The previous change fixed a bug in 'git repack -adf --path-walk' that
was due to an update to how path lists are initialized and missing some
important cases when processing the pending objects.
This change takes the three critical places where path lists are
initialized and combines them into a static method. This simplifies the
callers somewhat while also helping to avoid a missed update in the
future.
The other places where a path list (struct type_and_oid_list) is
initialized is for the following "fixed" lists:
* Tag objects.
* Commit objects.
* Root trees.
* Tagged trees.
* Tagged blobs.
These lists are created and consumed in different ways, with only the
root trees being passed into the logic that cares about the
"maybe_interesting" bit. It is appropriate to keep these uses separate.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Users reported an issue where objects were missing from their local
repositories after a full repack using 'git repack -adf --path-walk'.
This was alarming and took a while to create a reproducer. Here, we fix
the bug and include a test case that would fail without this fix.
The root cause is that certain objects existed in the index and had no
second versions. These objects are usually blobs, though trees can be
included if a cache-tree exists. The issue is that the revision walk
adds these objects to the "pending" list and the path-walk API forgets
to mark the lists it creates at this point as "maybe_interesting". If
these paths only ever have a single version in the history of the repo
(including the current staged version) then the parent directory never
tries to add a new object to the list and mark the list as
"maybe_interesting". Thus, when walking the list later, the group is
skipped as it is expected that no objects are interesting. This happens
even when there are actually no UNINTERESTING objects at all! This is
based on the optimization enabled by the pack.useSparse=true config
option, which is the default.
Thus, we create a test case that demonstrates the many cases of this
issue for reproducibility:
1. File a/b/c has only one committed version.
2. Files a/i and x/y only exist as staged changes.
3. Tree x/ only exists in the cache-tree.
After performing a non-path-walk repack to force all loose objects into
packfiles, run a --path-walk repack followed by 'git fsck'. This fsck is
what fails with the following errors:
error: invalid object 100644 f2e41136... for 'a/b/c'
This is the dropped instance of the single-versioned a/b/c file.
broken link from tree cfda31d8...
to tree 3f725fcd...
This is the missing tree for the single-versioned a/b/ directory.
missing blob 0ddf2bae... (a/i)
missing blob 975fbec8... (x/y)
missing blob a60d869d... (file)
missing blob f2e41136... (a/b/c)
missing tree 3f725fcd... (a/b/)
dangling tree 5896d7e... (staged root tree)
Note that since the staged root tree is missing, the fsck output cannot
even report that the staged x/ tree is missing as well.
The core problem here is that the "maybe_interesting" member of 'struct
type_and_oid_list' is not initialized to '1'. This member was added in
6333e7ae0b (path-walk: mark trees and blobs as UNINTERESTING,
2024-12-20) in a way to help when creating packfiles for a small commit
range using the sparse path algorithm (enabled by pack.useSparse=true).
The idea here is that the list is marked as "maybe_interesting" if an
object is added that does not have the UNINTERESTING flag on it. Later,
this is checked again in case all objects in the list were marked
UNINTERESTING after that point in time. In this case, the algorithm
skips the list as there is no reason to visit it.
This leads to the problem where the "maybe_interesting" member was not
appropriately initialized when the list is created from pending objects.
Initializing this in the correct places fixes the bug.
To reduce risk of similar bugs around initializing this structure, a
follow-up change will make initializing lists use a shared method.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There does not appear to be anything particularly incompatible about the
--shallow and --path-walk options of 'git pack-objects'. If shallow
commits are to be handled differently, then it is by the revision walk
that defines the commit set and which are interesting or uninteresting.
However, before the previous change, a trivial removal of the warning
would cause a failure in t5500-fetch-pack.sh when
GIT_TEST_PACK_PATH_WALK is enabled. The shallow fetch would provide more
objects than we desired, due to some incorrect behavior of the path-walk
API, especially around walking uninteresting objects.
The recently-added tests in t5538-push-shallow.sh help to confirm this
behavior is working with the --path-walk option if
GIT_TEST_PACK_PATH_WALK is enabled. These tests passed previously due to
the --path-walk feature being disabled in the presence of a shallow
clone.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In preparation for allowing both the --shallow and --path-walk options
in the 'git pack-objects' builtin, create a new 'edge_aggressive' option
in the path-walk API. This option will help walk the boundary more
thoroughly and help avoid sending extra objects during fetches and
pushes.
The only use of the 'edge_hint_aggressive' option in the revision API is
within mark_edges_uninteresting(), which is usually called before
between prepare_revision_walk() and before visiting commits with
get_revision(). In prepare_revision_walk(), the UNINTERESTING commits
are walked until a boundary is found.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Adapting the implementation of ll_find_deltas(), create a threaded
version of the --path-walk compression step in 'git pack-objects'.
This involves adding a 'regions' member to the thread_params struct,
allowing each thread to own a section of paths. We can simplify the way
jobs are split because there is no value in extending the batch based on
name-hash the way sections of the object entry array are attempted to be
grouped. We re-use the 'list_size' and 'remaining' items for the purpose
of borrowing work in progress from other "victim" threads when a thread
has finished its batch of work more quickly.
Using the Git repository as a test repo, the p5313 performance test
shows that the resulting size of the repo is the same, but the threaded
implementation gives gains of varying degrees depending on the number of
objects being packed. (This was tested on a 16-core machine.)
Test HEAD~1 HEAD
---------------------------------------------------
5313.20: big pack 2.38 1.99 -16.4%
5313.21: big pack size 16.1M 16.0M -0.2%
5313.24: repack 107.32 45.41 -57.7%
5313.25: repack size 213.3M 213.2M -0.0%
(Test output is formatted to better fit in message.)
This ~60% reduction in 'git repack --path-walk' time is typical across
all repos I used for testing. What is interesting is to compare when the
overall time improves enough to outperform the --name-hash-version=1
case. These time improvements correlate with repositories with data
shapes that significantly improve their data size as well. The
--path-walk feature frequently takes longer than --name-hash-version=2,
trading some extra computation for some additional compression. The
natural place where this additional computation comes from is the two
compression passes that --path-walk takes, though the first pass is
naturally faster due to the path boundaries avoiding a number of delta
compression attempts.
For example, the microsoft/fluentui repo has significant size reduction
from --name-hash-version=1 to --name-hash-version=2 followed by further
improvements with --path-walk. The threaded computation makes
--path-walk more competitive in time compared to --name-hash-version=2,
though still ~31% more expensive in that metric.
Repack Method Pack Size Time
------------------------------------------
Hash v1 439.4M 87.24s
Hash v2 161.7M 21.51s
Path Walk (Before) 142.5M 81.29s
Path Walk (After) 142.5M 28.16s
Similar results hold for the Git repository:
Repack Method Pack Size Time
------------------------------------------
Hash v1 248.8M 30.44s
Hash v2 249.0M 30.15s
Path Walk (Before) 213.2M 142.50s
Path Walk (After) 213.3M 45.41s
...as well as the nodejs/node repository:
Repack Method Pack Size Time
------------------------------------------
Hash v1 739.9M 71.18s
Hash v2 764.6M 67.82s
Path Walk (Before) 698.1M 208.10s
Path Walk (After) 698.0M 75.10s
Finally, the Linux kernel repository is a good test for this repacking
time change, even though the space savings is more subtle:
Repack Method Pack Size Time
------------------------------------------
Hash v1 2.5G 554.41s
Hash v2 2.5G 549.62s
Path Walk (before) 2.2G 1562.36s
Path Walk (before) 2.2G 559.00s
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, the --path-walk option to 'git pack-objects' would compute
deltas inline with the path-walk logic. This would make the progress
indicator look like it is taking a long time to enumerate objects, and
then very quickly computed deltas.
Instead of computing deltas on each region of objects organized by tree,
store a list of regions corresponding to these groups. These can later
be pulled from the list for delta compression before doing the "global"
delta search.
This presents a new progress indicator that can be used in tests to
verify that this stage is happening.
The current implementation is not integrated with threads, but we are
setting it up to arrive in the next change.
Since we do not attempt to sort objects by size until after exploring
all trees, we can remove the previous change to t5530 due to a different
error message appearing first.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Repositories registered with Scalar are expected to be client-only
repositories that are rather large. This means that they are more likely to
be good candidates for using the --path-walk option when running 'git
pack-objects', especially under the hood of 'git push'. Enable this config
in Scalar repositories.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Users may want to enable the --path-walk option for 'git pack-objects' by
default, especially underneath commands like 'git push' or 'git repack'.
This should be limited to client repositories, since the --path-walk option
disables bitmap walks, so would be bad to include in Git servers when
serving fetches and clones. There is potential that it may be helpful to
consider when repacking the repository, to take advantage of improved deltas
across historical versions of the same files.
Much like how "pack.useSparse" was introduced and included in
"feature.experimental" before being enabled by default, use the repository
settings infrastructure to make the new "pack.usePathWalk" config enabled by
"feature.experimental" and "feature.manyFiles".
In order to test that this config works, add a new trace2 region around
the path walk code that can be checked by a 'git push' command.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 'git pack-objects' supports a --path-walk option, allow passing it
through in 'git repack'. This presents interesting testing opportunities for
comparing the different repacking strategies against each other.
Add the --path-walk option to the performance tests in p5313.
For the microsoft/fluentui repo [1] checked out at a specific commit [2],
the --path-walk tests in p5313 look like this:
Test this tree
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5313.18: thin pack with --path-walk 0.08(0.06+0.02)
5313.19: thin pack size with --path-walk 18.4K
5313.20: big pack with --path-walk 2.10(7.80+0.26)
5313.21: big pack size with --path-walk 19.8M
5313.22: shallow fetch pack with --path-walk 1.62(3.38+0.17)
5313.23: shallow pack size with --path-walk 33.6M
5313.24: repack with --path-walk 81.29(96.08+0.71)
5313.25: repack size with --path-walk 142.5M
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
[2] e70848ebac1cd720875bccaa3026f4a9ed700e08
Along with the earlier tests in p5313, I'll instead reformat the
comparison as follows:
Repack Method Pack Size Time
---------------------------------------
Hash v1 439.4M 87.24s
Hash v2 161.7M 21.51s
Path Walk 142.5M 81.29s
There are a few things to notice here:
1. The benefits of --name-hash-version=2 over --name-hash-version=1 are
significant, but --path-walk still compresses better than that
option.
2. The --path-walk command is still using --name-hash-version=1 for the
second pass of delta computation, using the increased name hash
collisions as a potential method for opportunistic compression on
top of the path-focused compression.
3. The --path-walk algorithm is currently sequential and does not use
multiple threads for delta compression. Threading will be
implemented in a future change so the computation time will improve
to better compete in this metric.
There are small benefits in size for my copy of the Git repository:
Repack Method Pack Size Time
---------------------------------------
Hash v1 248.8M 30.44s
Hash v2 249.0M 30.15s
Path Walk 213.2M 142.50s
As well as in the nodejs/node repository [3]:
Repack Method Pack Size Time
---------------------------------------
Hash v1 739.9M 71.18s
Hash v2 764.6M 67.82s
Path Walk 698.1M 208.10s
[3] https://github.com/nodejs/node
This benefit also repeats in my copy of the Linux kernel repository:
Repack Method Pack Size Time
---------------------------------------
Hash v1 2.5G 554.41s
Hash v2 2.5G 549.62s
Path Walk 2.2G 1562.36s
It is important to see that even when the repository shape does not have
many name-hash collisions, there is a slight space boost to be found
using this method.
As this repacking strategy was released in Git for Windows 2.47.0, some
users have reported cases where the --path-walk compression is slightly
worse than the --name-hash-version=2 option. In those cases, it may be
beneficial to combine the two options. However, there has not been a
released version of Git that has both options and I don't have access to
these repos for testing.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It can be notoriously difficult to detect if delta bases are being
computed properly during 'git push'. Construct an example where it will
make a kilobyte worth of difference when a delta base is not found. We
can then use the progress indicators to distinguish between bytes and
KiB depending on whether the delta base is found and used.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are many tests that validate whether 'git pack-objects' works as
expected. Instead of duplicating these tests, add a new test environment
variable, GIT_TEST_PACK_PATH_WALK, that implies --path-walk by default
when specified.
This was useful in testing the implementation of the --path-walk
implementation, helping to find tests that are overly specific to the
default object walk. These include:
- t0411-clone-from-partial.sh : One test fetches from a repo that does
not have the boundary objects. This causes the path-based walk to
fail. Disable the variable for this test.
- t5306-pack-nobase.sh : Similar to t0411, one test fetches from a repo
without a boundary object.
- t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh : One test compares the case when packing with
bitmaps to the case when packing without them. Since we disable the
test variable when writing bitmaps, this causes a difference in the
object list (the --path-walk option adds an extra object). Specify
--no-path-walk in both processes for the comparison. Another test
checks for a specific delta base, but when computing dynamically
without using bitmaps, the base object it too small to be considered
in the delta calculations so no base is used.
- t5316-pack-delta-depth.sh : This script cares about certain delta
choices and their chain lengths. The --path-walk option changes how
these chains are selected, and thus changes the results of this test.
- t5322-pack-objects-sparse.sh : This demonstrates the effectiveness of
the --sparse option and how it combines with --path-walk.
- t5332-multi-pack-reuse.sh : This test verifies that the preferred
pack is used for delta reuse when possible. The --path-walk option is
not currently aware of the preferred pack at all, so finds a
different delta base.
- t7406-submodule-update.sh : When using the variable, the --depth
option collides with the --path-walk feature, resulting in a warning
message. Disable the variable so this warning does not appear.
I want to call out one specific test change that is only temporary:
- t5530-upload-pack-error.sh : One test cares specifically about an
"unable to read" error message. Since the current implementation
performs delta calculations within the path-walk API callback, a
different "unable to get size" error message appears. When this
is changed in a future refactoring, this test change can be reverted.
Similar to GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION, we do not add this option to the
linux-TEST-vars CI build as that's already an overloaded build.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous change added a --path-walk option to 'git pack-objects'.
Create a performance test that demonstrates the time and space benefits
of the feature.
In order to get an appropriate comparison, we need to avoid reusing
deltas and recompute them from scratch.
Compare the creation of a thin pack representing a small push and the
creation of a relatively large non-thin pack.
Running on my copy of the Git repository results in this data (removing
the repack tests for --name-hash-version):
Test this tree
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack with --name-hash-version=1 0.02(0.01+0.01)
5313.3: thin pack size with --name-hash-version=1 1.6K
5313.4: big pack with --name-hash-version=1 2.55(4.20+0.26)
5313.5: big pack size with --name-hash-version=1 16.4M
5313.6: shallow fetch pack with --name-hash-version=1 1.24(2.03+0.08)
5313.7: shallow pack size with --name-hash-version=1 12.2M
5313.10: thin pack with --name-hash-version=2 0.03(0.01+0.01)
5313.11: thin pack size with --name-hash-version=2 1.6K
5313.12: big pack with --name-hash-version=2 1.91(3.23+0.20)
5313.13: big pack size with --name-hash-version=2 16.4M
5313.14: shallow fetch pack with --name-hash-version=2 1.06(1.57+0.10)
5313.15: shallow pack size with --name-hash-version=2 12.5M
5313.18: thin pack with --path-walk 0.03(0.01+0.01)
5313.19: thin pack size with --path-walk 1.6K
5313.20: big pack with --path-walk 2.05(3.24+0.27)
5313.21: big pack size with --path-walk 16.3M
5313.22: shallow fetch pack with --path-walk 1.08(1.66+0.07)
5313.23: shallow pack size with --path-walk 12.4M
This can be reformatted as follows:
Pack Type Hash v1 Hash v2 Path Walk
---------------------------------------------------
thin pack (time) 0.02s 0.03s 0.03s
(size) 1.6K 1.6K 1.6K
big pack (time) 2.55s 1.91s 2.05s
(size) 16.4M 16.4M 16.3M
shallow pack (time) 1.24s 1.06s 1.08s
(size) 12.2M 12.5M 12.4M
Note that the timing is slower because there is no threading in the
--path-walk case (yet). Also, the shallow pack cases are really not
using the --path-walk logic right now because it is disabled until some
additions are made to the path walk API.
The cases where the --path-walk option really shines is when the default
name-hash is overwhelmed with unhelpful collisions. An open source
example can be found in the microsoft/fluentui repo [1] at a certain
commit [2].
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
[2] e70848ebac1cd720875bccaa3026f4a9ed700e08
Running the tests on this repo results in the following comparison table:
Pack Type Hash v1 Hash v2 Path Walk
---------------------------------------------------
thin pack (time) 0.36s 0.12s 0.08s
(size) 1.2M 22.0K 18.4K
big pack (time) 2.00s 2.90s 2.21s
(size) 20.4M 25.9M 19.5M
shallow pack (time) 1.41s 1.80s 1.65s
(size) 34.4M 33.7M 33.6M
Notice in particular that in the small thin pack, the time performance
has improved from 0.36s for --name-hash-version=1 to 0.08s and this is
likely due to the improved size of the resulting pack: 18.4K instead of
1.2M. The relatively new --name-hash-version=2 is competitive with
--path-walk (0.12s and 22.0K) but not quite as successful.
Finally, running this on a copy of the Linux kernel repository results
in these data points:
Pack Type Hash v1 Hash v2 Path Walk
---------------------------------------------------
thin pack (time) 0.03s 0.13s 0.03s
(size) 4.6K 4.6K 4.6K
big pack (time) 15.29s 12.32s 13.92s
(size) 201.1M 159.1M 158.5M
shallow pack (time) 10.88s 22.93s 22.74s
(size) 269.2M 273.8M 267.7M
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The t0450 test script verifies that builtin usage matches the synopsis
in the documentation. Adjust the builtin to match and then remove 'git
pack-objects' from the exception list.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In order to more easily compute delta bases among objects that appear at
the exact same path, add a --path-walk option to 'git pack-objects'.
This option will use the path-walk API instead of the object walk given
by the revision machinery. Since objects will be provided in batches
representing a common path, those objects can be tested for delta bases
immediately instead of waiting for a sort of the full object list by
name-hash. This has multiple benefits, including avoiding collisions by
name-hash.
The objects marked as UNINTERESTING are included in these batches, so we
are guaranteeing some locality to find good delta bases.
After the individual passes are done on a per-path basis, the default
name-hash is used to find other opportunistic delta bases that did not
match exactly by the full path name.
The current implementation performs delta calculations while walking
objects, which is not ideal for a few reasons. First, this will cause
the "Enumerating objects" phase to be much longer than usual. Second, it
does not take advantage of threading during the path-scoped delta
calculations. Even with this lack of threading, the path-walk option is
sometimes faster than the usual approach. Future changes will refactor
this code to allow for threading, but that complexity is deferred until
later to keep this patch as simple as possible.
This new walk is incompatible with some features and is ignored by
others:
* Object filters are not currently integrated with the path-walk API,
such as sparse-checkout or tree depth. A blobless packfile could be
integrated easily, but that is deferred for later.
* Server-focused features such as delta islands, shallow packs, and
using a bitmap index are incompatible with the path-walk API.
* The path walk API is only compatible with the --revs option, not
taking object lists or pack lists over stdin. These alternative ways
to specify the objects currently ignores the --path-walk option
without even a warning.
Future changes will create performance tests that demonstrate the power
of this approach.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This will be helpful in a future change, which will reuse this logic.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 3f763ddf28 (fetch: set remote/HEAD if it does not exist, 2024-11-22),
unconditionally adds "HEAD" to the list of ref prefixes we send to the
server.
This breaks a core assumption that the list of prefixes we send to the
server is complete. We must either send all prefixes we care about, or
none at all (in the latter case the server then advertises everything).
The tag following code is careful to only add "refs/tags/" to the list
of prefixes if there are already entries in the prefix list. But because
the new code from 3f763ddf28 runs after the tag code, and because it
unconditionally adds to the prefix list, we may end up with a prefix
list that _should_ have "refs/tags/" in it, but doesn't.
When that is the case, the server does not advertise any tags, and our
auto-following breaks because we never learned about any tags in the
first place.
Fix this by only adding "HEAD" to the ref prefixes when we know that we
are already limiting the advertisement. In either case we'll learn about
HEAD (either through the limited advertisement, or implicitly through a
full advertisement).
Reported-by: Igor Todorovski <itodorov@ca.ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Hotfix to help building Git-for-Windows.
* js/win-2.49-build-fixes:
cmake: generalize the handling of the `CLAR_TEST_OBJS` list
meson: fix sorting
ident: stop assuming that `gw_gecos` is writable
Some future breaking changes would remove certain parts of the
default repository, which were still described even when the
documents were built for the future with WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES.
* pw/repo-layout-doc-update:
docs: fix repository-layout when building with breaking changes
A late-comer to the v2.49.0 party, `sk/unit-test-oid`, added yet another
array item to `CLAR_TEST_OBJS`, causing the `win+VS build` job to fail
with symptoms like this one:
unit-tests-lib.lib(u-oid-array.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved
external symbol cl_parse_any_oid referenced in function fill_array
This is a similar scenario to the one that forced me to write
8afda42fce (cmake: generalize the handling of the `UNIT_TEST_OBJS`
list, 2024-09-18): The hard-coded echo of `CLAR_TEST_OBJS` in
`CMakeLists.txt` that recapitulates faithfully what was already
hard-coded in `Makefile` would either have to be updated whack-a-mole
style, or generalized.
Just like I chose the latter option for `UNIT_TEST_OBJS`, I now do the
same for `CLAR_TEST_OBJS`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 904339edbd (Introduce support for the Meson build system,
2024-12-06) the `meson.build` file was introduced, adding also a
Windows-specific list of source files. This list was obviously meant to
be sorted alphabetically, but there is one mistake. Let's fix that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 590e081dea (ident: add NO_GECOS_IN_PWENT for systems without
pw_gecos in struct passwd, 2011-05-19), code was introduced to iterate
over the `gw_gecos` field; The loop variable is of type `char *`, which
assumes that `gw_gecos` is writable.
However, it is not necessarily writable (and it is a bad idea to have it
writable in the first place), so let's switch the loop variable type to
`const char *`.
This is not a new problem, but what is new is the Meson build. While it
does not trigger in CI builds, imitating the commands of
`ci/run-build-and-tests.sh` in a regular Git for Windows SDK (`meson
setup build . --fatal-meson-warnings --warnlevel 2 --werror --wrap-mode
nofallback -Dfuzzers=true` followed by `meson compile -C build --`
results in this beautiful error:
"cc" [...] -o libgit.a.p/ident.c.obj "-c" ../ident.c
../ident.c: In function 'copy_gecos':
../ident.c:68:18: error: assignment discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
68 | for (src = get_gecos(w); *src && *src != ','; src++) {
| ^
cc1.exe: all warnings being treated as errors
Now, why does this not trigger in CI? The answer is as simple as it is
puzzling: The `win+Meson` job completely side-steps Git for Windows'
development environment, opting instead to use the GCC that is on the
`PATH` in GitHub-hosted `windows-latest` runners. That GCC is pinned to
v12.2.0 and targets the UCRT (unlikely to change any time soon, see
https://github.com/actions/runner-images/blob/win25/20250303.1/images/windows/toolsets/toolset-2022.json#L132-L141).
That is in stark contrast to Git for Windows, which uses GCC v14.2.0 and
targets MSVCRT. Git for Windows' `Makefile`-based build also obviously
uses different compiler flags, otherwise this compile error would have
had plenty of opportunity in almost 14 years to surface.
In other words, contrary to my expectations, the `win+Meson` job is
ill-equipped to replace the `win build` job because it exercises a
completely different tool version/compiler flags vector than what Git
for Windows needs.
Nevertheless, there is currently this huge push, including breaking
changes after -rc1 and all, for switching to Meson. Therefore, we need
to make it work, somehow, even in Git for Windows' SDK, hence this
patch, at this point in time.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Meson-based build procedure forgot to build some docs, which has
been corrected.
* pw/build-meson-technical-and-howto-docs:
meson: fix building technical and howto docs
The editorconfig file is updated to tell us that bash scripts are
similar to general Bourne shell scripts.
* dm/editorconfig-bash-is-like-sh:
editorconfig: add .bash extension
Convert a few unit tests to the clar framework.
* sk/unit-test-oid:
t/unit-tests: convert oidtree test to use clar test framework
t/unit-tests: convert oidmap test to use clar test framework
t/unit-tests: convert oid-array test to use clar test framework
t/unit-tests: implement clar specific oid helper functions
The path.[ch] API takes an explicit repository parameter passed
throughout the callchain, instead of relying on the_repository
singleton instance.
* ps/path-sans-the-repository:
path: adjust last remaining users of `the_repository`
environment: move access to "core.sharedRepository" into repo settings
environment: move access to "core.hooksPath" into repo settings
repo-settings: introduce function to clear struct
path: drop `git_path()` in favor of `repo_git_path()`
rerere: let `rerere_path()` write paths into a caller-provided buffer
path: drop `git_common_path()` in favor of `repo_common_path()`
worktree: return allocated string from `get_worktree_git_dir()`
path: drop `git_path_buf()` in favor of `repo_git_path_replace()`
path: drop `git_pathdup()` in favor of `repo_git_path()`
path: drop unused `strbuf_git_path()` function
path: refactor `repo_submodule_path()` family of functions
submodule: refactor `submodule_to_gitdir()` to accept a repo
path: refactor `repo_worktree_path()` family of functions
path: refactor `repo_git_path()` family of functions
path: refactor `repo_common_path()` family of functions
Since commit 8ccc75c245 (remote: announce removal of "branches/" and
"remotes/", 2025-01-22) enabling WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES when building git
removes support for reading branches from ".git/branches" and remotes
from ".git/remotes". However those locations are still documented in
gitrepository-layout.adoc even though the build does not support them.
Rectify this by adding a new document attribute "with-breaking-changes"
and use it to make the inclusion of those sections of the documentation
conditional. Note that the name of the attribute does not match the test
prerequisite WITHOUT_BREAKING_CHANGES added in c5bc9a7f94 (Makefile:
wire up build option for deprecated features, 2025-01-22). This is to
avoid the awkward double negative ifndef::without_breaking_changes for
documentation that should be included when WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES is
enabled. The test prerequisite will be renamed to match the
documentation attribute in a future patch series.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If block_source_read_block() or parse_footer() fail, we leak the "name"
member of struct reftable_reader in reftable_reader_new(). Release it.
Reported by: H Z <shiyuyuranzh@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Derrick Stolee