This has been proposed for a few times without much reaction
from the list. Actually remove it to see who screams.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The current git-p4 implementation does support file renames. However, because
it does not use the "p4 integrate" command, the history for the renamed file is
not linked to the new file.
This changeset adds support for perforce renames with the integrate command.
Currently this feature is only enabled when calling git-p4 submit with the -M
option. This is intended to look and behave similar to the "detect renames"
feature of other git commands.
The following sequence is used for renamed files:
p4 integrate -Dt x x'
p4 edit x'
rm x'
git apply
p4 delete x
By default, perforce will not allow an integration with a target file that has
been deleted. That is, if x' in the example above is the name of a previously
deleted file then perforce will fail the integrate. The -Dt option tells
perforce to allow the target of integrate to be a previously deleted file.
Signed-off-by: Chris Pettitt <cpettitt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
post-receive-email has one place where the variable fast_forward is not
spelled correctly. At the same place the logic was reversed. The
combination of both bugs made the script work correctly for fast-forward
commits but not for non-fast-forward ones. This change fixes this to
be correct in both cases.
Signed-off-by: Robert Schiele <rschiele@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Given that git uses 'commit', git-p4's 'sumbit' was a bit confusing at times;
often making me do 'git submit' and 'git-p4 commit' instead.
Signed-off-by: Marius Storm-Olsen <marius@trolltech.com>
Acked-By: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Added support for gtksourceview2 module (pygtksourceview 1.90.x) in
gitview. Also refactored code that creates the source buffer and view.
Signed-off-by: Frederick Akalin <akalin@akalin.cx>
Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Have the error message for missing recipients actually report the
missing config variable and not a fictional one.
Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Using the name of the committer of the revision at the tip of the
updated ref is not sensible. That information is available in the email
itself should it be wanted, and by supplying a "From", we were
effectively hiding the person who performed the push - which is useful
information in itself.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead print a single message around sequences of commands that can
potentially take some time.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
convert-objects was needed to convert from an old-style repository,
which hashed the compressed contents and used a different date format.
Such repositories are presumably no longer common and, if such
conversions are necessary, should be done by writing a frontend for
git-fast-import.
Linus, the original author, is OK with moving it to contrib.
Signed-off-by: Matt Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Without this, the value passed to sendmail would have an extra set of
single quotes. At least exim's sendmail emulation would object to that:
exim: bad -f address "'list-addr@example.org'": malformed address: ' \
may not follow 'list-addr@example.org
error: hooks/post-receive exited with error code 1
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A lot of shell scripts contained stuff starting with
while case "$#" in 0) break ;; esac
and similar. I consider breaking out of the condition instead of the
body od the loop ugly, and the implied "true" value of the
non-matching case is not really obvious to humans at first glance. It
happens not to be obvious to some BSD shells, either, but that's
because they are not POSIX-compliant. In most cases, this has been
replaced by a straight condition using "test". "case" has the
advantage of being faster than "test" on vintage shells where "test"
is not a builtin. Since none of them is likely to run the git
scripts, anyway, the added readability should be worth the change.
A few loops have had their termination condition expressed
differently.
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Thanks to Johannes Schindelin for review and fixes, and Julian
Phillips for the original C translation.
This changes a few small bits of behavior:
branch.<name>.merge is parsed as if it were the lhs of a fetch
refspec, and does not have to exactly match the actual lhs of a
refspec, so long as it is a valid abbreviation for the same ref.
branch.<name>.merge is no longer ignored if the remote is configured
with a branches/* file. Neither behavior is useful, because there can
only be one ref that gets fetched, but this is more consistant.
Also, fetch prints different information to standard out.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Usage info is emebed in the script, but the gist of it is to run the script
from a pre-commit hook to save permissions/ownership data to a file and check
that file into the repository. Then, a post_merge hook reads the file and
updates working tree permissions/ownership. All updates are transparent to
the user (although there is a --verbose option). Merge conflicts are handled
in the "read" phase (in pre-commit), and the script aborts the commit and
tells you how to fix things in the case of a merge conflict in the metadata
file. This same idea could be extended to handle file ACLs or other file
metadata if desired.
Signed-off-by: Josh England <jjengla@sandia.gov>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is based on the git-import.sh script, but is a little
more robust and efficient. More importantly, it should
serve as a quick template for interfacing fast-import with
perl scripts.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This example just puts a directory under git control. It is
significantly slower than using the git tools directly, but
hopefully shows a bit how fast-import works.
[jk: added header comments]
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The default behavior for each state can be customized, and it can also
be toggled directly from the status buffer.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This makes insertions and updates much more efficient.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This replaces the script "git-reset.sh" with "builtin-reset.c".
A few git commands used in the script are called from the builtin also:
"ls-files" to check for unmerged files, "read-tree" for resetting
the index file in "mixed" and "hard" resets, and "update-index" to
refresh at the end in the "mixed" reset and also for the option that
gets selected paths into the index.
The reset option with paths was implemented by Johannes Schindelin.
Since the option that gets selected paths into the index is not
a "reset" like the others because it does not change the HEAD at all,
now the command is showing a warning when the "--mixed" option
is supplied for that purpose.
The following table shows the behaviour of "git reset" for
the different supported options, where X means "changing"
the HEAD, index or working tree:
reset: --soft --mixed --hard -- <paths>
HEAD X X X -
index - X X X
files - - X -
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Recently I found that doing a sequence like the following:
git-new-workdir a b
...
git-new-workdir a b
by accident will cause a (and now also b) to have an infinite cycle
in its refs directory. This is caused by git-new-workdir trying
to create the "refs" symlink over again, only during the second
time it is being created within a's refs directory and is now also
pointing back at a's refs.
This causes confusion in git as suddenly branches are named things
like "refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/heads/foo" instead of the
more commonly accepted "refs/heads/foo". Plenty of commands start
to see ambiguous ref names and others just take ages to compute.
git-clone has the same safety check, so git-new-workdir should
behave just like it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If a change in a p4 "branch" appears that hasn't seen any previous commit and
that has a known branch mapping we now try to import it properly. First we
find the p4 change of the source branch that the new p4 branch is based on. Then
we using git rev-list --bisect to locate the corresponding git commit to that change.
Finally we import all changes in the new p4 branch up to the current change and resume
with the regular import.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Lately I have been doing a lot of calls to `git tag -d` and also to
`git tag -v`. In both such cases being able to complete the names
of existing tags saves the fingers some typing effort. We now look
for the -d or -v option to git-tag in the bash completion support
and offer up existing tag names as possible choices for these.
When creating a new tag we now also offer bash completion support
for the second argument to git-tag (the object to be tagged) as this
can often be a specific existing branch name and is not necessarily
the current HEAD.
If the -f option is being used to recreate an existing tag we now
also offer completion support on the existing tag names for the
first argument of git-tag, helping to the user to reselect the
prior tag name that they are trying to replace.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Both --left-right and --cherry-pick are particularly long to type, so
help the user there.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Don't create the p4/HEAD symbolic ref if p4/master doesn't exist yet.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After a clone with "git clone" of a repository the p4 branches are only in remotes/origin/p4/* and not in remotes/p4/*.
Separate the code for detection and creation out of the P4Sync command class into standalone methods and use them
from the P4Branches command.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The git-submodule command is new in 1.5.3 and contains a number
of useful subcommands for working on submodules. We usually try
to offer the subcommands of a git command in the bash completion,
so here they are for git-submodule.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I'm often finding that I need to run git-describe on very long
remote tracking branch names, to find out what tagged revision
the remote tracking branch is now at (or not at). Typing out
the ref names is painful, so bash completion on them is a very
useful feature.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
A number of commands have learned new tricks as part of git 1.5.3.
If these are long options (--foo) we tend to support them in the
bash completion, as it makes the user's task of using the option
slightly easier.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If core.bare is set to true in the config file of a repository that
the user is trying to create a working directory from we should
abort and suggest to the user that they remove the option first.
If we leave the core.bare=true setting in the config file then
working tree operations will get confused when they attempt to
execute in the new workdir, as it shares its config file with the
bare repository. The working tree operations will assume that the
workdir is bare and abort, which is not what the user wants.
If we changed core.bare to be false then working tree operations
will function in the workdir but other operations may fail in the
bare repository, as it claims to not be bare.
If we remove core.bare from the config then Git can fallback on
the legacy guessing behavior. This allows operations in the bare
repository to work as though it were bare, while operations in the
workdirs to act as though they are not bare.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
My day-job workflow involves using multiple workdirs attached to a
bunch of bare repositories. Such repositories are stored inside of
a directory called "foo.git", which means `git rev-parse --git-dir`
will return "." and not ".git". Under such conditions new-workdir
was getting confused about where the Git repository it was supplied
is actually located.
If we get "." for the result of --git-dir query it means we should
use the user supplied path as-is, and not attempt to perform any
magic on it, as the path is directly to the repository.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Gerrit Pape