Browse Source

builtin/apply: remove misleading comment on lock_file field

Just like pointer field like prefix, the piece of memory pointed at
by lock_file field is not owned by the apply_state structure.  It is
true that the caller needs to be careful about the lifetime rule for
lockfile instances, but that is none of this API's business.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
maint
Junio C Hamano 9 years ago
parent
commit
a7d4c49a82
  1. 5
      builtin/apply.c

5
builtin/apply.c

@ -52,10 +52,7 @@ struct apply_state { @@ -52,10 +52,7 @@ struct apply_state {
const char *prefix;
int prefix_length;

/*
* Since lockfile.c keeps a linked list of all created
* lock_file structures, it isn't safe to free(lock_file).
*/
/* These are lock_file related */
struct lock_file *lock_file;
int newfd;


Loading…
Cancel
Save