kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Derrick Stolee	1eb22c7dd8	multi-pack-index: repack batches below --batch-size The --batch-size=<size> option of 'git multi-pack-index repack' is intended to limit the amount of work done by the repack. In the case of a large repository, this command should repack a number of small pack-files but leave the large pack-files alone. Most often, the repository has one large pack-file from a 'git clone' operation and number of smaller pack-files from incremental 'git fetch' operations. The issue with '--batch-size' is that it also _prevents_ the repack from happening if the expected size of the resulting pack-file is too small. This was intended as a way to avoid frequent churn of small pack-files, but it has mostly caused confusion when a repository is of "medium" size. That is, not enormous like the Windows OS repository, but also not so small that this incremental repack isn't valuable. The solution presented here is to collect pack-files for repack if their expected size is smaller than the batch-size parameter until either the total expected size exceeds the batch-size or all pack-files are considered. If there are at least two pack-files, then these are combined to a new pack-file whose size should not be too much larger than the batch-size. This new strategy should succeed in keeping the number of pack-files small in these "medium" size repositories. The concern about churn is likely not interesting, as the real control over that is the frequency in which the repack command is run. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	4 years ago
Derrick Stolee	3ce4ca0a56	multi-pack-index: respect repack.packKeptObjects=false When selecting a batch of pack-files to repack in the "git multi-pack-index repack" command, Git should respect the repack.packKeptObjects config option. When false, this option says that the pack-files with an associated ".keep" file should not be repacked. This config value is "false" by default. There are two cases for selecting a batch of objects. The first is the case where the input batch-size is zero, which specifies "repack everything". The second is with a non-zero batch size, which selects pack-files using a greedy selection criteria. Both of these cases are updated and tested. Reported-by: Son Luong Ngoc <sluongng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
William Baker	680cba2c2b	multi-pack-index: add [--[no-]progress] option. Add the --[no-]progress option to git multi-pack-index. Pass the MIDX_PROGRESS flag to the subcommand functions when progress should be displayed by multi-pack-index. The progress feature was added to 'verify' in `144d703` ("multi-pack-index: report progress during 'verify'", 2018-09-13) but some subcommands were not updated to display progress, and the ability to opt-out was overlooked. Signed-off-by: William Baker <William.Baker@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Derrick Stolee	2af890bb28	multi-pack-index: prepare 'repack' subcommand In an environment where the multi-pack-index is useful, it is due to many pack-files and an inability to repack the object store into a single pack-file. However, it is likely that many of these pack-files are rather small, and could be repacked into a slightly larger pack-file without too much effort. It may also be important to ensure the object store is highly available and the repack operation does not interrupt concurrent git commands. Introduce a 'repack' subcommand to 'git multi-pack-index' that takes a '--batch-size' option. The subcommand will inspect the multi-pack-index for referenced pack-files whose size is smaller than the batch size, until collecting a list of pack-files whose sizes sum to larger than the batch size. Then, a new pack-file will be created containing the objects from those pack-files that are referenced by the multi-pack-index. The resulting pack is likely to actually be smaller than the batch size due to compression and the fact that there may be objects in the pack- files that have duplicate copies in other pack-files. The current change introduces the command-line arguments, and we add a test that ensures we parse these options properly. Since we specify a small batch size, we will guarantee that future implementations do not change the list of pack-files. In addition, we hard-code the modified times of the packs in the pack directory to ensure the list of packs sorted by modified time matches the order if sorted by size (ascending). This will be important in a future test. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Derrick Stolee	cff9711616	multi-pack-index: prepare for 'expire' subcommand The multi-pack-index tracks objects in a collection of pack-files. Only one copy of each object is indexed, using the modified time of the pack-files to determine tie-breakers. It is possible to have a pack-file with no referenced objects because all objects have a duplicate in a newer pack-file. Introduce a new 'expire' subcommand to the multi-pack-index builtin. This subcommand will delete these unused pack-files and rewrite the multi-pack-index to no longer refer to those files. More details about the specifics will follow as the method is implemented. Add a test that verifies the 'expire' subcommand is correctly wired, but will still be valid when the verb is implemented. Specifically, create a set of packs that should all have referenced objects and should not be removed during an 'expire' operation. The packs are created carefully to ensure they have a specific order when sorted by size. This will be important in a later test. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Derrick Stolee	81efa16154	Docs: rearrange subcommands for multi-pack-index We will add new subcommands to the multi-pack-index, and that will make the documentation a bit messier. Clean up the 'verb' descriptions by renaming the concept to 'subcommand' and removing the reference to the object directory. Helped-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Helped-by: Szeder Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Derrick Stolee	56ee7ff156	multi-pack-index: add 'verify' verb The multi-pack-index builtin writes multi-pack-index files, and uses a 'write' verb to do so. Add a 'verify' verb that checks this file matches the contents of the pack-indexes it replaces. The current implementation is a no-op, but will be extended in small increments in later commits. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Derrick Stolee	a340773026	multi-pack-index: add 'write' verb In anticipation of writing multi-pack-indexes, add a skeleton 'git multi-pack-index write' subcommand and send the options to a write_midx_file() method. Also create a skeleton test script that tests the 'write' subcommand. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Derrick Stolee	6a257f03ba	multi-pack-index: add builtin This new 'git multi-pack-index' builtin will be the plumbing access for writing, reading, and checking multi-pack-index files. The initial implementation is a no-op. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago