kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Tree: d4f8f74bc6

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Matthieu Moy	d38a30df7d	Be more user-friendly when refusing to do something because of conflict. Various commands refuse to run in the presence of conflicts (commit, merge, pull, cherry-pick/revert). They all used to provide rough, and inconsistant error messages. A new variable advice.resolveconflict is introduced, and allows more verbose messages, pointing the user to the appropriate solution. For commit, the error message used to look like this: $ git commit foo.txt: needs merge foo.txt: unmerged (c34a92682e0394bc0d6f4d4a67a8e2d32395c169) foo.txt: unmerged (3afcd75de8de0bb5076942fcb17446be50451030) foo.txt: unmerged (c9785d77b76dfe4fb038bf927ee518f6ae45ede4) error: Error building trees The "need merge" line is given by refresh_cache. We add the IN_PORCELAIN option to make the output more consistant with the other porcelain commands, and catch the error in return, to stop with a clean error message. The next lines were displayed by a call to cache_tree_update(), which is not reached anymore if we noticed the conflict. The new output looks like: U foo.txt fatal: 'commit' is not possible because you have unmerged files. Please, fix them up in the work tree, and then use 'git add/rm <file>' as appropriate to mark resolution and make a commit, or use 'git commit -a'. Pull is slightly modified to abort immediately if $GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD exists instead of waiting for merge to complain. The behavior of merge and the test-case are slightly modified to reflect the usual flow: start with conflicts, fix them, and afterwards get rid of MERGE_HEAD, with different error messages at each stage. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Stephan Beyer	944019c8b3	t3501: check that commits are actually done The basic idea of t3501 is to check whether revert and cherry-pick works on renamed files. But as there is no pure cherry-pick/revert test, it is good to also check if commits are actually done in that scenario. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Jeff King	0f2d4476c1	revert: actually check for a dirty index The previous code mistakenly used wt_status_prepare to check whether the index had anything commitable in it; however, that function is just an init function, and will never report a dirty index. The correct way with wt_status_* would be to call wt_status_print with the output pointing to /dev/null or similar. However, that does extra work by both examining the working tree and spewing status information to nowhere. Instead, let's just implement the useful subset of wt_status_print as an "is_index_dirty" function. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Kristian Høgsberg	9e54dc6c12	Remove unecessary hard-coding of EDITOR=':' VISUAL=':' in some test suites. They are already set and exoprted by sourcing ./test-lib.sh in all test scripts. Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Junio C Hamano	acb4441e0d	Use merge-recursive in git-revert/git-cherry-pick This makes revert and cherry-pick to use merge-recursive, to allow them to notice renames. A pair of test scripts demonstrate that an old change before a rename happened can be applied (reverted) after a rename with cherry-pick (with revert). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago