kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Tree: 7ebee44167

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Gary V. Vaughan	4fdf71be1c	tests: use "test_cmp", not "diff", when verifying the result In tests, call test_cmp rather than raw diff where possible (i.e. if the output does not go to a pipe), to allow the use of, say, 'cmp' when the default 'diff -u' is not compatible with a vendor diff. When that is not possible, use $DIFF, as set in GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS. Signed-off-by: Gary V. Vaughan <gary@thewrittenword.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Nanako Shiraishi	3604e7c5c6	tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t3600 - t6999) Converts tests between t3600-t6300. Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Johannes Sixt	41872fd573	t4127-apply-same-fn: Avoid sed -i Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Don Zickus	7a07841c0b	git-apply: handle a patch that touches the same path more than once better When working with a lot of people who backport patches all day long, every once in a while I get a patch that modifies the same file more than once inside the same patch. git-apply either fails if the second change relies on the first change or silently drops the first change if the second change is independent. The silent part is the scary scenario for us. Also this behaviour is different from the patch-utils. I have modified git-apply to create a table of the filenames of files it modifies such that if a later patch chunk modifies a file in the table it will buffer the previously changed file instead of reading the original file from disk. Logic has been put in to handle creations/deletions/renames/copies. All the relevant tests of git-apply succeed. A new test has been added to cover the cases I addressed. The fix is relatively straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago