Loosen overly strict ownership check introduced in the recent past,
to keep the promise "cloning a suspicious repository is a safe
first step to inspect it".
* bc/allow-upload-pack-from-other-people:
Allow cloning from repositories owned by another user
Describe a case where an option value needs to be spelled as a
separate argument, i.e. "--opt val", not "--opt=val".
* jc/doc-opt-tilde-expand:
doc: option value may be separate for valid reasons
Git documentation refers to $HOME and $XDG_CONFIG_HOME often, but does
not specify how or where these values come from on Windows where neither
is set by default. The new documentation reflects the behavior of
setup_windows_environment() in compat/mingw.c.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Barreto <alejandro.barreto@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: M Hickford <mirth.hickford@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce support for the Meson build system, a "modern" meta build
system that supports many different platforms, including Linux, macOS,
Windows and BSDs. Meson supports different backends, including Ninja,
Xcode and Microsoft Visual Studio. Several common IDEs provide an
integration with it.
The biggest contender compared to Meson is probably CMake as outlined in
our "Documentation/technical/build-systems.txt" file. Based on my own
personal experience from working with both build systems extensively I
strongly favor Meson over CMake. In my opinion, it feels significantly
easier to use with a syntax that feels more like a "real" programming
language. The second big reason is that Meson supports Rust natively,
which may prove to be important given that the project may pick up Rust
as another language eventually.
Using Meson is rather straight-forward. An example:
```
# Meson uses out-of-tree builds. You can set up multiple build
# directories, how you name them is completely up to you.
$ mkdir build
$ cd build
$ meson setup .. -Dprefix=/tmp/git-installation
# Build the project. This also provides several other targets like
e.g. `install` or `test`.
$ ninja
# Meson has been wired up to support execution of our test suites.
# Both our unit tests and our integration tests are supported.
# Running `meson test` without any arguments will execute all tests,
# but the syntax supports globbing to select only some tests.
$ meson test 't-*'
# Execute single test interactively to allow for debugging.
$ meson test 't0000-*' --interactive --test-args=-ix
```
The build instructions have been successfully tested on the following
systems, tests are passing:
- Apple macOS 10.15.
- FreeBSD 14.1.
- NixOS 24.11.
- OpenBSD 7.6.
- Ubuntu 24.04.
- Windows 10 with Cygwin.
- Windows 10 with MinGW64, except for t9700, which is also broken with
our Makefile.
- Windows 10 with Visual Studio 2022 toolchain, using the Native Tools
Command Prompt with `meson setup --vsenv`. Tests pass, except for
t9700.
- Windows 10 with Visual Studio 2022 solution, using the Native Tools
Command Prompt with `meson setup --backend vs2022`. Tests pass,
except for t9700.
- Windows 10 with VS Code, using the Meson plug-in.
It is expected that there will still be rough edges in the current
version. If this patch lands the expectation is that it will coexist
with our other build systems for a while. Like this, distributions can
slowly migrate over to Meson and report any findings they have to us
such that we can continue to iterate. A potential cutoff date for other
build systems may be Git 3.0.
Some notes:
- The installed distribution is structured somewhat differently than
how it used to be the case. All of our binaries are installed into
`$libexec/git-core`, while all binaries part of `$bindir` are now
symbolic links pointing to the former. This rule is consistent in
itself and thus easier to reason about.
- We do not install dashed binaries into `$libexec/git-core` anymore,
so there won't e.g. be a symlink for git-add(1). These are not
required by modern Git and there isn't really much of a use case for
those anymore. By not installing those symlinks we thus start the
deprecation of this layout.
- We're targeting Meson 1.3.0, which has been released relatively
recently November 2023. The only feature we use from that version is
`fs.relative_to()`, which we could replace if necessary. If so, we
could start to target Meson 1.0.0 and newer, released in December
2022.
- The whole build instructions count around 3300 lines, half of which
is listing all of our code and test files. Our Makefiles are around
5000 lines, autoconf adds another 1300 lines. CMake in comparison
has only 1200 linescode, but it avoids listing individual files and
does not wire up auto-configuration as extensively as the Meson
instructions do.
- We bundle a set of subproject wrappers for curl, expat, openssl,
pcre2 and zlib. This allows developers to build Git without these
dependencies preinstalled, and Meson will fetch and build them
automatically. This is especially helpful on Windows.
Helped-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We're contemplating whether to eventually replace our build systems with
a build system that is easier to use. Add a comparison of build systems
to our technical documentation as a baseline for discussion.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We include the list of available mergetools into our manpages. Extract
the script that performs this logic such that we can reuse it in other
build systems.
While at it, refactor the Makefile targets such that we don't create
"mergetools-list.made" anymore. It shouldn't be necessary, as we can
instead have other targets depend on "mergetools-{diff,merge}.txt"
directly.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "cmd-list.perl" script generates a list of commands that can be
included into our manpages. The script doesn't know about out-of-tree
builds and instead writes resulting files into the source directory.
Adapt it such that we can read data from the source directory and write
data into the build directory.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our documentation uses "include::" directives to include parts that are
either reused across multiple documents or parts that we generate at
build time. Unfortunately, top-level includes are only ever resolved
relative to the base directory, which is typically the directory of the
including document. Most importantly, it is not possible to have either
asciidoc or asciidoctor search multiple directories.
It follows that both kinds of includes must live in the same directory.
This is of course a bummer for out-of-tree builds, because here the
dynamically-built includes live in the build directory whereas the
static includes live in the source directory.
Introduce a `build_dir` attribute and prepend it to all of our includes
for dynamically-built files. This attribute gets set to the build
directory and thus converts the include path to an absolute path, which
asciidoc and asciidoctor know how to resolve.
Note that this change also requires us to update "build-docdep.perl",
which tries to figure out included files such our Makefile can set up
proper build-time dependencies. This script simply scans through the
source files for any lines that match "^include::" and treats the
remainder of the line as included file path. But given that those may
now contain the "{build_dir}" variable we have to teach the script to
replace that attribute with the actual build directory.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "bin-wrappers/" directory gets created by our build system and is
populated with one script for each of our binaries. There isn't anything
inherently wrong with the current layout, but it is somewhat hard to
adapt for out-of-tree build systems.
Adapt the layout such that our "bin-wrappers/" directory always exists
and contains our "wrap-for-bin.sh" script to make things a little bit
easier for subsequent steps.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation we generate embeds information for the exact Git
version used as well as the date of the commit. This information is
injected by injecting attributes into the build process via command line
argument.
Refactor the logic so that we write the information into "asciidoc.conf"
and "asciidoctor-extensions.rb" via `GIT-VERSION-GEN` for AsciiDoc and
AsciiDoctor, respectively.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently if we want to have a remote/HEAD locally that is different
from the one on the remote, but we still want to get a warning if remote
changes HEAD, our only option is to have an indiscriminate warning with
"follow_remote_head" set to "warn". Add a new option
"warn-if-not-$branch", where $branch is a branch name we do not wish to
get a warning about. If the remote HEAD is $branch do not warn,
otherwise, behave as "warn".
E.g. let's assume, that our remote origin has HEAD
set to "master", but locally we have "git remote set-head origin seen".
Setting 'remote.origin.followRemoteHEAD = "warn"' will always print
a warning, even though the remote has not changed HEAD from "master".
Setting 'remote.origin.followRemoteHEAD = "warn-if-not-master" will
squelch the warning message, unless the remote changes HEAD from
"master". Note, that should the remote change HEAD to "seen" (which we
have locally), there will still be no warning.
Improve the advice message in report_set_head to also include silencing
the warning message with "warn-if-not-$branch".
Signed-off-by: Bence Ferdinandy <bence@ferdinandy.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation mark-up updates.
* ja/git-diff-doc-markup:
doc: git-diff: apply format changes to config part
doc: git-diff: apply format changes to diff-generate-patch
doc: git-diff: apply format changes to diff-format
doc: git-diff: apply format changes to diff-options
doc: git-diff: apply new documentation guidelines
"git fsck" learned to issue warnings on "curiously formatted" ref
contents that have always been taken valid but something Git
wouldn't have written itself (e.g., missing terminating end-of-line
after the full object name).
* sj/ref-contents-check:
ref: add symlink ref content check for files backend
ref: check whether the target of the symref is a ref
ref: add basic symref content check for files backend
ref: add more strict checks for regular refs
ref: port git-fsck(1) regular refs check for files backend
ref: support multiple worktrees check for refs
ref: initialize ref name outside of check functions
ref: check the full refname instead of basename
ref: initialize "fsck_ref_report" with zero
The rev-list documentation doesn't mention that the given
commit must be in the specified commit range, leading
to unexpected results.
Signed-off-by: Kai Koponen <kaikopone@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add missing word “that” in the phrase “after verifying that”, like
what was done in 1b2dfb7050 (Documentation/git-update-ref.txt: drop
“flag”, 2024-10-21)
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the current implementation, if refs/remotes/$remote/HEAD does not
exist, running fetch will create it, but if it does exist it will not do
anything, which is a somewhat safe and minimal approach. Unfortunately,
for users who wish to NOT have refs/remotes/$remote/HEAD set for any
reason (e.g. so that `git rev-parse origin` doesn't accidentally point
them somewhere they do not want to), there is no way to remove this
behaviour. On the other side of the spectrum, users may want fetch to
automatically update HEAD or at least give them a warning if something
changed on the remote.
Introduce a new setting, remote.$remote.followRemoteHEAD with four
options:
- "never": do not ever do anything, not even create
- "create": the current behaviour, now the default behaviour
- "warn": print a message if remote and local HEAD is different
- "always": silently update HEAD on every change
Signed-off-by: Bence Ferdinandy <bence@ferdinandy.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This teaches the `worktree repair` command to respect the
`--[no-]relative-paths` CLI option and `worktree.useRelativePaths`
config setting. If an existing worktree with an absolute path is repaired
with `--relative-paths`, the links will be replaced with relative paths,
even if the original path was correct. This allows a user to covert
existing worktrees between absolute/relative as desired.
To simplify things, both linking files are written when one of the files
needs to be repaired. In some cases, this fixes the other file before it
is checked, in other cases this results in a correct file being written
with the same contents.
Signed-off-by: Caleb White <cdwhite3@pm.me>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This introduces the `--[no-]relative-paths` CLI option and
`worktree.useRelativePaths` configuration setting to the `worktree add`
command. When enabled these options allow worktrees to be linked using
relative paths, enhancing portability across environments where absolute
paths may differ (e.g., containerized setups, shared network drives).
Git still creates absolute paths by default, but these options allow
users to opt-in to relative paths if desired.
The t2408 test file is removed and more comprehensive tests are
written for the various worktree operations in their own files.
Signed-off-by: Caleb White <cdwhite3@pm.me>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A new extension, `relativeWorktrees`, is added to indicate that at least
one worktree in the repository has been linked with relative paths.
This ensures older Git versions do not attempt to automatically prune
worktrees with relative paths, as they would not not recognize the
paths as being valid.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Caleb White <cdwhite3@pm.me>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is more efficient to have something in the coding guidelines
document to point at, when we want to review and comment on a new
message in the codebase to make sure it "fits" in the set of
existing messages.
Let's write down established best practice we are aware of.
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We now ensure "index-pack" is used with the "--promisor" option
only during a "git fetch".
* jt/index-pack-allow-promisor-only-while-fetching:
index-pack: teach --promisor to forbid pack name
Documentation for "git bundle" saw improvements to more prominently
call out the use of '--all' when creating bundles.
* kh/bundle-docs:
Documentation/git-bundle.txt: discuss naïve backups
Documentation/git-bundle.txt: mention --all in spec. refs
Documentation/git-bundle.txt: remove old `--all` example
Documentation/git-bundle.txt: mention full backup example
Even though `git help cli` recommends users to prefer using
"--option=value" over "--option value", there can be reasons why
giving them separately is a good idea. One reason is that shells do
not perform tilde expansion for `--option=~/path/name` but they
expand `--options ~/path/name` just fine.
This is not a problem for many options whose option parsing is
properly written using OPT_FILENAME(), because the value given to
OPT_FILENAME() is tilde-expanded internally by us, but some commands
take a pathname as a mere string, which needs this trick to have the
shell help us.
I think the reason we originally decided to recommend the stuck form
was because an option that takes an optional value requires you to
use it in the stuck form, and it is one less thing for users to
worry about if they get into the habit to always use the stuck form.
But we should be discouraging ourselves from adding an option with
an optional value in the first place, and we might want to weaken
the current recommendation.
In any case, let's describe this one case where it is necessary to
use the separate form, with an example.
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Doc update to clarify how periodical maintenance are scheduled,
spread across time to avoid thundering hurds.
* sk/doc-maintenance-schedule:
doc: add a note about staggering of maintenance
Besides the textual symref, we also allow symbolic links as the symref.
So, we should also provide the consistency check as what we have done
for textual symref. And also we consider deprecating writing the
symbolic links. We first need to access whether symbolic links still
be used. So, add a new fsck message "symlinkRef(INFO)" to tell the
user be aware of this information.
We have already introduced "files_fsck_symref_target". We should reuse
this function to handle the symrefs which use legacy symbolic links. We
should not check the trailing garbage for symbolic refs. Add a new
parameter "symbolic_link" to disable some checks which should only be
executed for textual symrefs.
And we need to also generate the "referent" parameter for reusing
"files_fsck_symref_target" by the following steps:
1. Use "strbuf_add_real_path" to resolve the symlink and get the
absolute path "ref_content" which the symlink ref points to.
2. Generate the absolute path "abs_gitdir" of "gitdir" and combine
"ref_content" and "abs_gitdir" to extract the relative path
"relative_referent_path".
3. If "ref_content" is outside of "gitdir", we just set "referent" with
"ref_content". Instead, we set "referent" with
"relative_referent_path".
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ideally, we want to the users use "git symbolic-ref" to create symrefs
instead of writing raw contents into the filesystem. However, "git
symbolic-ref" is strict with the refname but not strict with the
referent. For example, we can make the "referent" located at the
"$(gitdir)/logs/aaa" and manually write the content into this where we
can still successfully parse this symref by using "git rev-parse".
$ git init repo && cd repo && git commit --allow-empty -mx
$ git symbolic-ref refs/heads/test logs/aaa
$ echo $(git rev-parse HEAD) > .git/logs/aaa
$ git rev-parse test
We may need to add some restrictions for "referent" parameter when using
"git symbolic-ref" to create symrefs because ideally all the
nonpseudo-refs should be located under the "refs" directory and we may
tighten this in the future.
In order to tell the user we may tighten the above situation, create
a new fsck message "symrefTargetIsNotARef" to notify the user that this
may become an error in the future.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have code that checks regular ref contents, but we do not yet check
the contents of symbolic refs. By using "parse_loose_ref_content" for
symbolic refs, we will get the information of the "referent".
We do not need to check the "referent" by opening the file. This is
because if "referent" exists in the file system, we will eventually
check its correctness by inspecting every file in the "refs" directory.
If the "referent" does not exist in the filesystem, this is OK as it is
seen as the dangling symref.
So we just need to check the "referent" string content. A regular ref
could be accepted as a textual symref if it begins with "ref:", followed
by zero or more whitespaces, followed by the full refname, followed only
by whitespace characters. However, we always write a single SP after
"ref:" and a single LF after the refname. It may seem that we should
report a fsck error message when the "referent" does not apply above
rules and we should not be so aggressive because third-party
reimplementations of Git may have taken advantage of the looser syntax.
Put it more specific, we accept the following contents:
1. "ref: refs/heads/master "
2. "ref: refs/heads/master \n \n"
3. "ref: refs/heads/master\n\n"
When introducing the regular ref content checks, we created two fsck
infos "refMissingNewline" and "trailingRefContent" which exactly
represents above situations. So we will reuse these two fsck messages to
write checks to info the user about these situations.
But we do not allow any other trailing garbage. The followings are bad
symref contents which will be reported as fsck error by "git-fsck(1)".
1. "ref: refs/heads/master garbage\n"
2. "ref: refs/heads/master \n\n\n garbage "
And we introduce a new "badReferentName(ERROR)" fsck message to report
above errors by using "is_root_ref" and "check_refname_format" to check
the "referent". Since both "is_root_ref" and "check_refname_format"
don't work with whitespaces, we use the trimmed version of "referent"
with these functions.
In order to add checks, we will do the following things:
1. Record the untrimmed length "orig_len" and untrimmed last byte
"orig_last_byte".
2. Use "strbuf_rtrim" to trim the whitespaces or newlines to make sure
"is_root_ref" and "check_refname_format" won't be failed by them.
3. Use "orig_len" and "orig_last_byte" to check whether the "referent"
misses '\n' at the end or it has trailing whitespaces or newlines.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have already used "parse_loose_ref_contents" function to check
whether the ref content is valid in files backend. However, by
using "parse_loose_ref_contents", we allow the ref's content to end with
garbage or without a newline.
Even though we never create such loose refs ourselves, we have accepted
such loose refs. So, it is entirely possible that some third-party tools
may rely on such loose refs being valid. We should not report an error
fsck message at current. We should notify the users about such
"curiously formatted" loose refs so that adequate care is taken before
we decide to tighten the rules in the future.
And it's not suitable either to report a warn fsck message to the user.
We don't yet want the "--strict" flag that controls this bit to end up
generating errors for such weirdly-formatted reference contents, as we
first want to assess whether this retroactive tightening will cause
issues for any tools out there. It may cause compatibility issues which
may break the repository. So, we add the following two fsck infos to
represent the situation where the ref content ends without newline or
has trailing garbages:
1. refMissingNewline(INFO): A loose ref that does not end with
newline(LF).
2. trailingRefContent(INFO): A loose ref has trailing content.
It might appear that we can't provide the user with any warnings by
using FSCK_INFO. However, in "fsck.c::fsck_vreport", we will convert
FSCK_INFO to FSCK_WARN and we can still warn the user about these
situations when using "git refs verify" without introducing
compatibility issues.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git-fsck(1)" implicitly checks the ref content by passing the
callback "fsck_handle_ref" to the "refs.c::refs_for_each_rawref".
Then, it will check whether the ref content (eventually "oid")
is valid. If not, it will report the following error to the user.
error: refs/heads/main: invalid sha1 pointer 0000...
And it will also report above errors when there are dangling symrefs
in the repository wrongly. This does not align with the behavior of
the "git symbolic-ref" command which allows users to create dangling
symrefs.
As we have already introduced the "git refs verify" command, we'd better
check the ref content explicitly in the "git refs verify" command thus
later we could remove these checks in "git-fsck(1)" and launch a
subprocess to call "git refs verify" in "git-fsck(1)" to make the
"git-fsck(1)" more clean.
Following what "git-fsck(1)" does, add a similar check to "git refs
verify". Then add a new fsck error message "badRefContent(ERROR)" to
represent that a ref has an invalid content.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git gc" discards any objects that are outside promisor packs that
are referred to by an object in a promisor pack, and we do not
refetch them from the promisor at runtime, resulting an unusable
repository. Work it around by including these objects in the
referring promisor pack at the receiving end of the fetch.
* jt/repack-local-promisor:
index-pack: repack local links into promisor packs
t5300: move --window clamp test next to unclamped
t0410: use from-scratch server
t0410: make test description clearer
Currently,
- Running "index-pack --promisor" outside a repo segfaults.
- It may be confusing to a user that running "index-pack --promisor"
within a repo may make changes to the repo's object DB, especially
since the packs indexed by the index-pack invocation may not even be
related to the repo.
As discussed in [1] and [2], teaching --promisor to forbid a packfile
name solves both these problems. This combination of arguments requires
a repo (since we are writing the resulting .pack and .idx to it) and it
is clear that the files are related to the repo.
Currently, Git uses "index-pack --promisor" only when fetching into
a repo, so it could be argued that we should teach "index-pack" a
new argument (say, "--fetching-mode") instead of tying --promisor to
a generic argument like the packfile name. However, this --promisor
feature could conceivably be used whenever we have a packfile that is
known to come from the promisor remote (whether obtained through Git's
fetch protocol or through other means) so not using a new argument seems
reasonable - one could envision a user-made script obtaining a packfile
and then running "index-pack --promisor --stdin", for example. In fact,
it might be possible to relax the restriction further (say, by also
allowing --promisor when indexing a packfile that is in the object DB),
but relaxing the restriction is backwards-compatible so we can revisit
that later.
One thing to watch out for is the possibility of a future Git feature
that indexes a pack in the context of a repo, but does not necessarily
write the resulting pack to it (and does not necessarily desire to
make any changes to the object DB). One such feature would be fetch
quarantine, which might need the repo context in order to detect
hash collisions, but would also need to ensure that the object DB
is undisturbed in case the fetch fails for whatever reason, even if
the reason occurs only after the indexing is complete. It may not be
obvious to the implementer of such a feature that "index-pack" could
sometimes write packs other than the indexed pack to the object DB,
but there are already other ways that "fetch" could write to the object
DB (in particular, packfile URIs and bundle URIs), so hopefully the
implementation of this future feature would already include a test that
the object DB be undisturbed.
This change requires the change to t5300 by 1f52cdfacb (index-pack:
document and test the --promisor option, 2022-03-09) to be undone.
(--promisor is already tested indirectly, so we don't need the explicit
test here any more.)
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20241114005652.GC1140565@coredump.intra.peff.net/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20241119185345.GB15723@coredump.intra.peff.net/
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
By the way, we also change the sentences where git-diff would refer to
itself, so that no link is created in the HTML output.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The format change is only applied to the sections of the file that are
filtered in git-diff.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation for git-diff has been updated to follow the new
documentation guidelines. The following changes have been applied to
the series of patches:
- switching the synopsis to a synopsis block which will automatically
format placeholders in italics and keywords in monospace
- use _<placeholder>_ instead of <placeholder> in the description
- use `backticks for keywords and more complex option
descriptions`. The new rendering engine will apply synopsis rules to
these spans.
- prevent git-diff from self-referencing itself via gitlink macro when
the generated link would point to the same page.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It might be naïve to think that those who need this education would end
up here in the first place. But I think it’s good to mention this
high-level concept here on a command which provides a backup strategy.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Mention `--all` as an alternative in “Specifying References”.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We don’t need this part now that we have a fleshed-out `--all` example.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Provide an example about how to make a “full backup” with caveats about
what that means in this case.
This is a requested use-case.[1] But the doc is a bit unassuming
about it:
If you want to match `git clone --mirror`, which would include your
refs such as `refs/remotes/*`, use `--all`.
The user cannot be expected to formulate “I want a full backup” as “I
want to match `git clone --mirror`” for a bundle file or something.
Let’s drop this mention of `--all` later in the doc and frontload it.
† 1: E.g.:
• https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5578270/fully-backup-a-git-repo
• https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11792671/how-to-git-bundle-a-complete-repo
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reported-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There somehow ended up too many bogus "merge X later to maint"
comments for topics that cannot be merged ever down to 'maint'
because they were forked from more recent integration branches
in the draft release notes. Remove them, as they are inviting
for mistakes later.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Historically, Git has allowed users to clone from an untrusted
repository, and we have documented that this is safe to do so:
`upload-pack` tries to avoid any dangerous configuration options or
hooks from the repository it's serving, making it safe to clone an
untrusted directory and run commands on the resulting clone.
However, this was broken by f4aa8c8bb1 ("fetch/clone: detect dubious
ownership of local repositories", 2024-04-10) in an attempt to make
things more secure. That change resulted in a variety of problems when
cloning locally and over SSH, but it did not change the stated security
boundary. Because the security boundary has not changed, it is safe to
adjust part of the code that patch introduced.
To do that and restore the previous functionality, adjust enter_repo to
take two flags instead of one.
The two bits are
- ENTER_REPO_STRICT: callers that require exact paths (as opposed
to allowing known suffixes like ".git", ".git/.git" to be
omitted) can set this bit. Corresponds to the "strict" parameter
that the flags word replaces.
- ENTER_REPO_ANY_OWNER_OK: callers that are willing to run without
ownership check can set this bit.
The former is --strict-paths option of "git daemon". The latter is
set only by upload-pack, which honors the claimed security boundary.
Note that local clones across ownership boundaries require --no-local so
that upload-pack is used. Document this fact in the manual page and
provide an example.
This patch was based on one written by Junio C Hamano.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "--shallow-exclude=<ref>" option to various history transfer
commands takes a ref, not an arbitrary revision.
* en/shallow-exclude-takes-a-ref-fix:
doc: correct misleading descriptions for --shallow-exclude
upload-pack: fix ambiguous error message
Teach index-pack to, when processing the objects in a pack with
--promisor specified on the CLI, repack local objects (and the local
objects that they refer to, recursively) referenced by these objects
into promisor packs.
This prevents the situation in which, when fetching from a promisor
remote, we end up with promisor objects (newly fetched) referring
to non-promisor objects (locally created prior to the fetch). This
situation may arise if the client had previously pushed objects to the
remote, for example. One issue that arises in this situation is that,
if the non-promisor objects become inaccessible except through promisor
objects (for example, if the branch pointing to them has moved to
point to the promisor object that refers to them), then GC will garbage
collect them. There are other ways to solve this, but the simplest
seems to be to enforce the invariant that we don't have promisor objects
referring to non-promisor objects.
This repacking is done from index-pack to minimize the performance
impact. During a fetch, the only time most objects are fully inflated
in memory is when their object ID is computed, so we also scan the
objects (to see which objects they refer to) during this time.
Also to minimize the performance impact, an object is calculated to be
local if it's a loose object or present in a non-promisor pack. (If it's
also in a promisor pack or referred to by an object in a promisor pack,
it is technically already a promisor object. But a misidentification
of a promisor object as a non-promisor object is relatively benign
here - we will thus repack that promisor object into a promisor pack,
duplicating it in the object store, but there is no correctness issue,
just an issue of inefficiency.)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Centralize documentation for repository extensions into a single place.
* cw/config-extensions:
doc: consolidate extensions in git-config documentation
Update the project's CodingGuidelines to discourage naming functions
with a "_1()" suffix.
* kn/arbitrary-suffixes:
CodingGuidelines: discourage arbitrary suffixes in function names
The documentation for the --shallow-exclude option to clone/fetch/etc.
claims that the option takes a revision, but it does not. As per
upload-pack.c's process_deepen_not(), it passes the option to
expand_ref() and dies if it does not find exactly one ref matching the
name passed. Further, this has always been the case ever since these
options were introduced by the commits merged in a460ea4a3c (Merge
branch 'nd/shallow-deepen', 2016-10-10). Fix the documentation to
match the implementation.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach 'git notes add' and 'git notes append' a new '-e' flag,
instructing them to open the note in $GIT_EDITOR before saving.
* sa/notes-edit:
notes: teach the -e option to edit messages in editor
Documentation update to clarify that 'uploadpack.allowAnySHA1InWant'
implies both 'allowTipSHA1InWant' and 'allowReachableSHA1InWant'.
* ps/upload-pack-doc:
doc: document how uploadpack.allowAnySHA1InWant impact other allow options
We often name functions with arbitrary suffixes like `_1` as an
extension of another existing function. This creates confusion and
doesn't provide good clarity into the functions purpose. Let's document
good function naming etiquette in our CodingGuidelines.
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
An extra worktree attached to a repository points at each other to
allow finding the repository from the worktree and vice versa
possible. Turn this linkage to relative paths.
* cw/worktree-relative:
worktree: add test for path handling in linked worktrees
worktree: link worktrees with relative paths
worktree: refactor infer_backlink() to use *strbuf
worktree: repair copied repository and linked worktrees
The `technical/repository-version.txt` document originally served as the
master list for extensions, requiring that any new extensions be defined
there. However, the `config/extensions.txt` file was introduced later
and has since become the de facto location for describing extensions,
with several extensions listed there but missing from
`repository-version.txt`.
This consolidates all extension definitions into `config/extensions.txt`,
making it the authoritative source for extensions. The references in
`repository-version.txt` are updated to point to `config/extensions.txt`,
and cross-references to related documentation such as
`gitrepository-layout[5]` and `git-config[1]` are added.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Caleb White <cdwhite3@pm.me>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
“Trailer” is the preferred nomenclature in this project. Also add a
definite article where I think it makes sense.
As we can see the rest of the document already prefers this term. This
just gets rid of the last stragglers.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
These two commands are similar enough to acknowledge each other on their
documentation pages.
See the previous commit where we discussed that option-less update-ref
does not support updating symbolic refs but symbolic-ref does.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Add a paragraph which just emphasizes that the command without any
options does not support refs in the final arguments. This is clear
already from the names `<new-oid>` and `<old-oid>` but the right balance
of redundancy makes documentation robust against stray interpretation.
This is also a good place to mention why `--stdin` has those `symref-*`
commands.
Suggested-by: Bence Ferdinandy <bence@ferdinandy.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
This paragraph interrupts the flow of the section by going into detail
about what a symbolic ref file is and how it is implemented. It is not
clear what the purpose is since symbolic refs were already mentioned
prior (“possibly dereferencing the symbolic refs”). Worse, it can
confuse the reader about what argument can be a symbolic ref since it
just says “it” and not which of the parameters; in turn the reader can
be lead to try `<new-oid>` and then get a confusing error since
update-ref will just say that it is not a valid SHA1.
gitglossary(7) already documents what a symref is, concretely, and quite
well at that.
Reported-by: Bence Ferdinandy <bence@ferdinandy.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Move the discussion of file system symbolic links to a new “Notes”
section (inspired by the one in git-symbolic-ref(1)) since this is
mostly of historical note at this point, not something that is needed in
the main section of the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Remove paragraphs which explain that using this command is safer than
echoing the branch name into `HEAD`.
Evoking the echo strategy is wrong now under the reftable backend since
this file does not exist. And the ref file backend majority user base
use porcelain commands to manage `HEAD` unless they are intentionally
poking at the implementation.
Maybe this warning was relevant for the usage patterns when it was
added[1] but now it just takes up space.
† 1: 129056370a (Add missing documentation., 2005-10-04)
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
The other paragraphs on options say “With <option>,”. Let’s be uniform.
Also add missing word “that”.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Used regex to find these typos:
(?<!struct )(?<=\s)([a-z]{1,}) \1(?=\s)
Signed-off-by: Sven Strickroth <email@cs-ware.de>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Notes can be added to a commit using:
- "-m" to provide a message on the command line.
- -C to copy a note from a blob object.
- -F to read the note from a file.
When these options are used, Git does not open an editor,
it simply takes the content provided via these options and
attaches it to the commit as a note.
Improve flexibility to fine-tune the note before finalizing it
by allowing the messages to be prefilled in the editor and edited
after the messages have been provided through -[mF].
Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Document how setting of `uploadpack.allowAnySHA1InWant`
influences other `uploadpack` options - `allowTipSHA1InWant`
and `allowReachableSHA1InWant`.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Szlazak <piotr.szlazak@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Junio C Hamano