kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Tree: b24f56d604

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Don Zickus	86747c132b	git-mailinfo fixes for patch munging Don't translate the patch to UTF-8, instead preserve the data as is. This also reverts a test case that was included in the original patch series. Also allow overwriting the authorship and title information we gather from RFC2822 mail headers with additional in-body headers, which was pointed out by Linus. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Don Zickus	ae1a743735	Add a couple more test cases to the suite. They handle cases where there is no attached patch. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Don Zickus	87ab799234	builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Linus Torvalds	34fc5cefa7	mailinfo: do not get confused with logical lines that are too long. It basically considers all the continuation lines to be lines of their own, and if the total line is bigger than what we can fit in it, we just truncate the result rather than stop in the middle and then get confused when we try to parse the "next" line (which is just the remainder of the first line). [jc: added test, and tightened boundary a bit per list discussion.] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Junio C Hamano	4839c0b5fa	t5100: mailinfo and mailsplit tests. Currently the test passes with 1.3.3 but not with the tip of "master". This is to verify the fixes from Eric W Biedermann. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	19 years ago