kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Tree: c09cd77ea2

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Pat Thoyts	899663f8e4	t3509: use unconstrained initial test to setup repository. The first test did not run on msysGit due to the SYMLINKS constraint and so subsequent tests failed because the test repository was not initialized. Signed-off-by: Pat Thoyts <patthoyts@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	14 years ago
Elijah Newren	86273e5764	merge-recursive: D/F conflicts where was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir In merge-recursive.c, whenever there was a rename where a file name on one side of the rename matches a directory name on the other side of the merge, then the very first check that string_list_has_string(&o->current_directory_set, ren1_dst) would trigger forcing it into marking it as a rename/directory conflict. However, if the path is only renamed on one side and a simple three-way merge between the separate files resolves cleanly, then we don't need to mark it as a rename/directory conflict. So, we can simply move the check for rename/directory conflicts after we've verified that there isn't a rename/rename conflict and that a threeway content merge doesn't work. This changes the particular error message one gets in the case where the directory name that a file on one side of the rename matches is not also part of the rename pair. For example, with commits containing the files: COMMON -> (HEAD, MERGE ) --------- --------------- ------- sub/file1 -> (sub/file1, newsub) <NULL> -> (newsub/newfile, <NULL>) then previously when one tried to merge MERGE into HEAD, one would get CONFLICT (rename/directory): Rename sub/file1->newsub in HEAD directory newsub added in merge Renaming sub/file1 to newsub~HEAD instead Adding newsub/newfile Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result. After this patch, the error message will instead become: Removing newsub Adding newsub/newfile CONFLICT (file/directory): There is a directory with name newsub in merge. Adding newsub as newsub~HEAD Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result. That makes more sense to me, because git can't know that there's a conflict until after it's tried resolving paths involving newsub/newfile to see if they are still in the way at the end (and if newsub/newfile is not in the way at the end, there should be no conflict at all, which did not hold with git previously). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Elijah Newren	56bfd762e5	t3509: Add rename + D/F conflict testcase that recursive strategy fails When one side of a file rename matches a directory name on the other side, the recursive merge strategy will fail. This is true even if the merge is trivially resolvable. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Elijah Newren	dd5685818b	Mark tests that use symlinks as needing SYMLINKS prerequisite Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Elijah Newren	5a2580d62f	merge_recursive: Fix renames across paths below D/F conflicts The rename logic in process_renames() handles renames and merging of file contents and then marks files as processed. However, there may be higher stage entries left in the index for other reasons (e.g., due to D/F conflicts). By checking for such cases and marking the entry as not processed, it allows process_entry() later to look at it and handle those higher stages. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Alexander Gladysh	f433f70547	Add a rename + D/F conflict testcase This is a simple testcase where both sides of the rename are paths involved in (separate) D/F merge conflicts Signed-off-by: Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago