kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

42903 Commits

6 Branches

36 Tags

131 MiB

Tree: a1bc3dd464

Commit Graph

Author SHA1 Message Date

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Jeff King	ea97002fc9	t/perf: time rev-list with UNINTERESTING commits We time a straight "rev-list --all" and its "--object" counterpart, both going all the way to the root. However, we do not time a partial history walk. This patch adds an extreme case: a walk over a very small slice of history, but with a very large set of UNINTERESTING tips. This is similar to the connectivity check run by git on a small fetch, or the walk done by any pre-receive hooks that want to check incoming commits. This test reveals a performance regression in git v1.8.4.2, caused by `fbd4a70` (list-objects: mark more commits as edges in mark_edges_uninteresting, 2013-08-16): Test fbd4a703^ `fbd4a703` ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0001.1: rev-list --all 0.69(0.67+0.02) 0.69(0.68+0.01) +0.0% 0001.2: rev-list --all --objects 3.47(3.44+0.02) 3.48(3.44+0.03) +0.3% 0001.4: rev-list $commit --not --all 0.04(0.04+0.00) 0.04(0.04+0.00) +0.0% 0001.5: rev-list --objects $commit --not --all 0.04(0.03+0.00) 0.27(0.24+0.02) +575.0% Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	11 years ago
Thomas Rast	342e9ef2d9	Introduce a performance testing framework This introduces a performance testing framework under t/perf/. It tries to be as close to the test-lib.sh infrastructure as possible, and thus should be easy to get used to for git developers. The following points were considered for the implementation: 1. You usually want to compare arbitrary revisions/build trees against each other. They may not have the performance test under consideration, or even the perf-lib.sh infrastructure. To cope with this, the 'run' script lets you specify arbitrary build dirs and revisions. It even automatically builds the revisions if it doesn't have them at hand yet. 2. Usually you would not want to run all tests. It would take too long anyway. The 'run' script lets you specify which tests to run; or you can also do it manually. There is a Makefile for discoverability and 'make clean', but it is not meant for real-world use. 3. Creating test repos from scratch in every test is extremely time-consuming, and shipping or downloading such large/weird repos is out of the question. We leave this decision to the user. Two different sizes of test repos can be configured, and the scripts just copy one or more of those (using hardlinks for the object store). By default it tries to use the build tree's git.git repository. This is fairly fast and versatile. Using a copy instead of a clone preserves many properties that the user may want to test for, such as lots of loose objects, unpacked refs, etc. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	13 years ago

Jeff King

ea97002fc9

t/perf: time rev-list with UNINTERESTING commits

We time a straight "rev-list --all" and its "--object"
counterpart, both going all the way to the root. However, we
do not time a partial history walk. This patch adds an
extreme case: a walk over a very small slice of history, but
with a very large set of UNINTERESTING tips. This is similar
to the connectivity check run by git on a small fetch, or
the walk done by any pre-receive hooks that want to check
incoming commits.

This test reveals a performance regression in git v1.8.4.2,
caused by fbd4a70 (list-objects: mark more commits as edges
in mark_edges_uninteresting, 2013-08-16):

Test                                             fbd4a703^         fbd4a703
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0001.1: rev-list --all                           0.69(0.67+0.02)   0.69(0.68+0.01) +0.0%
0001.2: rev-list --all --objects                 3.47(3.44+0.02)   3.48(3.44+0.03) +0.3%
0001.4: rev-list $commit --not --all             0.04(0.04+0.00)   0.04(0.04+0.00) +0.0%
0001.5: rev-list --objects $commit --not --all   0.04(0.03+0.00)   0.27(0.24+0.02) +575.0%

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

11 years ago

Thomas Rast

342e9ef2d9

Introduce a performance testing framework

This introduces a performance testing framework under t/perf/.  It
tries to be as close to the test-lib.sh infrastructure as possible,
and thus should be easy to get used to for git developers.

The following points were considered for the implementation:

1. You usually want to compare arbitrary revisions/build trees against
   each other.  They may not have the performance test under
   consideration, or even the perf-lib.sh infrastructure.

   To cope with this, the 'run' script lets you specify arbitrary
   build dirs and revisions.  It even automatically builds the revisions
   if it doesn't have them at hand yet.

2. Usually you would not want to run all tests.  It would take too
   long anyway.  The 'run' script lets you specify which tests to run;
   or you can also do it manually.  There is a Makefile for
   discoverability and 'make clean', but it is not meant for
   real-world use.

3. Creating test repos from scratch in every test is extremely
   time-consuming, and shipping or downloading such large/weird repos
   is out of the question.

   We leave this decision to the user.  Two different sizes of test
   repos can be configured, and the scripts just copy one or more of
   those (using hardlinks for the object store).  By default it tries
   to use the build tree's git.git repository.

   This is fairly fast and versatile.  Using a copy instead of a clone
   preserves many properties that the user may want to test for, such
   as lots of loose objects, unpacked refs, etc.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

13 years ago

2 Commits (a1bc3dd46433c6e7e6f1ca5f3bd5429858a60078)