It returns the result SHA1 on stdout, so you can do
remote=$(git-fetch-pack host:dir branchname)
and it will unpack the objects and "remote" will be the SHA1 name of the
branch on the other side. You can then save that off, or merge it, or
whatever.
It's meant to be used by "git fetch" for the local and ssh case.
It doesn't actually do the fetching now, but it does discover the common
commit point.
This patch fixes up the t/t5300 unit tests which were broken by the changes in:
Make the name of a pack-file depend on the objects packed there-in.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This is actually subtly wrong. If a short match is found in the object
directory, but would _also_ match another SHA1 ID in a pack (or it shows
in one pack but not another), we'll never have done the pack lookup, and
we think it's unique.
I can't find it in myself to care. You really want to use enough of a
SHA1 that there is never any ambiguity.
This means that the .git/objects/pack directory is also rsync'able,
since the filenames created there-in are either unique or refer to the
same data.
Otherwise you might not be able to pull from a directory that is partly
packed without having to worry about missing objects due to pack-file
name clashes.
In particular, check that it's a symlink, and points to refs/heads/. We
depend on that these days not only for "git checkout", but also because
fsck and others only check for references in the .git/refs/
subdirectory, not things like HEAD itself.
If we're inside a checked out CVS repository, there is
no need to explicitly specify the module as it is
available in CVS/Repository.
Also read CVS/Root if it's available and -d is not specified.
Finally, explicitly pass root to cvsps as CVS/Root takes
precedence over CVSROOT.
Signed-off-by: Sven Verdoolaege <skimo@kotnet.org>
This implements show_pack_info() function used in verify-pack
command when -v flag is used to obtain something like
unpack-objects used to give when it was first written.
It shows the following for each non-deltified object found in
the pack:
SHA1 type size offset
For deltified objects, it shows this instead:
SHA1 type size offset depth base_sha1
In order to get the output in the order that appear in the pack
file for debugging purposes, you can do this:
$ git-verify-pack -v packfile | sort -n -k 4,4
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Nico pointed out that having verify_pack.c and verify-pack.c was
confusing. Rename verify_pack.c to pack-check.c as suggested,
and enhances the verification done quite a bit.
- Built-in sha1_file unpacking knows that a base object of a
deltified object _must_ be in the same pack, and takes
advantage of that fact.
- Earlier verify-pack command only checked the SHA1 sum for the
entire pack file and did not look into its contents. It now
checks everything idx file claims to have unpacks correctly.
- It now has a hook to give more detailed information for
objects contained in the pack under -v flag.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This teaches packed_delta_info() that it only needs to look at
the type of the base object to figure out both type and size of
a deltified object. This saves quite a many calls to inflate()
when dealing with a deep delta chain.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This makes the receiver always send a full list of valid refs, which
will allow us to do better packs, as well as handle creation of new
refs. Eventually. Right now we just moved the matching and enabled it.
So now you can do
git-send-pack host:path branch1 branch2
to only send branches "branch1" and "branch2".
A "old ref" of all zeroes is considered a "don't care" ref, and allows
us to say "write the new ref regardless of what the old ref contained
(or even if it existed at all)".
This allows (if git-send-pack were to do it) creating new refs, and
fixing up old ones.
This concludes this lesson. I've actually successfully sent an update
using the git-send-pack command.
Probably tons of work still to do, and nasty debugging, but it's now
actually potentially useful.
After unpacking the object pack successfully, we go through the list of
refs, and verify that they still contain their expected values. Then we
replace them with the new ones.
Linus Torvalds