With the earlier DWIM patches, certain combination of options defaulted
to the "save" command correctly while certain equally valid combination
did not. For example, "git stash -k" were Ok but "git stash -q -k" did
not work.
This makes the logic of defaulting to "save" much simpler. If there are no
non-flag arguments, it is clear that there is no command word, and we
default to "save" subcommand. This rule prevents "git stash -q apply"
from quietly creating a stash with "apply" as the message.
This also teaches "git stash save" to reject an unknown option. This is
to keep a mistyped "git stash save --quite" from creating a stash with a
message "--quite", and this safety is more important with the new logic
to default to "save" with any option-looking argument without an explicit
comand word.
[jc: this is based on Matthieu's 3-patch series, and a follow-up
discussion, and he and Peff take all the credit; if I have introduced bugs
while reworking, they are mine.]
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This adds a hunk-based mode to git-stash. You can select hunks from
the difference between HEAD and worktree, and git-stash will build a
stash that reflects these changes. The index state of the stash is
the same as your current index, and we also let --patch imply
--keep-index.
Note that because the selected hunks are rolled back from the worktree
but not the index, the resulting state may appear somewhat confusing
if you had also staged these changes. This is not entirely
satisfactory, but due to the way stashes are applied, other solutions
would require a change to the stash format.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The change makes sure a stash (given or default) exists before
checking if the working tree is dirty.
If the default stash is requested, the old message was scary and
included a 'fatal' error from rev-parse:
fatal: Needed a single revision
: no valid stashed state found
It is replaced with a friendlier 'Nothing to apply' error, similar to
'git stash branch'.
If a specific stash is specified, the 'Needed a single revision' errors
from rev-parse are suppressed.
Signed-off-by: Ori Avtalion <ori@avtalion.name>
Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Acked-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To save me from the carpal tunnel syndrome, make 'git stash' accept
the short option '-k' instead of '--keep-index', and for even more
convenience, let's DWIM when this developer forgot to type the 'save'
command.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Replace remaining git-XXX calls with git XXX.
Signed-off-by: Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
Acked-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach stash pop, apply, save, and drop to be quiet when told. By using
the quiet option (-q), these actions will be silent unless errors are
encountered.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'git stash pop' supports the '--index' option since its initial
implementation (bd56ff54, git-stash: add new 'pop' subcommand,
2008-02-22), but its documentation does not mention it explicitly.
Moreover, both the usage shown by 'git stash -h' and the synopsis
section in the man page imply that 'git stash pop' does not have an
'--index' option.
First, this patch corrects the usage and the synopsis section.
Second, the patch moves the description of the '--index' option to the
'git stash pop' section in the documentation, and refers to it from
the 'git stash apply' section. This way it follows the intentions of
commit d1836637 (Documentation: teach stash/pop workflow instead of
stash/apply, 2009-05-28), as all 'git stash pop'-related documentation
will be in one place without references to 'git stash apply'.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Don't redirect stderr to /dev/null, use -q to suppress the output on
stderr.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The referenced commit tried to fix a flaw in stash's handling of a user
supplied invalid ref. i.e. 'git stash apply fake_ref@{0}' should fail
instead of applying stash@{0}. But, it did so in a naive way by avoiding the
use of the --default option of rev-parse, and instead manually supplied the
default revision if the user supplied an empty command line. This prevented
a common usage scenario of supplying flags on the stash command line (i.e.
non-empty command line) which would be parsed by lower level git commands,
without supplying a specific revision. This should fall back to the default
revision, but now it causes an error. e.g. 'git stash show -p'
The correct fix is to use the --verify option of rev-parse, which fails
properly if an invalid ref is supplied, and still allows falling back to a
default ref when one is not supplied.
Convert stash-drop to use --verify while we're at it, since specifying
multiple revisions for any of these commands is also an error and --verify
makes it so.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
apply_stash() and show_stash() each call rev-parse with
'--default refs/stash' as an argument. This option causes rev-parse to
operate on refs/stash if it is not able to successfully operate on any
element of the command line. This includes failure to supply a "valid"
revision. This has the effect of causing 'stash apply' and 'stash show'
to operate as if stash@{0} had been supplied when an invalid revision is
supplied.
e.g. 'git stash apply stash@{1}' would fall back to
'git stash apply stash@{0}'
This patch modifies these two functions so that they avoid using the
--default option of rev-parse.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Unlike the case where the user does have a real change in the work tree,
refusing to work because of unclean stat information is not very helpful.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
"git stash -h" showed some incomplete and ugly usage information.
For example, the useful "--keep-index" option for "save" or the "--index"
option for "apply" were not shown. Also in the documentation synopsis they
were not shown, so that there is no incentive to scroll down and even see
that such options exist.
This patch improves the git-stash synopsis in the documentation by
mentioning that further options to the stash commands and then copies
this synopsis to the usage information string of git-stash.sh.
For the latter, the dashless git command string has to be inserted on the
second and the following usage lines. The code of this is taken from
git-sh-setup so that all lines will show the command string.
Note that the "create" command is not advertised at all now, because
it was not mentioned in git-stash.txt.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add branch subcommand to completions and USAGE for git-stash.sh.
Complete stash names for show, apply, drop, pop, and branch.
Add "--index" long option for apply.
Signed-off-by: Lee Marlow <lee.marlow@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A command line "git stash save --keep-index I was doing this" was
misparsed and keep-index codepath did not trigger.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'git stash save' saves local modifications to a new stash, and runs 'git
reset --hard' to revert them to a clean index and work tree. When the
'--keep-index' option is specified, after that 'git reset --hard' the
previous contents of the index is restored and the work tree is updated
to match the index. This option is useful if the user wants to commit
only parts of his local modifications, but wants to test those parts
before committing.
Also add support for the completion of the new option, and add an
example use case to the documentation.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Restores the stashed state on a new branch rooted at the commit on which
the stash was originally created, so that conflicts caused by subsequent
changes on the original branch can be dealt with.
(Thanks to Junio for this nice idea.)
Signed-off-by: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When rebasing or stashing, chances are that you do not care about
dirty submodules, since they are not updated by those actions anyway.
So ignore the submodules' states.
Note: the submodule states -- as committed in the superproject --
will still be stashed and rebased, it is _just_ the state of the
submodule in the working tree which is ignored.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This combines the existing stash subcommands 'apply' and 'drop' to
allow a single stash entry to be applied and then dropped, in other
words 'popped', from the stash list.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This allows a single stash entry to be deleted. It takes an
optional argument which is a stash reflog entry. If no
arguments are supplied, it drops the most recent stash entry.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Because it is so tempting to expect "git stash clear stash@{4}"
to remove the fourth element in the stash while leaving other
elements intact, we should not blindly throw away everything
upon seeing such a command.
This may change when we start using "git reflog delete" to
selectively nuke a single (or multiple, for that matter) stash
entries with such a command line.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some scripts and libraries check stderr to detect a failing command,
instead of checking the exit code. Because the output from git-status
is not primarily for machine consumption, it would not hurt to send
these messages to stdout instead and it will make it easier to drive
the command for such callers.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the user types "git stash" mistakenly thinking that this will list
their stashes he/she may be surprised to see that it actually saved
a new stash and reset their working tree and index.
In the worst case they might not know how to recover the state. So
help them by telling them exactly what was saved and also how to
restore it immediately.
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The current git-stash behaviour is very error prone to typos. For example,
if you typed "git-stash llist", git-stash would think that you wanted to
save to a stash named "llist", but in fact, you meant "git-stash list".
Signed-off-by: Kevin Leung <kevinlsk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When you have a file called HEAD in your work tree, many commands that
our scripts feed "HEAD" to would complain about the rev vs path
ambiguity. A solution is to form command line more carefully by
appending -- to them, which makes it clear that we mean HEAD rev not
HEAD file.
This patch would apply to maint.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When colors are set to "true" on the repository, the git log output
will contain control characters to set/reset the colors, even when
the output is to a pipe. This makes list_stash() fail as the
downstream sed does not see what it is expecting.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit bc9e7399af "reverted" commit
f12e925ac2
Signed-off-by: Emil Medve <Emilian.Medve@Freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
--text follows this line--
These commands currently lack OPTIONS_SPEC; allow people to
easily list with "git grep 'OPTIONS_SPEC=$'" what they can help
improving.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 89d750bf6f I got a little too
aggressive with changing "git diff" to "git diff-tree". This is
shown to the user, who expects to see a full diff on their console,
and will want to see the output of their custom diff drivers (if
any) as the whole point of this call site is to show the diff to
the end-user.
Noticed by Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-stash needs to restrict itself to plumbing when running automated
diffs as part of its operation as the user may have configured a
custom diff driver that opens an interactive UI for certain/all
files. Doing that during scripted actions is very unfriendly to
the end-user and may cause git-stash to fail to work.
Reported by Johannes Sixt
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This subcommand creates a stash from the current state and writes out the
resulting commit object ID to the standard output, without updating the
stash ref nor resetting the tree. It is intended to be used by scripts
to temporarily rewind the working tree to a clean state.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There was no newline at the end of the index commit message, putting
the shell prompt at its end after a 'git cat-file commit $id'. This is
similar to what was fixed in 843103d693.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Luc Herren <jlh@gmx.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Originally, "apply --index" codepath was bolted on to the
"update working tree files and index, but then revert the
changes we make to the index except for added files so that we
do not forget about them" codepath, almost as an afterthought.
Because "apply --index" first prepares the final index state
upfront, "revert except the added paths" postprocessing does not
have to be done.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Two bugs that made the command practically unusable were fixed
with this.
- A stash created with a clean index does not have any
difference between the base tree and the index tree.
Trying to apply the diff between them to the index would
error out with "No changes". Even when the user asked to
unstash with --index, do not bother with --index action if
the base tree and the index tree match.
- After successfully performing the working tree merge, the
index was reloaded from an earlier state of unstashed index
with "read-tree"; this left all the paths cache dirty. By
moving the call to git-status after this read-tree, match the
cached stat information in the index.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier commit 7ab3cc70 fixed "stash clear" but broke save_stash,
because it forgot to make sure the reflog file exists before saving.
Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@bluebottle.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We say "SUBDIRECTORY_OK" but we did not chdir to toplevel; this
is fine as long as everything we use can be started from a
subdirectory, but unfortunately "merge-recursive" is not one of
the programs you can safely use from a subdirectory.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier when we read a tree into a temporary index, we read it
from scratch. Start from the current index and use read-tree -m
to preserve cached stat information as much as possible, in
order to speed up "git add -u". This makes "git stash" usable
in a source tree of nontrivial size.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When given this subcommand, git-stash will try to merge the stashed
index into the current one. Only trivial merges are possible, since
we have no index for the index ;-) If a trivial merge is not possible,
git-stash will bail out with a hint to skip the --index option.
For good measure, finally include a test case.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This allows you to say:
$ git stash starting to implement X
while creating a stash, and the resulting "stash list entry
would read as:
$ git stash list
stash@{0}: On master: starting to implement X
instead of the default message which talks about the commit the
stash happens to be based on (hence does not have much to do
with what the stashed change is trying to do).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A stash is about a change on top of an existing commit, and not
about that commit that happened to be on which the change was
created. Match the message we see in "git stash list" with the
commit log message to make this clear.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
If I do
git cat-file commit $commitid
for a commit created by stash, the next prompt starts directly after the
shortlog of HEAD.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, the git-log invocation would complain if a repo
had not had any stashes created in it yet:
$ git-init
$ git-stash
fatal: ambiguous argument 'refs/stash': unknown revision or
path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions
Instead, we only call git-log if we actually have a
refs/stash. We could alternatively create the ref when any
stash command is called, but it's better for the 'list'
command to not require write access to the repo.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Matthieu Moy