135 lines
		
	
	
		
			4.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			135 lines
		
	
	
		
			4.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
| Like other projects, we also have some guidelines to keep to the
 | |
| code.  For git in general, three rough rules are:
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - Most importantly, we never say "It's in POSIX; we'll happily
 | |
|    ignore your needs should your system not conform to it."
 | |
|    We live in the real world.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - However, we often say "Let's stay away from that construct,
 | |
|    it's not even in POSIX".
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - In spite of the above two rules, we sometimes say "Although
 | |
|    this is not in POSIX, it (is so convenient | makes the code
 | |
|    much more readable | has other good characteristics) and
 | |
|    practically all the platforms we care about support it, so
 | |
|    let's use it".
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Again, we live in the real world, and it is sometimes a
 | |
|    judgement call, the decision based more on real world
 | |
|    constraints people face than what the paper standard says.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| As for more concrete guidelines, just imitate the existing code
 | |
| (this is a good guideline, no matter which project you are
 | |
| contributing to). It is always preferable to match the _local_
 | |
| convention. New code added to git suite is expected to match
 | |
| the overall style of existing code. Modifications to existing
 | |
| code is expected to match the style the surrounding code already
 | |
| uses (even if it doesn't match the overall style of existing code).
 | |
| 
 | |
| But if you must have a list of rules, here they are.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For shell scripts specifically (not exhaustive):
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - We prefer $( ... ) for command substitution; unlike ``, it
 | |
|    properly nests.  It should have been the way Bourne spelled
 | |
|    it from day one, but unfortunately isn't.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - We use ${parameter-word} and its [-=?+] siblings, and their
 | |
|    colon'ed "unset or null" form.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - We use ${parameter#word} and its [#%] siblings, and their
 | |
|    doubled "longest matching" form.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - We use Arithmetic Expansion $(( ... )).
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - No "Substring Expansion" ${parameter:offset:length}.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - No shell arrays.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - No strlen ${#parameter}.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - No regexp ${parameter/pattern/string}.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - We do not use Process Substitution <(list) or >(list).
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - We prefer "test" over "[ ... ]".
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - We do not write the noiseword "function" in front of shell
 | |
|    functions.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - As to use of grep, stick to a subset of BRE (namely, no \{m,n\},
 | |
|    [::], [==], nor [..]) for portability.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    - We do not use \{m,n\};
 | |
| 
 | |
|    - We do not use -E;
 | |
| 
 | |
|    - We do not use ? nor + (which are \{0,1\} and \{1,\}
 | |
|      respectively in BRE) but that goes without saying as these
 | |
|      are ERE elements not BRE (note that \? and \+ are not even part
 | |
|      of BRE -- making them accessible from BRE is a GNU extension).
 | |
| 
 | |
| For C programs:
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - We use tabs to indent, and interpret tabs as taking up to
 | |
|    8 spaces.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - We try to keep to at most 80 characters per line.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - When declaring pointers, the star sides with the variable
 | |
|    name, i.e. "char *string", not "char* string" or
 | |
|    "char * string".  This makes it easier to understand code
 | |
|    like "char *string, c;".
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - We avoid using braces unnecessarily.  I.e.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	if (bla) {
 | |
| 		x = 1;
 | |
| 	}
 | |
| 
 | |
|    is frowned upon.  A gray area is when the statement extends
 | |
|    over a few lines, and/or you have a lengthy comment atop of
 | |
|    it.  Also, like in the Linux kernel, if there is a long list
 | |
|    of "else if" statements, it can make sense to add braces to
 | |
|    single line blocks.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - We try to avoid assignments inside if().
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - Try to make your code understandable.  You may put comments
 | |
|    in, but comments invariably tend to stale out when the code
 | |
|    they were describing changes.  Often splitting a function
 | |
|    into two makes the intention of the code much clearer.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - Double negation is often harder to understand than no negation
 | |
|    at all.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - Some clever tricks, like using the !! operator with arithmetic
 | |
|    constructs, can be extremely confusing to others.  Avoid them,
 | |
|    unless there is a compelling reason to use them.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - Use the API.  No, really.  We have a strbuf (variable length
 | |
|    string), several arrays with the ALLOC_GROW() macro, a
 | |
|    string_list for sorted string lists, a hash map (mapping struct
 | |
|    objects) named "struct decorate", amongst other things.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - When you come up with an API, document it.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - The first #include in C files, except in platform specific
 | |
|    compat/ implementations, should be git-compat-util.h or another
 | |
|    header file that includes it, such as cache.h or builtin.h.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - If you are planning a new command, consider writing it in shell
 | |
|    or perl first, so that changes in semantics can be easily
 | |
|    changed and discussed.  Many git commands started out like
 | |
|    that, and a few are still scripts.
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - Avoid introducing a new dependency into git. This means you
 | |
|    usually should stay away from scripting languages not already
 | |
|    used in the git core command set (unless your command is clearly
 | |
|    separate from it, such as an importer to convert random-scm-X
 | |
|    repositories to git).
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - When we pass <string, length> pair to functions, we should try to
 | |
|    pass them in that order.
 |