RPM build broke with "File not found" error on git-gui.1 and git-citool.1
They actually are git-gui.1.gz and git-citool.1.gz
Signed-off-by: Quy Tonthat <qtonthat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jakub Narebski pointed out that the git-gui blame viewer is not a
widely known feature, but is incredibly useful. Part of the issue
is advertising. Up until now we haven't even referenced git-gui from
within the core Git manual pages, mostly because I just wasn't sure
how I wanted to supply git-gui documentation to end-users, or how
that documentation should integrate with the core Git documentation.
Based upon Jakub's comment that many users may not even know that
the gui is available in a stock Git distribution I'm offering up
two basic manual pages: git-citool and git-gui. These should offer
enough of a starting point for users to identify that the gui exists,
and how to start it. Future releases of git-gui may contain their
own documentation system available from within a running git-gui.
But not today.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This uses "git-apply --whitespace=strip" to fix whitespace errors that have
crept in to our source files over time. There are a few files that need
to have trailing whitespaces (most notably, test vectors). The results
still passes the test, and build result in Documentation/ area is unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Not only that they are interesting to users, some of the
files are linked to by the included "Git User's Manual"
Signed-off-by: Quy Tonthat <qtonthat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
RPM packages did not include howto files which causes broken
links in howto-index.html
Signed-off-by: Quy Tonthat <qtonthat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
We don't have a copy of subprocess.py anymore, so we removed that
option from the Makefile. Let's not leave that cruft around the RPM
spec file either.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If not, the binaries get built once with the correct CFLAGS, and then again
with the ones in the Makefile when installing
Signed-off-by: Horst H. von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Now that we have git-merge-file, an RCS merge lookalike, we no longer
need it. So long, merge, and thanks for all the fish!
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Grabbing anything that had *arch* in its name into git-arch
package was a wrong idea and we lost git-archive from git-core
by mistake.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Install it as a vendor package. Remove .packlist, perllocal.pod,
Git.bs. Require perl(Error) for building so that our Error.pm is not
installed.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
After 567ffeb772 and
4bc87a28be, git-send-email no
longer requires any non-standard Perl modules, so there's no
reason to special-case it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
After 567ffeb772 and
4bc87a28be, git-send-email no
longer requires any non-standard Perl modules, so there's no
reason to special-case it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This patch renames the tarball "git" rather than "git-core", and changes
the names of various packages from git-core-foo to git-foo. git-core is
still the true core package; an empty RPM package named "git" pulls in
ALL the git packages -- this makes updates work correctly, and allows
"yum install git" to do the obvious thing.
It also renames the git-(core-)tk package to gitk.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I don't want to have to install x11-libs and all it's dependencies on
my headless machines, so this patch splits gitk out of the RPM.
The .deb already appears to have gitk split out.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Matysik <thomas@matysik.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Some specfile cleanups after the split.
- zlib dependency fix, current method is inconsistent, you can
potentially build a package that you can't install on machine you
built it on
- Add proper defattr
- Remove trailing '.' in summary
- Add docs to split up packages
- Add git-core dependency for each subpackage
- Move arch import to separate package as well
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Update git-core spec file based on feedback from Fedora Extras review.
- update BuildRoot to be more specific
- eliminate Requires that must be satisfied for base system install
- drop Vendor
- use dist tag to differentiate between branches
- own %{_datadir}/git-core/
- use RPM_OPT_FLAGS in spec file
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
There are several undocumented dependencies in the .spec and in the
INSTALL files. The following is from Fedora, perhaps other RPM
distributions call the packages differently.
Also, the manpages aren't always installed gzipped.
Updates to git-core.spec.in file:
- Some git scripts use Perl
- gitk needs wish, which is part of TCL/Tk.
- curl is used all over
- Need the ssh program from openssh-clients
Updates to INSTALL:
- Mention wish
- Mention ssh
Signed-off-by: Horst H. von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
I really wanted to try this out, instead of asking for an adjustment
to the 'git merge' driver and waiting. For now the new strategy is
called 'fredrik' and not in the list of default strategies to be tried.
The script wants Python 2.4 so this commit also adjusts Debian and RPM
build procecure files.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Tools directory being separate is just a historical
coincidence. Build and install together with the main
directory, just like the clean target does.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Sergey Vlasov says we do not pre-require (i.e. required packages
during installation) the dependencies, and should use Requires
instead of Prereq. Knowing nothing about RPM, I just believe
him.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Many many thanks go to Chris Wright and H. Peter Anvin whose
help were essential to get me going this build.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is my first attempt to adjust Debian and RPM to pass
prefix, to prepare the 0.99.4 release.
It updates debian/rules and git-core.spec.in to properly pass
prefix when building binary packages. It also updates
debian/changelog to make the resulting binary package name
0.99.4; this is not needed on the RPM side (it takes the version
number from the main Makefile).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If you don't want the documentation simply build with
make RPMBUILD="rpmbuild --without docs"
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
That way we avoid any confusion with "GNU Interactive Tools", and it's
more descriptive anyway (the rpm documentation talks about how git is
split into a "core" part and an "SCM" part, this makes it clear that
this is the core one).
targets: git.spec, dist, and rpm. A simple 'make rpm' will build the rpm.
Also adds git.spec.in which is used to generate git.spec.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Quy Tonthat