kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Junio C Hamano	4525e8e41a	Revert "mailinfo: Remove only one set of square brackets" This reverts commit `650d30d8a1`. Some mailing lists are configured add prefix "[listname] " to all their messages, and also people hand-edit subject lines, be it an output from format-patch or a patch generated by some other means. We cannot stop people from mucking with the subject line, and with the change, there always will be need for hand editing the subject when that happens. People have depended on the leading [bracketed string] removal.	16 years ago
Andreas Ericsson	650d30d8a1	mailinfo: Remove only one set of square brackets git-format-patch prepends patches with a [PATCH x/n] prefix, but mailinfo used to remove any number of square-bracket pairs and the content between them. This prevents one from using a commit subject like this: [ and ] must be allowed as input Removing the square bracket pair from this rather clumsily constructed subject line loses important information, so we must take care not to. This patch causes the subject stripping to stop after it has encountered one pair of square brackets. One possible downside of this patch is that the patch-handling programs will now fail at removing author-added square-brackets to be removed, such as [RFC][PATCH x/n] However, since format-patch only adds one set of square brackets, this behaviour is quite easily undesrstood and defended while the previous behaviour is not. Signed-off-by: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Brandon Casey	bf1db7dba5	t5100: use ancient encoding syntax for backwards compatibility Some ancient platforms do not have an extensive list of alternate names for character encodings. For example, Solaris 7 does not know that ISO-8859-1 is the same as ISO8859-1. Modern platforms do know this, so use the older names. The following conversions were performed: ISO-8859-1 --> ISO8859-1 ISO-8859-2 --> ISO8859-2 ISO-8859-8 --> ISO8859-8 iso-2022-jp --> ISO-2022-JP Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Kirill Smelkov	08e6710f76	mailinfo: cleanup extra spaces for complex 'From:' currently for cases like From: A U Thor <a.u.thor@example.com> (Comment) mailinfo extracts the following 'Author:' field: Author: A U Thor (Comment) ^^ which has two extra spaces left in there after removed email part. I think this is wrong so here is a fix. Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@landau.phys.spbu.ru> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Kirill Smelkov	806d5e9044	mailinfo: add explicit test for mails like '<a.u.thor@example.com> (A U Thor)' Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>	16 years ago
Kirill Smelkov	ddfb3696b9	mailinfo: 'From:' header should be unfold as well At present we do headers unfolding (see RFC822 3.1.1. LONG HEADER FIELDS) for all fields except 'From' (always) and 'Subject' (when keep_subject is set) Not unfolding 'From' is a bug -- see above-mentioned RFC link. Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@landau.phys.spbu.ru> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Kirill Smelkov	353aaf2fa1	mailinfo: correctly handle multiline 'Subject:' header When native language (RU) is in use, subject header usually contains several parts, e.g. Subject: [Navy-patches] [PATCH] =?utf-8?b?0JjQt9C80LXQvdGR0L0g0YHQv9C40YHQvtC6INC/0LA=?= =?utf-8?b?0LrQtdGC0L7QsiDQvdC10L7QsdGF0L7QtNC40LzRi9GFINC00LvRjyA=?= =?utf-8?b?0YHQsdC+0YDQutC4?= This exposes several bugs in builtin-mailinfo.c: 1. decode_b_segment: do not append explicit NUL -- explicit NUL was preventing correct header construction on parts concatenation via strbuf_addbuf in decode_header_bq. Fixes: -Subject: Изменён список пакетов необходимых для сборки +Subject: Изменён список па Then 2. Do not emit '\n' between "encoded-word" where RFC2046 says that linear white space between them are ignored when displaying. Fixes: -Subject: Изменён список пакетов необходимых для сборки +Subject: Изменён список па кетов необходимых для сборки Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Don Zickus	289796dd29	mailinfo: re-fix MIME multipart boundary parsing Recent changes to is_multipart_boundary() caused git-mailinfo to segfault. The reason was after handling the end of the boundary the code tried to look for another boundary. Because the boundary list was empty, dereferencing the pointer to the top of the boundary caused the program to go boom. The fix is to check to see if the list is empty and if so go on its merry way instead of looking for another boundary. I also fixed a couple of increments and decrements that didn't look correct relating to content_top. The boundary test case was updated to catch future problems like this again. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Junio C Hamano	a9fd1383a7	mailinfo: fix MIME multi-part message boundary handling After finding a MIME multi-part message boundary line, the handle_body() function is supposed to first flush any accumulated contents from the previous part to the output stream. However, the code mistakenly output the boundary line it found. The old code that used one global, fixed-length buffer line[] used an alternate static buffer newline[] for keeping track of this accumulated contents and flushed newline[] upon seeing the boundary; when `3b6121f` (git-mailinfo: use strbuf's instead of fixed buffers, 2008-07-13) converted a fixed-length buffer in this program to use strbuf,these two buffers were converted to "line" and "prev" (the latter of which now has a much more sensible name) strbufs, but the code mistakenly flushed "line" (which contains the boundary we have just found), instead of "prev". This resulted in the first boundary to be output in front of the first line of the message. The rewritten implementation of handle_boundary() lost the terminating newline; this would then result in the second line of the message to be stuck with the first line. The is_multipart_boundary() was designed to catch both the internal boundary and the terminating one (the one with trailing "--"); this also was broken with the rewrite, and the code in the handle_boundary() to handle the terminating boundary was never triggered. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Lukas Sandström	e9fe804a82	git-mailinfo: Fix getting the subject from the in-body [PATCH] line "Subject: " isn't in the static array "header", and thus memcmp("Subject:", header[i], 7) will never match. Even if it did so, hdr_data[] may not have been allocated if there weren't a "Subject: " in-body when we process "[PATCH]" in the affected codepath. Signed-off-by: Lukas Sandström <lukass@etek.chalmers.se> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Jay Soffian	87f1b8849b	mailinfo: feed only one line to handle_filter() for QP input The function is intended to be fed one logical line at a time to inspect, but a QP encoded raw input line can have more than one lines, just like BASE64 encoded one. Quoting LF as =0A may be unusual but RFC2045 allows it. The issue was noticed and fixed by Jay Soffian. JC added a test to protect the fix from regressing later. Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Simon Sasburg	f88a545a94	Make mailsplit and mailinfo strip whitespace from the start of the input Signed-off-by: Simon Sasburg <Simon.Sasburg@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Don Zickus	ae1a743735	Add a couple more test cases to the suite. They handle cases where there is no attached patch. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Linus Torvalds	34fc5cefa7	mailinfo: do not get confused with logical lines that are too long. It basically considers all the continuation lines to be lines of their own, and if the total line is bigger than what we can fit in it, we just truncate the result rather than stop in the middle and then get confused when we try to parse the "next" line (which is just the remainder of the first line). [jc: added test, and tightened boundary a bit per list discussion.] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Junio C Hamano	4839c0b5fa	t5100: mailinfo and mailsplit tests. Currently the test passes with 1.3.3 but not with the tip of "master". This is to verify the fixes from Eric W Biedermann. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	19 years ago

16 Commits (cfe370c6476392095bc3f18013d195b1cccd6184)