|
|
|
From 6503fbef433da29fe1f450e44c8eaca61888bcda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
|
|
From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
|
|
|
|
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:25:57 +0200
|
|
|
|
Subject: [PATCH] update-done: ignore nanosecond file timestamp components,
|
|
|
|
they are not reliable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90192
|
|
|
|
(cherry picked from commit 329c542585cd92cb905990e3bf59eda16fd88cfb)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cherry-picked from: a38a3e0
|
|
|
|
Resolves: #1222517
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
src/update-done/update-done.c | 12 +++++++++---
|
|
|
|
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/src/update-done/update-done.c b/src/update-done/update-done.c
|
|
|
|
index 561963e5eb..cb5cd6f4ab 100644
|
|
|
|
--- a/src/update-done/update-done.c
|
|
|
|
+++ b/src/update-done/update-done.c
|
|
|
|
@@ -36,9 +36,15 @@ static int apply_timestamp(const char *path, struct timespec *ts) {
|
|
|
|
assert(ts);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (stat(path, &st) >= 0) {
|
|
|
|
- /* Is the timestamp file already newer than the OS? If so, there's nothing to do. */
|
|
|
|
- if (st.st_mtim.tv_sec > ts->tv_sec ||
|
|
|
|
- (st.st_mtim.tv_sec == ts->tv_sec && st.st_mtim.tv_nsec >= ts->tv_nsec))
|
|
|
|
+ /* Is the timestamp file already newer than the OS? If
|
|
|
|
+ * so, there's nothing to do. We ignore the nanosecond
|
|
|
|
+ * component of the timestamp, since some file systems
|
|
|
|
+ * do not support any better accuracy than 1s and we
|
|
|
|
+ * have no way to identify the accuracy
|
|
|
|
+ * available. Most notably ext4 on small disks (where
|
|
|
|
+ * 128 byte inodes are used) does not support better
|
|
|
|
+ * accuracy than 1s. */
|
|
|
|
+ if (st.st_mtim.tv_sec > ts->tv_sec)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* It is older? Then let's update it */
|