kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Jonathan Nieder	2dec68cf8f	tests: add missing &&, batch 2 Same rules as before: this patch only adds " &&" to the end of some lines in the test suite. Intended to be applied on top of or squashed with the last batch if they look okay. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	14 years ago
Junio C Hamano	713c79e84b	more war on "sleep" in tests Two more tests that sleep only to waste tick can be converted to use test_tick and take expiry parameters relative to $test_tick. The basic idea is to replace "sleep 1" with "test_tick" to cause the "time" to pass. These tests are interested in expiring things with "now" as the timestamp, soo use a timestamp relative to $test_tick to give them more stability and reproducibility. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	7f3140cd23	git repack: keep commits hidden by a graft When you have grafts that pretend that a given commit has different parents than the ones recorded in the commit object, it is dangerous to let 'git repack' remove those hidden parents, as you can easily remove the graft and end up with a broken repository. So let's play it safe and keep those parent objects and everything that is reachable by them, in addition to the grafted parents. As this behavior can only be triggered by git pack-objects, and as that command handles duplicate parents gracefully, we do not bother to cull duplicated parents that may result by using both true and grafted parents. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Björn Steinbrink	1ec648278e	Add a test showing that 'git repack' throws away grafted-away parents Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Brandon Casey	1ef2d5a640	t7700-repack: repack -a now works properly, expect success from test Since the recent rework of the object listing mechanism of pack-objects/rev-list, git-repack now properly packs objects from alternate repositories even when the local repository contains packs. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Brandon Casey	094085e336	pack-objects: don't loosen objects available in alternate or kept packs If pack-objects is called with the --unpack-unreachable option then it will unpack (i.e. loosen) all unreferenced objects from local not-kept packs, including those that also exist in packs residing in an alternate object database or a locally kept pack. The only user of this option is git-repack. In this case, repack will follow the call to pack-objects with a call to prune-packed, which will delete these newly loosened objects, making the act of loosening a waste of time. The unnecessary loosening can be avoided by checking whether an object exists in a non-local pack or a locally kept pack before loosening it. This fixes the 'local packed unreachable obs that exist in alternate ODB are not loosened' test in t7700. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Brandon Casey	869a3d34c1	t7700: demonstrate repack flaw which may loosen objects unnecessarily If an unreferenced object exists in both a local pack and in either a pack residing in an alternate object database or a local kept pack, then the pack-objects call made by repack will loosen that object only to have it immediately pruned by repack's call to prune-packed. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Brandon Casey	79bc4c7155	pack-objects: only repack or loosen objects residing in "local" packs These two features were invented for use by repack when repack will delete the local packs that have been made redundant. The packs accessible through alternates are not deleted by repack, so the objects contained in them are still accessible after the local packs are deleted. They do not need to be repacked into the new pack or loosened. For the case of loosening they would immediately be deleted by the subsequent prune-packed that is called by repack anyway. This fixes the test 'packed unreachable obs in alternate ODB are not loosened' in t7700. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Brandon Casey	171110a4a6	git-repack.sh: don't use --kept-pack-only option to pack-objects The --kept-pack-only option to pack-objects treats all kept packs as equal. This results in objects that reside in an alternate pack that has a .keep file, not being packed into a newly created pack when the user specifies the -a option to repack. Since the user may not have any control over the alternate database, git should not refrain from repacking those objects even though they are in a pack with a .keep file. This fixes the 'packed obs in alternate ODB kept pack are repacked' test in t7700. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Brandon Casey	92cd872202	t7700-repack: add two new tests demonstrating repacking flaws 1) The new --kept-pack-only mechansim of rev-list/pack-objects has replaced --unpacked=. This new mechansim does not operate solely on "local" packs now. The result is that objects residing in an alternate pack which has a .keep file will not be repacked with repack -a. This flaw is only apparent when a commit object is the one residing in an alternate kept pack. 2) The 'repack unpacked objects' and 'loosen unpacked objects' mechanisms of pack-objects, i.e. --keep-unreachable and --unpack-unreachable, now do not operate solely on local packs. The --keep-unreachable option no longer has any callers, but --unpack-unreachable is used when repack is called with '-A -d' and the local repo has existing packs. In this case, objects residing in alternate, not-kept packs will be loosened, and then immediately deleted by repack's call to prune-packed. The test must manually call pack-objects to avoid the call to prune-packed that is made by repack when -d is used. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Brandon Casey	a83c88525e	t7700: demonstrate misbehavior of 'repack -a' when local packs exist The ability to "...fatten [the] local repository by packing everything that is needed by the local ref into a single new pack, including things that are borrowed from alternates"[1] is supposed to be provided by the '-a' or '-A' options to repack when '-l' is not used, but there is a flaw. For each pack in the local repository without a .keep file, repack supplies a --unpacked=<pack> argument to pack-objects. The --unpacked option to pack-objects, with or without an argument, causes pack-objects to ignore any object which is packed in a pack not mentioned in an argument to --unpacked=. So, if there are local packs, and 'repack -a' is called, then any objects which reside in packs accessible through alternates will _not_ be packed. If there are no local packs, then no --unpacked argument will be supplied, and repack will behave as expected. [1] http://mid.gmane.org/7v8wrwidi3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Brandon Casey	3289b9dec5	t7700: test that 'repack -a' packs alternate packed objects Previously, when 'repack -a' was called and there were no packs in the local repository without a .keep file, the repack would fall back to calling pack-objects with '--unpacked --incremental'. This resulted in the created pack file, if any, to be missing the packed objects in the alternate object store. Test that this specific case has been fixed. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Brandon Casey	daae062595	pack-objects: extend --local to mean ignore non-local loose objects too With this patch, --local means pack only local objects that are not already packed. Additionally, this fixes t7700 testing whether loose objects in an alternate object database are repacked. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Brandon Casey	3c3df42910	t7700: demonstrate mishandling of loose objects in an alternate ODB Loose objects residing in an alternate object database should not be packed when the -l option to repack is used. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Brandon Casey	dd718365cc	repack: don't repack local objects in packs with .keep file If the user created a .keep file for a local pack, then it can be inferred that the user does not want those objects repacked. This fixes the repack bug tested by t7700. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Brandon Casey	9245ddd515	t7700: demonstrate mishandling of objects in packs with a .keep file Objects residing in pack files that have an associated .keep file are not supposed to be repacked into new pack files, but they are. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago

17 Commits (d2c78075496d818d04cc04583b35af117c3a95ed)