This fixes my favorite annoyance with the git rpm packaging: don't pull
in tla when I say yum install git! You wouldn't expect yum install gcc
to pull in gcc-gfortran, right?
With this change, and blanket 'yum update' will automatically pull in the
new 'git' package and push out the old 'git-core', and if the old 'git'
package was installed 'git-all' will be pulled in instead. A couple of
things do break though: 'yum update git-core', because yum behaves
differently when given a specific package name - it doesn't follow obsoletes.
Instead, 'yum install git' will pull in the new git rpm, which will then
push out the old 'git-core'. Similarly, to get the newest version of
the meta package, 'yum install git-all' will install git-all, which then
pushes out the old 'git' meta package.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Without explicit version deps in the rpm spec file, 'yum update git'
effectively does nothing. Require explicit versions of the subpackages,
so that they get pulled in on an update.
Signed-off-by: James Bowes <jbowes@dangerouslyinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
HPA noticed that yum does not like the newer git RPM set; it turns out
that we do not ship git-p4 anymore but existing installations do not
realize the package is gone if we do not tell anything about it.
David Kastrup suggests using Obsoletes in the spec file of the new
RPM to replace the old package, so here is a try.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
RPM build broke with "File not found" error on git-gui.1 and git-citool.1
They actually are git-gui.1.gz and git-citool.1.gz
Signed-off-by: Quy Tonthat <qtonthat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jakub Narebski pointed out that the git-gui blame viewer is not a
widely known feature, but is incredibly useful. Part of the issue
is advertising. Up until now we haven't even referenced git-gui from
within the core Git manual pages, mostly because I just wasn't sure
how I wanted to supply git-gui documentation to end-users, or how
that documentation should integrate with the core Git documentation.
Based upon Jakub's comment that many users may not even know that
the gui is available in a stock Git distribution I'm offering up
two basic manual pages: git-citool and git-gui. These should offer
enough of a starting point for users to identify that the gui exists,
and how to start it. Future releases of git-gui may contain their
own documentation system available from within a running git-gui.
But not today.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This uses "git-apply --whitespace=strip" to fix whitespace errors that have
crept in to our source files over time. There are a few files that need
to have trailing whitespaces (most notably, test vectors). The results
still passes the test, and build result in Documentation/ area is unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Not only that they are interesting to users, some of the
files are linked to by the included "Git User's Manual"
Signed-off-by: Quy Tonthat <qtonthat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
RPM packages did not include howto files which causes broken
links in howto-index.html
Signed-off-by: Quy Tonthat <qtonthat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
We don't have a copy of subprocess.py anymore, so we removed that
option from the Makefile. Let's not leave that cruft around the RPM
spec file either.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If not, the binaries get built once with the correct CFLAGS, and then again
with the ones in the Makefile when installing
Signed-off-by: Horst H. von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Now that we have git-merge-file, an RCS merge lookalike, we no longer
need it. So long, merge, and thanks for all the fish!
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Grabbing anything that had *arch* in its name into git-arch
package was a wrong idea and we lost git-archive from git-core
by mistake.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Install it as a vendor package. Remove .packlist, perllocal.pod,
Git.bs. Require perl(Error) for building so that our Error.pm is not
installed.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
After 567ffeb772 and
4bc87a28be, git-send-email no
longer requires any non-standard Perl modules, so there's no
reason to special-case it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
After 567ffeb772 and
4bc87a28be, git-send-email no
longer requires any non-standard Perl modules, so there's no
reason to special-case it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This patch renames the tarball "git" rather than "git-core", and changes
the names of various packages from git-core-foo to git-foo. git-core is
still the true core package; an empty RPM package named "git" pulls in
ALL the git packages -- this makes updates work correctly, and allows
"yum install git" to do the obvious thing.
It also renames the git-(core-)tk package to gitk.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I don't want to have to install x11-libs and all it's dependencies on
my headless machines, so this patch splits gitk out of the RPM.
The .deb already appears to have gitk split out.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Matysik <thomas@matysik.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Some specfile cleanups after the split.
- zlib dependency fix, current method is inconsistent, you can
potentially build a package that you can't install on machine you
built it on
- Add proper defattr
- Remove trailing '.' in summary
- Add docs to split up packages
- Add git-core dependency for each subpackage
- Move arch import to separate package as well
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Update git-core spec file based on feedback from Fedora Extras review.
- update BuildRoot to be more specific
- eliminate Requires that must be satisfied for base system install
- drop Vendor
- use dist tag to differentiate between branches
- own %{_datadir}/git-core/
- use RPM_OPT_FLAGS in spec file
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
There are several undocumented dependencies in the .spec and in the
INSTALL files. The following is from Fedora, perhaps other RPM
distributions call the packages differently.
Also, the manpages aren't always installed gzipped.
Updates to git-core.spec.in file:
- Some git scripts use Perl
- gitk needs wish, which is part of TCL/Tk.
- curl is used all over
- Need the ssh program from openssh-clients
Updates to INSTALL:
- Mention wish
- Mention ssh
Signed-off-by: Horst H. von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
I really wanted to try this out, instead of asking for an adjustment
to the 'git merge' driver and waiting. For now the new strategy is
called 'fredrik' and not in the list of default strategies to be tried.
The script wants Python 2.4 so this commit also adjusts Debian and RPM
build procecure files.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Tools directory being separate is just a historical
coincidence. Build and install together with the main
directory, just like the clean target does.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Kristian Høgsberg