* jc/maint-add-p-overlapping-hunks:
t3701: add-p-fix makes the last test to pass
"add -p": work-around an old laziness that does not coalesce hunks
add--interactive.perl: factor out repeated --recount option
t3701: Editing a split hunk in an "add -p" session
add -p: 'q' should really quit
Since commit c793430 (Limit file descriptors used by packs, 2011-02-28),
the extra parameter added in f2e872aa (Work around EMFILE when there are
too many pack files, 2010-11-01) is not used anymore.
Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The config machinery already makes section and variable names
lowercase when parsing them, so using strcasecmp for comparison just
feels wasteful. No noticeable change intended.
Noticed-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jc/fix-diff-files-unmerged:
diff-files: show unmerged entries correctly
diff: remove often unused parameters from diff_unmerge()
diff.c: return filepair from diff_unmerge()
test: use $_z40 from test-lib
A broken here-document was not caught because end of file is taken by
an implicit end of the here document (POSIX does not seem to say it is
an error to lack the delimiter), and everything in the test just turned
into a single "cat into a file".
Noticed-by: Kacper Kornet <draenog@pld-linux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove spurious "=" after --relative-marks.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
According to c6dfb39 (remote-curl: add missing initialization of
argv0_path, 2009-10-13), stand-alone programs (non-builtins)
must call git_extract_argv0_path(argv[0]) in order to help builds
that derive the installation prefix at runtime. Without this call,
the program segfaults (or raises an assertion failure).
Signed-off-by: Dima Sharov <git.avalakvista@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The use of the sed command "1i No robots allowed" caused the version
of sed in OS X to die with
sed: 1: "1i "No robots allowed"\n": command i expects \ followed by
text
Since this command was just trying to add a single line to the
beginning of the file, do the same with "echo" followed by "cat".
Unbreaks t8001 and t8002 on OS X 10.6.7
Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <brian@gernhardtsoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jh/dirstat:
--dirstat: In case of renames, use target filename instead of source filename
Teach --dirstat not to completely ignore rearranged lines within a file
--dirstat-by-file: Make it faster and more correct
--dirstat: Describe non-obvious differences relative to --stat or regular diff
* mg/reflog-with-options:
reflog: fix overriding of command line options
t/t1411: test reflog with formats
builtin/log.c: separate default and setup of cmd_log_init()
Signed-off-by: Valentin Haenel <valentin.haenel@gmx.de>
Noticed-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Modify the p4merge client command to pass a reference to an empty file
instead of the local file when no base revision available.
In the situation where a merge tries to add a file from one branch
into a branch that already contains that file (by name), p4merge
currently seems to have successfully automatically resolved the
'conflict' when it is opened (correctly if the files differed by
just whitespace for example) but leaves the save button disabled. This
means the user of the p4merge client cannot commit the resolved
changes back to disk and merely exits, leaving the original
(merge-conflicted) file intact on the disk.
Provide an empty base file to p4merge so that it leaves the save
button enabled. This will allow saving of the auto-resolution to
disk.
Signed-off-by: Ciaran Jessup <ciaranj@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In conn, if password is not passed on command line, look for a password
entry in both the CVS password file and the CVSNT password file. If only
one file is found and the requested repository is in that file, or if both
files are found but the requested repository is found in only one file, use
the password from the single file containing the repository entry. If both
files are found and the requested repository is found in both files, then
produce an error message.
The CVS password file separates tokens with a space character, while
the CVSNT password file separates tokens with an equal (=) character.
Add a sub find_password_entry that accepts the password file name
and a delimiter to eliminate code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Guy Rouillier <guyr@burntmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The merge-one-file tool predates the invention of
GIT_WORK_TREE. By the time GIT_WORK_TREE was invented, most
people were using the merge-recursive strategy, which
handles resolving internally. Therefore these features have
had very little testing together.
For the most part, merge-one-file just works with
GIT_WORK_TREE; most of its heavy lifting is done by plumbing
commands which do respect GIT_WORK_TREE properly. The one
exception is a shell redirection which touches the worktree
directly, writing results to the wrong place in the presence
of a GIT_WORK_TREE variable.
This means that merges won't even fail; they will silently
produce incorrect results, throwing out the entire "theirs"
side of files which need content-level merging!
This patch makes merge-one-file chdir to the toplevel of the
working tree (and exit if we don't have one). This most
closely matches the assumption made by the original script
(before separate work trees were invented), and matches what
happens when the script is called as part of a merge
strategy.
While we're at it, we'll also error-check the call to cat.
Merging a file in a subdirectory could in fact fail, as the
redirection relies on the "checkout-index" call just prior
to create leading directories. But we never noticed, since
we ignored the error return from running cat.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There were no tests for either, except a brief use in
t1200-tutorial.
These tools are not used much these days, as most people
use the merge-recursive strategy, which handles everything
internally. However, they are used by the "octopus" and
"resolve" strategies, as well as any custom strategies
or merge scripts people have built around them.
For example, together with read-tree, they are the simplest
way to do a basic content-level merge without checking out
the entire repository contents beforehand.
This script adds a basic test of the tools to perform one
content-level merge. It also shows a failure of the tools to
work properly in the face of GIT_WORK_TREE or core.worktree.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 0beee4c (git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing, 2008-07-02),
"git add--interactive" behaves lazily and passes overlapping hunks to the
underlying "git apply" without coalescing. This was partially corrected
by 7a26e65 (its partial revert, 2009-05-16), but overlapping hunks are
still passed when the patch is edited.
Teach "git apply" the --allow-overlap option that disables a safety
feature that avoids misapplication of patches by not applying patches
to overlapping hunks, and pass this option form "add -p" codepath.
Do not even advertise the option, as this is merely a workaround, and the
correct fix is to make "add -p" correctly coalesce adjacent patch hunks.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Depending on the direction and the target of patch application, we would
need to pass --cached and --reverse to underlying "git apply". Also we
only pass --check when we are not applying but just checking.
But we always pass --recount since 8cbd431 (git-add--interactive: replace
hunk recounting with apply --recount, 2008-07-02). Instead of repeating
the same --recount over and over again, move it to a single place that
actually runs the command, namely, "run_git_apply" subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Arnaud Lacombe reported that with the recent change to reject overlapping
hunks fed to "git apply", the edit mode of an "add -p" session that lazily
feeds overlapping hunks without coalescing adjacent ones claim that the
patch does not apply. Expose the problem to be fixed.
Cf. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/170685/focus=171000
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "quit" command was added in 9a7a1e0 (git add -p: new "quit" command at
the prompt, 2009-04-10) to allow the user to say that hunks other than
what have already been chosen are undesirable, and exit the interactive
loop immediately. It forgot that there may be an undecided hunk before
the current one. In such a case, the interactive loop still goes back to
the beginning.
Clear all the USE bit for undecided hunks and exit the loop.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the command cannot make a connection to the SMTP server the error
message to diagnose the broken configuration is issued. However, when an
optional smtp-server-port is given and needs to be reported, the message
lacked a space between "hello=<smtp-domain>" and "port=<smtp-server-port>".
Signed-off-by: Sylvain Rabot <sylvain@abstraction.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The names and e-mails are sanitized by fmt_ident() when creating commits,
so that they do not contain "<" nor ">", and the "committer" and "author"
lines in the commit object will always be in the form:
("author" | "committer") name SP "<" email ">" SP timestamp SP zone
When parsing the email part out, the current code looks for SP starting
from the end of the email part, but the author could obfuscate the address
as "author at example dot com".
We should instead look for SP followed by "<", to match the logic of the
side that formats these lines.
Signed-off-by: Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'git rebase' uses 'git merge' to preserve merges (-p). This preserves
the original merge commit correctly, except when the original merge
commit was created by 'git merge --no-ff'. In this case, 'git rebase'
will fail to preserve the merge, because during 'git rebase', 'git
merge' will simply fast-forward and skip the commit. For example:
B
/ \
A---M
/
---o---O---P---Q
If we try to rebase M onto P, we lose the merge commit and this happens:
A---B
/
---o---O---P---Q
To correct this, we simply do a "no fast-forward" on all merge commits
when rebasing. Since by the time we decided to do a 'git merge' inside
'git rebase', it means there was a merge originally, so 'git merge'
should always create a merge commit regardless of what the merge
branches look like. This way, when rebase M onto P from the above
example, we get:
B
/ \
A---M
/
---o---O---P---Q
Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Junio C Hamano