path_name is either ptr that should not be freed, or a pointer to a strbuf
buffer that is deallocated when exiting the loop. Don't do that !
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the gain is not obvious in the diffstat, the resulting code is more
readable, _and_ in checkout-index/update-index we now reuse the same buffer
to unquote strings instead of always freeing/mallocing.
This also is more coherent with the next patch that reworks quoting
functions.
The quoting function is also made more efficient scanning for backslashes
and treating portions of strings without a backslash at once.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
read_line is now strbuf_getline, and is a first class citizen, it returns 0
when reading a line worked, EOF else.
The ->eof marker was used non-locally by fast-import.c, mimic the same
behaviour using a static int in "read_next_command", that now returns -1 on
EOF, and avoids to call strbuf_getline when it's in EOF state.
Also no longer automagically strbuf_release the buffer, it's counter
intuitive and breaks fast-import in a very subtle way.
Note: being at EOF implies that command_buf.len == 0.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier, add_file_to_index() invalidated the path in the cache-tree
but remove_file_from_cache() did not, and the user of the latter
needed to invalidate the entry himself. This led to a few bugs due to
missed invalidate calls already. This patch makes the management of
cache-tree less error prone by making more invalidate calls from lower
level cache API functions.
The rules are:
- If you are going to write the index, you should either maintain
cache_tree correctly.
- If you cannot, alternatively you can remove the entire cache_tree
by calling cache_tree_free() before you call write_cache().
- When you modify the index, cache_tree_invalidate_path() should be
called with the path you are modifying, to discard the entry from
the cache-tree structure.
- The following cache API functions exported from read-cache.c (and
the macro whose names have "cache" instead of "index")
automatically call cache_tree_invalidate_path() for you:
- remove_file_from_index();
- add_file_to_index();
- add_index_entry();
You can modify the index bypassing the above API functions
(e.g. find an existing cache entry from the index and modify it in
place). You need to call cache_tree_invalidate_path() yourself in
such a case.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Add strbuf_rtrim to remove trailing spaces.
* Add strbuf_insert to insert data at a given position.
* Off-by one fix in strbuf_addf: strbuf_avail() does not counts the final
\0 so the overflow test for snprintf is the strict comparison. This is
not critical as the growth mechanism chosen will always allocate _more_
memory than asked, so the second test will not fail. It's some kind of
miracle though.
* Add size extension hints for strbuf_init and strbuf_read. If 0, default
applies, else:
+ initial buffer has the given size for strbuf_init.
+ first growth checks it has at least this size rather than the
default 8192.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This trivial patch avoids re-hashing files that are already clean in the
index. This mirrors what commit 0781b8a9b2
did for "git add .", only for "git commit ." instead.
This improves the cold-cache case immensely, since we don't need to bring
in all the file contents, just the index and any files dirty in the index.
Before:
[torvalds@woody linux]$ time git commit .
real 1m49.537s
user 0m3.892s
sys 0m2.432s
After:
[torvalds@woody linux]$ time git commit .
real 0m14.273s
user 0m1.312s
sys 0m0.516s
(both after doing a "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" to get cold-cache
behaviour - even with the index optimization git still has to "lstat()"
all the files, so with a truly cold cache, bringing all the inodes in
will take some time).
[jc: trivial "return 0;" fixed]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Two scanf() calls were converted to strtoul_ui() but the return
values were not updated to match. scanf() returns the number of
matched "values" which for this usage is 1 on success. strtoul_ui()
return 0 on success. Update these call sites to match.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* builtin-grep.c (strtoul_ui): Move function definition from here, to...
* git-compat-util.h (strtoul_ui): ...here, with an added "base" parameter.
* builtin-grep.c (cmd_grep): Update use of strtoul_ui to include base, "10".
* builtin-update-index.c (read_index_info): Diagnose an invalid mode integer
that is out of range or merely larger than INT_MAX.
(cmd_update_index): Use strtoul_ui, not sscanf.
* convert-objects.c (write_subdirectory): Likewise.
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I finally got around to looking at Alex' patch to teach update-index about
gitlinks too, so that "git commit -a" along with any other explicit
update-index scripts can work.
I don't think there was anything wrong with Alex' patch, but the code he
patched I felt was just so ugly that the added cases just pushed it over
the edge. Especially as I don't think that patch necessarily did the right
thing for a gitlink entry that already existed in the index, but that
wasn't actually a real git repository in the working tree (just an empty
subdirectory or a non-git snapshot because it hadn't wanted to track that
particular subproject).
So I ended up deciding to clean up the git-update-index handling the same
way I tackled the directory traversal used by git-add earlier: by
splitting the different cases up into multiple smaller functions, and just
making the code easier to read (and adding more comments about the
different cases).
So this replaces the old "process_file()" with a new "process_path()"
function that then just calls out to different helper functions depending
on what kind of path it is. Processing a nondirectory ends up being just
one of the simpler cases.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* builtin-grep.c (strtoul_ui): Move function definition from here, to...
* git-compat-util.h (strtoul_ui): ...here, with an added "base" parameter.
* builtin-grep.c (cmd_grep): Update use of strtoul_ui to include base, "10".
* builtin-update-index.c (read_index_info): Diagnose an invalid mode integer
that is out of range or merely larger than INT_MAX.
(cmd_update_index): Use strtoul_ui, not sscanf.
* convert-objects.c (write_subdirectory): Likewise.
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I'd like to consistently name all index-layer functions that
operate on the default index xxx_cache(), and this application
specific function interferes with the plan.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When defined, this allows plumbing commands that update the
index (add, apply, checkout-index, merge-recursive, mv,
read-tree, rm, update-index, and write-tree) to write their
resulting index to an alternative index file while holding a
lock to the original index file. With this, git-commit that
jumps the index does not have to make an extra copy of the index
file, and more importantly, it can do the update while holding
the lock on the index.
However, I think the interface to let an environment variable
specify the output is a mistake, as shown in the documentation.
If a curious user has the environment variable set to something
other than the file GIT_INDEX_FILE points at, almost everything
will break. This should instead be a command line parameter to
tell these plumbing commands to write the result in the named
file, to prevent stupid mistakes.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Some file systems that can host git repositories and their working copies
do not support symbolic links. But then if the repository contains a symbolic
link, it is impossible to check out the working copy.
This patch enables partial support of symbolic links so that it is possible
to check out a working copy on such a file system. A new flag
core.symlinks (which is true by default) can be set to false to indicate
that the filesystem does not support symbolic links. In this case, symbolic
links that exist in the trees are checked out as small plain files, and
checking in modifications of these files preserve the symlink property in
the database (as long as an entry exists in the index).
Of course, this does not magically make symbolic links work on such defective
file systems; hence, this solution does not help if the working copy relies
on that an entry is a real symbolic link.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This delays the error exit from hold_lock_file_for_update() in
update-index, so that "update-index --refresh" in a read-only
repository can still report what paths are stat-dirty before
exiting.
Also it makes -q to squelch the error message.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When we do not trust executable bit from lstat(2), we copied
existing ce_mode bits without checking if the filesystem object
is a regular file (which is the only thing we apply the "trust
executable bit" business) nor if the blob in the index is a
regular file (otherwise, we should do the same as registering a
new regular file, which is to default non-executable).
Noticed by Johannes Sixt.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
In particular, it fixes the following (typical for cygwin) problem:
$ git-update-index --chmod=-x ../wrapper/Jamfile
fatal: git-update-index: cannot chmod -x '../wrapper/Jamfile'
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
An earlier commit f28b34a broke symlinks when trust-executable-bit
is not set because it incorrectly assumed that everything was a
regular file.
Reported by Juergen Ruehle.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If the user has configured core.filemode=0 then we shouldn't set
the execute bit in the index when adding a new file as the user
has indicated that the local filesystem can't be trusted.
This means that when adding files that should be marked executable
in a repository with core.filemode=0 the user must perform a
'git update-index --chmod=+x' on the file before committing the
addition.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It called read_ref(git_path(..)..), where read_ref does the git_path()
stuff itself.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I often find myself typing this but the common abbreviation "g" for
"again" has not been supported so far for some unknown reason.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This abstracts away the size of the hash values when copying them
from memory location to memory location, much as the introduction
of hashcmp abstracted away hash value comparsion.
A few call sites were using char* rather than unsigned char* so
I added the cast rather than open hashcpy to be void*. This is a
reasonable tradeoff as most call sites already use unsigned char*
and the existing hashcmp is also declared to be unsigned char*.
[jc: Splitted the patch to "master" part, to be followed by a
patch for merge-recursive.c which is not in "master" yet.
Fixed the cast in the latter hunk to combine-diff.c which was
wrong in the original.
Also converted ones left-over in combine-diff.c, diff-lib.c and
upload-pack.c ]
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Introduces global inline:
hashcmp(const unsigned char *sha1, const unsigned char *sha2)
Uses memcmp for comparison and returns the result based on the length of
the hash name (a future runtime decision).
Acked-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
[jc: I needed to hand merge the changes to the updated codebase,
so the result needs to be checked.]
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Most of the callers except the one in refs.c use the function to
update the index file. Among the index writers, everybody
except write-tree dies if they cannot open it for writing.
This gives the function an extra argument, to tell it to die
when it cannot create a new file as the lockfile.
The only caller that does not have to die is write-tree, because
updating the index for the cache-tree part is optional and not
being able to do so does not affect the correctness. I think we
do not have to be so careful and make the failure into die() the
same way as other callers, but that would be a different patch.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This changes the calling convention of built-in commands and
passes the "prefix" (i.e. pathname of $PWD relative to the
project root level) down to them.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
hold_lock_file_for_update() relies on that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The framework to create lockfiles that are removed at exit is
first used to reliably write the index file, but it is
applicable to other things, so stop calling it "cache_file".
This also rewords a few remaining error message that called the
index file "cache file".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This cleans up and libifies the "git update-index --[really-]refresh"
functionality. This will be eventually required for eventually doing the
"commit" and "status" commands as built-ins.
It really just moves "refresh_index()" from update-index.c to
read-cache.c, but it also has to change the calling convention so that the
function uses a "unsigned int flags" argument instead of various static
flags variables for passing down the information about whether to be quiet
or not, and allow unmerged entries etc.
That actually cleans up update-index.c too, since it turns out that all
those flags were really specific to that one function of the index update,
so they shouldn't have had file-scope visibility even before.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
With this one, it's now a fatal error to try to add a pathname
that cannot be added with "git add", i.e.
[torvalds@g5 git]$ git add .git/config
fatal: unable to add .git/config to index
and
[torvalds@g5 git]$ git add foo/../bar
fatal: unable to add foo/../bar to index
instead of the old "Ignoring path xyz" warning that would end up
silently succeeding on any other paths.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Unfortunately, prefix_path() sometimes returns a newly xmalloc()ed buffer,
and in other cases it returns a substring!
For example, when calling
git update-index ./hello.txt
prefix_path() returns "hello.txt", but does not allocate a new buffer. The
original code only checked if the result of prefix_path() was different from
what was passed in, and thusly trigger a segmentation fault.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Unfortunately, prefix_path() sometimes returns a newly xmalloc()ed buffer,
and in other cases it returns a substring!
For example, when calling
git update-index ./hello.txt
prefix_path() returns "hello.txt", but does not allocate a new buffer. The
original code only checked if the result of prefix_path() was different from
what was passed in, and thusly trigger a segmentation fault.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When pathspecs are given, update-index --again further limits
the set of paths to be updated to those that match them.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
After running 'git-update-index' for some paths, you may want to
do the update on the same set of paths again.
The new flag --again checks the paths whose index entries are
are different from the HEAD commit and updates them from the
working tree contents.
This was brought up by Carl Worth on #git.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
prefix_path() sometimes allocates new memory and returns it, and
other times returns the incoming path argument intact. The
callers need to be a bit careful not to leak memory.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It completely forgot to take the prefix into account, so you
had to feed the full path even when you start from a
subdirectory, which was nonsensical.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The patch makes "--chmod=-x" and "--chmod=+x" act like "--add"
and "--remove" to affect the behaviour of the command for the
rest of the path parameters, not just the following one.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Retire git-unresolve and make it into "git-update-index --unresolve".
It processes all paths that follow.
During a merge, you would mark a path that is dealt with with:
$ git update-index hello
and you would "undo" it with:
$ git update-index --unresolve hello
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If git-update-index --index-info -z is used only the first
record given to the process will actually be updated as
the -z option is ignored until after all index records
have been read and processed. This meant that multiple
null terminated records were seen as a single record which
was lacking a trailing LF, however since the first record
ended in a null the C string handling functions ignored the
trailing garbage. So --index-info should be required to be
the last command line option, much as --stdin is required
to be the last command line option. Because --index-info
implies --stdin this isn't an issue as the user shouldn't
be passing --stdin when also passing --index-info.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The earlier round failed to make --really-refresh to mark
up-to-date index entry to valid again due to a trivial thinko.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Brandon Casey