You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
228 lines
7.0 KiB
228 lines
7.0 KiB
git-tag(1) |
|
========== |
|
|
|
NAME |
|
---- |
|
git-tag - Create, list, delete or verify a tag object signed with GPG |
|
|
|
|
|
SYNOPSIS |
|
-------- |
|
[verse] |
|
'git-tag' [-a | -s | -u <key-id>] [-f] [-m <msg> | -F <file>] <name> [<head>] |
|
'git-tag' -d <name>... |
|
'git-tag' [-n [<num>]] -l [<pattern>] |
|
'git-tag' -v <name>... |
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
----------- |
|
Adds a 'tag' reference in `.git/refs/tags/` |
|
|
|
Unless `-f` is given, the tag must not yet exist in |
|
`.git/refs/tags/` directory. |
|
|
|
If one of `-a`, `-s`, or `-u <key-id>` is passed, the command |
|
creates a 'tag' object, and requires the tag message. Unless |
|
`-m <msg>` or `-F <file>` is given, an editor is started for the user to type |
|
in the tag message. |
|
|
|
Otherwise just the SHA1 object name of the commit object is |
|
written (i.e. a lightweight tag). |
|
|
|
A GnuPG signed tag object will be created when `-s` or `-u |
|
<key-id>` is used. When `-u <key-id>` is not used, the |
|
committer identity for the current user is used to find the |
|
GnuPG key for signing. |
|
|
|
OPTIONS |
|
------- |
|
-a:: |
|
Make an unsigned, annotated tag object |
|
|
|
-s:: |
|
Make a GPG-signed tag, using the default e-mail address's key |
|
|
|
-u <key-id>:: |
|
Make a GPG-signed tag, using the given key |
|
|
|
-f:: |
|
Replace an existing tag with the given name (instead of failing) |
|
|
|
-d:: |
|
Delete existing tags with the given names. |
|
|
|
-v:: |
|
Verify the gpg signature of the given tag names. |
|
|
|
-n <num>:: |
|
<num> specifies how many lines from the annotation, if any, |
|
are printed when using -l. |
|
The default is not to print any annotation lines. |
|
If no number is given to `-n`, only the first line is printed. |
|
|
|
-l <pattern>:: |
|
List tags with names that match the given pattern (or all if no pattern is given). |
|
Typing "git tag" without arguments, also lists all tags. |
|
|
|
-m <msg>:: |
|
Use the given tag message (instead of prompting) |
|
|
|
-F <file>:: |
|
Take the tag message from the given file. Use '-' to |
|
read the message from the standard input. |
|
|
|
CONFIGURATION |
|
------------- |
|
By default, git-tag in sign-with-default mode (-s) will use your |
|
committer identity (of the form "Your Name <your@email.address>") to |
|
find a key. If you want to use a different default key, you can specify |
|
it in the repository configuration as follows: |
|
|
|
------------------------------------- |
|
[user] |
|
signingkey = <gpg-key-id> |
|
------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|
---------- |
|
|
|
On Re-tagging |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
What should you do when you tag a wrong commit and you would |
|
want to re-tag? |
|
|
|
If you never pushed anything out, just re-tag it. Use "-f" to |
|
replace the old one. And you're done. |
|
|
|
But if you have pushed things out (or others could just read |
|
your repository directly), then others will have already seen |
|
the old tag. In that case you can do one of two things: |
|
|
|
. The sane thing. |
|
Just admit you screwed up, and use a different name. Others have |
|
already seen one tag-name, and if you keep the same name, you |
|
may be in the situation that two people both have "version X", |
|
but they actually have 'different' "X"'s. So just call it "X.1" |
|
and be done with it. |
|
|
|
. The insane thing. |
|
You really want to call the new version "X" too, 'even though' |
|
others have already seen the old one. So just use "git tag -f" |
|
again, as if you hadn't already published the old one. |
|
|
|
However, Git does *not* (and it should not)change tags behind |
|
users back. So if somebody already got the old tag, doing a "git |
|
pull" on your tree shouldn't just make them overwrite the old |
|
one. |
|
|
|
If somebody got a release tag from you, you cannot just change |
|
the tag for them by updating your own one. This is a big |
|
security issue, in that people MUST be able to trust their |
|
tag-names. If you really want to do the insane thing, you need |
|
to just fess up to it, and tell people that you messed up. You |
|
can do that by making a very public announcement saying: |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
Ok, I messed up, and I pushed out an earlier version tagged as X. I |
|
then fixed something, and retagged the *fixed* tree as X again. |
|
|
|
If you got the wrong tag, and want the new one, please delete |
|
the old one and fetch the new one by doing: |
|
|
|
git tag -d X |
|
git fetch origin tag X |
|
|
|
to get my updated tag. |
|
|
|
You can test which tag you have by doing |
|
|
|
git rev-parse X |
|
|
|
which should return 0123456789abcdef.. if you have the new version. |
|
|
|
Sorry for inconvenience. |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
Does this seem a bit complicated? It *should* be. There is no |
|
way that it would be correct to just "fix" it behind peoples |
|
backs. People need to know that their tags might have been |
|
changed. |
|
|
|
|
|
On Automatic following |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
If you are following somebody else's tree, you are most likely |
|
using tracking branches (`refs/heads/origin` in traditional |
|
layout, or `refs/remotes/origin/master` in the separate-remote |
|
layout). You usually want the tags from the other end. |
|
|
|
On the other hand, if you are fetching because you would want a |
|
one-shot merge from somebody else, you typically do not want to |
|
get tags from there. This happens more often for people near |
|
the toplevel but not limited to them. Mere mortals when pulling |
|
from each other do not necessarily want to automatically get |
|
private anchor point tags from the other person. |
|
|
|
You would notice "please pull" messages on the mailing list says |
|
repo URL and branch name alone. This is designed to be easily |
|
cut&pasted to "git fetch" command line: |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
Linus, please pull from |
|
|
|
git://git..../proj.git master |
|
|
|
to get the following updates... |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
becomes: |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
$ git pull git://git..../proj.git master |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
In such a case, you do not want to automatically follow other's |
|
tags. |
|
|
|
One important aspect of git is it is distributed, and being |
|
distributed largely means there is no inherent "upstream" or |
|
"downstream" in the system. On the face of it, the above |
|
example might seem to indicate that the tag namespace is owned |
|
by upper echelon of people and tags only flow downwards, but |
|
that is not the case. It only shows that the usage pattern |
|
determines who are interested in whose tags. |
|
|
|
A one-shot pull is a sign that a commit history is now crossing |
|
the boundary between one circle of people (e.g. "people who are |
|
primarily interested in networking part of the kernel") who may |
|
have their own set of tags (e.g. "this is the third release |
|
candidate from the networking group to be proposed for general |
|
consumption with 2.6.21 release") to another circle of people |
|
(e.g. "people who integrate various subsystem improvements"). |
|
The latter are usually not interested in the detailed tags used |
|
internally in the former group (that is what "internal" means). |
|
That is why it is desirable not to follow tags automatically in |
|
this case. |
|
|
|
It may well be that among networking people, they may want to |
|
exchange the tags internal to their group, but in that workflow |
|
they are most likely tracking with each other's progress by |
|
having tracking branches. Again, the heuristic to automatically |
|
follow such tags is a good thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
|
------ |
|
Written by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, |
|
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> and Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>. |
|
|
|
Documentation |
|
-------------- |
|
Documentation by David Greaves, Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>. |
|
|
|
GIT |
|
--- |
|
Part of the gitlink:git[7] suite
|
|
|