From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Jones Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 11:46:42 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Try to make sure configure.ac and grub-rpm-sort play nice. Apparently the test for whether to use grub-rpm-sort and also the renaming of it to grub2-rpm-sort on the runtime side weren't right. Related: rhbz#1124074 Signed-off-by: Peter Jones --- configure.ac | 2 +- util/grub-mkconfig_lib.in | 9 ++++++--- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 273da6cb906..04c052dc610 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -1549,7 +1549,7 @@ AC_SUBST([LIBDEVMAPPER]) AC_ARG_ENABLE([rpm-sort], [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-rpm-sort], [enable native rpm sorting of kernels in grub (default=guessed)])]) -if test x"$enable_rpm-sort" = xno ; then +if test x"$enable_rpm_sort" = xno ; then rpm_sort_excuse="explicitly disabled" fi diff --git a/util/grub-mkconfig_lib.in b/util/grub-mkconfig_lib.in index e85b60c322a..c67a319916a 100644 --- a/util/grub-mkconfig_lib.in +++ b/util/grub-mkconfig_lib.in @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ fi if test "x$grub_mkrelpath" = x; then grub_mkrelpath="${bindir}/@grub_mkrelpath@" fi +if test "x$grub_rpm_sort" = x; then + grub_rpm_sort="${sbindir}/@grub_rpm_sort@" +fi if which gettext >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; then : @@ -213,10 +216,10 @@ version_sort () esac } -if [ "x$RPMLIB" = x ]; then +if [ "x$grub_rpm_sort" != x -a -x "$grub_rpm_sort" ]; then + kernel_sort="$grub_rpm_sort" +else kernel_sort=version_sort -else - kernel_sort="${sbindir}/grub-rpm-sort" fi version_test_numeric ()