Browse Source
This does two things. - When one branch renamed and the other branch did not, the resulting half-merged file in the working tree used to swap branches around and showed as if renaming side was "ours". This was confusing and inconsistent (even though the conflict markers were marked with branch names, it was not a good enough excuse). This changes the order of arguments to mergeFile in such a case to make sure we always see "our" change between <<< and ===, and "their" change between === and >>>. - When both branches renamed to the same path, and when one branch renamed and the other branch did not, we attempt mergeFile. When this automerge conflicted, we used to collapse the index. Now we use update-index --index-info to inject higher stage entries to leave the index in unmerged state for these two cases. What this still does _not_ do is to inject unmerged state into the index when the structural changes conflict. I have not thought things through what to do in each case yet, but the cases this commit cover are the most common ones, so this would be a good start. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>maint
Junio C Hamano
19 years ago
1 changed files with 46 additions and 8 deletions
Loading…
Reference in new issue