rather than the "old"
(i.e., we are showing entries, not faking parents).
This removes all of the tricky logic around skipping
past root commits.
But note that we have no way to show an entry with the
null sha1 in its "new" field (because such a commit
obviously does not exist). Normally this would not
happen, since we delete reflogs along with refs, but
there is one special case. When we rename the currently
checked out branch, we write two reflog entries into
the HEAD log: one where the commit goes away, and
another where it comes back.
Prior to this commit, we show both entries with
identical reflog messages. After this commit, we show
only the "comes back" entry. See the update in t3200
which demonstrates this.
Arguably either is fine, as the whole double-entry
thing is a bit hacky in the first place. And until a
recent fix, we truncated the traversal in such a case
anyway, which was _definitely_ wrong.
3. We show individual reflogs in order, but choose which
reflog to show at each stage based on which has the
most recent timestamp. This interleaves the output
from multiple reflogs based on date order, which is
probably what you'd want with limiting like "-n 30".
Note that the implementation aims for simplicity. It
does a linear walk over the reflog queue for each
commit it pulls, which may perform badly if you
interleave an enormous number of reflogs. That seems
like an unlikely use case; if we did want to handle it,
we could probably keep a priority queue of reflogs,
ordered by the timestamp of their current tip entry.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Junio C Hamano