207 lines
		
	
	
		
			7.6 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			207 lines
		
	
	
		
			7.6 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
| gitcvs-migration(7)
 | |
| ===================
 | |
| 
 | |
| NAME
 | |
| ----
 | |
| gitcvs-migration - Git for CVS users
 | |
| 
 | |
| SYNOPSIS
 | |
| --------
 | |
| [verse]
 | |
| 'git cvsimport' *
 | |
| 
 | |
| DESCRIPTION
 | |
| -----------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Git differs from CVS in that every working tree contains a repository with
 | |
| a full copy of the project history, and no repository is inherently more
 | |
| important than any other.  However, you can emulate the CVS model by
 | |
| designating a single shared repository which people can synchronize with;
 | |
| this document explains how to do that.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Some basic familiarity with Git is required. Having gone through
 | |
| linkgit:gittutorial[7] and
 | |
| linkgit:gitglossary[7] should be sufficient.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Developing against a shared repository
 | |
| --------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Suppose a shared repository is set up in /pub/repo.git on the host
 | |
| foo.com.  Then as an individual committer you can clone the shared
 | |
| repository over ssh with:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git clone foo.com:/pub/repo.git/ my-project
 | |
| $ cd my-project
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| and hack away.  The equivalent of 'cvs update' is
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git pull origin
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| which merges in any work that others might have done since the clone
 | |
| operation.  If there are uncommitted changes in your working tree, commit
 | |
| them first before running git pull.
 | |
| 
 | |
| [NOTE]
 | |
| ================================
 | |
| The 'pull' command knows where to get updates from because of certain
 | |
| configuration variables that were set by the first 'git clone'
 | |
| command; see `git config -l` and the linkgit:git-config[1] man
 | |
| page for details.
 | |
| ================================
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can update the shared repository with your changes by first committing
 | |
| your changes, and then using the 'git push' command:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git push origin master
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| to "push" those commits to the shared repository.  If someone else has
 | |
| updated the repository more recently, 'git push', like 'cvs commit', will
 | |
| complain, in which case you must pull any changes before attempting the
 | |
| push again.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In the 'git push' command above we specify the name of the remote branch
 | |
| to update (`master`).  If we leave that out, 'git push' tries to update
 | |
| any branches in the remote repository that have the same name as a branch
 | |
| in the local repository.  So the last 'push' can be done with either of:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------
 | |
| $ git push origin
 | |
| $ git push foo.com:/pub/project.git/
 | |
| ------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| as long as the shared repository does not have any branches
 | |
| other than `master`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Setting Up a Shared Repository
 | |
| ------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| We assume you have already created a Git repository for your project,
 | |
| possibly created from scratch or from a tarball (see
 | |
| linkgit:gittutorial[7]), or imported from an already existing CVS
 | |
| repository (see the next section).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Assume your existing repo is at /home/alice/myproject.  Create a new "bare"
 | |
| repository (a repository without a working tree) and fetch your project into
 | |
| it:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ mkdir /pub/my-repo.git
 | |
| $ cd /pub/my-repo.git
 | |
| $ git --bare init --shared
 | |
| $ git --bare fetch /home/alice/myproject master:master
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Next, give every team member read/write access to this repository.  One
 | |
| easy way to do this is to give all the team members ssh access to the
 | |
| machine where the repository is hosted.  If you don't want to give them a
 | |
| full shell on the machine, there is a restricted shell which only allows
 | |
| users to do Git pushes and pulls; see linkgit:git-shell[1].
 | |
| 
 | |
| Put all the committers in the same group, and make the repository
 | |
| writable by that group:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ chgrp -R $group /pub/my-repo.git
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Make sure committers have a umask of at most 027, so that the directories
 | |
| they create are writable and searchable by other group members.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Importing a CVS archive
 | |
| -----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| NOTE: These instructions use the `git-cvsimport` script which ships with
 | |
| git, but other importers may provide better results. See the note in
 | |
| linkgit:git-cvsimport[1] for other options.
 | |
| 
 | |
| First, install version 2.1 or higher of cvsps from
 | |
| https://github.com/andreyvit/cvsps[https://github.com/andreyvit/cvsps] and make
 | |
| sure it is in your path.  Then cd to a checked out CVS working directory
 | |
| of the project you are interested in and run linkgit:git-cvsimport[1]:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git cvsimport -C <destination> <module>
 | |
| -------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This puts a Git archive of the named CVS module in the directory
 | |
| <destination>, which will be created if necessary.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The import checks out from CVS every revision of every file.  Reportedly
 | |
| cvsimport can average some twenty revisions per second, so for a
 | |
| medium-sized project this should not take more than a couple of minutes.
 | |
| Larger projects or remote repositories may take longer.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The main trunk is stored in the Git branch named `origin`, and additional
 | |
| CVS branches are stored in Git branches with the same names.  The most
 | |
| recent version of the main trunk is also left checked out on the `master`
 | |
| branch, so you can start adding your own changes right away.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The import is incremental, so if you call it again next month it will
 | |
| fetch any CVS updates that have been made in the meantime.  For this to
 | |
| work, you must not modify the imported branches; instead, create new
 | |
| branches for your own changes, and merge in the imported branches as
 | |
| necessary.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you want a shared repository, you will need to make a bare clone
 | |
| of the imported directory, as described above. Then treat the imported
 | |
| directory as another development clone for purposes of merging
 | |
| incremental imports.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Advanced Shared Repository Management
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Git allows you to specify scripts called "hooks" to be run at certain
 | |
| points.  You can use these, for example, to send all commits to the shared
 | |
| repository to a mailing list.  See linkgit:githooks[5].
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can enforce finer grained permissions using update hooks.  See
 | |
| link:howto/update-hook-example.html[Controlling access to branches using
 | |
| update hooks].
 | |
| 
 | |
| Providing CVS Access to a Git Repository
 | |
| ----------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| It is also possible to provide true CVS access to a Git repository, so
 | |
| that developers can still use CVS; see linkgit:git-cvsserver[1] for
 | |
| details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Alternative Development Models
 | |
| ------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| CVS users are accustomed to giving a group of developers commit access to
 | |
| a common repository.  As we've seen, this is also possible with Git.
 | |
| However, the distributed nature of Git allows other development models,
 | |
| and you may want to first consider whether one of them might be a better
 | |
| fit for your project.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, you can choose a single person to maintain the project's
 | |
| primary public repository.  Other developers then clone this repository
 | |
| and each work in their own clone.  When they have a series of changes that
 | |
| they're happy with, they ask the maintainer to pull from the branch
 | |
| containing the changes.  The maintainer reviews their changes and pulls
 | |
| them into the primary repository, which other developers pull from as
 | |
| necessary to stay coordinated.  The Linux kernel and other projects use
 | |
| variants of this model.
 | |
| 
 | |
| With a small group, developers may just pull changes from each other's
 | |
| repositories without the need for a central maintainer.
 | |
| 
 | |
| SEE ALSO
 | |
| --------
 | |
| linkgit:gittutorial[7],
 | |
| linkgit:gittutorial-2[7],
 | |
| linkgit:gitcore-tutorial[7],
 | |
| linkgit:gitglossary[7],
 | |
| linkgit:giteveryday[7],
 | |
| link:user-manual.html[The Git User's Manual]
 | |
| 
 | |
| GIT
 | |
| ---
 | |
| Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite
 |