This test was accidentally skipped as the wrong test dts file was built.
The fragment numbering in this sugar-free test case needed adjusting to
match the numbering generated by dtc for overlay_overlay.dts.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <pbarker@konsulko.com>
Message-Id: <20201219143521.2118-1-pbarker@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
So far, the tests for generating runtime overlays with dtc weren't checking
the syntactic sugar. This adds such a test.
Furthermore the existing tests were only minimally testing dtc's output
for the overlay. This adds a test comparing the dtc output with the
more or less manually constructed overlays we already have for testing
libfdt's overlay application code. This does require some minor changes
to that manually constructed overlay which don't change the sematics but
re-order / rename things to match the way dtc does it.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This changes the names of the testfiles for a number of the testcases of
the dtc overlay generation functionality to make them shorter and a bit
cleaerer what's going on. In addition we move some of the check_path
sanity checks closer to the dtc commands they verify.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Add a number of tests for dynamic objects/overlays.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Add some test infrastructure to test that the overlay can be merged, but
also that poorly formatted fixups would fail as expected.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
[dwg: Don't execute bad overlay tests without overlay aware dtc]
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Paul Barker