You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
211 lines
7.1 KiB
211 lines
7.1 KiB
git-rerere(1) |
|
============= |
|
|
|
NAME |
|
---- |
|
git-rerere - Reuse recorded resolution of conflicted merges |
|
|
|
SYNOPSIS |
|
-------- |
|
'git-rerere' [clear|diff|status|gc] |
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
----------- |
|
|
|
In a workflow that employs relatively long lived topic branches, |
|
the developer sometimes needs to resolve the same conflict over |
|
and over again until the topic branches are done (either merged |
|
to the "release" branch, or sent out and accepted upstream). |
|
|
|
This command helps this process by recording conflicted |
|
automerge results and corresponding hand-resolve results on the |
|
initial manual merge, and later by noticing the same automerge |
|
results and applying the previously recorded hand resolution. |
|
|
|
[NOTE] |
|
You need to set the config variable rerere.enabled to enable this |
|
command. |
|
|
|
|
|
COMMANDS |
|
-------- |
|
|
|
Normally, git-rerere is run without arguments or user-intervention. |
|
However, it has several commands that allow it to interact with |
|
its working state. |
|
|
|
'clear':: |
|
|
|
This resets the metadata used by rerere if a merge resolution is to be |
|
is aborted. Calling gitlink:git-am[1] --skip or gitlink:git-rebase[1] |
|
[--skip|--abort] will automatically invoke this command. |
|
|
|
'diff':: |
|
|
|
This displays diffs for the current state of the resolution. It is |
|
useful for tracking what has changed while the user is resolving |
|
conflicts. Additional arguments are passed directly to the system |
|
diff(1) command installed in PATH. |
|
|
|
'status':: |
|
|
|
Like diff, but this only prints the filenames that will be tracked |
|
for resolutions. |
|
|
|
'gc':: |
|
|
|
This command is used to prune records of conflicted merge that |
|
occurred long time ago. By default, conflicts older than 15 |
|
days that you have not recorded their resolution, and conflicts |
|
older than 60 days, are pruned. These are controlled with |
|
`gc.rerereunresolved` and `gc.rerereresolved` configuration |
|
variables. |
|
|
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|
---------- |
|
|
|
When your topic branch modifies overlapping area that your |
|
master branch (or upstream) touched since your topic branch |
|
forked from it, you may want to test it with the latest master, |
|
even before your topic branch is ready to be pushed upstream: |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
o---*---o topic |
|
/ |
|
o---o---o---*---o---o master |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
For such a test, you need to merge master and topic somehow. |
|
One way to do it is to pull master into the topic branch: |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
$ git checkout topic |
|
$ git merge master |
|
|
|
o---*---o---+ topic |
|
/ / |
|
o---o---o---*---o---o master |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
The commits marked with `*` touch the same area in the same |
|
file; you need to resolve the conflicts when creating the commit |
|
marked with `+`. Then you can test the result to make sure your |
|
work-in-progress still works with what is in the latest master. |
|
|
|
After this test merge, there are two ways to continue your work |
|
on the topic. The easiest is to build on top of the test merge |
|
commit `+`, and when your work in the topic branch is finally |
|
ready, pull the topic branch into master, and/or ask the |
|
upstream to pull from you. By that time, however, the master or |
|
the upstream might have been advanced since the test merge `+`, |
|
in which case the final commit graph would look like this: |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
$ git checkout topic |
|
$ git merge master |
|
$ ... work on both topic and master branches |
|
$ git checkout master |
|
$ git merge topic |
|
|
|
o---*---o---+---o---o topic |
|
/ / \ |
|
o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
When your topic branch is long-lived, however, your topic branch |
|
would end up having many such "Merge from master" commits on it, |
|
which would unnecessarily clutter the development history. |
|
Readers of the Linux kernel mailing list may remember that Linus |
|
complained about such too frequent test merges when a subsystem |
|
maintainer asked to pull from a branch full of "useless merges". |
|
|
|
As an alternative, to keep the topic branch clean of test |
|
merges, you could blow away the test merge, and keep building on |
|
top of the tip before the test merge: |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
$ git checkout topic |
|
$ git merge master |
|
$ git reset --hard HEAD^ ;# rewind the test merge |
|
$ ... work on both topic and master branches |
|
$ git checkout master |
|
$ git merge topic |
|
|
|
o---*---o-------o---o topic |
|
/ \ |
|
o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
This would leave only one merge commit when your topic branch is |
|
finally ready and merged into the master branch. This merge |
|
would require you to resolve the conflict, introduced by the |
|
commits marked with `*`. However, often this conflict is the |
|
same conflict you resolved when you created the test merge you |
|
blew away. `git-rerere` command helps you to resolve this final |
|
conflicted merge using the information from your earlier hand |
|
resolve. |
|
|
|
Running `git-rerere` command immediately after a conflicted |
|
automerge records the conflicted working tree files, with the |
|
usual conflict markers `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` in |
|
them. Later, after you are done resolving the conflicts, |
|
running `git-rerere` again records the resolved state of these |
|
files. Suppose you did this when you created the test merge of |
|
master into the topic branch. |
|
|
|
Next time, running `git-rerere` after seeing a conflicted |
|
automerge, if the conflict is the same as the earlier one |
|
recorded, it is noticed and a three-way merge between the |
|
earlier conflicted automerge, the earlier manual resolution, and |
|
the current conflicted automerge is performed by the command. |
|
If this three-way merge resolves cleanly, the result is written |
|
out to your working tree file, so you would not have to manually |
|
resolve it. Note that `git-rerere` leaves the index file alone, |
|
so you still need to do the final sanity checks with `git diff` |
|
(or `git diff -c`) and `git add` when you are satisfied. |
|
|
|
As a convenience measure, `git-merge` automatically invokes |
|
`git-rerere` when it exits with a failed automerge, which |
|
records it if it is a new conflict, or reuses the earlier hand |
|
resolve when it is not. `git-commit` also invokes `git-rerere` |
|
when recording a merge result. What this means is that you do |
|
not have to do anything special yourself (Note: you still have |
|
to set the config variable rerere.enabled to enable this command). |
|
|
|
In our example, when you did the test merge, the manual |
|
resolution is recorded, and it will be reused when you do the |
|
actual merge later with updated master and topic branch, as long |
|
as the earlier resolution is still applicable. |
|
|
|
The information `git-rerere` records is also used when running |
|
`git-rebase`. After blowing away the test merge and continuing |
|
development on the topic branch: |
|
|
|
------------ |
|
o---*---o-------o---o topic |
|
/ |
|
o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master |
|
|
|
$ git rebase master topic |
|
|
|
o---*---o-------o---o topic |
|
/ |
|
o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
you could run `git rebase master topic`, to keep yourself |
|
up-to-date even before your topic is ready to be sent upstream. |
|
This would result in falling back to three-way merge, and it |
|
would conflict the same way the test merge you resolved earlier. |
|
`git-rerere` is run by `git rebase` to help you resolve this |
|
conflict. |
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
|
------ |
|
Written by Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> |
|
|
|
GIT |
|
--- |
|
Part of the gitlink:git[7] suite
|
|
|