You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
351 lines
12 KiB
351 lines
12 KiB
git-subtree(1) |
|
============== |
|
|
|
NAME |
|
---- |
|
git-subtree - Merge subtrees together and split repository into subtrees |
|
|
|
|
|
SYNOPSIS |
|
-------- |
|
[verse] |
|
'git subtree' add -P <prefix> <commit> |
|
'git subtree' add -P <prefix> <repository> <ref> |
|
'git subtree' pull -P <prefix> <repository> <ref> |
|
'git subtree' push -P <prefix> <repository> <ref> |
|
'git subtree' merge -P <prefix> <commit> |
|
'git subtree' split -P <prefix> [OPTIONS] [<commit>] |
|
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
----------- |
|
Subtrees allow subprojects to be included within a subdirectory |
|
of the main project, optionally including the subproject's |
|
entire history. |
|
|
|
For example, you could include the source code for a library |
|
as a subdirectory of your application. |
|
|
|
Subtrees are not to be confused with submodules, which are meant for |
|
the same task. Unlike submodules, subtrees do not need any special |
|
constructions (like .gitmodule files or gitlinks) be present in |
|
your repository, and do not force end-users of your |
|
repository to do anything special or to understand how subtrees |
|
work. A subtree is just a subdirectory that can be |
|
committed to, branched, and merged along with your project in |
|
any way you want. |
|
|
|
They are also not to be confused with using the subtree merge |
|
strategy. The main difference is that, besides merging |
|
the other project as a subdirectory, you can also extract the |
|
entire history of a subdirectory from your project and make it |
|
into a standalone project. Unlike the subtree merge strategy |
|
you can alternate back and forth between these |
|
two operations. If the standalone library gets updated, you can |
|
automatically merge the changes into your project; if you |
|
update the library inside your project, you can "split" the |
|
changes back out again and merge them back into the library |
|
project. |
|
|
|
For example, if a library you made for one application ends up being |
|
useful elsewhere, you can extract its entire history and publish |
|
that as its own git repository, without accidentally |
|
intermingling the history of your application project. |
|
|
|
[TIP] |
|
In order to keep your commit messages clean, we recommend that |
|
people split their commits between the subtrees and the main |
|
project as much as possible. That is, if you make a change that |
|
affects both the library and the main application, commit it in |
|
two pieces. That way, when you split the library commits out |
|
later, their descriptions will still make sense. But if this |
|
isn't important to you, it's not *necessary*. git subtree will |
|
simply leave out the non-library-related parts of the commit |
|
when it splits it out into the subproject later. |
|
|
|
|
|
COMMANDS |
|
-------- |
|
add:: |
|
Create the <prefix> subtree by importing its contents |
|
from the given <commit> or <repository> and remote <ref>. |
|
A new commit is created automatically, joining the imported |
|
project's history with your own. With '--squash', imports |
|
only a single commit from the subproject, rather than its |
|
entire history. |
|
|
|
merge:: |
|
Merge recent changes up to <commit> into the <prefix> |
|
subtree. As with normal 'git merge', this doesn't |
|
remove your own local changes; it just merges those |
|
changes into the latest <commit>. With '--squash', |
|
creates only one commit that contains all the changes, |
|
rather than merging in the entire history. |
|
+ |
|
If you use '--squash', the merge direction doesn't always have to be |
|
forward; you can use this command to go back in time from v2.5 to v2.4, |
|
for example. If your merge introduces a conflict, you can resolve it in |
|
the usual ways. |
|
|
|
pull:: |
|
Exactly like 'merge', but parallels 'git pull' in that |
|
it fetches the given ref from the specified remote |
|
repository. |
|
|
|
push:: |
|
Does a 'split' (see below) using the <prefix> supplied |
|
and then does a 'git push' to push the result to the |
|
repository and ref. This can be used to push your |
|
subtree to different branches of the remote repository. |
|
|
|
split:: |
|
Extract a new, synthetic project history from the |
|
history of the <prefix> subtree. The new history |
|
includes only the commits (including merges) that |
|
affected <prefix>, and each of those commits now has the |
|
contents of <prefix> at the root of the project instead |
|
of in a subdirectory. Thus, the newly created history |
|
is suitable for export as a separate git repository. |
|
+ |
|
After splitting successfully, a single commit id is printed to stdout. |
|
This corresponds to the HEAD of the newly created tree, which you can |
|
manipulate however you want. |
|
+ |
|
Repeated splits of exactly the same history are guaranteed to be |
|
identical (i.e. to produce the same commit ids). Because of this, if |
|
you add new commits and then re-split, the new commits will be attached |
|
as commits on top of the history you generated last time, so 'git merge' |
|
and friends will work as expected. |
|
+ |
|
Note that if you use '--squash' when you merge, you should usually not |
|
just '--rejoin' when you split. |
|
|
|
|
|
OPTIONS |
|
------- |
|
-q:: |
|
--quiet:: |
|
Suppress unnecessary output messages on stderr. |
|
|
|
-d:: |
|
--debug:: |
|
Produce even more unnecessary output messages on stderr. |
|
|
|
-P <prefix>:: |
|
--prefix=<prefix>:: |
|
Specify the path in the repository to the subtree you |
|
want to manipulate. This option is mandatory |
|
for all commands. |
|
|
|
-m <message>:: |
|
--message=<message>:: |
|
This option is only valid for add, merge and pull (unsure). |
|
Specify <message> as the commit message for the merge commit. |
|
|
|
|
|
OPTIONS FOR add, merge, push, pull |
|
---------------------------------- |
|
--squash:: |
|
This option is only valid for add, merge, and pull |
|
commands. |
|
+ |
|
Instead of merging the entire history from the subtree project, produce |
|
only a single commit that contains all the differences you want to |
|
merge, and then merge that new commit into your project. |
|
+ |
|
Using this option helps to reduce log clutter. People rarely want to see |
|
every change that happened between v1.0 and v1.1 of the library they're |
|
using, since none of the interim versions were ever included in their |
|
application. |
|
+ |
|
Using '--squash' also helps avoid problems when the same subproject is |
|
included multiple times in the same project, or is removed and then |
|
re-added. In such a case, it doesn't make sense to combine the |
|
histories anyway, since it's unclear which part of the history belongs |
|
to which subtree. |
|
+ |
|
Furthermore, with '--squash', you can switch back and forth between |
|
different versions of a subtree, rather than strictly forward. 'git |
|
subtree merge --squash' always adjusts the subtree to match the exactly |
|
specified commit, even if getting to that commit would require undoing |
|
some changes that were added earlier. |
|
+ |
|
Whether or not you use '--squash', changes made in your local repository |
|
remain intact and can be later split and send upstream to the |
|
subproject. |
|
|
|
|
|
OPTIONS FOR split |
|
----------------- |
|
--annotate=<annotation>:: |
|
This option is only valid for the split command. |
|
+ |
|
When generating synthetic history, add <annotation> as a prefix to each |
|
commit message. Since we're creating new commits with the same commit |
|
message, but possibly different content, from the original commits, this |
|
can help to differentiate them and avoid confusion. |
|
+ |
|
Whenever you split, you need to use the same <annotation>, or else you |
|
don't have a guarantee that the new re-created history will be identical |
|
to the old one. That will prevent merging from working correctly. git |
|
subtree tries to make it work anyway, particularly if you use --rejoin, |
|
but it may not always be effective. |
|
|
|
-b <branch>:: |
|
--branch=<branch>:: |
|
This option is only valid for the split command. |
|
+ |
|
After generating the synthetic history, create a new branch called |
|
<branch> that contains the new history. This is suitable for immediate |
|
pushing upstream. <branch> must not already exist. |
|
|
|
--ignore-joins:: |
|
This option is only valid for the split command. |
|
+ |
|
If you use '--rejoin', git subtree attempts to optimize its history |
|
reconstruction to generate only the new commits since the last |
|
'--rejoin'. '--ignore-join' disables this behaviour, forcing it to |
|
regenerate the entire history. In a large project, this can take a long |
|
time. |
|
|
|
--onto=<onto>:: |
|
This option is only valid for the split command. |
|
+ |
|
If your subtree was originally imported using something other than git |
|
subtree, its history may not match what git subtree is expecting. In |
|
that case, you can specify the commit id <onto> that corresponds to the |
|
first revision of the subproject's history that was imported into your |
|
project, and git subtree will attempt to build its history from there. |
|
+ |
|
If you used 'git subtree add', you should never need this option. |
|
|
|
--rejoin:: |
|
This option is only valid for the split command. |
|
+ |
|
After splitting, merge the newly created synthetic history back into |
|
your main project. That way, future splits can search only the part of |
|
history that has been added since the most recent --rejoin. |
|
+ |
|
If your split commits end up merged into the upstream subproject, and |
|
then you want to get the latest upstream version, this will allow git's |
|
merge algorithm to more intelligently avoid conflicts (since it knows |
|
these synthetic commits are already part of the upstream repository). |
|
+ |
|
Unfortunately, using this option results in 'git log' showing an extra |
|
copy of every new commit that was created (the original, and the |
|
synthetic one). |
|
+ |
|
If you do all your merges with '--squash', don't use '--rejoin' when you |
|
split, because you don't want the subproject's history to be part of |
|
your project anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
EXAMPLE 1. Add command |
|
---------------------- |
|
Let's assume that you have a local repository that you would like |
|
to add an external vendor library to. In this case we will add the |
|
git-subtree repository as a subdirectory of your already existing |
|
git-extensions repository in ~/git-extensions/: |
|
|
|
$ git subtree add --prefix=git-subtree --squash \ |
|
git://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree.git master |
|
|
|
'master' needs to be a valid remote ref and can be a different branch |
|
name |
|
|
|
You can omit the --squash flag, but doing so will increase the number |
|
of commits that are included in your local repository. |
|
|
|
We now have a ~/git-extensions/git-subtree directory containing code |
|
from the master branch of git://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree.git |
|
in our git-extensions repository. |
|
|
|
EXAMPLE 2. Extract a subtree using commit, merge and pull |
|
--------------------------------------------------------- |
|
Let's use the repository for the git source code as an example. |
|
First, get your own copy of the git.git repository: |
|
|
|
$ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git test-git |
|
$ cd test-git |
|
|
|
gitweb (commit 1130ef3) was merged into git as of commit |
|
0a8f4f0, after which it was no longer maintained separately. |
|
But imagine it had been maintained separately, and we wanted to |
|
extract git's changes to gitweb since that time, to share with |
|
the upstream. You could do this: |
|
|
|
$ git subtree split --prefix=gitweb --annotate='(split) ' \ |
|
0a8f4f0^.. --onto=1130ef3 --rejoin \ |
|
--branch gitweb-latest |
|
$ gitk gitweb-latest |
|
$ git push git@github.com:whatever/gitweb.git gitweb-latest:master |
|
|
|
(We use '0a8f4f0^..' because that means "all the changes from |
|
0a8f4f0 to the current version, including 0a8f4f0 itself.") |
|
|
|
If gitweb had originally been merged using 'git subtree add' (or |
|
a previous split had already been done with --rejoin specified) |
|
then you can do all your splits without having to remember any |
|
weird commit ids: |
|
|
|
$ git subtree split --prefix=gitweb --annotate='(split) ' --rejoin \ |
|
--branch gitweb-latest2 |
|
|
|
And you can merge changes back in from the upstream project just |
|
as easily: |
|
|
|
$ git subtree pull --prefix=gitweb \ |
|
git@github.com:whatever/gitweb.git master |
|
|
|
Or, using '--squash', you can actually rewind to an earlier |
|
version of gitweb: |
|
|
|
$ git subtree merge --prefix=gitweb --squash gitweb-latest~10 |
|
|
|
Then make some changes: |
|
|
|
$ date >gitweb/myfile |
|
$ git add gitweb/myfile |
|
$ git commit -m 'created myfile' |
|
|
|
And fast forward again: |
|
|
|
$ git subtree merge --prefix=gitweb --squash gitweb-latest |
|
|
|
And notice that your change is still intact: |
|
|
|
$ ls -l gitweb/myfile |
|
|
|
And you can split it out and look at your changes versus |
|
the standard gitweb: |
|
|
|
git log gitweb-latest..$(git subtree split --prefix=gitweb) |
|
|
|
EXAMPLE 3. Extract a subtree using branch |
|
----------------------------------------- |
|
Suppose you have a source directory with many files and |
|
subdirectories, and you want to extract the lib directory to its own |
|
git project. Here's a short way to do it: |
|
|
|
First, make the new repository wherever you want: |
|
|
|
$ <go to the new location> |
|
$ git init --bare |
|
|
|
Back in your original directory: |
|
|
|
$ git subtree split --prefix=lib --annotate="(split)" -b split |
|
|
|
Then push the new branch onto the new empty repository: |
|
|
|
$ git push <new-repo> split:master |
|
|
|
|
|
AUTHOR |
|
------ |
|
Written by Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> |
|
|
|
|
|
GIT |
|
--- |
|
Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite
|
|
|