kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Johannes Sixt	1f553918a8	test-lib: Introduce test_chmod and use it instead of update-index --chmod This function replaces sequences of 'chmod +x' and 'git update-index --chmod=+x' in the test suite, whose purpose is to help filesystems that need core.filemode=false. Two places where only 'chmod +x' was used we also use this new function. The function calls 'git update-index --chmod' without checking core.filemode (unlike some of the call sites did). We do this because the call sites expect that the executable bit ends up in the index (ie. it is not the purpose of the call sites to test whether git treats 'chmod +x' and 'update-index --chmod=+x' correctly). Therefore, on filesystems with core.filemode=true the 'git update-index --chmod' is a no-op. The function uses --add with update-index to help one call site in t6031-merge-recursive. It makes no difference for the other callers. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>	16 years ago
Johannes Sixt	2559bff32c	t3400-rebase: Move detached HEAD check earlier Short story: There is a section in t3400 that tests fundamental rebase properties. `3ec7371f` (Add two extra tests for git rebase, 2009-02-09) added a check that rebase works on a detached HEAD, but the test was put near the end of the file. This moves it to a more suitable place. Long story: The test that preceded the one in question tests that a rebased commit degrades from a content change with mode change to a mere mode change. But on Windows, where we have core.filemode=false, the original commit did not record the mode change, and so the rebase operation did not rebase anything. This caused the subsequent detached HEAD test to fail. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	3ec7371f63	Add two extra tests for git rebase	16 years ago
Nanako Shiraishi	0cb0e143ff	tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t0000 - t3599) Converts tests between t0050-t3903. Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Jeff King	bbf08124e0	fix bsd shell negation On some shells (notably /bin/sh on FreeBSD 6.1), the construct foo && ! bar \| baz is true if foo && baz whereas for most other shells (such as bash) is true if foo && ! baz We can work around this by specifying foo && ! (bar \| baz) which works everywhere. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Bryan Donlan	0e46e70462	Don't use the 'export NAME=value' in the test scripts. This form is not portable across all shells, so replace instances of: export FOO=bar with: FOO=bar export FOO Signed-off-by: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@fushizen.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Junio C Hamano	41ac414ea2	Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test should succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	ece7b74903	apply --index-info: fall back to current index for mode changes "git diff" does not record index lines for pure mode changes (i.e. no lines changed). Therefore, apply --index-info would call out a bogus error. Instead, fall back to reading the info from the current index. Incidentally, this fixes an error where git-rebase would not rebase a commit including a pure mode change, and changes requiring a threeway merge. Noticed and later tested by Chris Shoemaker. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	18 years ago
Johannes Sixt	1308c17b3e	Allow rebase to run if upstream is completely merged Consider this history: o--o-...-B <- origin \ \ x--x--M--x--x <- master In this situation, rebase considers master fully up-to-date and would not do anything. However, if there were additional commits on origin, the rebase would run and move the commits x on top of origin. Here we change rebase to short-circuit out only if the history since origin is strictly linear. Consequently, the above as well as a history like this would be linearized: o--o <- origin \ x--x \ \ x--M--x--x <- master Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	18 years ago
Junio C Hamano	5be60078c9	Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	18 years ago
Amos Waterland	294c695d8c	git rebase loses author name/email if given bad email address If GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL is of a certain form, `git rebase master' will blow away the author name and email when fast-forward merging commits. I have not tracked it down, but here is a testcase that demonstrates the behavior. Signed-off-by: Amos Waterland <apw@us.ibm.com> Acked-by: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@watson.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	19 years ago

12 Commits (951886481668b97485640a1b24fc73fccff0d629)