You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
286 lines
8.6 KiB
286 lines
8.6 KiB
git-bisect(1) |
|
============= |
|
|
|
NAME |
|
---- |
|
git-bisect - Find the change that introduced a bug by binary search |
|
|
|
|
|
SYNOPSIS |
|
-------- |
|
'git bisect' <subcommand> <options> |
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
----------- |
|
The command takes various subcommands, and different options depending |
|
on the subcommand: |
|
|
|
git bisect help |
|
git bisect start [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<paths>...] |
|
git bisect bad [<rev>] |
|
git bisect good [<rev>...] |
|
git bisect skip [<rev>...] |
|
git bisect reset [<branch>] |
|
git bisect visualize |
|
git bisect replay <logfile> |
|
git bisect log |
|
git bisect run <cmd>... |
|
|
|
This command uses 'git-rev-list --bisect' option to help drive the |
|
binary search process to find which change introduced a bug, given an |
|
old "good" commit object name and a later "bad" commit object name. |
|
|
|
Getting help |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
Use "git bisect" to get a short usage description, and "git bisect |
|
help" or "git bisect -h" to get a long usage description. |
|
|
|
Basic bisect commands: start, bad, good |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
The way you use it is: |
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------ |
|
$ git bisect start |
|
$ git bisect bad # Current version is bad |
|
$ git bisect good v2.6.13-rc2 # v2.6.13-rc2 was the last version |
|
# tested that was good |
|
------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
|
When you give at least one bad and one good versions, it will bisect |
|
the revision tree and say something like: |
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------ |
|
Bisecting: 675 revisions left to test after this |
|
------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
|
and check out the state in the middle. Now, compile that kernel, and |
|
boot it. Now, let's say that this booted kernel works fine, then just |
|
do |
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------ |
|
$ git bisect good # this one is good |
|
------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
|
which will now say |
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------ |
|
Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this |
|
------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
|
and you continue along, compiling that one, testing it, and depending |
|
on whether it is good or bad, you say "git bisect good" or "git bisect |
|
bad", and ask for the next bisection. |
|
|
|
Until you have no more left, and you'll have been left with the first |
|
bad kernel rev in "refs/bisect/bad". |
|
|
|
Bisect reset |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
Oh, and then after you want to reset to the original head, do a |
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------ |
|
$ git bisect reset |
|
------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
|
to get back to the original branch, instead of being in one of the |
|
bisection branches ("git bisect start" will do that for you too, |
|
actually: it will reset the bisection state, and before it does that |
|
it checks that you're not using some old bisection branch). |
|
|
|
Bisect visualize |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
During the bisection process, you can say |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
$ git bisect visualize |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
to see the currently remaining suspects in `gitk`. `visualize` is a bit |
|
too long to type and `view` is provided as a synonym. |
|
|
|
If `DISPLAY` environment variable is not set, `git log` is used |
|
instead. You can even give command line options such as `-p` and |
|
`--stat`. |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
$ git bisect view --stat |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
Bisect log and bisect replay |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
The good/bad input is logged, and |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
$ git bisect log |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
shows what you have done so far. You can truncate its output somewhere |
|
and save it in a file, and run |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
$ git bisect replay that-file |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
if you find later you made a mistake telling good/bad about a |
|
revision. |
|
|
|
Avoiding to test a commit |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
If in a middle of bisect session, you know what the bisect suggested |
|
to try next is not a good one to test (e.g. the change the commit |
|
introduces is known not to work in your environment and you know it |
|
does not have anything to do with the bug you are chasing), you may |
|
want to find a near-by commit and try that instead. |
|
|
|
It goes something like this: |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
$ git bisect good/bad # previous round was good/bad. |
|
Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this |
|
$ git bisect visualize # oops, that is uninteresting. |
|
$ git reset --hard HEAD~3 # try 3 revs before what |
|
# was suggested |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
Then compile and test the one you chose to try. After that, tell |
|
bisect what the result was as usual. |
|
|
|
Bisect skip |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
Instead of choosing by yourself a nearby commit, you may just want git |
|
to do it for you using: |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
$ git bisect skip # Current version cannot be tested |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
But computing the commit to test may be slower afterwards and git may |
|
eventually not be able to tell the first bad among a bad and one or |
|
more "skip"ped commits. |
|
|
|
Cutting down bisection by giving more parameters to bisect start |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
You can further cut down the number of trials if you know what part of |
|
the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking down, by giving |
|
paths parameters when you say `bisect start`, like this: |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
$ git bisect start -- arch/i386 include/asm-i386 |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
If you know beforehand more than one good commits, you can narrow the |
|
bisect space down without doing the whole tree checkout every time you |
|
give good commits. You give the bad revision immediately after `start` |
|
and then you give all the good revisions you have: |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
$ git bisect start v2.6.20-rc6 v2.6.20-rc4 v2.6.20-rc1 -- |
|
# v2.6.20-rc6 is bad |
|
# v2.6.20-rc4 and v2.6.20-rc1 are good |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
Bisect run |
|
~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
If you have a script that can tell if the current source code is good |
|
or bad, you can automatically bisect using: |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
$ git bisect run my_script |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
Note that the "run" script (`my_script` in the above example) should |
|
exit with code 0 in case the current source code is good. Exit with a |
|
code between 1 and 127 (inclusive), except 125, if the current |
|
source code is bad. |
|
|
|
Any other exit code will abort the automatic bisect process. (A |
|
program that does "exit(-1)" leaves $? = 255, see exit(3) manual page, |
|
the value is chopped with "& 0377".) |
|
|
|
The special exit code 125 should be used when the current source code |
|
cannot be tested. If the "run" script exits with this code, the current |
|
revision will be skipped, see `git bisect skip` above. |
|
|
|
You may often find that during bisect you want to have near-constant |
|
tweaks (e.g., s/#define DEBUG 0/#define DEBUG 1/ in a header file, or |
|
"revision that does not have this commit needs this patch applied to |
|
work around other problem this bisection is not interested in") |
|
applied to the revision being tested. |
|
|
|
To cope with such a situation, after the inner git-bisect finds the |
|
next revision to test, with the "run" script, you can apply that tweak |
|
before compiling, run the real test, and after the test decides if the |
|
revision (possibly with the needed tweaks) passed the test, rewind the |
|
tree to the pristine state. Finally the "run" script can exit with |
|
the status of the real test to let "git bisect run" command loop to |
|
know the outcome. |
|
|
|
EXAMPLES |
|
-------- |
|
|
|
* Automatically bisect a broken build between v1.2 and HEAD: |
|
+ |
|
------------ |
|
$ git bisect start HEAD v1.2 -- # HEAD is bad, v1.2 is good |
|
$ git bisect run make # "make" builds the app |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
* Automatically bisect a broken test suite: |
|
+ |
|
------------ |
|
$ cat ~/test.sh |
|
#!/bin/sh |
|
make || exit 125 # this "skip"s broken builds |
|
make test # "make test" runs the test suite |
|
$ git bisect start v1.3 v1.1 -- # v1.3 is bad, v1.1 is good |
|
$ git bisect run ~/test.sh |
|
------------ |
|
+ |
|
Here we use a "test.sh" custom script. In this script, if "make" |
|
fails, we "skip" the current commit. |
|
+ |
|
It's safer to use a custom script outside the repo to prevent |
|
interactions between the bisect, make and test processes and the |
|
script. |
|
+ |
|
And "make test" should "exit 0", if the test suite passes, and |
|
"exit 1" (for example) otherwise. |
|
|
|
* Automatically bisect a broken test case: |
|
+ |
|
------------ |
|
$ cat ~/test.sh |
|
#!/bin/sh |
|
make || exit 125 # this "skip"s broken builds |
|
~/check_test_case.sh # does the test case passes ? |
|
$ git bisect start HEAD HEAD~10 -- # culprit is among the last 10 |
|
$ git bisect run ~/test.sh |
|
------------ |
|
+ |
|
Here "check_test_case.sh" should "exit 0", if the test case passes, |
|
and "exit 1" (for example) otherwise. |
|
+ |
|
It's safer if both "test.sh" and "check_test_case.sh" scripts are |
|
outside the repo to prevent interactions between the bisect, make and |
|
test processes and the scripts. |
|
|
|
Author |
|
------ |
|
Written by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> |
|
|
|
Documentation |
|
------------- |
|
Documentation by Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>. |
|
|
|
GIT |
|
--- |
|
Part of the linkgit:git[7] suite
|
|
|