kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
SZEDER Gábor	1c5e94f459	tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of 'test_cmp <empty> <out>' Using 'test_must_be_empty' is shorter and more idiomatic than >empty && test_cmp empty out as it saves the creation of an empty file. Furthermore, sometimes the expected empty file doesn't have such a descriptive name like 'empty', and its creation is far away from the place where it's finally used for comparison (e.g. in 't7600-merge.sh', where two expected empty files are created in the 'setup' test, but are used only about 500 lines later). These cases were found by instrumenting 'test_cmp' to error out the test script when it's used to compare empty files, and then converted manually. Note that even after this patch there still remain a lot of cases where we use 'test_cmp' to check empty files: - Sometimes the expected output is not hard-coded in the test, but 'test_cmp' is used to ensure that two similar git commands produce the same output, and that output happens to be empty, e.g. the test 'submodule update --merge - ignores --merge for new submodules' in 't7406-submodule-update.sh'. - Repetitive common tasks, including preparing the expected results and running 'test_cmp', are often extracted into a helper function, and some of this helper's callsites expect no output. - For the same reason as above, the whole 'test_expect_success' block is within a helper function, e.g. in 't3070-wildmatch.sh'. - Or 'test_cmp' is invoked in a loop, e.g. the test 'cvs update (-p)' in 't9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh'. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	d3c6751b18	tests: make use of the test_must_be_empty function Change various tests that use an idiom of the form: >expect && test_cmp expect actual To instead use: test_must_be_empty actual The test_must_be_empty() wrapper was introduced in `ca8d148daf` ("test: test_must_be_empty helper", 2013-06-09). Many of these tests have been added after that time. This was mostly found with, and manually pruned from: git grep '^\s+>.expect. &&$' t Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Henning Schild	53fc999306	gpg-interface t: extend the existing GPG tests with GPGSM Add test cases to cover the new X509/gpgsm support. Most of them resemble existing ones. They just switch the format to x509 and set the signingkey when creating signatures. Validation of signatures does not need any configuration of git, it does need gpgsm to be configured to trust the key(-chain). Several of the testcases build on top of existing gpg testcases. The commit ships a self-signed key for committer@example.com and configures gpgsm to trust it. Signed-off-by: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	b5d5a567fb	column: fix off-by-one default width By default we want to fill the whole screen if possible, but we do not want to use up _all_ terminal columns because the last character is going hit the border, push the cursor over and wrap. Keep it at default value zero, which will make print_columns() set the width at term_columns() - 1. This affects the test in t7004 because effective column width before was 40 but now 39 so we need to compensate it by one or the output at 39 columns has a different layout. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	8b44b2be89	gpg-interface: find the last gpg signature line A signed tag has a detached signature like this: object ... [...more header...] This is the tag body. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- [opaque gpg data] -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Our parser finds the _first_ line that appears to start a PGP signature block, meaning we may be confused by a signature (or a signature-like line) in the actual body. Let's keep parsing and always find the final block, which should be the detached signature over all of the preceding content. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Ben Toews <mastahyeti@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	cf98a52ba4	t7004: fix mistaken tag name We have a series of tests which create signed tags with various properties, but one test accidentally verifies a tag from much earlier in the series. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Ben Toews <mastahyeti@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin	9eed6e40c0	tag: add --edit option Add a --edit option whichs allows modifying the messages provided by -m or -F, the same way git commit --edit does. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin <NMoreyChaisemartin@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	b521fd1228	tag: respect color.ui config Since `11b087adfd` (ref-filter: consult want_color() before emitting colors, 2017-07-13), we expect that setting "color.ui" to "always" will enable color tag formats even without a tty. As that commit was built on top of `136c8c8b8f` (color: check color.ui in git_default_config(), 2017-07-13) from the same series, we didn't need to touch tag's config parsing at all. However, since we reverted `136c8c8b8f`, we now need to explicitly call git_color_default_config() to make this work. Let's do so, and also restore the test dropped in `0c88bf5050` (provide --color option for all ref-filter users, 2017-10-03). That commit swapped out our "color.ui=always" test for "--color" in preparation for "always" going away. But since it is here to stay, we should test both cases. Note that for-each-ref also lost its color.ui support as part of reverting `136c8c8b8f`. But as a plumbing command, it should _not_ respect the color.ui config. Since it also gained a --color option in `0c88bf5050`, that's the correct way to ask it for color. We'll continue to test that, and confirm that "color.ui" is not respected. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	0c88bf5050	provide --color option for all ref-filter users When ref-filter learned about want_color() in `11b087adfd` (ref-filter: consult want_color() before emitting colors, 2017-07-13), it became useful to be able to turn colors off and on for specific commands. For git-branch, you can do so with --color/--no-color. But for git-for-each-ref and git-tag, the other users of ref-filter, you have no option except to tweak the "color.ui" config setting. Let's give both of these commands the usual color command-line options. This is a bit more obvious as a method for overriding the config. And it also prepares us for the behavior of "always" changing (so that we are still left with a way of forcing color when our output goes to a non-terminal). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	e433749d86	test-terminal: set TERM=vt100 The point of the test-terminal script is to simulate in the test scripts an environment where output is going to a real terminal. But since test-lib.sh also sets TERM=dumb, the simulation isn't very realistic. The color code will skip auto-coloring for TERM=dumb, leading to us liberally sprinkling test_terminal env TERM=vt100 git ... through the test suite to convince the tests to actually generate colors. Let's set TERM for programs run under test_terminal, which is one less thing for test-writers to remember. In most cases the callers can be simplified, but note there is one interesting case in t4202. It uses test_terminal to check the auto-enabling of --decorate, but the expected output _doesn't_ contain colors (because TERM=dumb suppresses them). Using TERM=vt100 is closer to what the real world looks like; adjust the expected output to match. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Ramsay Jones	21dac1deee	test-lib: don't use ulimit in test prerequisites on cygwin On cygwin (and MinGW), the 'ulimit' built-in bash command does not have the desired effect of limiting the resources of new processes, at least for the stack and file descriptors. However, it always returns success and leads to several test prerequisites being erroneously set to true. Add a check for cygwin and MinGW to the prerequisite expressions, using a 'test_have_prereq !MINGW,!CYGWIN' clause, to guard against using ulimit. This affects the prerequisite expressions for the ULIMIT_STACK_SIZE, CMDLINE_LIMIT and ULIMIT_FILE_DESCRIPTORS prerequisites. Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Michael J Gruber	4db464f815	t7004: move limited stack prereq to test-lib The lazy prerequisite ULIMIT_STACK_SIZE is used only in t7004 so far. Move it to test-lib.sh so that it can be used in other tests (which it will be in a follow-up commit). Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@grubix.eu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	dff2813391	tests: don't give unportable ">" to "test" built-in, use -gt Change an argument to test_line_count (which'll ultimately be turned into a "test" expression) to use "-gt" instead of ">" for an arithmetic test. This broken on e.g. OpenBSD as of v2.13.0 with my commit `ac3f5a3468` ("ref-filter: add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref", 2017-03-24). Downstream just worked around it by patching git and didn't tell us about it, I discovered this when reading various Git packaging implementations: https://github.com/openbsd/ports/commit/7e48bf88a20 Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Jeff King	11b087adfd	ref-filter: consult want_color() before emitting colors When color placeholders like %(color:red) are used in a ref-filter format, we unconditionally output the colors, even if the user has asked us for no colors. This usually isn't a problem when the user is constructing a --format on the command line, but it means we may do the wrong thing when the format is fed from a script or alias. For example: $ git config alias.b 'branch --format=%(color:green)%(refname)' $ git b --no-color should probably omit the green color. Likewise, running: $ git b >branches should probably also omit the color, just as we would for all baked-in coloring (and as we recently started to do for user-specified colors in --pretty formats). This commit makes both of those cases work by teaching the ref-filter code to consult want_color() before outputting any color. The color flag in ref_format defaults to "-1", which means we'll consult color.ui, which in turn defaults to the usual isatty() check on stdout. However, callers like git-branch which support their own color config (and command-line options) can override that. The new tests independently cover all three of the callers of ref-filter (for-each-ref, tag, and branch). Even though these seem redundant, it confirms that we've correctly plumbed through all of the necessary config to make colors work by default. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	0d75bfe67b	tests: fix tests broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease The GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease compile-time testing option added in my `bb946bba76` ("i18n: add GETTEXT_POISON to simulate unfriendly translator", 2011-02-22) has been slowly bitrotting as strings have been marked for translation, and new tests have been added without running it. I brought this up on the list ("[BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease", [1]) asking whether this mode was useful at all anymore. At least one person occasionally uses it, and Lars Schneider offered to change one of the the Travis builds to run in this mode, so fix up the failing ones. My test setup runs most of the tests, with the notable exception of skipping all the p4 tests, so it's possible that there's still some lurking regressions I haven't fixed. 1. <CACBZZX62+acvi1dpkknadTL827mtCm_QesGSZ=6+UnyeMpg8+Q@mail.gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	75057691be	tag: add tests for --with and --without Change the test suite to test for these synonyms for --contains and --no-contains, respectively. Before this change there were no tests for them at all. This doesn't exhaustively test for them as well as their --contains and --no-contains synonyms, but at least it's something. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	ac3f5a3468	ref-filter: add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref Change the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands to have a --no-contains option in addition to their longstanding --contains options. This allows for finding the last-good rollout tag given a known-bad <commit>. Given a hypothetically bad commit `cf5c7253e0`, the git version to revert to can be found with this hacky two-liner: (git tag -l 'v[0-9]'; git tag -l --contains `cf5c7253e0` 'v[0-9]') \| sort \| uniq -c \| grep -E '^ 1 ' \| awk '{print $2}' \| tail -n 10 With this new --no-contains option the same can be achieved with: git tag -l --no-contains `cf5c7253e0` 'v[0-9]' \| sort \| tail -n 10 As the filtering machinery is shared between the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands, implement this for those commands too. A practical use for this with "branch" is e.g. finding branches which were branched off between v2.8.0 and v2.10.0: git branch --contains v2.8.0 --no-contains v2.10.0 The "describe" command also has a --contains option, but its semantics are unrelated to what tag/branch/for-each-ref use --contains for. A --no-contains option for "describe" wouldn't make any sense, other than being exactly equivalent to not supplying --contains at all, which would be confusing at best. Add a --without option to "tag" as an alias for --no-contains, for consistency with --with and --contains. The --with option is undocumented, and possibly the only user of it is Junio (<xmqqefy71iej.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>). But it's trivial to support, so let's do that. The additions to the the test suite are inverse copies of the corresponding --contains tests. With this change --no-contains for tag, branch & for-each-ref is just as well tested as the existing --contains option. In addition to those tests, add a test for "tag" which asserts that --no-contains won't find tree/blob tags, which is slightly unintuitive, but consistent with how --contains works & is documented. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	1e0c3b680c	tag: change --point-at to default to HEAD Change the --points-at option to default to HEAD for consistency with its siblings --contains, --merged etc. which default to HEAD. Previously we'd get: $ git tag --points-at 2>&1 \| head -n 1 error: option `points-at' requires a value This changes behavior added in commit `ae7706b9ac` (tag: add --points-at list option, 2012-02-08). Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	6a338149f6	tag: implicitly supply --list given another list-like option Change the "tag" command to implicitly turn on its --list mode when provided with a list-like option such as --contains, --points-at etc. This is for consistency with how "branch" works. When "branch" is given a list-like option, such as --contains, it implicitly provides --list. Before this change "tag" would error out on those sorts of invocations. I.e. while both of these worked for "branch": git branch --contains v2.8.0 <pattern> git branch --list --contains v2.8.0 <pattern> Only the latter form worked for "tag": git tag --contains v2.8.0 'rc' git tag --list --contains v2.8.0 'rc' Now "tag", like "branch", will implicitly supply --list when a list-like option is provided, and no other conflicting non-list options (such as -d) are present on the command-line. Spelunking through the history via: git log --reverse -p -G'only allowed with' -- 'builtintag*c' Reveals that there was no good reason for not allowing this in the first place. The --contains option added in `32c35cfb1e` ("git-tag: Add --contains option", 2009-01-26) made this an error. All the other subsequent list-like options that were added copied its pattern of making this usage an error. The only tests that break as a result of this change are tests that were explicitly checking that this "branch-like" usage wasn't permitted. Change those failing tests to check that this invocation mode is permitted, add extra tests for the list-like options we weren't testing, and tests to ensure that e.g. we don't toggle the list mode in the presence of other conflicting non-list options. With this change errors messages such as "--contains option is only allowed with -l" don't make sense anymore, since options like --contain turn on -l. Instead we error out when list-like options such as --contain are used in conjunction with conflicting options such as -d or -v. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	c485b24c42	tag: change misleading --list <pattern> documentation Change the documentation for --list so that it's described as a toggle, not as an option that takes a <pattern> as an argument. Junio initially documented this in `b867c7c23a` ("git-tag: -l to list tags (usability).", 2006-02-17), but later Jeff King changed "tag" to accept multiple patterns in `588d0e834b` ("tag: accept multiple patterns for --list", 2011-06-20). However, documenting this as "-l <pattern>" was never correct, as these both worked before Jeff's change: git tag -l 'v' git tag 'v' -l One would expect an option that was documented like that to only accept: git tag --list git tag --list 'vrc' And after Jeff's change, one that took multiple patterns: git tag --list 'vrc' --list '2.8' But since it's actually a toggle all of these work as well, and produce identical output to the last example above: git tag --list 'vrc' '2.8' git tag --list 'vrc' '2.8' --list --list --list git tag --list 'vrc' '2.8' --list -l --list -l --list Now the documentation is more in tune with how the "branch" command describes its --list option since commit `cddd127b9a` ("branch: introduce --list option", 2011-08-28). Change the test suite to assert that these invocations work for the cases that weren't already being tested for. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	bf748049f5	tag: add more incompatibles mode tests Amend the test suite to test for more invalid uses like "-l -a" etc. This change tests the code path in builtin/tag.c between lines: if (argc == 0 && !cmdmode) And: if ((create_tag_object \|\| force) && (cmdmode != 0)) Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Santiago Torres	b42ca35e5c	t7004, t7030: fix here-doc syntax errors Jan Palus noticed that some here-doc are spelled incorrectly, resulting the entire remainder of the test snippet being slurped into the "expect" file as if it were data, e.g. in this sequence cat >expect <<EOF && ... expectation ... EOF git $cmd_being_tested >actual && test_cmp expect actual the last command of the test is "cat" that sends everything to 'expect' and succeeds. Fixing these issues in t7004 and t7030 reveals that "git tag -v" and "git verify-tag" with their --format option do not work as the test was expecting originally. Instead of showing both valid tags and tags with incorrect signatures on their output, tags that do not pass verification are omitted from the output. Another breakage that is uncovered is that these tests must be restricted to environment where gpg is available. Arguably, that is a safer behaviour, and because the format specifiers like %(tag) do not have a way to show if the signature verifies correctly, the command with the --format option cannot be used to get a list of tags annotated with their signature validity anyway. For now, let's fix the here-doc syntax, update the expectation to match the reality, and update the test prerequisite. Maybe later when we extend the --format language available to "git tag -v" and "git verify-tag" to include things like "%(gpg:status)", we may want to change the behaviour so that piping a list of tag names into xargs git verify-tag --format='%(gpg:status) %(tag)' becomes a good way to produce such a list, but that is a separate topic. Noticed-by: Jan Palus <jan.palus@gmail.com> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	682b29f90d	tag tests: fix a typo in a test description Change "suceed" to "succeed" in a test description. The typo has been here since the code was originally added in commit `ef5a6fb597` ("Add test-script for git-tag", 2007-06-28). Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	4612edc639	tag: remove a TODO item from the test suite Change the test for "git tag -l" to not have an associated TODO comment saying that it should return non-zero if there's no tags. This was added in commit `ef5a6fb597` ("Add test-script for git-tag", 2007-06-28) when the tests for "tag" were initially added, but at this point changing this would be inconsistent with how "git tag" is a synonym for "git tag -l", and would needlessly break external code that relies on this porcelain command. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	b643827b94	ref-filter: add test for --contains on a non-commit Change the tag test suite to test for --contains on a tree & blob. It only accepts commits and will spew out "<object> is a tree, not a commit". It's sufficient to test this just for the "tag" and "branch" commands, because it covers all the machinery shared between "branch" and "for-each-ref". Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	17d6c744dc	ref-filter: make combining --merged & --no-merged an error Change the behavior of specifying --merged & --no-merged to be an error, instead of silently picking the option that was provided last. Subsequent changes of mine add a --no-contains option in addition to the existing --contains. Providing both of those isn't an error, and has actual meaning. Making its cousins have different behavior in this regard would be confusing to the user, especially since we'd be silently disregarding some of their command-line input. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Cornelius Weig	df8512ede8	tag: generate useful reflog message When tags are created with `--create-reflog` or with the option `core.logAllRefUpdates` set to 'always', a reflog is created for them. So far, the description of reflog entries for tags was empty, making the reflog hard to understand. For example: `6e3a7b3` refs/tags/test@{0}: Now, a reflog message is generated when creating a tag, following the pattern "tag: tagging <short-sha1> (<description>)". If GIT_REFLOG_ACTION is set, the message becomes "$GIT_REFLOG_ACTION (<description>)" instead. If the tag references a commit object, the description is set to the subject line of the commit, followed by its commit date. For example: `6e3a7b3` refs/tags/test@{0}: tag: tagging `6e3a7b3398` (Git 2.12-rc0, 2017-02-03) If the tag points to a tree/blob/tag objects, the following static strings are taken as description: - "tree object" - "blob object" - "other tag object" Signed-off-by: Cornelius Weig <cornelius.weig@tngtech.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Cornelius Weig	341fb28621	refs: add option core.logAllRefUpdates = always When core.logallrefupdates is true, we only create a new reflog for refs that are under certain well-known hierarchies. The reason is that we know that some hierarchies (like refs/tags) are not meant to change, and that unknown hierarchies might not want reflogs at all (e.g., a hypothetical refs/foo might be meant to change often and drop old history immediately). However, sometimes it is useful to override this decision and simply log for all refs, because the safety and audit trail is more important than the performance implications of keeping the log around. This patch introduces a new "always" mode for the core.logallrefupdates option which will log updates to everything under refs/, regardless where in the hierarchy it is (we still will not log things like ORIG_HEAD and FETCH_HEAD, which are known to be transient). Based-on-patch-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Cornelius Weig <cornelius.weig@tngtech.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Santiago Torres	4fea72f4f7	t/t7004-tag: Add --format specifier tests tag -v now supports --format specifiers to inspect the contents of a tag upon verification. Add two tests to ensure this behavior is respected in future changes. Signed-off-by: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
SZEDER Gábor	c026557a37	versioncmp: generalize version sort suffix reordering The 'versionsort.prereleaseSuffix' configuration variable, as its name suggests, is supposed to only deal with tagnames with prerelease suffixes, and allows sorting those prerelease tags in a user-defined order before the suffixless main release tag, instead of sorting them simply lexicographically. However, the previous changes in this series resulted in an interesting and useful property of version sort: - The empty string as a configured suffix matches all tagnames, including tagnames without any suffix, but - tagnames containing a "real" configured suffix are still ordered according to that real suffix, because any longer suffix takes precedence over the empty string. Exploiting this property we can easily generalize suffix reordering and specify the order of tags with given suffixes not only before but even after a main release tag by using the empty suffix to denote the position of the main release tag, without any algorithm changes: $ git -c versionsort.prereleaseSuffix=-alpha \ -c versionsort.prereleaseSuffix=-beta \ -c versionsort.prereleaseSuffix="" \ -c versionsort.prereleaseSuffix=-gamma \ -c versionsort.prereleaseSuffix=-delta \ tag -l --sort=version:refname 'v3.0*' v3.0-alpha1 v3.0-beta1 v3.0 v3.0-gamma1 v3.0-delta1 Since 'versionsort.prereleaseSuffix' is not a fitting name for a configuration variable to control this more general suffix reordering, introduce the new variable 'versionsort.suffix'. Still keep the old configuration variable name as a deprecated alias, though, to avoid suddenly breaking setups already using it. Ignore the old variable if both old and new configuration variables are set, but emit a warning so users will be aware of it and can fix their configuration. Extend the documentation to describe and add a test to check this more general behavior. Note: since the empty suffix matches all tagnames, tagnames with suffixes not included in the configuration are listed together with the suffixless main release tag, ordered lexicographically right after that, i.e. before tags with suffixes listed in the configuration following the empty suffix. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
SZEDER Gábor	51acfa9db5	versioncmp: use earliest-longest contained suffix to determine sorting order When comparing tagnames, it is possible that a tagname contains more than one of the configured prerelease suffixes around the first different character. After fixing a bug in the previous commit such a tagname is sorted according to the contained suffix which comes first in the configuration. This is, however, not quite the right thing to do in the following corner cases: 1. $ git -c versionsort.suffix=-bar -c versionsort.suffix=-foo-baz -c versionsort.suffix=-foo-bar tag -l --sort=version:refname 'v1' v1.0-foo-bar v1.0-foo-baz The suffix of the tagname 'v1.0-foo-bar' is clearly '-foo-bar', so it should be listed last. However, as it also contains '-bar' around the first different character, it is listed first instead, because that '-bar' suffix comes first the configuration. 2. One of the configured suffixes starts with the other: $ git -c versionsort.prereleasesuffix=-pre \ -c versionsort.prereleasesuffix=-prerelease \ tag -l --sort=version:refname 'v2' v2.0-prerelease1 v2.0-pre1 v2.0-pre2 Here the tagname 'v2.0-prerelease1' should be the last. When comparing 'v2.0-pre1' and 'v2.0-prerelease1' the first different characters are '1' and 'r', respectively. Since this first different character must be part of the configured suffix, the '-pre' suffix is not recognized in the first tagname. OTOH, the '-prerelease' suffix is properly recognized in 'v2.0-prerelease1', thus it is listed first. Improve version sort in these corner cases, and - look for a configured prerelease suffix containing the first different character or ending right before it, so the '-pre' suffixes are recognized in case (2). This also means that when comparing tagnames 'v2.0-pre1' and 'v2.0-pre2', swap_prereleases() would find the '-pre' suffix in both, but then it will return "undecided" and the caller will do the right thing by sorting based in '1' and '2'. - If the tagname contains more than one suffix, then give precedence to the contained suffix that starts at the earliest offset in the tagname to address (1). - If there are more than one suffixes starting at that earliest position, then give precedence to the longest of those suffixes, thus ensuring that in (2) the tagname 'v2.0-prerelease1' won't be sorted based on the '-pre' suffix. Add tests for these corner cases and adjust the documentation accordingly. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
SZEDER Gábor	b8231660fa	versioncmp: cope with common part overlapping with prerelease suffix Version sort with prerelease reordering sometimes puts tagnames in the wrong order, when the common part of two compared tagnames overlaps with the leading character(s) of one or more configured prerelease suffixes. Note the position of "v2.1.0-beta-1": $ git -c versionsort.prereleaseSuffix=-beta \ tag -l --sort=version:refname v2.1.* v2.1.0-beta-2 v2.1.0-beta-3 v2.1.0 v2.1.0-RC1 v2.1.0-RC2 v2.1.0-beta-1 v2.1.1 v2.1.2 The reason is that when comparing a pair of tagnames, first versioncmp() looks for the first different character in a pair of tagnames, and then the swap_prereleases() helper function looks for a configured prerelease suffix _starting at_ that character. Thus, when in the above example the sorting algorithm happens to compare the tagnames "v2.1.0-beta-1" and "v2.1.0-RC2", swap_prereleases() tries to match the suffix "-beta" against "beta-1" to no avail, and the two tagnames erroneously end up being ordered lexicographically. To fix this issue change swap_prereleases() to look for configured prerelease suffixes _containing_ the position of that first different character. Care must be taken, when a configured suffix is longer than the tagnames' common part up to the first different character, to avoid reading memory before the beginning of the tagnames. Add a test that uses an exceptionally long prerelease suffix to check for this, in the hope that in case of a regression the illegal memory access causes a segfault in 'git tag' on one of the commonly used platforms (the test happens to pass successfully on my Linux system with the safety check removed), or at least makes valgrind complain. Under some circumstances it's possible that more than one prerelease suffixes can be found in the same tagname around that first different character. With this simple bugfix patch such a tagname is sorted according to the contained suffix that comes first in the configuration for now. This is less than ideal in some cases, and the following patch will take care of those. Reported-by: Leho Kraav <leho@conversionready.com> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
SZEDER Gábor	0c1b4878de	t7004-tag: add version sort tests to show prerelease reordering issues Version sort with prerelease reordering sometimes puts tagnames in the wrong order, when the common part of two compared tagnames ends with the leading character(s) of one or more configured prerelease suffixes. Add tests that demonstrate these issues. The unrelated '--format should list tags as per format given' test later uses tags matching the same prefix as the version sort tests, thus was affected by the new tags added for the new tests in this patch. Change that test to perform its checks on a different set of tags. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
SZEDER Gábor	9ffda48f53	t7004-tag: use test_config helper ... instead of setting and then manually unsetting configuration variables, on one occasion even outside the test_expect_success block. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
SZEDER Gábor	eba286e310	t7004-tag: delete unnecessary tags with test_when_finished The '--force is moot with a non-existing tag name' test creates two new tags, which are then deleted right after the test is finished, outside the test_expect_success block, allowing 'git tag -d's output to pollute the test output. Use test_when_finished to delete those tags. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	3bb16a8bf2	tag, branch, for-each-ref: add --ignore-case for sorting and filtering This options makes sorting ignore case, which is great when you have branches named bug-12-do-something, Bug-12-do-some-more and BUG-12-do-what and want to group them together. Sorting externally may not be an option because we lose coloring and column layout from git-branch and git-tag. The same could be said for filtering, but it's probably less important because you can always go with the ugly pattern [bB][uU][gG]-* if you're desperate. You can't have case-sensitive filtering and case-insensitive sorting (or the other way around) with this though. For branch and tag, that should be no problem. for-each-ref, as a plumbing, might want finer control. But we can always add --{filter,sort}-ignore-case when there is a need for it. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Michael J Gruber	efee9553a4	gpg-interface: check gpg signature creation status When we create a signature, it may happen that gpg returns with "success" but not with an actual detached signature on stdout. Check for the correct signature creation status to catch these cases better. Really, --status-fd parsing is the only way to check gpg status reliably. We do the same for verify already. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	9 years ago
Laurent Arnoud	61c2fe0c29	tag: add the option to force signing of annotated tags The `tag.forcesignannotated` configuration variable makes "git tag" that would implicitly create an annotated tag to instead create a signed tag. For example $ git tag -m "This is a message" tag-with-message $ git tag -F message-file tag-with-message would create a signed tag if the configuration variable is in effect. To override this from the command line, the user can explicitly ask for an annotated tag, like so: $ git tag -a -m "This is a message" tag-with-message $ git tag -a -F message-file tag-with-message Creation of a light-weight tag, i.e. $ git tag lightweight is not affected. Signed-off-by: Laurent Arnoud <laurent@spkdev.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	9 years ago
Jeff King	0571979bd6	tag: do not show ambiguous tag names as "tags/foo" Since `b7cc53e9` (tag.c: use 'ref-filter' APIs, 2015-07-11), git-tag has started showing tags with ambiguous names (i.e., when both "heads/foo" and "tags/foo" exists) as "tags/foo" instead of just "foo". This is both: - pointless; the output of "git tag" includes only refs/tags, so we know that "foo" means the one in "refs/tags". and - ambiguous; in the original output, we know that the line "foo" means that "refs/tags/foo" exists. In the new output, it is unclear whether we mean "refs/tags/foo" or "refs/tags/tags/foo". The reason this happens is that commit `b7cc53e9` switched git-tag to use ref-filter's "%(refname:short)" output formatting, which was adapted from for-each-ref. This more general code does not know that we care only about tags, and uses shorten_unambiguous_ref to get the short-name. We need to tell it that we care only about "refs/tags/", and it should shorten with respect to that value. In theory, the ref-filter code could figure this out by us passing FILTER_REFS_TAGS. But there are two complications there: 1. The handling of refname:short is deep in formatting code that does not even have our ref_filter struct, let alone the arguments to the filter_ref struct. 2. In git v2.7.0, we expose the formatting language to the user. If we follow this path, it will mean that "%(refname:short)" behaves differently for "tag" versus "for-each-ref" (including "for-each-ref refs/tags/"), which can lead to confusion. Instead, let's add a new modifier to the formatting language, "strip", to remove a specific set of prefix components. This fixes "git tag", and lets users invoke the same behavior from their own custom formats (for "tag" or "for-each-ref") while leaving ":short" with its same consistent meaning in all places. We introduce a test in t7004 for "git tag", which fails without this patch. We also add a similar test in t3203 for "git branch", which does not actually fail. But since it is likely that "branch" will eventually use the same formatting code, the test helps defend against future regressions. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	9 years ago
Elia Pinto	63873a0aa7	t/t7004-tag.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`. The backquoted form is the traditional method for command substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require careful escaping with the backslash character. The patch was generated by: for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh") do perl -i -pe 'BEGIN{undef $/;} s/`(.+?)`/\$(\1)/smg' "${_f}" done and then carefully proof-read. Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	9 years ago
Karthik Nayak	5242860f54	tag.c: implement '--merged' and '--no-merged' options Use 'ref-filter' APIs to implement the '--merged' and '--no-merged' options into 'tag.c'. The '--merged' option lets the user to only list tags merged into the named commit. The '--no-merged' option lets the user to only list tags not merged into the named commit. If no object is provided it assumes HEAD as the object. Add documentation and tests for the same. Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> Mentored-by: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Karthik Nayak	df0947417a	tag.c: implement '--format' option Implement the '--format' option provided by 'ref-filter'. This lets the user list tags as per desired format similar to the implementation in 'git for-each-ref'. Add tests and documentation for the same. Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> Mentored-by: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Karthik Nayak	b7cc53e92c	tag.c: use 'ref-filter' APIs Make 'tag.c' use 'ref-filter' APIs for iterating through refs, sorting and printing of refs. This removes most of the code used in 'tag.c' replacing it with calls to the 'ref-filter' library. Make 'tag.c' use the 'filter_refs()' function provided by 'ref-filter' to filter out tags based on the options set. For printing tags we use 'show_ref_array_item()' function provided by 'ref-filter'. We improve the sorting option provided by 'tag.c' by using the sorting options provided by 'ref-filter'. This causes the test 'invalid sort parameter on command line' in t7004 to fail, as 'ref-filter' throws an error for all sorting fields which are incorrect. The test is changed to reflect the same. Modify documentation for the same. Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> Mentored-by: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
David Turner	144c76fa39	update-ref and tag: add --create-reflog arg Allow the creation of a ref (e.g. stash) with a reflog already in place. For most refs (e.g. those under refs/heads), this happens automatically, but for others, we need this option. Currently, git does this by pre-creating the reflog, but alternate ref backends might store reflogs somewhere other than .git/logs. Code that now directly manipulates .git/logs should instead use git plumbing commands. I also added --create-reflog to git tag, just for completeness. In a moment, we will use this argument to make git stash work with alternate ref backends. Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Stefan Beller	fc38a9bb4d	t7004: rename ULIMIT test prerequisite to ULIMIT_STACK_SIZE During creation of the patch series our discussion we could have a more descriptive name for the prerequisite for the test so it stays unique when other limits of ulimit are introduced. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Stefan Beller	71ad0505cc	t7004: rename ULIMIT test prerequisite to ULIMIT_STACK_SIZE During creation of the patch series, our discussion revealed that we could have a more descriptive name for the prerequisite for the test so it stays unique when other limits of ulimit are introduced. Let's rename the existing ulimit about setting the stack size to a more explicit ULIMIT_STACK_SIZE. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Jeff King	11f228b0be	t7004: fix embedded single-quotes This test uses single quotes inside the single-quoted test snippet, which effectively makes the contents unquoted. Since they don't need quoted anyway, this isn't a problem, but let's switch them to double-quotes to make it more obviously correct. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Jeff King	99094a7ad4	t: fix trivial &&-chain breakage These are tests which are missing a link in their &&-chain, but during a setup phase. We may fail to notice failure in commands that build the test environment, but these are typically not expected to fail at all (but it's still good to double-check that our test environment is what we expect). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	d811c8e17c	versionsort: support reorder prerelease suffixes Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Christian Hesse	c0e0ed6efe	tests: skip RFC1991 tests for gnupg 2.1 GnuPG >= 2.1.0 no longer supports RFC1991, so skip these tests. Signed-off-by: Christian Hesse <mail@eworm.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago

1 2 3

121 Commits (a4b8ab5363a32f283a61ef3a962853556d136c0e)