In windows you cannot remove current or opened directory,
an opened file, a running program, a loaded library, etc...
[jc: signoffs? With a minor quoting fix.]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This uses the same hashing algorithm to the "preferred base
tree" objects and the incoming pathnames, to group the same
files from different revs together, while spreading files with
the same basename in different directories.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Since we sort objects by type, hash, preferredness and then
size, after we have a delta against preferred base, there is no
point trying a delta with non-preferred base. This seems to
save expensive calls to diff-delta and it also seems to save the
output space as well.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This implements "eye candy" similar to the pack-object/unpack-object
to entertain users while a large tree is being checked out after
a clone or a pull.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
New tests are added to the git-rm test case to cover this as well.
Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This adds a git-rm command which provides convenience similar to
git-add, (and a bit more since it takes care of the rm as well if
given -f).
Like git-add, git-rm expands the given path names through
git-ls-files. This means it only acts on files listed in the
index. And it does act recursively on directories by default, (no -r
needed as in the case of rm itself). When it recurses, it does not
remove empty directories that are left behind.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Unless --no-tags flag was given, git-fetch tried to always
follow remote tags that point at the commits we picked up.
It is not very useful to pick up tags from remote unless storing
the fetched branch head in a local tracking branch. This is
especially true if the fetch is done to merge the remote branch
into our current branch as one-shot basis (i.e. "please pull"),
and is even harmful if the remote repository has many irrelevant
tags.
This proposed update disables the automated tag following unless
we are storing the a fetched branch head in a local tracking
branch.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This updates the progress output to match "every one second or
every percent whichever comes early" used by unpack-objects, as
discussed on the list.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If that pack is big, it takes significant time to write and might
benefit from some more eye candies as well. This is however disabled
when the pack is written to stdout since in that case the output is
usually piped into unpack_objects which already does its own progress
reporting.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This provides a stable and simpler progress reporting mechanism that
updates progress as often as possible but accurately not updating more
than once a second. The deltification phase is also made more
interesting to watch (since repacking a big repository and only seeing a
dot appear once every many seconds is rather boring and doesn't provide
much food for anticipation).
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
"empty ident not allowed" error makes commit-tree fail, so we
are already safer in that we would not end up with commit
objects that have bogus names on the author or committer fields.
However, before commit-tree is called there are already changes
made to the index file and the working tree. The operation can
be resumed after fixing the environment problem, but when this
triggers to a newcomer with unusable gecos, the first question
becomes "what did I lose and how would I recover".
This patch modifies some Porcelainish commands to verify
GIT_COMMITTER_IDENT as soon as we know we are going to make some
commits before doing much damage to prevent confusion.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Previous one warned people upfront to encourage fixing their
environment early, but some people just use repositories and git
tools read-only without making any changes, and in such a case
there is not much point insisting on them having a usable ident.
This round attempts to move the error until either "git-var"
asks for the ident explicitly or "commit-tree" wants to use it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It appears that some people who did not care about having bogus
names in their own commit messages are bitten by the recent
change to require a sane environment [*1*].
While it was a good idea to prevent people from using bogus
names to create commits and doing sign-offs, the error message
is not very informative. This patch attempts to warn things
upfront and hint people how to fix their environments.
[Footnote]
*1* The thread is this one.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=113868084800004
Especially this message.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?m=113932830015032
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This tries to rework the solution for the excess delta chain
problem. An earlier commit worked it around ``cheaply'', but
repeated repacking risks unbound growth of delta chains.
This version counts the length of delta chain we are reusing
from the existing pack, and makes sure a base object that has
sufficiently long delta chain does not get deltified.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
A new flag -q makes underlying pack-objects less chatty.
A new flag -f forces delta to be recomputed from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This introduces --no-reuse-delta option to disable reusing of
existing delta, which is a large part of the optimization
introduced by this series. This may become necessary if
repeated repacking makes delta chain too long. With this, the
output of the command becomes identical to that of the older
implementation. But the performance suffers greatly.
It still allows reusing non-deltified representations; there is
no point uncompressing and recompressing the whole text.
It also adds a couple more statistics output, while squelching
it under -q flag, which the last round forgot to do.
$ time old-git-pack-objects --stdout >/dev/null <RL
Generating pack...
Done counting 184141 objects.
Packing 184141 objects....................
real 12m8.530s user 11m1.450s sys 0m57.920s
$ time git-pack-objects --stdout >/dev/null <RL
Generating pack...
Done counting 184141 objects.
Packing 184141 objects.....................
Total 184141, written 184141 (delta 138297), reused 178833 (delta 134081)
real 0m59.549s user 0m56.670s sys 0m2.400s
$ time git-pack-objects --stdout --no-reuse-delta >/dev/null <RL
Generating pack...
Done counting 184141 objects.
Packing 184141 objects.....................
Total 184141, written 184141 (delta 134833), reused 47904 (delta 0)
real 11m13.830s user 9m45.240s sys 0m44.330s
There is one remaining issue when --no-reuse-delta option is not
used. It can create delta chains that are deeper than specified.
A<--B<--C<--D E F G
Suppose we have a delta chain A to D (A is stored in full either
in a pack or as a loose object. B is depth1 delta relative to A,
C is depth2 delta relative to B...) with loose objects E, F, G.
And we are going to pack all of them.
B, C and D are left as delta against A, B and C respectively.
So A, E, F, and G are examined for deltification, and let's say
we decided to keep E expanded, and store the rest as deltas like
this:
E<--F<--G<--A
Oops. We ended up making D a bit too deep, didn't we? B, C and
D form a chain on top of A!
This is because we did not know what the final depth of A would
be, when we checked objects and decided to keep the existing
delta. Unfortunately, deferring the decision until just before
the deltification is not an option. To be able to make B, C,
and D candidates for deltification with the rest, we need to
know the type and final unexpanded size of them, but the major
part of the optimization comes from the fact that we do not read
the delta data to do so -- getting the final size is quite an
expensive operation.
To prevent this from happening, we should keep A from being
deltified. But how would we tell that, cheaply?
To do this most precisely, after check_object() runs, each
object that is used as the base object of some existing delta
needs to be marked with the maximum depth of the objects we
decided to keep deltified (in this case, D is depth 3 relative
to A, so if no other delta chain that is longer than 3 based on
A exists, mark A with 3). Then when attempting to deltify A, we
would take that number into account to see if the final delta
chain that leads to D becomes too deep.
However, this is a bit cumbersome to compute, so we would cheat
and reduce the maximum depth for A arbitrarily to depth/4 in
this implementation.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When generating a new pack, notice if we have already needed
objects in existing packs. If an object is stored deltified,
and its base object is also what we are going to pack, then
reuse the existing deltified representation unconditionally,
bypassing all the expensive find_deltas() and try_deltas()
calls.
Also, notice if what we are going to write out exactly match
what is already in an existing pack (either deltified or just
compressed). In such a case, we can just copy it instead of
going through the usual uncompressing & recompressing cycle.
Without this patch, in linux-2.6 repository with about 1500
loose objects and a single mega pack:
$ git-rev-list --objects v2.6.16-rc3 >RL
$ wc -l RL
184141 RL
$ time git-pack-objects p <RL
Generating pack...
Done counting 184141 objects.
Packing 184141 objects....................
a1fc7b3e537fcb9b3c46b7505df859f0a11e79d2
real 12m4.323s
user 11m2.560s
sys 0m55.950s
With this patch, the same input:
$ time ../git.junio/git-pack-objects q <RL
Generating pack...
Done counting 184141 objects.
Packing 184141 objects.....................
a1fc7b3e537fcb9b3c46b7505df859f0a11e79d2
Total 184141, written 184141, reused 182441
real 1m2.608s
user 0m55.090s
sys 0m1.830s
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The real problem triggered an earlier fix was that an alternate
entry was pointing at a removed directory. Complaining on
object/pack directory that cannot be opendir-ed produces noise
in an ancient repository that does not have object/pack
directory and has never been packed.
Detect the real user error and report it. Also if opendir
failed for other reasons (e.g. no read permissions), report that
as well.
Spotted by Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-cvsserver is highly functional. However, not all methods are implemented,
and for those methods that are implemented, not all switches are implemented.
All the common read operations are implemented, and add/remove/commit are
supported.
Testing has been done using both the CLI CVS client, and the Eclipse CVS
plugin. Most functionality works fine with both of these clients.
Currently git-cvsserver only works over SSH connections, see the
Documentation for more details on how to configure your client. It
does not support pserver for anonymous access but it should not be
hard to implement. Anonymous access will need tighter input validation.
In our very informal tests, it seems to be significantly faster than a real
CVS server.
This utility depends on a version of git-cvsannotate that supports -S and on
DBD::SQLite.
Licensed under GPLv2. Copyright The Open University UK.
Authors: Martyn Smith <martyn@catalyst.net.nz>
Martin Langhoff <martin@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Martin Langhoff <martin@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Since Ryan's git-annotate is much faster, and has support for renames,
it is likely it goes into the mainstream git soon. Adapt it a little to
work with gitcvs, and actually use it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Stephen C. Tweedie noticed that we give up running rev-list when
we see too many refs on the remote side. Limit the number of
negative references we give to rev-list and continue.
Not sending any negative references to rev-list is very bad --
we may be pushing a ref that is new to the other end.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* fix:
git-push: Update documentation to describe the no-refspec behavior.
format-patch: pretty-print timestamp correctly.
git-add: Add support for --, documentation, and test.
* jc/perl:
cvsimport: avoid open "-|" list form for Perl 5.6
svnimport: avoid open "-|" list form for Perl 5.6
send-email: avoid open "-|" list form for Perl 5.6
rerere: avoid open "-|" list form for Perl 5.6
fmt-merge-msg: avoid open "-|" list form for Perl 5.6
* jc/pack-reuse:
pack-objects: avoid delta chains that are too long.
git-repack: allow passing a couple of flags to pack-objects.
pack-objects: finishing touches.
pack-objects: reuse data from existing packs.
* jc/nostat:
cache_name_compare() compares name and stage, nothing else.
"assume unchanged" git: documentation.
ls-files: split "show-valid-bit" into a different option.
"Assume unchanged" git: --really-refresh fix.
ls-files: debugging aid for CE_VALID changes.
"Assume unchanged" git: do not set CE_VALID with --refresh
"Assume unchanged" git
It turns out that the git-push documentation didn't describe what it
would do when not given a refspec, (not on the command line, nor in a
remotes file). This is fairly important for the user who is trying to
understand operations such as:
git clone git://something/some/where
# hack, hack, hack
git push origin
I tracked the mystery behavior down to git-send-pack and lifted the
relevant portion of its documentation up to git-push, (namely that all
refs existing both locally and remotely are updated).
Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This patch address the below:
Use monospace font to draw branch and tag name
set the font size to 13.
Make the graph column resizable. This helps to accommodate large tag names
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This fix the below bug
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:
>
> It does not work in my repository, since you do not seem to
> handle branch and tag names with slashes in them. All of my
> topic branches live in directories with two-letter names
> (e.g. ak/gitview).
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I found a paper thin man page for git-rebase, but was quite happy to
see something much more useful in the usage statement of the script
when I went there to find out how this thing worked. Here it is
cleaned up slightly and expanded a bit into the actual documentation.
Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This adds support to git-add to allow the common -- to separate
command-line options and file names. It adds documentation and a new
git-add test case as well.
[jc: this should apply to 1.2.X maintenance series, so I reworked
git-ls-files --error-unmatch test. ]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
In my attempt to port git to IRIX, I broke it. Sorry.
Signed-off-by: Johannes E. Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Solaris 9 and up do not need -liconv, so NEEDS_LIBICONV should be set
only for S8.
- Move the declaration of the uname variables to early in the Makefile
so they can be referenced by prefix and gitexecdir variables.
- gitexecdir defaults to being same as bindir, it might as well reference
that variable.
[jc: corrupt patch, sneakily tried to remove inclusion of GIT-VERSION-FILE
I do not know why I am applying this...]
Signed-off-by: Paul Jakma <paul@quagga.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This reads data in the format a (non recursive) ls-tree outputs
and writes a tree object to the object database. The created
tree object name is output to the standard output.
For convenience, the input data does not need to be sorted; the
command sorts the input lines internally.
By request from Tommi Virtanen.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Alex Riesen