kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

21965 Commits

6 Branches

36 Tags

131 MiB

Tree: ea28baed79

Commit Graph

Author SHA1 Message Date

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Thomas Rast	2179870803	combined diff: correctly handle truncated file Consider an evil merge of two commits A and B, both of which have a file 'foo', but the merge result does not have that file. The combined-diff code learned in `4462731` (combine-diff: do not punt on removed or added files., 2006-02-06) to concisely show only the removal, since that is the evil part and the previous contents are presumably uninteresting. However, to diagnose an empty merge result, it overloaded the variable that holds the file's length. This means that the check also triggers for truncated files. Consequently, such files were not shown in the diff at all despite the merge being clearly evil. Fix this by adding a new variable that distinguishes whether the file was deleted (which is the case `4462731` handled) or truncated. In the truncated case, we show the full combined diff again, which is rather spammy but at least does not hide the evilness. Reported-by: David Martínez Martí <desarrollo@gestiweb.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Junio C Hamano	df3dac3758	tests: update tests that used to fail "diff --cc" output t4038 tests was fixed by `b810cbb` (diff --cc: a lost line at the beginning of the file is shown incorrectly, 2009-07-22), which was actually the commit that introduced this test.. An error in "git merge -s resolve" t6035 tests was fixed by `730f728` (unpack-trees.c: look ahead in the index, 2009-09-20). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Junio C Hamano	b810cbbde9	diff --cc: a lost line at the beginning of the file is shown incorrectly When combine-diff inspected the diff from one parent to the merge result, it misinterpreted a header in the form @@ -l,k +0,0 @@. This hunk header means that K lines were removed from the beginning of the file, so the lost lines must be queued to the sline that represents the first line of the merge result, but we incremented our pointer incorrectly and ended up queuing it to the second line, which in turn made the lossage appear _after_ the first line. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago

Thomas Rast

2179870803

combined diff: correctly handle truncated file

Consider an evil merge of two commits A and B, both of which have a
file 'foo', but the merge result does not have that file.

The combined-diff code learned in 4462731 (combine-diff: do not punt
on removed or added files., 2006-02-06) to concisely show only the
removal, since that is the evil part and the previous contents are
presumably uninteresting.

However, to diagnose an empty merge result, it overloaded the variable
that holds the file's length.  This means that the check also triggers
for truncated files.  Consequently, such files were not shown in the
diff at all despite the merge being clearly evil.

Fix this by adding a new variable that distinguishes whether the file
was deleted (which is the case 4462731 handled) or truncated.  In the
truncated case, we show the full combined diff again, which is rather
spammy but at least does not hide the evilness.

Reported-by: David Martínez Martí <desarrollo@gestiweb.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

15 years ago

Junio C Hamano

df3dac3758

tests: update tests that used to fail

"diff --cc" output t4038 tests was fixed by b810cbb (diff --cc: a lost
line at the beginning of the file is shown incorrectly, 2009-07-22), which
was actually the commit that introduced this test..

An error in "git merge -s resolve" t6035 tests was fixed by 730f728
(unpack-trees.c: look ahead in the index, 2009-09-20).

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

15 years ago

Junio C Hamano

b810cbbde9

diff --cc: a lost line at the beginning of the file is shown incorrectly

When combine-diff inspected the diff from one parent to the merge result,
it misinterpreted a header in the form @@ -l,k +0,0 @@.

This hunk header means that K lines were removed from the beginning of the
file, so the lost lines must be queued to the sline that represents the
first line of the merge result, but we incremented our pointer incorrectly
and ended up queuing it to the second line, which in turn made the lossage
appear _after_ the first line.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

16 years ago

3 Commits (ea28baed79981e065a5a6d39323c4fb7d2b51685)