kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Eric Sunshine	e19831c94f	worktree: teach 'add' to respect --force for registered but missing path For safety, "git worktree add <path>" will refuse to add a new worktree at <path> if <path> is already associated with a worktree entry, even if <path> is missing (for instance, has been deleted or resides on non-mounted removable media or network share). The typical way to re-create a worktree at <path> in such a situation is either to prune all "broken" entries ("git worktree prune") or to selectively remove the worktree entry manually ("git worktree remove <path>"). However, neither of these approaches ("prune" nor "remove") is especially convenient, and they may be unsuitable for scripting when a tool merely wants to re-use a worktree if it exists or create it from scratch if it doesn't (much as a tool might use "mkdir -p" to re-use or create a directory). Therefore, teach 'add' to respect --force as a convenient way to re-use a path already associated with a worktree entry if the path is non-existent. For a locked worktree, require --force to be specified twice. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Eric Sunshine	cb56f55c16	worktree: disallow adding same path multiple times A given path should only ever be associated with a single registered worktree. This invariant is enforced by refusing to create a new worktree at a given path if that path already exists. For example: $ git worktree add -q --detach foo $ git worktree add -q --detach foo fatal: 'foo' already exists However, the check can be fooled, and the invariant broken, if the path is missing. Continuing the example: $ rm -fr foo $ git worktree add -q --detach foo $ git worktree list ... eadebfe [master] .../foo eadebfe (detached HEAD) .../foo eadebfe (detached HEAD) This "corruption" leads to the unfortunate situation in which the worktree can not be removed: $ git worktree remove foo fatal: validation failed, cannot remove working tree: '.../foo' does not point back to '.git/worktrees/foo' Nor can the bogus entry be pruned: $ git worktree prune -v $ git worktree list ... eadebfe [master] .../foo eadebfe (detached HEAD) .../foo eadebfe (detached HEAD) without first deleting the worktree directory manually: $ rm -fr foo $ git worktree prune -v Removing .../foo: gitdir file points to non-existent location Removing .../foo1: gitdir file points to non-existent location $ git worktree list ... eadebfe [master] or by manually deleting the worktree entry in .git/worktrees. To address this problem, upgrade "git worktree add" validation to allow worktree creation only if the given path is not already associated with an existing worktree (even if the path itself is non-existent), thus preventing such bogus worktree entries from being created in the first place. Reported-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Elia Pinto	371979c217	worktree: add --quiet option Add the '--quiet' option to git worktree, as for the other git commands. 'add' is the only command affected by it since all other commands, except 'list', are currently silent by default. [jc: appiled trivial fix-up to keep the tests from touching outside the scratch area] Helped-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Helped-by: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	9f4bcf81ea	tests: make use of the test_must_be_empty function Change various tests that use an idiom of the form: >expect && test_cmp expect actual To instead use: test_must_be_empty actual The test_must_be_empty() wrapper was introduced in `ca8d148daf` ("test: test_must_be_empty helper", 2013-06-09). Many of these tests have been added after that time. This was mostly found with, and manually pruned from: git grep '^\s+>.expect. &&$' t Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	8d7b558bae	checkout & worktree: introduce checkout.defaultRemote Introduce a checkout.defaultRemote setting which can be used to designate a remote to prefer (via checkout.defaultRemote=origin) when running e.g. "git checkout master" to mean origin/master, even though there's other remotes that have the "master" branch. I want this because it's very handy to use this workflow to checkout a repository and create a topic branch, then get back to a "master" as retrieved from upstream: ( cd /tmp && rm -rf tbdiff && git clone git@github.com:trast/tbdiff.git && cd tbdiff && git branch -m topic && git checkout master ) That will output: Branch 'master' set up to track remote branch 'master' from 'origin'. Switched to a new branch 'master' But as soon as a new remote is added (e.g. just to inspect something from someone else) the DWIMery goes away: ( cd /tmp && rm -rf tbdiff && git clone git@github.com:trast/tbdiff.git && cd tbdiff && git branch -m topic && git remote add avar git@github.com:avar/tbdiff.git && git fetch avar && git checkout master ) Will output (without the advice output added earlier in this series): error: pathspec 'master' did not match any file(s) known to git. The new checkout.defaultRemote config allows me to say that whenever that ambiguity comes up I'd like to prefer "origin", and it'll still work as though the only remote I had was "origin". Also adjust the advice.checkoutAmbiguousRemoteBranchName message to mention this new config setting to the user, the full output on my git.git is now (the last paragraph is new): $ ./git --exec-path=$PWD checkout master error: pathspec 'master' did not match any file(s) known to git. hint: 'master' matched more than one remote tracking branch. hint: We found 26 remotes with a reference that matched. So we fell back hint: on trying to resolve the argument as a path, but failed there too! hint: hint: If you meant to check out a remote tracking branch on, e.g. 'origin', hint: you can do so by fully qualifying the name with the --track option: hint: hint: git checkout --track origin/<name> hint: hint: If you'd like to always have checkouts of an ambiguous <name> prefer hint: one remote, e.g. the 'origin' remote, consider setting hint: checkout.defaultRemote=origin in your config. I considered splitting this into checkout.defaultRemote and worktree.defaultRemote, but it's probably less confusing to break our own rules that anything shared between config should live in core.* than have two config settings, and I couldn't come up with a short name under core.* that made sense (core.defaultRemoteForCheckout?). See also `70c9ac2f19` ("DWIM "git checkout frotz" to "git checkout -b frotz origin/frotz"", 2009-10-18) which introduced this DWIM feature to begin with, and `4e85333197` ("worktree: make add <path> <branch> dwim", 2017-11-26) which added it to git-worktree. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
brian m. carlson	8125a58b91	t: switch $_z40 to $ZERO_OID Switch all uses of $_z40 to $ZERO_OID so that they work correctly with larger hashes. This commit was created by using the following sed command to modify all files in the t directory except t/test-lib.sh: sed -i 's/\$_z40/$ZERO_OID/g' Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Thomas Gummerer	f60a7b763f	worktree: teach "add" to check out existing branches Currently 'git worktree add <path>' creates a new branch named after the basename of the path by default. If a branch with that name already exists, the command refuses to do anything, unless the '--force' option is given. However we can do a little better than that, and check the branch out if it is not checked out anywhere else. This will help users who just want to check an existing branch out into a new worktree, and save a few keystrokes. As the current behaviour is to simply 'die()' when a branch with the name of the basename of the path already exists, there are no backwards compatibility worries here. We will still 'die()' if the branch is checked out in another worktree, unless the --force flag is passed. Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Eric Sunshine	a4bf1e3c2e	worktree: add: fix 'post-checkout' not knowing new worktree location Although "git worktree add" learned to run the 'post-checkout' hook in `ade546be47` (worktree: invoke post-checkout hook, 2017-12-07), it neglected to change to the directory of the newly-created worktree before running the hook. Instead, the hook runs within the directory from which the "git worktree add" command itself was invoked, which effectively neuters the hook since it knows nothing about the new worktree directory. Further, `ade546be47` failed to sanitize the environment before running the hook, which means that user-assigned values of GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE could mislead the hook about the location of the new worktree. In the case of "git worktree add" being run from a bare repository, the GIT_DIR="." assigned by Git itself leaks into the hook's environment and breaks Git commands; this is so even when the working directory is correctly changed to the new worktree before the hook runs since ".", relative to the new worktree directory, does not point at the bare repository. Fix these problems by (1) changing to the new worktree's directory before running the hook, and (2) sanitizing the environment of GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE so hooks can't be confused by misleading values. Enhance the t2025 'post-checkout' tests to verify that the hook is indeed run within the correct directory and that Git commands invoked by the hook compute Git-dir and top-level worktree locations correctly. While at it, also add two new tests: (1) verify that the hook is run within the correct directory even when the new worktree is created from a sibling worktree (as opposed to the main worktree); (2) verify that the hook is provided with correct context when the new worktree is created from a bare repository (test provided by Lars Schneider). Implementation Notes: Rather than sanitizing the environment of GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE, an alternative would be to set them explicitly, as is already done for other Git commands run internally by "git worktree add". This patch opts instead to sanitize the environment in order to clearly document that the worktree is fully functional by the time the hook is run, thus does not require special environmental overrides. The hook is run manually, rather than via run_hook_le(), since it needs to change the working directory to that of the worktree, and run_hook_le() does not provide such functionality. As this is a one-off case, adding 'run_hook' overloads which allow the directory to be set does not seem warranted at this time. Reported-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Eric Sunshine	b3b05971c1	clone: support 'clone --shared' from a worktree When worktree functionality was originally implemented, the possibility of 'clone --local' from within a worktree was overlooked, with the result that the location of the "objects" directory of the source repository was computed incorrectly, thus the objects could not be copied or hard-linked by the clone. This shortcoming was addressed by `744e469755` (clone: allow --local from a linked checkout, 2015-09-28). However, the related case of 'clone --shared' (despite being handled only a few lines away from the 'clone --local' case) was not fixed by `744e469755`, with a similar result of the "objects" directory location being incorrectly computed for insertion into the 'alternates' file. Fix this. Reported-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Eric Sunshine	ade546be47	worktree: invoke post-checkout hook (unless --no-checkout) git-clone and git-checkout both invoke the post-checkout hook following a successful checkout, yet git-worktree neglects to do so even though it too "checks out" the worktree. Fix this oversight. Implementation note: The newly-created worktree may reference a branch or be detached. In the latter case, a commit lookup is performed, though the result is used only in a boolean sense to (a) determine if the commit actually exists, and (b) assign either the branch name or commit ID to HEAD. Since the post-commit hook needs to know the ID of the checked-out commit, the lookup now needs to be done in all cases, rather than only when detached. Consequently, a new boolean is needed to handle (b) since the lookup result itself can no longer perform that role. Reported-by: Matthew K Gumbel <matthew.k.gumbel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Thomas Gummerer	e92445a731	add worktree.guessRemote config option Some users might want to have the --guess-remote option introduced in the previous commit on by default, so they don't have to type it out every time they create a new worktree. Add a config option worktree.guessRemote that allows users to configure the default behaviour for themselves. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Thomas Gummerer	71d6682d8c	worktree: add --guess-remote flag to add subcommand Currently 'git worktree add <path>' creates a new branch named after the basename of the <path>, that matches the HEAD of whichever worktree we were on when calling "git worktree add <path>". It's sometimes useful to have 'git worktree add <path> behave more like the dwim machinery in 'git checkout <new-branch>', i.e. check if the new branch name, derived from the basename of the <path>, uniquely matches the branch name of a remote-tracking branch, and if so check out that branch and set the upstream to the remote-tracking branch. Add a new --guess-remote option that enables exactly that behaviour. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Thomas Gummerer	4e85333197	worktree: make add <path> <branch> dwim Currently 'git worktree add <path> <branch>', errors out when 'branch' is not a local branch. It has no additional dwim'ing features that one might expect. Make it behave more like 'git checkout <branch>' when the branch doesn't exist locally, but a remote tracking branch uniquely matches the desired branch name, i.e. create a new branch from the remote tracking branch and set the upstream to the remote tracking branch. As 'git worktree add' currently just dies in this situation, there are no backwards compatibility worries when introducing this feature. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Thomas Gummerer	e284e892ca	worktree: add --[no-]track option to the add subcommand Currently 'git worktree add' sets up tracking branches if '<branch>' is a remote tracking branch, and doesn't set them up otherwise, as is the default for 'git branch'. This may or may not be what the user wants. Allow overriding this behaviour with a --[no-]track flag that gets passed through to 'git branch'. We already respect branch.autoSetupMerge, as 'git worktree' just calls 'git branch' internally. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	507e6e9eec	worktree add: add --lock option As explained in the document. This option has an advantage over the command sequence "git worktree add && git worktree lock": there will be no gap that somebody can accidentally "prune" the new worktree (or soon, explicitly "worktree remove" it). "worktree add" does keep a lock on while it's preparing the worktree. If --lock is specified, this lock remains after the worktree is created. Suggested-by: David Taylor <David.Taylor@dell.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Dennis Kaarsemaker	171c646f8c	worktree: allow the main brach of a bare repository to be checked out In bare repositories, get_worktrees() still returns the main repository, so git worktree list can show it. ignore it in find_shared_symref so we can still check out the main branch. Signed-off-by: Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@kaarsemaker.net> Acked-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Jordan DE GEA	1a450e2fd1	worktree: allow "-" short-hand for @{-1} in add command Since `git worktree add` uses `git checkout` when `[<branch>]` is used, and `git checkout -` is already supported, it makes sense to allow the same shortcut in `git worktree add`. Signed-off-by: Jordan DE GEA <jordan.de-gea@grenoble-inp.org> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	9 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	14ace5b77b	branch: do not rename a branch under bisect or rebase The branch name in that case could be saved in rebase's head_name or bisect's BISECT_START files. Ideally we should try to update them as well. But it's trickier (). Let's play safe and see if the user complains about inconveniences before doing that. () If we do it, bisect and rebase need to provide an API to rename branches. We can't do it in worktree.c or builtin/branch.c because when other people change rebase/bisect code, they may not be aware of this code and accidentally break it (e.g. rename the branch file, or refer to the branch in new files). It's a lot more work. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	9 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	04a3dfb8b5	worktree.c: check whether branch is bisected in another worktree Similar to the rebase case, we want to detect if "HEAD" in some worktree is being bisected because 1) we do not want to checkout this branch in another worktree, after bisect is done it will want to go back to this branch 2) we do not want to delete the branch is either or git bisect will fail to return to the (long gone) branch Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	9 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	8d9fdd7087	worktree.c: check whether branch is rebased in another worktree This function find_shared_symref() is used in a couple places: 1) in builtin/branch.c: it's used to detect if a branch is checked out elsewhere and refuse to delete the branch. 2) in builtin/notes.c: it's used to detect if a note is being merged in another worktree 3) in branch.c, the function die_if_checked_out() is actually used by "git checkout" and "git worktree add" to see if a branch is already checked out elsewhere and refuse the operation. In cases 1 and 3, if a rebase is ongoing, "HEAD" will be in detached mode, find_shared_symref() fails to detect it and declares "no branch is checked out here", which is not really what we want. This patch tightens the test. If the given symref is "HEAD", we try to detect if rebase is ongoing. If so return the branch being rebased. This makes checkout and branch delete operations safer because you can't checkout a branch being rebased in another place, or delete it. Special case for checkout. If the current branch is being rebased, git-rebase.sh may use "git checkout" to abort and return back to the original branch. The updated test in find_shared_symref() will prevent that and "git rebase --abort" will fail as a result. find_shared_symref() and die_if_checked_out() have to learn a new option ignore_current_worktree to loosen the test a bit. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	9 years ago
Ray Zhang	ef2a0ac9a0	worktree: add: introduce --checkout option By adding this option which defaults to true, we can use the corresponding --no-checkout to make some customizations before the checkout, like sparse checkout, etc. Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Ray Zhang <zhanglei002@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	9 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	beb6f24bee	worktree add -B: do the checkout test before update branch If --force is not given but -B is, we should not proceed if the given branch is already checked out elsewhere. add_worktree() has this test, but it kicks in too late when "git branch --force" is already executed. As a result, even though we correctly refuse to create a new worktree, we have already updated the branch and mess up the other checkout. Repeat the die_if_checked_out() test again for this specific case before "git branch" runs. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	9 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	0ebf4a2af3	worktree: fix "add -B" Current code does not update "symref" when -B is used. This string contains the new HEAD. Because it's empty "git worktree add -B" fails at symbolic-ref step. Because branch creation is already done before calling add_worktree(), -B is equivalent to -b from add_worktree() point of view. We do not need the special case for -B. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	9 years ago
Elia Pinto	697b90d7e6	t/t2025-worktree-add.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`. The backquoted form is the traditional method for command substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require careful escaping with the backslash character. The patch was generated by: for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh") do perl -i -pe 'BEGIN{undef $/;} s/`(.+?)`/\$(\1)/smg' "${_f}" done and then carefully proof-read. Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	9 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	744e469755	clone: allow --local from a linked checkout Noticed-by: Bjørnar Snoksrud <snoksrud@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	9 years ago
Eric Sunshine	5c942570fe	worktree: add: suppress auto-vivication with --detach and no <branch> Fix oversight where branch auto-vivication incorrectly kicks in when --detach is specified and <branch> omitted. Instead, treat: git worktree add --detach <path> as shorthand for: git worktree add --detach <path> HEAD Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Eric Sunshine	ab0b2c53ed	worktree: make --detach mutually exclusive with -b/-B Be consistent with git-checkout which disallows this (not particularly meaningful) combination. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Eric Sunshine	746bbdc64f	checkout: teach check_linked_checkout() about symbolic link HEAD check_linked_checkout() only understands symref-style HEAD (i.e. "ref: refs/heads/master"), however, HEAD may also be a an actual symbolic link (on platforms which support it). To accurately detect if a branch is checked out elsewhere, it needs to handle symbolic link HEAD, as well. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Eric Sunshine	1eb07d829f	worktree: add: auto-vivify new branch when <branch> is omitted As a convenience, when <branch> is omitted from "git worktree <path> <branch>" and neither -b nor -B is used, automatically create a new branch named after <path>, as if "-b $(basename <path>)" was specified. Thus, "git worktree add ../hotfix" creates a new branch named "hotfix" and associates it with new worktree "../hotfix". Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Eric Sunshine	0f4af3b9ea	worktree: add: make -b/-B default to HEAD when <branch> is omitted As a convenience, like "git branch" and "git checkout -b", make "git worktree add -b <newbranch> <path> <branch>" default to HEAD when <branch> is omitted. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Eric Sunshine	f194b1ef6e	tests: worktree: retrofit "checkout --to" tests for "worktree add" With the introduction of "git worktree add", "git checkout --to" is slated for removal. Therefore, retrofit linked worktree creation tests to use "git worktree add" instead. (The test to check exclusivity of "checkout --to" and "checkout <paths>" is dropped altogether since it becomes meaningless with retirement of "checkout --to".) Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Eric Sunshine	c990a4c11d	checkout: fix bug with --to and relative HEAD Given "git checkout --to <path> HEAD~1", the new worktree's HEAD should begin life at the current branch's HEAD~1, however, it actually ends up at HEAD~2. This happens because: 1. git-checkout resolves HEAD~1 2. to satisfy is_git_directory(), prepare_linked_worktree() creates a HEAD for the new worktree with the value of the resolved HEAD~1 3. git-checkout re-invokes itself with the same arguments within the new worktree to populate the worktree 4. the sub git-checkout resolves HEAD~1 relative to its own HEAD, which is the resolved HEAD~1 from the original invocation, resulting unexpectedly and incorrectly in HEAD~2 (relative to the original) Fix this by unconditionally assigning the current worktree's HEAD as the value of the new worktree's HEAD. As a side-effect, this change also eliminates a dependence within prepare_linked_checkout() upon 'struct branch_info'. The plan is to eventually relocate "git checkout --to" functionality to "git worktree add", and worktree.c won't have knowledge of 'struct branch_info', so removal of this dependency is a step toward that goal. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	e1c1ab9d25	checkout: don't check worktrees when not necessary When --patch or pathspecs are passed to git checkout, the working tree will not be switching branch, so there's no need to check if the branch that we are running checkout on is already checked out. Original-patch-by: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@catern.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	1d0fa898ea	checkout: add --ignore-other-wortrees Noticed-by: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Max Kirillov	ee4fb8435e	checkout: do not fail if target is an empty directory Non-recursive checkout creates empty directpries in place of submodules. If then I try to "checkout --to" submodules there, it refuses to do so, because directory already exists. Fix by allowing checking out to empty directory. Add test and modify the existing one so that it uses non-empty directory. Signed-off-by: Max Kirillov <max@max630.net> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	ad35f61518	t2025: add a test to make sure grafts is working from a linked checkout Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Dennis Kaarsemaker	3473ad0cf6	checkout: don't require a work tree when checking out into a new one For normal use cases, it does not make sense for 'checkout' to work on a bare repository, without a worktree. But "checkout --to" is an exception because it _creates_ a new worktree. Allow this option to run on bare repositories. People who check out from a bare repository should remember that core.logallrefupdates is off by default and it should be turned back on. `--to` cannot do this automatically behind the user's back because some user may deliberately want no reflog. For people interested in repository setup/discovery code, is_bare_repository_cfg (aka "core.bare") is unchanged by this patch, which means 'true' by default for bare repos. Fortunately when we get the repo through a linked checkout, is_bare_repository_cfg is never used. So all is still good. [nd: commit message] Signed-off-by: Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@kaarsemaker.net> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	3b8925c78b	checkout: clean up half-prepared directories in --to mode Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	5883034c61	checkout: reject if the branch is already checked out elsewhere One branch obviously can't be checked out at two places (but detached heads are ok). Give the user a choice in this case: --detach, -b new-branch, switch branch in the other checkout first or simply 'cd' and continue to work there. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	529fef20cf	checkout: support checking out into a new working directory "git checkout --to" sets up a new working directory with a .git file pointing to $GIT_DIR/worktrees/<id>. It then executes "git checkout" again on the new worktree with the same arguments except "--to" is taken out. The second checkout execution, which is not contaminated with any info from the current repository, will actually check out and everything that normal "git checkout" does. Helped-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago

37 Commits (e21cc076a31c8f6a39946f914338aa4dd6c9de3d)