A policy document that describes platform support levels and
expectation on platform stakeholders has been introduced.
* es/doc-platform-support-policy:
Documentation: add platform support policy
Supporting many platforms is only possible when we have the right tools to
ensure that support.
Teach platform maintainers how they can help us to help them, by
explaining what kind of tooling support we would like to have, and what
level of support becomes available as a result. Provide examples so that
platform maintainers can see what we're asking for in practice.
With this policy in place, we can make changes with stronger assurance
that we are not breaking anybody we promised not to. Instead, we can
feel confident that our existing testing and integration practices
protect those who care from breakage.
Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Work around asciidoctor's css that renders `monospace` material
in the SYNOPSIS section of manual pages as block elements.
* js/doc-markup-updates-fix:
Doc: fix Asciidoctor css workaround
asciidoctor: fix `synopsis` rendering
The previous step introduced docinfo.html to be used to tweak the
CSS used by the asciidoctor, that by default renders <code> inside
<pre> as a block element, breaking the SYNOPSIS section of a few
pages that adopted a new convention we use since Git 2.45.
But in this project, HTML files are all generated. We do not force
any human to write HTML by hand, which is an unusual and cruel
punishment. "*.html" is in the .gitignore file, and "make clean"
removes them. Having a tracked .html file makes "make clean" make
the tree dirty by removing the tracked docinfo.html file.
Let's do an obvious, minimum and stupid workaround to generate that
file at runtime instead. The mark-up is being rethought in a major
way for the next development cycle, and the CSS workaround we added
in the previous step may have to adjusted, possibly in a large way,
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 76880f0510 (doc: git-clone: apply new documentation formatting
guidelines, 2024-03-29), the synopsis of `git clone`'s manual page is
rendered differently than before; Its parent commit did the same for
`git init`.
The result looks quite nice. When rendered with AsciiDoc, that is. When
rendered using AsciiDoctor and displayed in a graphical web browser such
as Firefox, Chrome, Edge, etc, the result is quite unpleasant to my eye,
reading something like this:
SYNOPSIS
git clone
[
--template=
<template-directory>]
[
-l
] [
-s
] [
--no-hardlinks
] [
-q
] [
[... continuing like this ...]
The reason is that AsciiDoctor's default style sheet contains this (see
https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor/blob/854923b15533/src/stylesheets/asciidoctor.css#L519-L521
for context):
pre > code {
display: block;
}
It is this `display: block` that forces the parts that are enclosed in
`<code>` tags (such as the `git clone` or the `--template=` part) to be
rendered on their own line.
Side note: This seems not to affect console web browsers like `lynx` or
`w3m`, most likely because most style sheet directions cannot be
respected in text terminals and therefore they seem to punt on style
sheets altogether.
To fix this, let's apply the method recommended by AsciiDoctor in
https://docs.asciidoctor.org/asciidoctor/latest/html-backend/default-stylesheet/#customize-docinfo
to partially override AsciiDoctor's default style sheet so that the
`<code>` sections of the synopsis are no longer each rendered on their
own, individual lines.
This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/5063.
Even on the Git home page, where AsciiDoctor's default stylesheet is
_not_ used, this change resulted in some unpleasant rendering where not
only the font is changed for the `<code>` sections of the synopsis, but
padding and a different background color make the visual impression
quite uneven. This has been addressed in the meantime, via
https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/commit/a492d0565512.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The pseudo-merge reachability bitmap to help more efficient storage
of the reachability bitmap in a repository with too many refs has
been added.
* tb/pseudo-merge-reachability-bitmap: (26 commits)
pack-bitmap.c: ensure pseudo-merge offset reads are bounded
Documentation/technical/bitmap-format.txt: add missing position table
t/perf: implement performance tests for pseudo-merge bitmaps
pseudo-merge: implement support for finding existing merges
ewah: `bitmap_equals_ewah()`
pack-bitmap: extra trace2 information
pack-bitmap.c: use pseudo-merges during traversal
t/test-lib-functions.sh: support `--notick` in `test_commit_bulk()`
pack-bitmap: implement test helpers for pseudo-merge
ewah: implement `ewah_bitmap_popcount()`
pseudo-merge: implement support for reading pseudo-merge commits
pack-bitmap.c: read pseudo-merge extension
pseudo-merge: scaffolding for reads
pack-bitmap: extract `read_bitmap()` function
pack-bitmap-write.c: write pseudo-merge table
pseudo-merge: implement support for selecting pseudo-merge commits
config: introduce `git_config_double()`
pack-bitmap: make `bitmap_writer_push_bitmapped_commit()` public
pack-bitmap: implement `bitmap_writer_has_bitmapped_object_id()`
pack-bitmap-write: support storing pseudo-merge commits
...
The "check-docs" target of our top-level Makefile fulfills two different
roles. For one it runs the "lint-docs" target of the "Documentation/"
Makefile. And second it performs some checks of whether there are any
manpages that are missing or extraneous via some inline scripts.
The second set of checks feels quite misplaced in the top-level Makefile
as it would fit in much better with our "lint-docs" target. Back when
the checks were introduced in 8c989ec528 (Makefile: $(MAKE) check-docs,
2006-04-13), that target did not yet exist though.
Furthermore, the script makes use of several Makefile variables which
are defined in the top-level Makefile, which makes it hard to access
their contents from elsewhere. There is a trick though that we already
use in "check-builtins.sh" to gain access: we can create an ad-hoc
Makefile that has an extra target to print those variables.
Pull out the script into a separate "lint-manpages.sh" script by using
that trick. Wire up that script via the "lint-docs" target. For one,
normal shell scripts are way easier to reason about than those which are
embedded in a Makefile. Second, it allows one to easily execute the
script standalone without any of the other checks.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce a new manual page, gitpacking(7) to collect useful information
about advanced packing concepts in Git.
In future commits in this series, this manual page will expand to
describe the new pseudo-merge bitmaps feature, as well as include
examples, relevant configuration bits, use-cases, and so on.
Outside of this series, this manual page may absorb similar pieces from
other parts of Git's documentation about packing.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The Git project currently operates according to an informal
consensus-building process, which is currently described in the
SubmittingPatches document. However, that focuses on small/medium-scale
patch series. For larger-scale decisions, the process is not as well
described. Document what to expect so that we have something concrete to
help inform newcomers to the project.
This document explicitly does not aim to impose a formal process to
decision-making, nor to change pre-existing norms. Its only aim is to
describe how the project currently operates today.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In our current testing environment, we spend a significant amount of
effort crafting end-to-end tests for error conditions that could easily
be captured by unit tests (or we simply forgo some hard-to-setup and
rare error conditions). Describe what we hope to accomplish by
implementing unit tests, and explain some open questions and milestones.
Discuss desired features for test frameworks/harnesses, and provide a
comparison of several different frameworks. Finally, document our
rationale for implementing a custom framework.
Co-authored-by: Calvin Wan <calvinwan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Calvin Wan <calvinwan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
manpages expect the date of the last revision, if that is not found
DocBook Stylesheets go through a series of hacks to generate one with
the format `%d/%d/%Y` which is not ideal.
In addition to this format not being standard, different tools generate
dates with different formats.
There's no need for any confusion if we specify the revision date, so
let's do so.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The hacks to add version information to the man pages comes from 2007
7ef195ba3e (Documentation: Add version information to man pages,
2007-03-25). In that code we passed three fields to DocBook Stylesheets:
`source`, `version`, and `manual`, however, all the stylesheets do is
join the strings `source` and `version` [1].
Their own documentation explains that in pracice the source is just a
combination of two fields [2]:
In practice, there are many pages that simply have a version number in
the "source" field.
Splitting that information might have seemed more proper in 2007, but it
not achieve anything in practice.
Asciidoctor had support for this information in their manpage backend
since day 1: v1.5.3 (2015), but it didn't include the version. In the
docbook5 backend they did in v1.5.7 (2018), but again: no version.
There is no need for us to demand that that they add support for the
version field when in reality all that is going to happen is that both
fields are going to be joined.
Let's do that ourselves so we can forget about all our hacks for this
and so it works for both asciidoc.py, and docbook5 and manpage backends
of asciidoctor.
[1] https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets/blob/master/xsl/common/refentry.xsl#L545
[2] https://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/doc/common/template.get.refentry.source.html
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 50d9bbba92 (Documentation: Avoid use of xmlto --stringparam,
2009-12-04) introduced manpage-base-url.xsl because ancient versions of
xmlto did not have --stringparam.
However, that was more than ten years ago, no need for that complexity
anymore, we can just use --stringparam.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 2007 the docbook project made the mistake of converting ' to \' for
man pages [1]. It's a problem because groff interprets \' as acute
accent which is rendered as ' in ASCII, but as ´ in utf-8.
This started a cascade of bug reports in git [2], debian [3], Arch Linux
[4], docbook itself [5], and probably many others.
A solution was to use the correct groff character: \(aq, which is always
rendered as ', but the problem is that such character doesn't work in
other troff programs.
A portable solution required the use of a conditional character that is
\(aq in groff, but ' in all others:
.ie \n(.g .ds Aq \(aq
.el .ds Aq '
The proper solution took time to be implemented in docbook, but in 2010
they did it [6]. So the docbook man page stylesheets were broken from
1.73 to 1.76.
Unfortunately by that point many workarounds already existed. In the
case of git, GNU_ROFF was introduced, and in the case of Arch Linux
a mapping from \' to ' was added to groff's man.local. Other
distributions might have done the same, or similar workarounds.
Since 2010 there is no need for this workaround, which is fixed
elsewhere, not just in docbook, but other layers as well.
Let's remove it.
[1] ea2a0bac56
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20091012102926.GA3937@debian.b2j/
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507673#65
[4] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9643
[5] https://sourceforge.net/p/docbook/bugs/1022/
[6] fb55343426
Inspired-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A GNU make pattern rule with multiple targets has always meant that
a single invocation of the recipe will build all the targets.
However in older versions of GNU make a recipe that did not really
build all the targets would be tolerated.
Starting with GNU make 4.4 this behavior is deprecated and pattern
rules are expected to generate files to match all the patterns.
If not all targets are created then GNU make will not consider any
target up to date and will re-run the recipe when it is run again.
Modify Documentation/Makefile to split the man page-creating pattern
rule into a separate pattern rule for each pattern.
Reported-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Smith <psmith@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
During the initial development of the fsck-msgids.txt feature, it
has become apparent that it is very much error prone to make sure
the description in the documentation file are sorted and correctly
match what is in the fsck.h header file.
Add a quick-and-dirty Perl script and doc-lint target to sanity
check that the fsck-msgids.txt is consistent with the error type
list in the fsck.h header file.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a reviewing guidelines document including advice and common terminology
used in Git mailing list reviews. The document is included in the
'TECH_DOCS' list in order to include it in Git's published documentation.
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Hoist the remainder of "scalar" out of contrib/ to the main part of
the codebase.
* vd/scalar-to-main:
Documentation/technical: include Scalar technical doc
t/perf: add 'GIT_PERF_USE_SCALAR' run option
t/perf: add Scalar performance tests
scalar-clone: add test coverage
scalar: add to 'git help -a' command list
scalar: implement the `help` subcommand
git help: special-case `scalar`
scalar: include in standard Git build & installation
scalar: fix command documentation section header
Share the text used to explain configuration variables used by "git
<subcmd>" in "git help <subcmd>" with the text from "git help config".
* ab/dedup-config-and-command-docs:
docs: add CONFIGURATION sections that fuzzy map to built-ins
docs: add CONFIGURATION sections that map to a built-in
log docs: de-duplicate configuration sections
difftool docs: de-duplicate configuration sections
notes docs: de-duplicate and combine configuration sections
apply docs: de-duplicate configuration sections
send-email docs: de-duplicate configuration sections
grep docs: de-duplicate configuration sections
docs: add and use include template for config/* includes
In b6a8d09f6d (gc docs: include the "gc.*" section from "config" in
"gc", 2019-04-07) the "git gc" documentation was made to include the
config/gc.txt in its "CONFIGURATION" section. We do that in several
other places, but "git gc" was the only one with a blurb above the
include to orient the reader.
We don't want readers to carefully scrutinize "git-config(1)" and
"git-gc(1)" looking for discrepancies, instead we should tell them
that the latter includes a part of the former.
This change formalizes that wording in two new templates to be
included, one for the "git gc" case where the entire section is
included from "git-config(1)", and another for when the inclusion of
"git-config(1)" follows discussion unique to that documentation. In
order to use that re-arrange the order of those being discussed in the
"git-merge(1)" documentation.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Include 'Documentation/technical/scalar.txt' alongside the other HTML
technical docs when installing them.
Now that the document is intended as a widely-accessible reference, remove
the internal work-in-progress roadmap from the document. Those details
should no longer be needed to guide Scalar's development and, if they were
left, they could fall out-of-date and be misleading to readers.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Move 'scalar' out of 'contrib/' and into the root of the Git tree. The goal
of this change is to build 'scalar' as part of the standard Git build &
install processes.
This patch includes both the physical move of Scalar's files out of
'contrib/' ('scalar.c', 'scalar.txt', and 't9xxx-scalar.sh'), and the
changes to the build definitions in 'Makefile' and 'CMakelists.txt' to
accommodate the new program.
At a high level, Scalar is built so that:
- there is a 'scalar-objs' target (similar to those created in 029bac01a8
(Makefile: add {program,xdiff,test,git,fuzz}-objs & objects targets,
2021-02-23)) for debugging purposes.
- it appears in the root of the install directory (rather than the
gitexecdir).
- it is included in the 'bin-wrappers/' directory for use in tests.
- it receives a platform-specific executable suffix (e.g., '.exe'), if
applicable.
- 'scalar.txt' is installed as 'man1' documentation.
- the 'clean' target removes the 'scalar' executable.
Additionally, update the root level '.gitignore' file to ignore the Scalar
executable.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce the idea of bundle URIs to the Git codebase through an
aspirational design document. This document includes the full design
intended to include the feature in its fully-implemented form. This will
take several steps as detailed in the Implementation Plan section.
By committing this document now, it can be used to motivate changes
necessary to reach these final goals. The design can still be altered as
new information is discovered.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Continue the move of existing Documentation/technical/* protocol and
file-format documentation into our main documentation space by moving
the http-protocol.txt documentation over. I'm renaming it to
"protocol-http" to be consistent with other things in the new
gitformat-protocol-* namespace.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Integrate the cruft packs documentation initially added in
3d89a8c118 (Documentation/technical: add cruft-packs.txt, 2022-05-20)
to the newly created "gitformat-pack" documentation.
Like the "bitmap-format" added before it in
0d4455a3ab (documentation: add documentation for the bitmap format,
2013-11-14) the "cruft-packs" were documented in their own file.
As the diff move detection will show there is no change to
"Documentation/technical/cruft-packs.txt" here except to move it, and
to "indent" the existing sections by adding an extra "=" to them.
We could similarly convert the "bitmap-format.txt", but let's leave it
for now due to a conflict with the in-flight ac/bitmap-lookup-table
series.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Continue the move of existing Documentation/technical/* protocol and
file-format documentation into our main documentation space by moving
the various documentation pertaining to the *.pack format and related
files, and updating things that refer to it to link to the new
location.
By moving these we can properly link from the newly created
gitformat-commit-graph to a gitformat-chunk-format page.
Integrating "Documentation/technical/bitmap-format.txt" and
"Documentation/technical/cruft-packs.txt" might logically be part of
this change, but as those cover parts of the wider "pack
format" (including associated files) that's documented outside of
"Documentation/technical/pack-format.txt" let's leave those for now,
subsequent commit(s) will address those.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Continue the move of existing Documentation/technical/* protocol and
file-format documentation into our main documentation space by moving
the signature format documentation.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Continue the move of existing Documentation/technical/* protocol and
file-format documentation into our main documentation space by moving
the index format documentation.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Continue the move of existing Documentation/technical/* protocol and
file-format documentation into our main documentation space. By moving
the things that discuss the protocol we can properly link from
e.g. lsrefs.unborn and protocol.version documentation to a manpage we
build by default.
So far we have been using the "gitformat-" prefix for the
documentation we've been moving over from Documentation/technical/*,
but for protocol documentation let's use "gitprotocol-*".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Continue the move of existing Documentation/technical/* protocol and
file-format documentation into our main documentation space.
By moving the documentation for the commit-graph format into man
section 5 and the new "developerinterfaces" category. This change is
split from subsequent commits due to the relatively large amount of
ASCIIDOC formatting changes that are required.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Create a new "File formats, protocols and other developer interfaces"
section in the main "git help git" manual page and start moving the
documentation that now lives in "Documentation/technical/*.git" over
to it. This complements the newly added and adjacent "Repository,
command and file interfaces" section.
This makes the technical documentation more accessible and
discoverable. Before this we wouldn't install it by default, and had
no ability to build man page versions of them. The links to them from
our existing documentation link to the generated HTML version of these
docs.
So let's start moving those over, starting with just the
"bundle-format.txt" documentation added in 7378ec90e1 (doc: describe
Git bundle format, 2020-02-07). We'll now have a new
gitformat-bundle(5) man page. Subsequent commits will move more git
internal format documentation over.
Unfortunately the syntax of the current Documentation/technical/*.txt
is not the same (when it comes to section headings etc.) as our
Documentation/*.txt documentation, so change the relevant bits of
syntax as we're moving this over.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Create a new "Repository, command and file interfaces" section in the
main "git help git" manual page. Move things that belong under this
new criteria from the generic "Guides" section.
The "Guides" section was added in f442f28a81 (git.txt: add list of
guides, 2020-08-05). It makes sense to have e.g. "giteveryday(7)" and
"gitfaq(7)" listed under "Guides".
But placing e.g. "gitignore(5)" in it is stretching the meaning of
what a "guide" is, ideally that section should list things similar to
"giteveryday(7)" and "gitcore-tutorial(7)".
An alternate name that was considered for this new section was "User
formats", for consistency with the nomenclature used for man section 5
in general. My man(1) lists it as "File formats and conventions,
e.g. /etc/passwd".
So calling this "git help --formats" or "git help --user-formats"
would make sense for e.g. gitignore(5), but would be stretching it
somewhat for githooks(5), and would seem really suspect for the likes
of gitcli(7).
Let's instead pick a name that's closer to the generic term "User
interface", which is really what this documentation discusses: General
user-interface documentation that doesn't obviously belong elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Adjust technical/bitmap-format to be formatted by AsciiDoc, and
add some missing information to the documentation.
source: <pull.1246.v4.git.1655355834.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
* ac/bitmap-format-doc:
bitmap-format.txt: add information for trailing checksum
bitmap-format.txt: fix some formatting issues
bitmap-format.txt: feed the file to asciidoc to generate html
Adjust technical/bitmap-format to be formatted by AsciiDoc, and
add some missing information to the documentation.
* ac/bitmap-format-doc:
bitmap-format.txt: add information for trailing checksum
bitmap-format.txt: fix some formatting issues
bitmap-format.txt: feed the file to asciidoc to generate html
Documentation/Makefile does not include bitmap-format.txt to generate
a html page using asciidoc.
Teach Documentation/Makefile to also generate a html page for
Documentation/technical/bitmap-format.txt file.
Signed-off-by: Abhradeep Chakraborty <chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A mechanism to pack unreachable objects into a "cruft pack",
instead of ejecting them into loose form to be reclaimed later, has
been introduced.
* tb/cruft-packs:
sha1-file.c: don't freshen cruft packs
builtin/gc.c: conditionally avoid pruning objects via loose
builtin/repack.c: add cruft packs to MIDX during geometric repack
builtin/repack.c: use named flags for existing_packs
builtin/repack.c: allow configuring cruft pack generation
builtin/repack.c: support generating a cruft pack
builtin/pack-objects.c: --cruft with expiration
reachable: report precise timestamps from objects in cruft packs
reachable: add options to add_unseen_recent_objects_to_traversal
builtin/pack-objects.c: --cruft without expiration
builtin/pack-objects.c: return from create_object_entry()
t/helper: add 'pack-mtimes' test-tool
pack-mtimes: support writing pack .mtimes files
chunk-format.h: extract oid_version()
pack-write: pass 'struct packing_data' to 'stage_tmp_packfiles'
pack-mtimes: support reading .mtimes files
Documentation/technical: add cruft-packs.txt
Create a technical document to explain cruft packs. It contains a brief
overview of the problem, some background, details on the implementation,
and a couple of alternative approaches not considered here.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reimplement "vimdiff[123]" mergetool drivers with a more generic
layout mechanism.
* fr/vimdiff-layout:
mergetools: add description to all diff/merge tools
vimdiff: add tool documentation
vimdiff: integrate layout tests in the unit tests framework ('t' folder)
vimdiff: new implementation with layout support
This document gathers tips, scripts and configuration file to help
people working on Git’s codebase use their favorite tools while
following Git’s coding style.
Move the part about Emacs configuration from CodingGuidelines to
ToolsForGit.txt because it's the purpose of the new file centralize the
information about tools.
But, add a mention to Documentation/ToolsForGit.txt in CodingGuidelines
because there is also information about the coding style in it.
Helped-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@univ-lyon1.fr>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: COGONI Guillaume <cogoni.guillaume@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a regression in my dad9cd7d51 (Makefile: move ".SUFFIXES" rule to
shared.mak, 2022-03-03). As explained in the GNU make documentation
for the $* variable, available at:
info make --index-search='$*'
This rule relied on ".texi" being in the default list of suffixes, as
seen at:
make -f/dev/null -p | grep -v -e ^# -e ^$|grep -F .SUFFIXES
The documentation explains what was going on here:
In an explicit rule, there is no stem; so '$*' cannot be determined
in that way. Instead, if the target name ends with a recognized
suffix (*note Old-Fashioned Suffix Rules: Suffix Rules.), '$*' is
set to the target name minus the suffix. For example, if the
target name is 'foo.c', then '$*' is set to 'foo', since '.c' is a
suffix. GNU 'make' does this bizarre thing only for compatibility
with other implementations of 'make'. You should generally avoid
using '$*' except in implicit rules or static pattern rules.
If the target name in an explicit rule does not end with a
recognized suffix, '$*' is set to the empty string for that rule.
I.e. this rule added back in 5cefc33bff (Documentation: add
gitman.info target, 2007-12-10) was resolving gitman.texi from
gitman.info. We can instead just use the more obvious $< variable
referring to the prerequisite.
This was the only use of $* in our Makefiles in an explicit rule, the
three remaining ones are all implicit rules, and therefore didn't
depend on the ".SUFFIXES" list.
Reported-by: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Running 'git {merge,diff}tool --tool-help' now also prints usage
information about the vimdiff tool (and its variants) instead of just
its name.
Two new functions ('diff_cmd_help()' and 'merge_cmd_help()') have been
added to the set of functions that each merge tool (ie. scripts found
inside "mergetools/") can overwrite to provided tool specific
information.
Right now, only 'mergetools/vimdiff' implements these functions, but
other tools are encouraged to do so in the future, specially if they
take configuration options not explained anywhere else (as it is the
case with the 'vimdiff' tool and the new 'layout' option)
Note that the function 'show_tool_names', used in the implementation of
'git mergetool --tool-help', is also used in Documentation/Makefile to
generate the list of allowed values for the configuration variables
'{diff,merge}.{gui,}tool'. Adjust the rule so its output is an Asciidoc
"description list" instead of a plain list, with the tool name as the
item and the newly added tool description as the description.
In addition, a section has been added to
"Documentation/git-mergetool.txt" to explain the new "layout"
configuration option with examples.
Helped-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fernando Ramos <greenfoo@u92.eu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a template to do the "mkdir -p" of $(@D) (the parent dir of $@)
for us, and use it for the "make lint-docs" targets I added in
8650c6298c (doc lint: make "lint-docs" non-.PHONY, 2021-10-15).
As seen in 4c64fb5aad (Documentation/Makefile: fix lint-docs mkdir
dependency, 2021-10-26) maintaining these manual lists of parent
directory dependencies is fragile, in addition to being obviously
verbose.
I used this pattern at the time because I couldn't find another method
than "order-only" prerequisites to avoid doing a "mkdir -p $(@D)" for
every file being created, which as noted in [1] would be significantly
slower.
But as it turns out we can use this neat trick of only doing a "mkdir
-p" if the $(wildcard) macro tells us the path doesn't exist. A re-run
of a performance test similar to that noted downthread of [1] in [2]
shows that this is faster, in addition to being less verbose and more
reliable (this uses my "git-hyperfine" thin wrapper for "hyperfine"[3]):
$ git -c hyperfine.hook.setup= hyperfine -L rev HEAD~1,HEAD~0 -s 'make -C Documentation lint-docs' -p 'rm -rf Documentation/.build' 'make -C Documentation -j1 lint-docs'
Benchmark 1: make -C Documentation -j1 lint-docs' in 'HEAD~1
Time (mean ± σ): 2.914 s ± 0.062 s [User: 2.449 s, System: 0.489 s]
Range (min … max): 2.834 s … 3.020 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: make -C Documentation -j1 lint-docs' in 'HEAD~0
Time (mean ± σ): 2.315 s ± 0.062 s [User: 1.950 s, System: 0.386 s]
Range (min … max): 2.229 s … 2.397 s 10 runs
Summary
'make -C Documentation -j1 lint-docs' in 'HEAD~0' ran
1.26 ± 0.04 times faster than 'make -C Documentation -j1 lint-docs' in 'HEAD~1'
So let's use that pattern both for the "lint-docs" target, and a few
miscellaneous other targets.
This method of creating parent directories is explicitly racy in that
we don't know if we're going to say always create a "foo" followed by
a "foo/bar" under parallelism, or skip the "foo" because we created
"foo/bar" first. In this case it doesn't matter for anything except
that we aren't guaranteed to get the same number of rules firing when
running make in parallel.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/211028.861r45y3pt.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/
2. https://lore.kernel.org/git/211028.86o879vvtp.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/
3. https://gitlab.com/avar/git-hyperfine/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The $(QUIET) variables we define are largely duplicated between our
various Makefiles, let's define them in the new "shared.mak" instead.
Since we're not using the environment to pass these around we don't
need to export the "QUIET_GEN" and "QUIET_BUILT_IN" variables
anymore. The "QUIET_GEN" variable is used in "git-gui/Makefile" and
"gitweb/Makefile", but they've got their own definition for those. The
"QUIET_BUILT_IN" variable is only used in the top-level "Makefile". We
still need to export the "V" variable.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have various behavior that's shared across our Makefiles, or that
really should be (e.g. via defined templates). Let's create a
top-level "shared.mak" to house those sorts of things, and start by
adding the ".DELETE_ON_ERROR" flag to it.
See my own 7b76d6bf22 (Makefile: add and use the ".DELETE_ON_ERROR"
flag, 2021-06-29) and db10fc6c09 (doc: simplify Makefile using
.DELETE_ON_ERROR, 2021-05-21) for the addition and use of the
".DELETE_ON_ERROR" flag.
I.e. this changes the behavior of existing rules in the altered
Makefiles (except "Makefile" & "Documentation/Makefile"). I'm
confident that this is safe having read the relevant rules in those
Makfiles, and as the GNU make manual notes that it isn't the default
behavior is out of an abundance of backwards compatibility
caution. From edition 0.75 of its manual, covering GNU make 4.3:
[Enabling '.DELETE_ON_ERROR' is] almost always what you want
'make' to do, but it is not historical practice; so for
compatibility, you must explicitly request it.
This doesn't introduce a bug by e.g. having this
".DELETE_ON_ERROR" flag only apply to this new shared.mak, Makefiles
have no such scoping semantics.
It does increase the danger that any Makefile without an explicit "The
default target of this Makefile is..." snippet to define the default
target as "all" could have its default rule changed if our new
shared.mak ever defines a "real" rule. In subsequent commits we'll be
careful not to do that, and such breakage would be obvious e.g. in the
case of "make -C t".
We might want to make that less fragile still (e.g. by using
".DEFAULT_GOAL" as noted in the preceding commit), but for now let's
simply include "shared.mak" without adding that boilerplate to all the
Makefiles that don't have it already. Most of those are already
exposed to that potential caveat e.g. due to including "config.mak*".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Junio C Hamano