This function can be used in other parts of git. Let's move the
function to commit.c and also rename it to make the name of the
function more generic.
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Mentored-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Charvi Mendiratta <charvi077@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Disable the recent mergetool's hideresolved feature by default for
backward compatibility and safety.
* jn/mergetool-hideresolved-is-optional:
doc: describe mergetool configuration in git-mergetool(1)
mergetool: do not enable hideResolved by default
fc47391e24 (drop vcs-svn experiment, 2020-08-13) removed most vcs-svn
files. Drop the remaining header files as well, as they are no longer
used.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add and apply a semantic patch for converting code that open-codes
CALLOC_ARRAY to use it instead. It shortens the code and infers the
element size automatically.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make CALLOC_ARRAY usable like a function by requiring callers to supply
the trailing semicolon, which all of the current ones already do. With
the extra semicolon e.g. the following code wouldn't compile because it
disconnects the "else" from the "if":
if (condition)
CALLOC_ARRAY(ptr, n);
else
whatever();
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the EXAMPLES section, git-push(1) says that 'git push origin' pushes
the current branch to the value of the 'remote.origin.merge'
configuration.
This wording (which dates back to b2ed944af7 (push: switch default from
"matching" to "simple", 2013-01-04)) is incorrect. There is no such
configuration as 'remote.<name>.merge'. This likely was originally
intended to read "branch.<name>.merge" instead.
Indeed, when 'push.default' is 'simple' (which is the default value, and
is applicable in this scenario per "without additional configuration"),
setup_push_upstream() dies if the branch's local name does not match
'branch.<name>.merge'.
Correct this long-standing typo to resolve some recent confusion on the
intended behavior of this example.
Reported-by: Adam Sharafeddine <adam.shrfdn@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Fabien Terrani <terranifabien@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In particular, this describes mergetool.hideResolved, which can help
users discover this setting (either because it may be useful to them
or in order to understand mergetool's behavior if they have forgotten
setting it in the past).
Tested by running
make -C Documentation git-mergetool.1
man Documentation/git-mergetool.1
and reading through the page.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When 98ea309b3f (mergetool: add hideResolved configuration,
2021-02-09) introduced the mergetool.hideResolved setting to reduce
the clutter in viewing non-conflicted sections of files in a
mergetool, it enabled it by default, explaining:
No adverse effects were noted in a small survey of popular mergetools[1]
so this behavior defaults to `true`.
In practice, alas, adverse effects do appear. A few issues:
1. No indication is shown in the UI that the base, local, and remote
versions shown have been modified by additional resolution. This
is inherent in the design: the idea of mergetool.hideResolved is to
convince a mergetool that expects pristine local, base, and remote
files to show partially resolved verisons of those files instead;
there is no additional source of information accessible to the
mergetool to see where the resolution has happened.
(By contrast, a mergetool generating the partial resolution from
conflict markers for itself would be able to hilight the resolved
sections with a different color.)
A user accustomed to seeing the files without partial resolution
gets no indication that this behavior has changed when they upgrade
Git.
2. If the computed merge did not line up the files correctly (for
example due to repeated sections in the file), the partially
resolved files can be misleading and do not have enough information
to reconstruct what happened and compute the correct merge result.
3. Resolving a conflict can involve information beyond the textual
conflict. For example, if the local and remote versions added
overlapping functionality in different ways, seeing the full
unresolved versions of each alongside the base gives information
about each side's intent that makes it possible to come up with a
resolution that combines those two intents. By contrast, when
starting with partially resolved versions of those files, one can
produce a subtly wrong resolution that includes redundant extra
code added by one side that is not needed in the approach taken
on the other.
All that said, a user wanting to focus on textual conflicts with
reduced clutter can still benefit from mergetool.hideResolved=true as
a way to deemphasize sections of the code that resolve cleanly without
requiring any changes to the invoked mergetool. The caveats described
above are reduced when the user has explicitly turned this on, because
then the user is aware of them.
Flip the default to 'false'.
Reported-by: Dana Dahlstrom <dahlstrom@google.com>
Helped-by: Seth House <seth@eseth.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
credential_approve() already checks for a non-empty password before
saving, so there's no need to do the extra check here.
Signed-off-by: John Szakmeister <john@szakmeister.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We already looked for the PKI credentials in the credential store, but
failed to approve it on success. Meaning, the PKI certificate password
was never stored and git would request it on every connection to the
remote. Let's complete the chain by storing the certificate password on
success.
Likewise, we also need to reject the credential when there is a failure.
Curl appears to report client-related certificate issues are reported
with the CURLE_SSL_CERTPROBLEM error. This includes not only a bad
password, but potentially other client certificate related problems.
Since we cannot get more information from curl, we'll go ahead and
reject the credential upon receiving that error, just to be safe and
avoid caching or saving a bad password.
Signed-off-by: John Szakmeister <john@szakmeister.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Every %(describe) placeholder in $Format:...$ strings in files with the
attribute export-subst is expanded by calling git describe. This can
potentially result in a lot of such calls per archive. That's OK for
local repositories under control of the user of git archive, but could
be a problem for hosted repositories.
Expand only a single %(describe) placeholder per archive for now to
avoid denial-of-service attacks. We can make this limit configurable
later if needed, but let's start out simple.
Reported-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 552955ed7f ("clone: use more conventional config/option layering",
2020-10-01), clone learned to read configuration options earlier in its
execution, before creating the new repository. However, that led to a
problem: if the core.bare setting is set to false in the global config,
cloning a bare repository segfaults. This happens because the
repository is falsely thought to be non-bare, but clone has set the work
tree to NULL, which is then dereferenced.
The code to initialize the repository already considers the fact that a
user might want to override the --bare option for git init, but it
doesn't take into account clone, which uses a different option. Let's
just check that the work tree is not NULL, since that's how clone
indicates that the repository is bare. This is also the case for git
init, so we won't be regressing that case.
Reported-by: Joseph Vusich <jvusich@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When checking whether a commit was rewritten to a single object id, we
use a glob that insists on a 40-hex result. This works for sha1, but
fails t7003 when run with GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha256.
Since the previous commit simplified the case statement here, we only
have two arms: an empty string or a single object id. We can just loosen
our glob to match anything, and still distinguish those cases (we lose
the ability to notice bogus input, but that's not a problem; we are the
one who wrote the map in the first place, and anyway update-ref will
complain loudly if the input isn't a valid hash).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a ref maps to a commit that is neither rewritten nor kept by
filter-branch (e.g., because it was eliminated by rev-list's pathspec
selection), we rewrite it to its nearest ancestor.
Since the initial commit in 6f6826c52b (Add git-filter-branch,
2007-06-03), we have warned when there are multiple such ancestors in
the map file. However, the warning code is impossible to trigger these
days. Since a0e46390d3 (filter-branch: fix ref rewriting with
--subdirectory-filter, 2008-08-12), we find the ancestor using "rev-list
-1", so it can only ever have a single value.
This code is made doubly confusing by the fact that we append to the map
file when mapping ancestors. However, this can never yield multiple
values because:
- we explicitly check whether the map already exists, and if so, do
nothing (so our "append" will always be to a file that does not
exist)
- even if we were to try mapping twice, the process to do so is
deterministic. I.e., we'd always end up with the same ancestor for a
given sha1. So warning about it would be pointless; there is no
ambiguity.
So swap out the warning code for a BUG (which we'll simplify further in
the next commit). And let's stop using the append operator to make the
ancestor-mapping code less confusing.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After it has rewritten all of the commits, filter-branch will then
rewrite each of the input refs based on the resulting map of old/new
commits. But we don't have any explicit test coverage of this code.
Let's make sure we are covering each of those cases:
- deleting a ref when all of its commits were pruned
- rewriting a ref based on the mapping (this happens throughout the
script, but let's make sure we generate the correct messages)
- rewriting a ref whose tip was excluded, in which case we rewrite to
the nearest ancestor. Note in this case that we still insist that no
"warning" line is present (even though it looks like we'd trigger
the "... was rewritten into multiple commits" one). See the next
commit for more details.
Note these all pass currently, but the latter two will fail when run
with GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha256.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The code to fsck objects received across multiple packs during a
single git fetch session has been broken when the packfile URI
feature was in use. A workaround has been added by disabling the
codepath to avoid keeping a packfile that is too small.
* jt/transfer-fsck-across-packs-fix:
fetch-pack: do not mix --pack_header and packfile uri
Clang no longer produces a libFuzzer.a. Instead, you can include
libFuzzer by using -fsanitize=fuzzer. Therefore we should use that in
the example command for building fuzzers.
We also add -fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link to the CFLAGS to ensure that all
the required instrumentation is added when compiling git [1], and remove
-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc-guard as it is deprecated.
I happen to have tested with LLVM 11 - however -fsanitize=fuzzer appears
to work in a wide range of reasonably modern clangs.
(On my system: what used to be libFuzzer.a now lives under the following
path, which is tricky albeit not impossible for a novice such as myself
to find:
/usr/lib64/clang/11.0.0/lib/linux/libclang_rt.fuzzer-x86_64.a )
[1] https://releases.llvm.org/11.0.0/docs/LibFuzzer.html#fuzzer-usage
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hunt <ajrhunt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Pass the number of elements first and ther size second, as expected
by xcalloc(). Provide a semantic patch, which was actually used to
generate the rest of this patch.
The semantic patch would generate flip-flop diffs if both arguments
are sizeofs. We don't have such a case, and it's hard to imagine
the usefulness of such an allocation. If it ever occurs then we
could deal with it by duplicating the rule in the semantic patch to
make it cancel itself out, or we could change the code to use
CALLOC_ARRAY.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When fetching (as opposed to cloning) from a repository with packfile
URIs enabled, an error like this may occur:
fatal: pack has bad object at offset 12: unknown object type 5
fatal: finish_http_pack_request gave result -1
fatal: fetch-pack: expected keep then TAB at start of http-fetch output
This bug was introduced in b664e9ffa1 ("fetch-pack: with packfile URIs,
use index-pack arg", 2021-02-22), when the index-pack args used when
processing the inline packfile of a fetch response and when processing
packfile URIs were unified.
This bug happens because fetch, by default, partially reads (and
consumes) the header of the inline packfile to determine if it should
store the downloaded objects as a packfile or loose objects, and thus
passes --pack_header=<...> to index-pack to inform it that some bytes
are missing. However, when it subsequently fetches the additional
packfiles linked by URIs, it reuses the same index-pack arguments, thus
wrongly passing --index-pack-arg=--pack_header=<...> when no bytes are
missing.
This does not happen when cloning because "git clone" always passes
do_keep, which instructs the fetch mechanism to always retain the
packfile, eliminating the need to read the header.
There are a few ways to fix this, including filtering out pack_header
arguments when downloading the additional packfiles, but I decided to
stick to always using index-pack throughout when packfile URIs are
present - thus, Git no longer needs to read the bytes, and no longer
needs --pack_header here.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous commit teaches `git stash show --include-untracked`. It
may be desirable for a user to be able to always enable the
--include-untracked behavior. Teach the stash.showIncludeUntracked
config option which allows users to do this in a similar manner to
stash.showPatch.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Stash entries can be made with untracked files via
`git stash push --include-untracked`. However, because the untracked
files are stored in the third parent of the stash entry and not the
stash entry itself, running `git stash show` does not include the
untracked files as part of the diff.
With --include-untracked, untracked paths, which are recorded in the
third-parent if it exists, are shown in addition to the paths that have
modifications between the stash base and the working tree in the stash.
It is possible to manually craft a malformed stash entry where duplicate
untracked files in the stash entry will mask tracked files. We detect
and error out in that case via a custom unpack_trees() callback:
stash_worktree_untracked_merge().
Also, teach stash the --only-untracked option which only shows the
untracked files of a stash entry. This is similar to `git show stash^3`
but it is nice to provide a convenient abstraction for it so that users
do not have to think about the underlying implementation.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The comment in this block is meant to indicate that passing '--all',
'--reflog', and so on aren't necessary when repacking with the
'--geometric' option.
But, it has two problems: first, it is factually incorrect ('--all' is
*not* incompatible with '--stdin-packs' as the comment suggests);
second, it is quite focused on the geometric case for a block that is
guarding against it.
Reword this comment to address both issues.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are a number of places in the geometric repack code where we
multiply the number of objects in a pack by another unsigned value. We
trust that the number of objects in a pack is always representable by a
uint32_t, but we don't necessarily trust that that number can be
multiplied without overflow.
Sprinkle some unsigned_add_overflows() and unsigned_mult_overflows() in
split_pack_geometry() to check that we never overflow any unsigned types
when adding or multiplying them.
Arguably these checks are a little too conservative, and certainly they
do not help the readability of this function. But they are serving a
useful purpose, so I think they are worthwhile overall.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To determine the where to place the split when repacking with the
'--geometric' option, split_pack_geometry() assigns the "split" variable
and then decrements it in a loop.
It would be equivalent (and more readable) to assign the split to the
loop position after exiting the loop, so do that instead.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We don't currently have a test that demonstrates the non-idempotent
behavior of 'git repack --geometric' with loose objects, so add one here
to make sure we don't regress in this area.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 0fabafd0b9 (builtin/repack.c: add '--geometric' option, 2021-02-22),
the 'git repack --geometric' code aborts early when there is zero or one
pack.
When there are no packs, this code does the right thing by placing the
split at "0". But when there is exactly one pack, the split is placed at
"1", which means that "git repack --geometric" (with any factor)
repacks all of the objects in a single pack.
This is wasteful, and the remaining code in split_pack_geometry() does
the right thing (not repacking the objects in a single pack) even when
only one pack is present.
Loosen the guard to only stop when there aren't any packs, and let the
rest of the code do the right thing. Add a test to ensure that this is
the case.
Noticed-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Charvi Mendiratta