Browse Source
There seems to be a perception that the howto's are bit-rotting a little. The manual might be a more visible location for some of them, and make-dist.txt seems like a good candidate to include as an example in the manual. For now, incorporate much of it verbatim. Later we may want to update the example a bit. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>maint
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8656/a86569103aa29db44a783f016e2b8703656c4d27" alt="bfields@citi.umich.edu"
2 changed files with 42 additions and 52 deletions
@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
|
||||
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:39:48 -0700 (PDT) |
||||
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> |
||||
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> |
||||
cc: git@vger.kernel.org |
||||
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: git checkout -f branch doesn't remove extra files |
||||
Abstract: In this article, Linus talks about building a tarball, |
||||
incremental patch, and ChangeLog, given a base release and two |
||||
rc releases, following the convention of giving the patch from |
||||
the base release and the latest rc, with ChangeLog between the |
||||
last rc and the latest rc. |
||||
|
||||
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Dave Jones wrote: |
||||
> |
||||
> > Git actually has a _lot_ of nifty tools. I didn't realize that people |
||||
> > didn't know about such basic stuff as "git-tar-tree" and "git-ls-files". |
||||
> |
||||
> Maybe its because things are moving so fast :) Or maybe I just wasn't |
||||
> paying attention on that day. (I even read the git changes via RSS, |
||||
> so I should have no excuse). |
||||
|
||||
Well, git-tar-tree has been there since late April - it's actually one of |
||||
those really early commands. I'm pretty sure the RSS feed came later ;) |
||||
|
||||
I use it all the time in doing releases, it's a lot faster than creating a |
||||
tar tree by reading the filesystem (even if you don't have to check things |
||||
out). A hidden pearl. |
||||
|
||||
This is my crappy "release-script": |
||||
|
||||
[torvalds@g5 ~]$ cat bin/release-script |
||||
#!/bin/sh |
||||
stable="$1" |
||||
last="$2" |
||||
new="$3" |
||||
echo "# git-tag v$new" |
||||
echo "git-tar-tree v$new linux-$new | gzip -9 > ../linux-$new.tar.gz" |
||||
echo "git-diff-tree -p v$stable v$new | gzip -9 > ../patch-$new.gz" |
||||
echo "git-rev-list --pretty v$new ^v$last > ../ChangeLog-$new" |
||||
echo "git-rev-list --pretty=short v$new ^v$last | git-shortlog > ../ShortLog" |
||||
echo "git-diff-tree -p v$last v$new | git-apply --stat > ../diffstat-$new" |
||||
|
||||
and when I want to do a new kernel release I literally first tag it, and |
||||
then do |
||||
|
||||
release-script 2.6.12 2.6.13-rc6 2.6.13-rc7 |
||||
|
||||
and check that things look sane, and then just cut-and-paste the commands. |
||||
|
||||
Yeah, it's stupid. |
||||
|
||||
Linus |
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in new issue