Documentation mark-up fix.
* ja/doc-markup-attached-paragraph-fix:
doc: fix indentation of refStorage item in git-config(1)
doc: change the markup of paragraphs following a nested list item
Asciidoctor and asciidoc.py have different behaviors when a paragraph
follows a nested list item. Asciidoctor has a bug[1] that makes it keep a
plus sign (+) used to attached paragraphs at the beginning of the paragraph.
This commit uses workarounds to avoid this problem by using second level
definition lists and open blocks.
[1]:https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor/issues/4704
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Asciidoc.py and Asciidoctor do not process the '+' verbatim the same way. A
span is detected when the format sign (here '+')is preceded by a non-word
character. It seems that '{nbsp}' is considered a non-word sign by
Asciidoc.py, but not by Asciidoctor.
Using a double format-sign opens 'unconstrained' span, independent on the
preceding character in both engines.
The '+' sign is used instead of the backtick '`' because it is not processed
as synopsis in asciidoc.py. Unfortunately, the post-processing of verbatim
synopsis in asciidoctor cannot be bypassed and formatting of the parentheses
is forced in syntax sign instead of keywords, unless a proper grammar
analyzer is used.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Use _<placeholder>_ instead of <placeholder> in the description
- Use `backticks` for keywords and more complex option
descriptions. The new rendering engine will apply synopsis rules to
these spans.
For all the formats in the form of %(foo), the formatting needs to be
heavier because we not want the parentheses to be rendered as syntax
elements,but as keywords, i.e. we need to circumvent the syntax highlighting
of synopsis. In this particular case, this requires the heavy escaping of
the parts that contain parentheses with ++.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We presently use the ".txt" extension for our AsciiDoc files. While not
wrong, most editors do not associate this extension with AsciiDoc,
meaning that contributors don't get automatic editor functionality that
could be useful, such as syntax highlighting and prose linting.
It is much more common to use the ".adoc" extension for AsciiDoc files,
since this helps editors automatically detect files and also allows
various forges to provide rich (HTML-like) rendering. Let's do that
here, renaming all of the files and updating the includes where
relevant. Adjust the various build scripts and makefiles to use the new
extension as well.
Note that this should not result in any user-visible changes to the
documentation.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Junio C Hamano