kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Tree: 8e566f24b3

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Nicolas Pitre	0d8aafd252	sideband.c: ESC is spelled '\033' not '\e' for portability. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Nicolas Pitre	ebe8fa738d	fix display overlap between remote and local progress It is possible for the remote summary line to be displayed over the local progress display line, and therefore that local progress gets bumped to the next line. However, if the progress line is long enough, it might not be entirely overwritten by the remote summary line. This creates a messed up display such as: remote: Total 310 (delta 160), reused 178 (delta 112)iB/s Receiving objects: 100% (310/310), 379.98 KiB \| 136 KiB/s, done. So we have to clear the screen line before displaying the remote message to make sure the local progress is not visible anymore on the first line. Yet some Git versions on the remote side might be sending updates to the same line and terminate it with \r, and a separate packet with a single \n might be sent later when the progress display is done. This means the screen line must not be cleared in that case. Since the sideband code already has to figure out line breaks in the received packet to properly prepend the "remote:" prefix, we can easily determine if the remote line about to be displayed is empty. Only when it is not then a proper suffix is inserted before the \r or \n to clear the end of the screen line. Also some magic constants related to the prefix length have been replaced with a variable, making it similar to the suffix length handling. Since gcc is smart enough to detect that the variable is constant there is no impact on the generated code. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Nicolas Pitre	ed1902ef5c	cope with multiple line breaks within sideband progress messages A single sideband packet may sometimes contain multiple lines of progress messages, but we prepend "remote: " only to the whole buffer which creates a messed up display in that case. Make sure that the "remote: " prefix is applied to every remote lines. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>	17 years ago
Nicolas Pitre	9ac13ec941	atomic write for sideband remote messages It has been a few times that I ended up with such a confusing display: \|remote: Generating pack... \|remote: Done counting 17 objects. \|remote: Result has 9 objects. \|remote: Deltifying 9 objects. \|remote: 100% (9/9) done \|remote: Unpacking 9 objects \|Total 9, written 9 (delta 8), reused 0 (delta 0) \| 100% (9/9) done The confusion can be avoided in most cases by writing the remote message in one go to prevent interleacing with local messages. The buffer declaration has been moved inside recv_sideband() to avoid extra string copies. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Junio C Hamano	958c24b1b8	Move sideband server side support into reusable form. The server side support; this is just the very low level, and the caller needs to know which band it wants to send things out. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> (cherry picked from b786552b67878c7780c50def4c069d46dc54efbe commit)	18 years ago
Junio C Hamano	49a52b1d1f	Move sideband client side support into reusable form. This moves the receiver side of the sideband support from fetch-clone.c to sideband.c and its header file, so that archiver protocol can use it. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago