Set the members callback_func and callback_data of freq->slot to NULL
when releasing a http_object_request. release_active_slot() is also
invoked on the slot to remove the curl handle associated with the slot
from the multi stack (CURLM *curlm in http.c).
These prevent the callback function and data from being used in http
methods (like http.c::finish_active_slot()) after a
http_object_request has been free'd.
Noticed by Ali Polatel, who later tested this patch to verify that it
fixes the problem he saw; Dscho helped to identify the problem spot.
Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint-1.6.3:
Fix overridable written with an extra 'e'
Documentation: git-archive: mark --format as optional in summary
Round-down years in "years+months" relative date view
* maint-1.6.2:
Fix overridable written with an extra 'e'
Documentation: git-archive: mark --format as optional in summary
Round-down years in "years+months" relative date view
Conflicts:
Documentation/git-archive.txt
The --format option was made optional in 8ff21b1 (git-archive: make
tar the default format, 2007-04-09), but it was not marked as optional
in the summary. This trival patch just changes the summary to match
the rest of the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Wesley J. Landaker <wjl@icecavern.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, a commit from 1 year and 7 months ago would display as
"2 years, 7 months ago".
Signed-off-by: David Reiss <dreiss@facebook.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit de435ac0 changed the behavior of --decorate from printing the
full ref (e.g., "refs/heads/master") to a shorter, more human-readable
version (e.g., just "master"). While this is nice for human readers,
external tools using the output from "git log" may prefer the full
version.
This patch introduces an extension to --decorate to allow the caller to
specify either the short or the full versions.
Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jp/symlink-dirs:
t6035-merge-dir-to-symlink depends on SYMLINKS prerequisite
git-checkout: be careful about untracked symlinks
lstat_cache: guard against full match of length of 'name' parameter
Demonstrate bugs when a directory is replaced with a symlink
It used to be a single, huge line, badly wrapped by xterm.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When you have to add certain lines like ACKs (or for that matter,
Signed-off-by:s) to a range of commits starting with HEAD, you might
be tempted to use 'git rebase -i -10', but that is a waste of your
time.
It is better to use 'git filter-branch' with an appropriate message
filter, and this commit adds an example how to do so to
filter-branch's man page.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The effects of repacking on a repository with alternates are a bit
subtle. The two main things users will want are:
1. Not to waste disk space by accidentally copying objects which could
be shared.
2. Copying all objects explicitly to break the dependency on the source
repo.
This patch describes both under the "clone -s" documentation. It makes
sense to put it there rather than in git-repack.txt for both cases.
For (1), we are warning the user who is using "clone -s" about what _not_
to do, so we need to get their attention when reading about "clone -s".
For (2), we are telling them how git-repack can be used to accomplish a
task, but until they know that git-repack is the right tool, they have no
reason to look at the repack documentation.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 0392513 (add-interactive: refactor mode hunk handling, 2009-04-16),
we merged the interaction loops for mode changes and hunk staging.
This was fine at the time, because 0beee4c (git-add--interactive:
remove hunk coalescing, 2008-07-02) removed hunk coalescing.
However, in 7a26e65 (Revert "git-add--interactive: remove hunk
coalescing", 2009-05-16), we resurrected it. Since then, the code
would attempt in vain to merge mode changes with diff hunks,
corrupting both in the process.
We add a check to the coalescing loop to ensure it only looks at diff
hunks, thus skipping mode changes.
Noticed-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When trying to stage changes to file which has also pending `chmod +x`,
`git add -p` produces lots of 'Use of uninitialized value ...' warnings
and fails to do the job:
$ echo content >> file
$ chmod +x file
$ git add -p
diff --git a/file b/file
index e69de29..d95f3ad
--- a/file
+++ b/file
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
Stage mode change [y,n,q,a,d,/,j,J,g,?]? y
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+content
Stage this hunk [y,n,q,a,d,/,K,g,e,?]? y
Use of uninitialized value $o_ofs in addition (+) at .../git-add--interactive line 776.
Use of uninitialized value $ofs in numeric le (<=) at .../git-add--interactive line 806.
Use of uninitialized value $o0_ofs in concatenation (.) or string at .../git-add--interactive line 830.
Use of uninitialized value $n0_ofs in concatenation (.) or string at .../git-add--interactive line 830.
Use of uninitialized value $o_ofs in addition (+) at .../git-add--interactive line 776.
fatal: corrupt patch at line 5
diff --git a/file b/file
index e69de29..d95f3ad
--- a/file
+++ b/file
@@ -,0 + @@
+content
Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint-1.6.3:
Change mentions of "git programs" to "git commands"
Documentation: merge: one <remote> is required
help.c: give correct structure's size to memset()
'git push' failing because of non-fast forward is a very common situation,
and a beginner does not necessarily understand "fast forward" immediately.
Add a new section to the git-push documentation and refer them to it.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
<filepattern>... is optional (e.g. when the --all or --update
options are used) so use square brackets in the synopsis.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Most of the docs and printouts refer to "commands" when discussing what
the end users call via the "git" top-level program. We should refer them
as "git programs" when we discuss the fact that the commands are
implemented as separate programs, but in other contexts, it is better to
use the term "git commands" consistently.
Signed-off-by: Ori Avtalion <ori@avtalion.name>
Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge only requires one <remote>, so "<remote>..." should be used in the
synopsis (and not "<remote> <remote>...").
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These two structures are of the same type, but we'd better be consistent.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Avoid git ending with this message:
"Patch format is not supported."
With improved error message in the format detection failure case by
Giuseppe Bilotta.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Sebrecht <ni.s@laposte.net>
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We traditionally allowed a mbox file or a directory name of a maildir (but
never an individual file inside a maildir) to be given to "git am". Even
though an individual file in a maildir (or more generally, a piece of
RFC2822 e-mail) is not a mbox file, it contains enough information to
create a commit out of it, so there is no reason to reject one. Running
mailsplit on such a file feels stupid, but it does not hurt.
This builds on top of a5a6755 (git-am foreign patch support: introduce
patch_format, 2009-05-27) that introduced mailbox format detection. The
codepath to deal with a mbox requires it to begin with "From " line and
also allows it to begin with "From: ", but a random piece of e-mail can
and often do begin with any valid RFC2822 header lines.
Instead of checking the first line, we extract all the lines up to the
first empty line, and make sure they look like e-mail headers.
A test is added to t4150 to demonstrate this feature.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If your name is, say, Üwë, you want your cover letters to appear
correctly. Convince format-patch to mark it as 8-bit.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This function is useful outside of log-tree.c, too.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The script was looking for something that matched the '^our $gitbin'
regex, which no longer exists in gitweb.cgi.
Now it looks for 'MOD_PERL', which should be on the line that checks
to see if the script is running in a mod_perl environment.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rada <marada@uwaterloo.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously when merging directly from a local tracking
branch like:
git merge origin/master
The merge message said:
Merge commit 'origin/master'
* commit 'origin/master':
...
Instead, let's be more explicit about what we are merging:
Merge remote branch 'origin/master'
* origin/master:
...
We accomplish this by recognizing remote tracking branches
in git-merge when we build the simulated FETCH_HEAD output
that we feed to fmt-merge-msg.
In addition to a new test in t7608, we have to tweak the
expected output of t3409, which does such a merge.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we have both a tag and a branch named "foo", then calling
"git merge foo" will warn about the ambiguous ref, but merge
the tag.
When generating the commit message, though, we simply
checked whether "refs/heads/foo" existed, and if it did,
assumed it was a branch. This led to the statement "Merge
branch 'foo'" in the commit message, which is quite wrong.
Instead, we should use dwim_ref to find the actual ref used,
and describe it appropriately.
In addition to the test in t7608, we must also tweak the
expected output of t4202, which was accidentally triggering
this bug.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When calling "git merge $X", we automatically generate a
commit message containing something like "Merge branch
'$X'". This test script checks that those messages say what
they should, and exposes a failure when merging a refname
that is ambiguous between a tag and a branch.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Tay Ray Chuan