kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	c91cfd1916	tests: A SANITY test prereq for testing if we're root Some tests depend on not being able to write to files after chmod -w. This doesn't work when running the tests as root. Change test-lib.sh to test if this works, and if so it sets a new SANITY test prerequisite. The tests that use this previously failed when run under root. There was already a test for this in t3600-rm.sh, added by Junio C Hamano in `2283645` in 2006. That check now uses the new SANITY prerequisite. Some of this was resurrected from the "Tests in Cygwin" thread in May 2009: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/116729/focus=118385 Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Johannes Sixt	704a3143d5	Use prerequisite tags to skip tests that depend on symbolic links Many tests depend on that symbolic links work. This introduces a check that sets the prerequisite tag SYMLINKS if the file system supports symbolic links. Since so many tests have to check for this prerequisite, we do the check in test-lib.sh, so that we don't need to repeat the test in many scripts. To check for 'ln -s' failures, you can use a FAT partition on Linux: $ mkdosfs -C git-on-fat 1000000 $ sudo mount -o loop,uid=j6t,gid=users,shortname=winnt git-on-fat /mnt Clone git to /mnt and $ GIT_SKIP_TESTS='t0001.1[34] t0010 t1301 t403[34] t4129.[47] t5701.7 t7701.3 t9100 t9101.26 t9119 t9124.[67] t9200.10 t9600.6' \ make test (These additionally skipped tests depend on POSIX permissions that FAT on Linux does not provide.) Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>	16 years ago
Junio C Hamano	c4758d3c93	Fix read-tree not to discard errors This fixes the issue identified with recently added tests to t1004 Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Junio C Hamano	8a785dc921	Add tests to catch problems with un-unlinkable symlinks This currently fails not because we refuse to check out, but because we detect error but incorrectly discard it in the callchain. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Junio C Hamano	29dc133198	git-merge-one-file: fix longstanding stupid thinko When a merge result creates a new file, and when our side already has a file in the path, taking the merge result may clobber the untracked file. However, the logic to detect this situation was totally the wrong way. We should complain when the file exists, not when the file does not exist. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Linus Torvalds	7f8ab8dc07	Don't update unchanged merge entries In commit `34110cd4e3` ("Make 'unpack_trees()' have a separate source and destination index") I introduced a really stupid bug in that it would always add merged entries with the CE_UPDATE flag set. That caused us to always re-write the file, even when it was already up-to-date in the source index. Not only is that really stupid from a performance angle, but more importantly it's actively wrong: if we have dirty state in the tree when we merge, overwriting it with the result of the merge will incorrectly overwrite that dirty state. This trivially fixes the problem - simply don't set the CE_UPDATE flag when the merge result matches the old state. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Junio C Hamano	5be60078c9	Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	18 years ago
Pavel Roskin	3dff5379bf	Assorted typo fixes Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Junio C Hamano	f8a9d42872	read-tree: further loosen "working file will be lost" check. This follows up commit `ed93b449` where we removed overcautious "working file will be lost" check. A new option "--exclude-per-directory=.gitignore" can be used to tell the "git-read-tree" command that the user does not mind losing contents in untracked files in the working tree, if they need to be overwritten by a merge (either a two-way "switch branches" merge, or a three-way merge). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Junio C Hamano	ed93b449c5	merge: loosen overcautious "working file will be lost" check. The three-way merge complained unconditionally when a path that does not exist in the index is involved in a merge when it existed in the working tree. If we are merging an old version that had that path tracked, but the path is not tracked anymore, and if we are merging that old version in, the result will be that the path is not tracked. In that case we should not complain. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago