This was already the case for the old "diff --check" call, but the new
one that checks whether there are any non-ascii file names was missing
it, making that check fail for root commits.
Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This reverts commit 0cc5691a8b.
There is not enough justification for doing this. We do not update
things in .git/branches and .git/remotes anymore, but still do read
information from there and will keep doing so.
Besides, this breaks quite a lot of tests in t55?? series.
Git itself does not even look at this directory. Any tools that
actually needs it should create it itself.
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The first argument of the tar command is interpreted as a bundle of
letters specifying the mode of operation and additional options, with
any option arguments taken from subsequent words on the command line
as needed. The implementation of tar in busybox treats this bundle
as if preceded by a dash and then parses it by getopt rules, which
mishandles 'tar xfo -'. Use 'tar xof -' instead to work this around.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a comment explaining why square brackets around a tr range
are not only ok, but actually required in this case.
Correct spelling and grammar.
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
At the moment non-ascii encodings of filenames are not portably
converted between different filesystems by git. This will most likely
change in the future but to allow repositories to be portable among
different file/operating systems this check is enabled by default.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make the sample pre-commit hook script discard
all git-rev-parse output, not just stderr.
Otherwise, it would print an SHA1.
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Because no special rule for this existed it was allowed by default
Signed-off-by: Heiko Voigt <heiko.voigt@mahr.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since git doesn't provide a receive.denyBranchCreation or similar, here is
an example of how to be sure users cannot create branches remotely by
pushing a new reference.
This setup has been proven useful to prevent creation of spurious branches
because of users having their remote.origin.push set to HEAD, when they
use `git push` while being on a local topic branch of theirs instead of
the proper one.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A lot of people see this message for the first time on the gitweb
interface, where there is no clue as to what 'this file' means.
Signed-off-by: John Tapsell <johnflux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Two patches 9907721 (templates/Makefile: don't depend on local umask
setting, 2008-02-28) and 96cda0b (templates/Makefile: install is
unnecessary, just use mkdir -p, 2008-08-21) tried to prevent an overtight
umask the builder/installer might have from screwing over the installation
procedure, but we forgot there was another source of trouble. If the
person who checked out the source tree had an overtight umask, it will
leak out to the built products, which is propagated to the installation
destination.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The native install on some platforms (namely IRIX 6.5) treats non-absolute
paths as being relative to the root directory rather than relative to
the current directory. Work around this by avoiding install in this case
since it is unnecessary, and instead depend on the local umask setting
and use mkdir.
Tested-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If 'make install' was run with sufficient privileges, then the installed
templates, which are copied using 'tar', would receive the user and group
of whoever built git. This instructs 'tar' to ignore the user and group
that are recorded in the archive.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now "diff --check" can detect not just whitespace errors but also notices
leftover conflict marker lines, we can use it in the sample pre-commit
hook script.
These days the object layer knows about the empty tree object without
actually having one in the repository, so we can run the test even for the
initial commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since the Makefile in the template/ subdirectory is only used to install
the templates, we do not simply pass down the setting of template_dir
when it is relative, but construct the intended destination in a new
variable: A relative template_dir is relative to gitexecdir.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
The perldiag(1) has following to say about this:
"Can't do inplace edit without backup"
(F) You're on a system such as MS-DOS that gets confused if
you try reading from a deleted (but still opened) file. You
have to say -i.bak, or some such.
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We used to mark hooks we ship as samples by making them unexecutable, but
some filesystems cannot tell what is executable and what is not.
This makes it much more explicit. The hooks are suffixed with .sample
(but now are made executable), so enabling it is still one step operation
(instead of "chmod +x $hook", you would do "mv $hook.sample $hook") but
now they won't get accidentally enabled on systems without executable bit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This hook is what I have been using to manage topic branches in git.git,
but have not been updated to the Real Thing for a while.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The patterns to the case statement could never be matched, so the hook
was a noop. This patch also replaces the non-portable use of in-place sed.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Koeppen <git-dev@marzelpan.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Don't take the local umask setting into account when installing the
templates/* files and directories, running 'make install' with umask set
to 077 resulted in template/* installed with permissions 700 and 600.
The problem was discovered by Florian Zumbiehl, reported through
http://bugs.debian.org/467518
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The prepare-commit-msg hook is run whenever a "fresh" commit message
is prepared, just before it is shown in the editor (if it is).
Its purpose is to modify the commit message in-place.
It takes one to three parameters. The first is the name of the file that
the commit log message. The second is the source of the commit message,
and can be: "message" (if a -m or -F option was given); "template" (if a
-t option was given or the configuration option commit.template is set);
"merge" (if the commit is a merge or a .git/MERGE_MSG file exists);
"squash" (if a .git/SQUASH_MSG file exists); or "commit", followed by
a commit SHA1 as the third parameter (if a -c, -C or --amend option
was given).
If its exit status is non-zero, git-commit will abort. The hook is
not suppressed by the --no-verify option, so it should not be used
as a replacement for the pre-commit hook.
The sample prepare-commit-msg comments out the `Conflicts:` part of
a merge's commit message; other examples are commented out, including
adding a Signed-off-by line at the bottom of the commit messsage,
that the user can then edit or discard altogether.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This hook thought to have found a conflict marker any time it saw
a 7-character combination of any of the characters '<>=' at the
beginning of a line, whereas it should only look for the *same*
character to appear repeatedly.
Also, restrict it to match exactly 7 times, to avoid matching the
underlining with '='-characters often used in documentation.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Luc Herren <jlh@gmx.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The install-sh script as shipped with automake requires a space between
the -m switch and its argument. Since this is also the regular way of
doing it with other install implementations this change inserts the
missing space in all makefiles.
Signed-off-by: Robert Schiele <rschiele@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the worktree happened to have a file called HEAD, "diff-index --cached HEAD"
would complain about the ambiguity between revision and path. Avoid it by
using an explicit "--" for disambiguation.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Decline deleting tags or branches through git push <remote> :<ref> by
default, support config options hooks.allowdeletetag, hooks.allowdeletebranch
to override this per repository.
Before this patch the update hook interpreted deleting a tag, no matter if
annotated or not, through git push <remote> :<tag> as unannotated tag, and
declined it by default, but with an unappropriate error message:
$ git push origin :atag
deleting 'refs/tags/atag'
*** The un-annotated tag, atag, is not allowed in this repository
*** Use 'git tag [ -a | -s ]' for tags you want to propagate.
ng refs/tags/atag hook declined
error: hooks/update exited with error code 1
error: hook declined to update refs/tags/atag
error: failed to push to 'monolith:/git/qm/test-repo'
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The update hook template intends to abort if the project description file
hasn't been adjusted or is empty. This patch fixes the check for 'being
adjusted'.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous check caused the hook to reject as unannotated any tag
whose SHA1 starts with a zero.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
All the other directory location variables do not have the trailing
slash.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This uses "git-apply --whitespace=strip" to fix whitespace errors that have
crept in to our source files over time. There are a few files that need
to have trailing whitespaces (most notably, test vectors). The results
still passes the test, and build result in Documentation/ area is unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
source ref might be 0000...0000 to delete a branch through git-push,
'git <remote> push :<branch>'. The update hook should not decline this.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The update hook is no longer the correct place to generate emails; there
is now the hooks/post-receive script which is run automatically after a
ref has been updated.
This patch is to make use of that new location, and to address some
faults in the old update hook.
The primary problem in the conversion was that in the update hook, the
ref has not actually been changed, but is about to be. In the
post-receive hook the ref has already been updated. That meant that
where we previously had lines like:
git rev-list --not --all
would now give the wrong list because "--all" in the post-receive hook
includes the ref that we are making the email for. This made it more
difficult to show only the new revisions added by this update.
The solution is not pretty; however it does work and doesn't need any
changes to git-rev-list itself. It also fixes (more accurately: reduces
the likelihood of) a nasty race when another update occurs while this
script is running. The solution, in short, looks like this (see the
source code for a longer explanation)
git rev-parse --not --all | grep -v $(git rev-parse $refname) |
git rev-list --pretty --stdin $oldrev..$newrev
This uses git-rev-parse followed by grep to filter out the revision of
the ref in question before it gets to rev-list and inhibits the output
of itself. By using $(git rev-parse $revname) rather than $newrev as the
filter, it also takes care of the situation where another update to the
same ref has been made since $refname was $newrev.
The second problem that is addressed is that of tags inhibiting the
correct output of an update email. Consider this, with somebranch and
sometag pointing at the same revision:
git push origin somebranch
git push origin sometag
That would work fine; the push of the branch would generate an email
containing all the new commits introduced by the update, then the push
of the tag would generate the shortlog formatted tag email. Now
consider:
git push origin sometag
git push origin somebranch
When some branch comes to run its "--not --all" line, it will find
sometag, and filter those commits from the email - leaving nothing.
That meant that those commits would not show (in full) on any email.
The fix is to not use "--all", and instead use "--branches" in the
git-rev-parse command.
Other changes
* Lose the monstrous one-giant-script layout and put things in easy to
digest functions. This makes it much easier to find the place you
need to change if you wanted to customise the output. I've also
tried to write more verbose comments for the same reason. The hook
script is big, mainly because of all the different cases that it has
to handle, so being easy to navigate is important.
* All uses of "git-command" changed to "git command", to cope better
if a user decided not to install all the hard links to git;
* Cleaned up some of the English in the email
* The fact that the receive hook makes the ref available also allows me
to use Shawn Pearce's fantastic suggestion that an annotated tag can
be parsed with git-for-each-ref. This removes the potentially
non-portable use of "<<<" heredocs and the nasty messing around with
"date" to convert numbers of seconds UTC to a real date
* Deletions are now caught and notified (briefly)
* To help with debugging, I've retained the command line mode from the
update hook; but made it so that the output is not emailed, it's just
printed to the screen. This could then be redirected if the user
wanted
* Removed the "Hello" from the beginning of the email - it's just
noise, and no one seriously has their day made happier by "friendly"
programs
* The fact that it doesn't rely on repository state as an indicator any
more means that it's far more stable in its output; hopefully the
same arguments will always generate the same email - even if the
repository changes in the future. This means you can easily recreate
an email should you want to.
* Included Jim Meyering's envelope sender option for the sendmail call
* The hook is now so big that it was inappropriate to copy it
to every repository by keeping it in the templates directory.
Instead, I've put a comment saying to look in contrib/hooks, and
given an example of calling the script from that template hook. The
advantage of calling the script residing at some fixed location is
that if a future package of git included a bug fixed version of the
script, that would be picked up automatically, and the user would not
have to notice and manually copy the new hook to every repository
that uses it.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The update hook's only job is to decide is a particular update
is allowed or not. It was not the right place to send out
update notification e-mails from to begin with, as the final
stage of updating refs can fail after this hook runs.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It was annoying to always have the first email from a project be from
the "Unnamed repository; edit this file to name it for gitweb project";
just because it's so easy to forget to set it.
This patch checks to see if the description file is still default (or
empty) and aborts if so - allowing you to fix the problem before sending
out silly looking emails to every developer.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Previously git-describe would output lines of the form
v1.1.1-gf509d56
The update hook found the dash and stripped it off using
sed 's/-g.*//'
The remainder was then used as the previous tag name.
However, git-describe has changed format. The output is now of the form
v1.1.1-23-gf509d56
The above sed fragment doesn't strip the middle "-23", and so the
previous tag name used would be "v1.1.1-23". This is incorrect.
Since the hook script was written, git-describe now gained support for
"--abbrev=0", which it uses as a special flag to tell it not to output
anything other than the nearest tag name. This patch fixes the problem,
and prevents any future recurrence by using this new flag rather than
sed to find the previous tag.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Per Junio's suggestion we are setting 'make' to be quiet by default,
with `make V=1` available to force GNU make back to its default
behavior of showing each command it is running.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I find it difficult to see compiler warnings amongst the massive
spewing produced by GNU make as it works through our productions.
This is especially true if CFLAGS winds up being rather long, due
to a large number of -W options being enabled and due to a number
of -D options being configured/required by my platform.
By defining QUIET_MAKE (e.g. make QUIET_MAKE=YesPlease) during
compilation users will get a less verbose output, such as:
...
CC builtin-grep.c
builtin-grep.c:187: warning: 'external_grep' defined but not used
CC builtin-init-db.c
CC builtin-log.c
CC builtin-ls-files.c
CC builtin-ls-tree.c
...
The verbose (normal make) output is still the default.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
By default allowunannotated is unset in the repo config, hence
$allowunannotated is empty, and must be quoted to not break the syntax.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Instead of using antiquated "git-rev-parse | git-rev-list"
pipeline, it is easier to use "git-rev-list" or "git-log" these
days, as Linus points out.
While we are at it, fix the typo on variable name $newref that
should be $newrev.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
44478d99ee introduced a filter using "git-rev-parse --not --all" to the
log display to prevent the display of revisions already in the
repository. However, the table of contents generation didn't get that
same update.
This patch fixes that. The table of contents before the log and the log
now both display the same list of revisions.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If you were issuing emails for two branches, and one merged the other,
you would get the same log messages appearing in two separate emails.
e.g. A working repository, where the last push to central was done at
the revision marked "B", after which two branches were developed
further.
* -- B -- 1 -- 1 -- M (branch1)
\ /
2 -- 2 -- 2 (branch2)
Now imagine that branch2 is pushed to the email-generating repository;
an email containing all the "2" revisions would be sent. Now, let's say
branch1 is pushed, the old update hook would run
git-rev-list $newrev ^$baserev
Where $newrev would be "M" and $baserev would be "B". This list
includes all the "2" revisions as well as all the "1" revisions.
This patch addresses this problem by using
git-rev-parse --not --all | git-rev-list --stdin $newrev ^$baserev
To inhibit the display of all revisions that are already in the
repository.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
In a repository with a large number of refs, the following command line
could easily overflow the command line size limitations
git-rev-list $newref $(git-rev-parse --not --all)
Fortunately, git-rev-list already has the means to cope with this
situation with the --stdin switch
git-rev-parse --not --all | git-rev-list --stdin $newref
Which is exactly what this patch does.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I know it's only an example, but having this might save someone else the
trouble of writing an enhanced version for themselves.
It basically does the same job as the old update hook, but with these
differences:
* The recipients list is read from the repository config file from
hooks.mailinglist
* Updating unannotated tags can be allowed by setting
hooks.allowunannotated
* Announcement emails (via annotated tag creation) can be sent to a
different mailing list by setting hooks.announcelist
* Output email is more verbose and generates specific content depending
on whether the ref is a tag, an annotated tag, a branch, or a
tracking branch
* The email is easier to filter; the subject line is prefixed with
[SCM] and a project description pulled from the "description" file
* It catches (and displays differently) branch updates that are
performed with a --force
Obviously, it's nothing that clever - it's the update hook I use on my
repositories but I've tried to keep it general, and tried to make the
output always relevant to the type of update.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I got bitten because in the UK (where one would expect 1970-01-01 00:00
to be UTC 0) some politicians decided to mess around with daylight
savings time from 1968 to 1971; it was permanently BST (+0100). That
means that on my computer the following is true:
$ date --date="1970-01-01 00:00" +"%F %T %z (%Z)"
1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0100 (BST)
This of course means that the --date argument to date is specified in
local time, not UTC. So when the hooks--update script does this:
date=$(date --date="1970-01-01 00:00:00 $ts seconds")
It's actually saying (in my timezone) "1970-01-01 01:00:00 UTC" + $ts.
Clearly this is wrong. The UNIX epoch started at midnight UTC not 1am
UTC.
This leads to the tagged time in hooks--update being shown as one hour
earlier than the true tagged time (in my timezone). The problem would
be worse for other timezones. For a +1300 timezone on 1970-01-01, the
tagged time would be 13 hours earlier. Oops.
The solution is to force the reference time to UTC, which is what this
patch does. In my timezone:
$ date --date="1970-01-01 00:00 +0000" +"%F %T %z (%Z)"
1970-01-01 01:00:00 +0100 (BST)
Much better.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Otherwise, sending the diagnostic to stdout would provoke a
protocol failure.
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Björn Steinbrink