kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Tao Klerks	8a649be7e8	push: default to single remote even when not named origin With "push.default=current" configured, a simple "git push" will push to the same-name branch on the current branch's branch.<name>.pushRemote, or remote.pushDefault, or origin. If none of these are defined, the push will fail with error "fatal: No configured push destination". The same "default to origin if no config" behavior applies with "push.default=matching". Other commands use "origin" as a default when there are multiple options, but default to the single remote when there is only one - for example, "git checkout <something>". This "assume the single remote if there is only one" behavior is more friendly/useful than a defaulting behavior that only uses the name "origin" no matter what. Update "git push" to also default to the single remote (and finally fall back to "origin" as default if there are several), for "push.default=current" and for other current and future remote-defaulting push behaviors. This change also modifies the behavior of ls-remote in a consistent way, so defaulting not only supplies 'origin', but any single configured remote also. Document the change in behavior, correct incorrect assumptions in related tests, and add test cases reflecting this new single-remote-defaulting behavior. Signed-off-by: Tao Klerks <tao@klerks.biz> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	3 years ago
Tao Klerks	bdaf1dfae7	branch: new autosetupmerge option 'simple' for matching branches With the default push.default option, "simple", beginners are protected from accidentally pushing to the "wrong" branch in centralized workflows: if the remote tracking branch they would push to does not have the same name as the local branch, and they try to do a "default push", they get an error and explanation with options. There is a particular centralized workflow where this often happens: a user branches to a new local topic branch from an existing remote branch, eg with "checkout -b feature1 origin/master". With the default branch.autosetupmerge configuration (value "true"), git will automatically add origin/master as the upstream tracking branch. When the user pushes with a default "git push", with the intention of pushing their (new) topic branch to the remote, they get an error, and (amongst other things) a suggestion to run "git push origin HEAD". If they follow this suggestion the push succeeds, but on subsequent default pushes they continue to get an error - so eventually they figure out to add "-u" to change the tracking branch, or they spelunk the push.default config doc as proposed and set it to "current", or some GUI tooling does one or the other of these things for them. When one of their coworkers later works on the same topic branch, they don't get any of that "weirdness". They just "git checkout feature1" and everything works exactly as they expect, with the shared remote branch set up as remote tracking branch, and push and pull working out of the box. The "stable state" for this way of working is that local branches have the same-name remote tracking branch (origin/feature1 in this example), and multiple people can work on that remote feature branch at the same time, trusting "git pull" to merge or rebase as required for them to be able to push their interim changes to that same feature branch on that same remote. (merging from the upstream "master" branch, and merging back to it, are separate more involved processes in this flow). There is a problem in this flow/way of working, however, which is that the first user, when they first branched from origin/master, ended up with the "wrong" remote tracking branch (different from the stable state). For a while, before they pushed (and maybe longer, if they don't use -u/--set-upstream), their "git pull" wasn't getting other users' changes to the feature branch - it was getting any changes from the remote "master" branch instead (a completely different class of changes!) An experienced git user might say "well yeah, that's what it means to have the remote tracking branch set to origin/master!" - but the original user above didn't ask to have the remote master branch added as remote tracking branch - that just happened automatically when they branched their feature branch. They didn't necessarily even notice or understand the meaning of the "set up to track 'origin/master'" message when they created the branch - especially if they are using a GUI. Looking at how to fix this, you might think "OK, so disable auto setup of remote tracking - set branch.autosetupmerge to false" - but that will inconvenience the second user in this story - the one who just wanted to start working on the topic branch. The first and second users swap roles at different points in time of course - they should both have a sane configuration that does the right thing in both situations. Make this "branches have the same name locally as on the remote" workflow less painful / more obvious by introducing a new branch.autosetupmerge option called "simple", to match the same-name "push.default" option that makes similar assumptions. This new option automatically sets up tracking in a subset of the current default situations: when the original ref is a remote tracking branch and has the same branch name on the remote (as the new local branch name). Update the error displayed when the 'push.default=simple' configuration rejects a mismatching-upstream-name default push, to offer this new branch.autosetupmerge option that will prevent this class of error. With this new configuration, in the example situation above, the first user does not get origin/master set up as the tracking branch for the new local branch. If they "git pull" in their new local-only branch, they get an error explaining there is no upstream branch - which makes sense and is helpful. If they "git push", they get an error explaining how to push and suggesting they specify --set-upstream - which is exactly the right thing to do for them. This new option is likely not appropriate for users intentionally implementing a "triangular workflow" with a shared upstream tracking branch, that they "git pull" in and a "private" feature branch that they push/force-push to just for remote safe-keeping until they are ready to push up to the shared branch explicitly/separately. Such users are likely to prefer keeping the current default merge.autosetupmerge=true behavior, and change their push.default to "current". Also extend the existing branch tests with three new cases testing this option - the obvious matching-name and non-matching-name cases, and also a non-matching-ref-type case. The matching-name case needs to temporarily create an independent repo to fetch from, as the general strategy of using the local repo as the remote in these tests precludes locally branching with the same name as in the "remote". Signed-off-by: Tao Klerks <tao@klerks.biz> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	3 years ago
Josh Steadmon	d3115660b4	branch: add flags and config to inherit tracking It can be helpful when creating a new branch to use the existing tracking configuration from the branch point. However, there is currently not a method to automatically do so. Teach git-{branch,checkout,switch} an "inherit" argument to the "--track" option. When this is set, creating a new branch will cause the tracking configuration to default to the configuration of the branch point, if set. For example, if branch "main" tracks "origin/main", and we run `git checkout --track=inherit -b feature main`, then branch "feature" will track "origin/main". Thus, `git status` will show us how far ahead/behind we are from origin, and `git pull` will pull from origin. This is particularly useful when creating branches across many submodules, such as with `git submodule foreach ...` (or if running with a patch such as [1], which we use at $job), as it avoids having to manually set tracking info for each submodule. Since we've added an argument to "--track", also add "--track=direct" as another way to explicitly get the original "--track" behavior ("--track" without an argument still works as well). Finally, teach branch.autoSetupMerge a new "inherit" option. When this is set, "--track=inherit" becomes the default behavior. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180927221603.148025-1-sbeller@google.com/ Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	3 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	52f1e82178	pull: remove support for `--rebase=preserve` In preparation for `git-rebase--preserve-merges.sh` entering its after life, we remove this (deprecated) option that would still rely on it. To help users transition who still did not receive the memo about the deprecation, we offer a helpful error message instead of throwing our hands in the air and saying that we don't know that option, never heard of it. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	4 years ago
Bert Wesarg	88f8576eda	pull --rebase/remote rename: document and honor single-letter abbreviations rebase types When `46af44b07d` (pull --rebase=<type>: allow single-letter abbreviations for the type, 2018-08-04) landed in Git, it had the side effect that not only 'pull --rebase=<type>' accepted the single-letter abbreviations but also the 'pull.rebase' and 'branch.<name>.rebase' configurations. However, 'git remote rename' did not honor these single-letter abbreviations when reading the 'branch..rebase' configurations. We now document the single-letter abbreviations and both code places share a common function to parse the values of 'git pull --rebase=', 'pull.rebase', and 'branches.*.rebase'. The only functional change is the handling of the `branch_info::rebase` value. Before it was an unsigned enum, thus the truth value could be checked with `branch_info::rebase != 0`. But `enum rebase_type` is signed, thus the truth value must now be checked with `branch_info::rebase >= REBASE_TRUE` Signed-off-by: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	d787d311db	checkout: split part of it to new command 'switch' "git checkout" doing too many things is a source of confusion for many users (and it even bites old timers sometimes). To remedy that, the command will be split into two new ones: switch and restore. The good old "git checkout" command is still here and will be until all (or most of users) are sick of it. See the new man page for the final design of switch. The actual implementation though is still pretty much the same as "git checkout" and not completely aligned with the man page. Following patches will adjust their behavior to match the man page. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	427c3bd28a	rebase: deprecate --preserve-merges We have something much better now: --rebase-merges (which is a complete re-design --preserve-merges, with a lot of issues fixed such as the inability to reorder commits with --preserve-merges). Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	7273b95dbb	config.txt: move branch.* to a separate file Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago