Documentation mark-up fix.
* ja/doc-markup-attached-paragraph-fix:
doc: fix indentation of refStorage item in git-config(1)
doc: change the markup of paragraphs following a nested list item
Clarify the "--merge-base" command line option in "git merge-tree".
* en/doc-merge-tree-describe-merge-base:
Documentation/git-merge-tree.adoc: clarify the --merge-base option
"git refs migrate" to migrate the reflog entries from a refs
backend to another had a handful of bugs squashed.
* ps/reflog-migrate-fixes:
refs: fix invalid old object IDs when migrating reflogs
refs: stop unsetting REF_HAVE_OLD for log-only updates
refs/files: detect race when generating reflog entry for HEAD
refs: fix identity for migrated reflogs
ident: fix type of string length parameter
builtin/reflog: implement subcommand to write new entries
refs: export `ref_transaction_update_reflog()`
builtin/reflog: improve grouping of subcommands
Documentation/git-reflog: convert to use synopsis type
Grammar and typo fixes. Also change “work it around” to “work around”.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix missing single-quote pairs in a documentation page.
* kh/doc-interpret-trailers-markup-fix:
doc: interpret-trailers: close all pairs of single quotes
The start_delayed_progress() function in the progress eye-candy API
did not clear its internal state, making an initial delay value
larger than 1 second ineffective, which has been corrected.
* js/progress-delay-fix:
progress: pay attention to (customized) delay time
Update the instruction to use of GGG in the MyFirstContribution
document to say that a GitHub PR could be made against `git/git`
instead of `gitgitgadget/git`.
* ds/doc-ggg-pr-fork-clarify:
doc: clarify which remotes can be used with GitGitGadget
The compatObjectFormat extension is used to hide an incomplete
feature that is not yet usable for any purpose other than
developing the feature further. Document it as such to discourage
its use by mere mortals.
* bc/doc-compat-object-format-not-working:
docs: note that extensions.compatobjectformat is incomplete
Make sure that normal paragraphs in most user-facing docs[1] don’t
use literal blocks. This can easily happen if you try to maintain
indentation in order to continue a block; that might work in
e.g. Markdown variants, but not in AsciiDoc.
The fixes are straightforward, i.e. just deindent the block and maybe
add line continuations. The only exception is git-sparse-checkout(1)
where we also replace indentation used for *intended* literal blocks
with `----`.
† 1: These have not been considered:
• `Documentation/howto/`
• `Documentation/technical/`
• `Documentation/gitprotocol*`
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 5a12fd2a8c (doc: change the markup of paragraphs following a
nested list item, 2025-09-27) converted the list of items in
config/extensions.adoc into a definition list. This caused a small
regression in the indentation of one item, but only when built with
AsciiDoctor. You can see the problem with:
$ ./doc-diff --asciidoctor 5a12fd2a8c^ 5a12fd2a8c
--- a/c44beea485f0f2feaf460e2ac87fdd5608d63cf0-asciidoctor/home/peff/share/man/man1/git-config.1
+++ b/5a12fd2a8c850df311aa149c9bad87b7cb002abb-asciidoctor/home/peff/share/man/man1/git-config.1
@@ -3128,9 +3128,9 @@ CONFIGURATION FILE
• reftable for the reftable format. This format is
experimental and its internals are subject to change.
- Note that this setting should only be set by git-init(1) or git-
- clone(1). Trying to change it after initialization will not work
- and will produce hard-to-diagnose issues.
+ Note that this setting should only be set by git-init(1) or git-
+ clone(1). Trying to change it after initialization will not work and
+ will produce hard-to-diagnose issues.
relativeWorktrees
If enabled, indicates at least one worktree has been linked with
(along with many other changes which are correctly fixing what
5a12fd2a8c intended to fix). The "Note" paragraph should remain aligned
with the bullet points, as they are left-aligned with the rest of the
definition text.
The confusion comes from a paragraph following a list item (ironically,
the same case that 5a12fd2a8c was solving!). We can solve it by adding
"--" block markers around the nested list. We couldn't have done that
before 5a12fd2a8c because before then our list was nested inside another
set of block markers, something that AsciiDoctor has trouble with. But
now that we are a top-level definition list, it is OK to do so (and in
fact, you can see that commit already made a similar adjustment for the
worktreeConfig entry).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --merge-base option for merge-tree has a few slightly awkward
constructions or omissions:
* Split the initial long sentence describing the option into two,
making the instructions and the limitations clearer for readers.
* Add context to the final sentence that might be obvious to some
readers but isn't immediately obvious to all.
* The discussion about lack of support for multiple merge bases
simply leave folks wondering why that matters and could help or
hurt. Separate it out and add a brief explanation.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation was inaccurate since 9a121b0d22 (credential: handle
`credential.<partial-URL>.<key>` again, 2020-04-24)
Add tests for documented behaviour.
Signed-off-by: M Hickford <mirth.hickford@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
All the final paragraphs on these three options are rendered as
literal blocks. The intent was surely to keep each of them wed to their
respective description list items. But the attempt at maintaining the
indentation level of the block causes each them to be interpreted as a
code block, since code blocks can be represented using indentation.
We need to use list continuation (+) in order to keep them wed to
their blocks.
There is also an unordered list which sandwiches two paragraphs on an
option. We don’t need to do anything about that since it attaches to the
description list item without list continuation (i.e. it is already
correct). But for consistency let’s use list continuation and an open
block on it.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Asciidoctor and asciidoc.py have different behaviors when a paragraph
follows a nested list item. Asciidoctor has a bug[1] that makes it keep a
plus sign (+) used to attached paragraphs at the beginning of the paragraph.
This commit uses workarounds to avoid this problem by using second level
definition lists and open blocks.
[1]:https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor/issues/4704
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This was written in e836757e14 (whatschanged: list it in
BreakingChanges document, 2025-05-12) which was on the same
topic that added the `--i-still-use-this` requirement.[1]
Maybe it was a work-in-progress comment/status.
[1]: jc/you-still-use-whatchanged
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The closest equivalent is `git log --raw --no-merges`.
Also change to “defaults” (implicit plural).
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-whatchanged(1) is deprecated and you need to pass
`--i-still-use-this` in order to force it to work as before.
There are two affected users, or usages:
1. people who use the command in scripts; and
2. people who are used to using it interactively.
For (1) the replacement is straightforward.[1] But people in (2) might
like the name or be really used to typing it.[3]
An obvious first thought is to suggest aliasing `whatchanged` to the
git-log(1) equivalent.[1] But this doesn’t work and is awkward since you
cannot shadow builtins via aliases.
Now you are left in an uncomfortable limbo; your alias won’t work until
the command is removed for good.
Let’s lift this limitation by allowing *deprecated* builtins to be
shadowed by aliases.
The only observed demand for aliasing has been for git-whatchanged(1),
not for git-pack-redundant(1). But let’s be consistent and treat all
deprecated commands the same.
[1]:
git log --raw --no-merges
With a minor caveat: you get different outputs if you happen to
have empty commits (no changes)[2]
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20250825085428.GA367101@coredump.intra.peff.net/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/BL3P221MB0449288C8B0FA448A227FD48833AA@BL3P221MB0449.NAMP221.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM/
Based-on-patch-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With 145 builtin commands (according to `git --list-cmds=builtins`),
users are probably not keeping on top of which ones (if any) are
deprecated.
Let’s expand the experimental `--list-cmds`[1] to allow users and
programs to query for this information. We will also use this in an
upcoming commit to implement `is_deprecated_command`.
[1]: Using something which is experimental to query for deprecations is
perhaps not the most ideal approach, but it is simple to implement
and better than having to scan the documentation
Acked-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Helped-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
68061e3470 (fast-import: disallow "feature export-marks" by default,
2019-08-29) added the documentation for this option. The second
paragraph is a literal block but it looks like it should just be
a regular paragraph.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation incorrectly referred to the extension without an 's'.
This fixes the typo for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Malinouski <m.l.malinouski@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a missed backtick to the end of a code segment so that it will be
rendered like preceding examples.
I deeply appreciate the thoroughness of this documentation. I noticed
the formatting discrepancy reading https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config.
Signed-off-by: Kyle E. Mitchell <kyle@kemitchell.com>
Acked-by: Jean-Noël AVILA <avila.jn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier recommendation by IETF with RFC 2595 was to deprecate
implicit TLS in preference for upgrade an initially unencrypted
connection with STARTTLS command. These days, however, IETF
recommends that connections be made using "Implicit TLS", in
preference to STARTTLS and the like, completely reversing their
earlier position, in RFC8314.
Update the GMail example to use the implicit TLS to match the
current recommendation at port 465.
Signed-off-by: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@live.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The compatibility object format is only implemented for loose objects,
not packed objects, so anyone attempting to push or fetch data into a
repository with this option will likely not see it work as expected. In
addition, the underlying storage of loose object mapping is likely to
change because the current format is inefficient and does not handle
important mapping information such as that of submodules.
It would have been preferable to initially document that this was not
yet ready for prime time, but we did not do so. We hinted at the fact
that this functionality is incomplete in the description, but did not
say so explicitly. Let's do so now: indicate that this feature is
incomplete and subject to change and that the option is not designed to
be used by end users.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Using one of the start_delayed_*() functions, clients of the progress
API can request that a progress meter is only shown after some time.
To do that, the implementation intends to count down the number of
seconds stored in struct progress by observing flag progress_update,
which the timer interrupt handler sets when a second has elapsed. This
works during the first second of the delay. But the code forgets to
reset the flag to zero, so that subsequent calls of display_progress()
think that another second has elapsed and decrease the count again
until zero is reached. Due to the frequency of the calls, this happens
without an observable delay in practice, so that the effective delay is
always just one second.
This bug has been with us since the inception of the feature. Despite
having been touched on various occasions, such as 8aade107dd
(progress: simplify "delayed" progress API), 9c5951cacf (progress:
drop delay-threshold code), and 44a4693bfc (progress: create
GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY), the short delay went unnoticed.
Copy the flag state into a local variable and reset the global flag
right away so that we can detect the next clock tick correctly.
Since we have not had any complaints that the delay of one second is
too short nor that GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY is ignored, people seem to be
comfortable with the status quo. Therefore, set the default to 1 to
keep the current behavior.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Revert back to “Git's” which was used before d30c5cc459 (doc: convert
git-mergetool options to new synopsis style, 2025-05-25) accidentally
changed it.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are three tips how to compose a non-line-wrapped patch with
Thunderbird. The first one suggests use of an add-on. The one
referenced has long been superseded by a different one. Update the
link to the new one. Mention that additional configuration is
required to make the add-on work.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The docs mostly point to using git/git as one's remote, however, when it
comes to Sending a PR to GitGitGadget section, the reader is told to use
gitgitgadget/git, with no mention of git/git, potentially leading to
some confusion.
Clarify that both gitgitgadget/git and git/git can be used, albeit with
some differences.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Sassoli <danielesassoli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Junio C Hamano