585 lines
		
	
	
		
			19 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			585 lines
		
	
	
		
			19 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
| A tutorial introduction to git (for version 1.5.1 or newer)
 | |
| ===========================================================
 | |
| 
 | |
| This tutorial explains how to import a new project into git, make
 | |
| changes to it, and share changes with other developers.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you are instead primarily interested in using git to fetch a project,
 | |
| for example, to test the latest version, you may prefer to start with
 | |
| the first two chapters of link:user-manual.html[The Git User's Manual].
 | |
| 
 | |
| First, note that you can get documentation for a command such as "git
 | |
| diff" with:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ man git-diff
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| It is a good idea to introduce yourself to git with your name and
 | |
| public email address before doing any operation.  The easiest
 | |
| way to do so is:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git config --global user.name "Your Name Comes Here"
 | |
| $ git config --global user.email you@yourdomain.example.com
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Importing a new project
 | |
| -----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Assume you have a tarball project.tar.gz with your initial work.  You
 | |
| can place it under git revision control as follows.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ tar xzf project.tar.gz
 | |
| $ cd project
 | |
| $ git init
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Git will reply
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| Initialized empty Git repository in .git/
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| You've now initialized the working directory--you may notice a new
 | |
| directory created, named ".git".
 | |
| 
 | |
| Next, tell git to take a snapshot of the contents of all files under the
 | |
| current directory (note the '.'), with linkgit:git-add[1]:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git add .
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This snapshot is now stored in a temporary staging area which git calls
 | |
| the "index".  You can permanently store the contents of the index in the
 | |
| repository with linkgit:git-commit[1]:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git commit
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This will prompt you for a commit message.  You've now stored the first
 | |
| version of your project in git.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Making changes
 | |
| --------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Modify some files, then add their updated contents to the index:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git add file1 file2 file3
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| You are now ready to commit.  You can see what is about to be committed
 | |
| using linkgit:git-diff[1] with the --cached option:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git diff --cached
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| (Without --cached, linkgit:git-diff[1] will show you any changes that
 | |
| you've made but not yet added to the index.)  You can also get a brief
 | |
| summary of the situation with linkgit:git-status[1]:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git status
 | |
| # On branch master
 | |
| # Changes to be committed:
 | |
| #   (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
 | |
| #
 | |
| #	modified:   file1
 | |
| #	modified:   file2
 | |
| #	modified:   file3
 | |
| #
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you need to make any further adjustments, do so now, and then add any
 | |
| newly modified content to the index.  Finally, commit your changes with:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git commit
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This will again prompt your for a message describing the change, and then
 | |
| record a new version of the project.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Alternatively, instead of running `git add` beforehand, you can use
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git commit -a
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| which will automatically notice any modified (but not new) files, add
 | |
| them to the index, and commit, all in one step.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A note on commit messages: Though not required, it's a good idea to
 | |
| begin the commit message with a single short (less than 50 character)
 | |
| line summarizing the change, followed by a blank line and then a more
 | |
| thorough description.  Tools that turn commits into email, for
 | |
| example, use the first line on the Subject: line and the rest of the
 | |
| commit in the body.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Git tracks content not files
 | |
| ----------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Many revision control systems provide an "add" command that tells the
 | |
| system to start tracking changes to a new file.  Git's "add" command
 | |
| does something simpler and more powerful: `git add` is used both for new
 | |
| and newly modified files, and in both cases it takes a snapshot of the
 | |
| given files and stages that content in the index, ready for inclusion in
 | |
| the next commit.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Viewing project history
 | |
| -----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| At any point you can view the history of your changes using
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git log
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you also want to see complete diffs at each step, use
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git log -p
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Often the overview of the change is useful to get a feel of
 | |
| each step
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git log --stat --summary
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Managing branches
 | |
| -----------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| A single git repository can maintain multiple branches of
 | |
| development.  To create a new branch named "experimental", use
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git branch experimental
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you now run
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git branch
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| you'll get a list of all existing branches:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
|   experimental
 | |
| * master
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The "experimental" branch is the one you just created, and the
 | |
| "master" branch is a default branch that was created for you
 | |
| automatically.  The asterisk marks the branch you are currently on;
 | |
| type
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git checkout experimental
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| to switch to the experimental branch.  Now edit a file, commit the
 | |
| change, and switch back to the master branch:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| (edit file)
 | |
| $ git commit -a
 | |
| $ git checkout master
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Check that the change you made is no longer visible, since it was
 | |
| made on the experimental branch and you're back on the master branch.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can make a different change on the master branch:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| (edit file)
 | |
| $ git commit -a
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| at this point the two branches have diverged, with different changes
 | |
| made in each.  To merge the changes made in experimental into master, run
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git merge experimental
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If the changes don't conflict, you're done.  If there are conflicts,
 | |
| markers will be left in the problematic files showing the conflict;
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git diff
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| will show this.  Once you've edited the files to resolve the
 | |
| conflicts,
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git commit -a
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| will commit the result of the merge. Finally,
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ gitk
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| will show a nice graphical representation of the resulting history.
 | |
| 
 | |
| At this point you could delete the experimental branch with
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git branch -d experimental
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This command ensures that the changes in the experimental branch are
 | |
| already in the current branch.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you develop on a branch crazy-idea, then regret it, you can always
 | |
| delete the branch with
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git branch -D crazy-idea
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Branches are cheap and easy, so this is a good way to try something
 | |
| out.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Using git for collaboration
 | |
| ---------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Suppose that Alice has started a new project with a git repository in
 | |
| /home/alice/project, and that Bob, who has a home directory on the
 | |
| same machine, wants to contribute.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Bob begins with:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git clone /home/alice/project myrepo
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This creates a new directory "myrepo" containing a clone of Alice's
 | |
| repository.  The clone is on an equal footing with the original
 | |
| project, possessing its own copy of the original project's history.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Bob then makes some changes and commits them:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| (edit files)
 | |
| $ git commit -a
 | |
| (repeat as necessary)
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| When he's ready, he tells Alice to pull changes from the repository
 | |
| at /home/bob/myrepo.  She does this with:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ cd /home/alice/project
 | |
| $ git pull /home/bob/myrepo master
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This merges the changes from Bob's "master" branch into Alice's
 | |
| current branch.  If Alice has made her own changes in the meantime,
 | |
| then she may need to manually fix any conflicts.  (Note that the
 | |
| "master" argument in the above command is actually unnecessary, as it
 | |
| is the default.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| The "pull" command thus performs two operations: it fetches changes
 | |
| from a remote branch, then merges them into the current branch.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you are working in a small closely knit group, it is not
 | |
| unusual to interact with the same repository over and over
 | |
| again.  By defining 'remote' repository shorthand, you can make
 | |
| it easier:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git remote add bob /home/bob/myrepo
 | |
| ------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| With this, Alice can perform the first operation alone using the
 | |
| "git fetch" command without merging them with her own branch,
 | |
| using:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git fetch bob
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Unlike the longhand form, when Alice fetches from Bob using a
 | |
| remote repository shorthand set up with `git remote`, what was
 | |
| fetched is stored in a remote tracking branch, in this case
 | |
| `bob/master`.  So after this:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git log -p master..bob/master
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| shows a list of all the changes that Bob made since he branched from
 | |
| Alice's master branch.
 | |
| 
 | |
| After examining those changes, Alice
 | |
| could merge the changes into her master branch:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git merge bob/master
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This `merge` can also be done by 'pulling from her own remote
 | |
| tracking branch', like this:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git pull . remotes/bob/master
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that git pull always merges into the current branch,
 | |
| regardless of what else is given on the command line.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Later, Bob can update his repo with Alice's latest changes using
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git pull
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that he doesn't need to give the path to Alice's repository;
 | |
| when Bob cloned Alice's repository, git stored the location of her
 | |
| repository in the repository configuration, and that location is
 | |
| used for pulls:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git config --get remote.origin.url
 | |
| /home/alice/project
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| (The complete configuration created by git-clone is visible using
 | |
| "git config -l", and the linkgit:git-config[1] man page
 | |
| explains the meaning of each option.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Git also keeps a pristine copy of Alice's master branch under the
 | |
| name "origin/master":
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git branch -r
 | |
|   origin/master
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If Bob later decides to work from a different host, he can still
 | |
| perform clones and pulls using the ssh protocol:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git clone alice.org:/home/alice/project myrepo
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Alternatively, git has a native protocol, or can use rsync or http;
 | |
| see linkgit:git-pull[1] for details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Git can also be used in a CVS-like mode, with a central repository
 | |
| that various users push changes to; see linkgit:git-push[1] and
 | |
| link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS users].
 | |
| 
 | |
| Exploring history
 | |
| -----------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Git history is represented as a series of interrelated commits.  We
 | |
| have already seen that the git log command can list those commits.
 | |
| Note that first line of each git log entry also gives a name for the
 | |
| commit:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git log
 | |
| commit c82a22c39cbc32576f64f5c6b3f24b99ea8149c7
 | |
| Author: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
 | |
| Date:   Tue May 16 17:18:22 2006 -0700
 | |
| 
 | |
|     merge-base: Clarify the comments on post processing.
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| We can give this name to git show to see the details about this
 | |
| commit.
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git show c82a22c39cbc32576f64f5c6b3f24b99ea8149c7
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| But there are other ways to refer to commits.  You can use any initial
 | |
| part of the name that is long enough to uniquely identify the commit:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git show c82a22c39c	# the first few characters of the name are
 | |
| 			# usually enough
 | |
| $ git show HEAD		# the tip of the current branch
 | |
| $ git show experimental	# the tip of the "experimental" branch
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Every commit usually has one "parent" commit
 | |
| which points to the previous state of the project:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git show HEAD^  # to see the parent of HEAD
 | |
| $ git show HEAD^^ # to see the grandparent of HEAD
 | |
| $ git show HEAD~4 # to see the great-great grandparent of HEAD
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that merge commits may have more than one parent:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git show HEAD^1 # show the first parent of HEAD (same as HEAD^)
 | |
| $ git show HEAD^2 # show the second parent of HEAD
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can also give commits names of your own; after running
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git-tag v2.5 1b2e1d63ff
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| you can refer to 1b2e1d63ff by the name "v2.5".  If you intend to
 | |
| share this name with other people (for example, to identify a release
 | |
| version), you should create a "tag" object, and perhaps sign it; see
 | |
| linkgit:git-tag[1] for details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Any git command that needs to know a commit can take any of these
 | |
| names.  For example:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git diff v2.5 HEAD	 # compare the current HEAD to v2.5
 | |
| $ git branch stable v2.5 # start a new branch named "stable" based
 | |
| 			 # at v2.5
 | |
| $ git reset --hard HEAD^ # reset your current branch and working
 | |
| 			 # directory to its state at HEAD^
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Be careful with that last command: in addition to losing any changes
 | |
| in the working directory, it will also remove all later commits from
 | |
| this branch.  If this branch is the only branch containing those
 | |
| commits, they will be lost.  Also, don't use "git reset" on a
 | |
| publicly-visible branch that other developers pull from, as it will
 | |
| force needless merges on other developers to clean up the history.
 | |
| If you need to undo changes that you have pushed, use linkgit:git-revert[1]
 | |
| instead.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The git grep command can search for strings in any version of your
 | |
| project, so
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git grep "hello" v2.5
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| searches for all occurrences of "hello" in v2.5.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you leave out the commit name, git grep will search any of the
 | |
| files it manages in your current directory.  So
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git grep "hello"
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| is a quick way to search just the files that are tracked by git.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Many git commands also take sets of commits, which can be specified
 | |
| in a number of ways.  Here are some examples with git log:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git log v2.5..v2.6            # commits between v2.5 and v2.6
 | |
| $ git log v2.5..                # commits since v2.5
 | |
| $ git log --since="2 weeks ago" # commits from the last 2 weeks
 | |
| $ git log v2.5.. Makefile       # commits since v2.5 which modify
 | |
| 				# Makefile
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can also give git log a "range" of commits where the first is not
 | |
| necessarily an ancestor of the second; for example, if the tips of
 | |
| the branches "stable-release" and "master" diverged from a common
 | |
| commit some time ago, then
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git log stable..experimental
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| will list commits made in the experimental branch but not in the
 | |
| stable branch, while
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git log experimental..stable
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| will show the list of commits made on the stable branch but not
 | |
| the experimental branch.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The "git log" command has a weakness: it must present commits in a
 | |
| list.  When the history has lines of development that diverged and
 | |
| then merged back together, the order in which "git log" presents
 | |
| those commits is meaningless.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Most projects with multiple contributors (such as the linux kernel,
 | |
| or git itself) have frequent merges, and gitk does a better job of
 | |
| visualizing their history.  For example,
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ gitk --since="2 weeks ago" drivers/
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| allows you to browse any commits from the last 2 weeks of commits
 | |
| that modified files under the "drivers" directory.  (Note: you can
 | |
| adjust gitk's fonts by holding down the control key while pressing
 | |
| "-" or "+".)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Finally, most commands that take filenames will optionally allow you
 | |
| to precede any filename by a commit, to specify a particular version
 | |
| of the file:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git diff v2.5:Makefile HEAD:Makefile.in
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can also use "git show" to see any such file:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| $ git show v2.5:Makefile
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Next Steps
 | |
| ----------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This tutorial should be enough to perform basic distributed revision
 | |
| control for your projects.  However, to fully understand the depth
 | |
| and power of git you need to understand two simple ideas on which it
 | |
| is based:
 | |
| 
 | |
|   * The object database is the rather elegant system used to
 | |
|     store the history of your project--files, directories, and
 | |
|     commits.
 | |
| 
 | |
|   * The index file is a cache of the state of a directory tree,
 | |
|     used to create commits, check out working directories, and
 | |
|     hold the various trees involved in a merge.
 | |
| 
 | |
| link:tutorial-2.html[Part two of this tutorial] explains the object
 | |
| database, the index file, and a few other odds and ends that you'll
 | |
| need to make the most of git.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you don't want to continue with that right away, a few other
 | |
| digressions that may be interesting at this point are:
 | |
| 
 | |
|   * linkgit:git-format-patch[1], linkgit:git-am[1]: These convert
 | |
|     series of git commits into emailed patches, and vice versa,
 | |
|     useful for projects such as the linux kernel which rely heavily
 | |
|     on emailed patches.
 | |
| 
 | |
|   * linkgit:git-bisect[1]: When there is a regression in your
 | |
|     project, one way to track down the bug is by searching through
 | |
|     the history to find the exact commit that's to blame.  Git bisect
 | |
|     can help you perform a binary search for that commit.  It is
 | |
|     smart enough to perform a close-to-optimal search even in the
 | |
|     case of complex non-linear history with lots of merged branches.
 | |
| 
 | |
|   * link:everyday.html[Everyday GIT with 20 Commands Or So]
 | |
| 
 | |
|   * link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS users].
 |