Commit Graph

5 Commits (7c78c599bb9b51e5cbdae3e7dc1d723eefcf7c61)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Patrick Steinhardt fc1ddf42af t: remove TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK annotations
Now that the default value for TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK is `true` there
is no longer a need to have that variable declared in all of our tests.
Drop it.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-11-21 08:23:48 +09:00
Patrick Steinhardt 1869525066 refs/reftable: wire up support for exclude patterns
Exclude patterns can be used by reference backends to skip over blocks
of references that are uninteresting to the caller. Reference backends
do not have to wire up support for them, and all callers are expected to
behave as if the backend didn't support them. In fact, the only backend
that supports exclude patterns right now is the "packed" backend.

Exclude patterns can be quite an important performance optimization in
repositories that have loads of references. The patterns are set up in
case "transfer.hideRefs" and friends are configured during a fetch, so
handling these patterns becomes important once there are lots of hidden
refs in a served repository.

Now that we have properly re-seekable reftable iterators we can also
wire up support for these patterns in the "reftable" backend. Doing so
is conceptually simple: once we hit a reference whose prefix matches the
current exclude pattern we re-seek the iterator to the first reference
that doesn't match the pattern anymore. This schema only works for
trivial patterns that do not have any globbing characters in them, but
this restriction also applies do the "packed" backend.

This makes t1419 work with the "reftable" backend with some slight
modifications. Of course it also speeds up listing of references with
hidden refs. The following benchmark prints one reference with 1 million
hidden references:

    Benchmark 1: HEAD~
      Time (mean ± σ):      93.3 ms ±   2.1 ms    [User: 90.3 ms, System: 2.5 ms]
      Range (min … max):    89.8 ms …  97.2 ms    33 runs

    Benchmark 2: HEAD
      Time (mean ± σ):       4.2 ms ±   0.6 ms    [User: 2.2 ms, System: 1.8 ms]
      Range (min … max):     3.1 ms …   8.1 ms    765 runs

    Summary
      HEAD ran
       22.15 ± 3.19 times faster than HEAD~

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-09-16 13:57:19 -07:00
Patrick Steinhardt 61e1c560bc t1419: mark test suite as files-backend specific
With 59c35fac54 (refs/packed-backend.c: implement jump lists to avoid
excluded pattern(s), 2023-07-10) we have implemented logic to handle
excluded refs more efficiently in the "packed" ref backend. This logic
allows us to skip emitting refs completely which we know to not be of
any interest to the caller, which can avoid quite some allocations and
object lookups.

This was wired up via a new `exclude_patterns` parameter passed to the
backend's ref iterator. The backend only needs to handle them on a best
effort basis though, and in fact we only handle it for the "packed-refs"
file, but not for loose references. Consequently, all callers must still
filter emitted refs with those exclude patterns.

The result is that handling exclude patterns is completely optional in
the ref backend, and any future backends may or may not implement it.
Let's thus mark the test for t1419 to depend on the REFFILES prereq.

An alternative would be to introduce a new prereq that tells us whether
the backend under test supports exclude patterns or not. But this does
feel a bit overblown:

  - It would either map to the REFFILES prereq, in which case it feels
    overengineered because the prereq is only ever relevant to t1419.

  - Otherwise, it could auto-detect whether the backend supports exclude
    patterns. But this could lead to silent failures in case the support
    for this feature breaks at any point in time.

It should thus be good enough to just use the REFFILES prereq for now.
If future backends ever grow support for exclude patterns we can easily
add their respective prereq as another condition for this test suite to
execute.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Reviewed-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-01-29 13:54:33 -08:00
Taylor Blau c489f47a64 refs/packed-backend.c: add trace2 counters for jump list
The previous commit added low-level tests to ensure that the packed-refs
iterator did not enumerate excluded sections of the refspace.

However, there was no guarantee that these sections weren't being
visited, only that they were being suppressed from the output. To harden
these tests, add a trace2 counter which tracks the number of regions
skipped by the packed-refs iterator, and assert on its value.

Suggested-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-07-10 14:48:55 -07:00
Taylor Blau 59c35fac54 refs/packed-backend.c: implement jump lists to avoid excluded pattern(s)
When iterating through the `packed-refs` file in order to answer a query
like:

    $ git for-each-ref --exclude=refs/__hidden__

it would be useful to avoid walking over all of the entries in
`refs/__hidden__/*` when possible, since we know that the ref-filter
code is going to throw them away anyways.

In certain circumstances, doing so is possible. The algorithm for doing
so is as follows:

  - For each excluded pattern, find the first record that matches it,
    and the first record that *doesn't* match it (i.e. the location
    you'd next want to consider when excluding that pattern).

  - Sort the set of excluded regions from the previous step in ascending
    order of the first location within the `packed-refs` file that
    matches.

  - Clean up the results from the previous step: discard empty regions,
    and combine adjacent regions. The set of regions which remains is
    referred to as the "jump list", and never contains any references
    which should be included in the result set.

Then when iterating through the `packed-refs` file, if `iter->pos` is
ever contained in one of the regions from the previous steps, advance
`iter->pos` past the end of that region, and continue enumeration.

Note that we only perform this optimization when none of the excluded
pattern(s) have special meta-characters in them. For a pattern like
"refs/foo[ac]", the excluded regions ("refs/fooa", "refs/fooc", and
everything underneath them) are not connected. A future implementation
that handles this case may split the character class (pretending as if
two patterns were excluded: "refs/fooa", and "refs/fooc").

There are a few other gotchas worth considering. First, note that the
jump list is sorted, so once we jump past a region, we can avoid
considering it (or any regions preceding it) again. The member
`jump_pos` is used to track the first next-possible region to jump
through.

Second, note that the jump list is best-effort, since we do not handle
loose references, and because of the meta-character issue above. The
jump list may not skip past all references which won't appear in the
results, but will never skip over a reference which does appear in the
result set.

In repositories with a large number of hidden references, the speed-up
can be significant. Tests here are done with a copy of linux.git with a
reference "refs/pull/N" pointing at every commit, as in:

    $ git rev-list HEAD | awk '{ print "create refs/pull/" NR " " $0 }' |
        git update-ref --stdin
    $ git pack-refs --all

, it is significantly faster to have `for-each-ref` jump over the
excluded references, as opposed to filtering them out after the fact:

    $ hyperfine \
      'git for-each-ref --format="%(objectname) %(refname)" | grep -vE "^[0-9a-f]{40} refs/pull/"' \
      'git.prev for-each-ref --format="%(objectname) %(refname)" --exclude="refs/pull"' \
      'git.compile for-each-ref --format="%(objectname) %(refname)" --exclude="refs/pull"'
    Benchmark 1: git for-each-ref --format="%(objectname) %(refname)" | grep -vE "^[0-9a-f]{40} refs/pull/"
      Time (mean ± σ):     798.1 ms ±   3.3 ms    [User: 687.6 ms, System: 146.4 ms]
      Range (min … max):   794.5 ms … 805.5 ms    10 runs

    Benchmark 2: git.prev for-each-ref --format="%(objectname) %(refname)" --exclude="refs/pull"
      Time (mean ± σ):      98.9 ms ±   1.4 ms    [User: 93.1 ms, System: 5.7 ms]
      Range (min … max):    97.0 ms … 104.0 ms    29 runs

    Benchmark 3: git.compile for-each-ref --format="%(objectname) %(refname)" --exclude="refs/pull"
      Time (mean ± σ):       4.5 ms ±   0.2 ms    [User: 0.7 ms, System: 3.8 ms]
      Range (min … max):     4.1 ms …   5.8 ms    524 runs

    Summary
      'git.compile for-each-ref --format="%(objectname) %(refname)" --exclude="refs/pull"' ran
       21.87 ± 1.05 times faster than 'git.prev for-each-ref --format="%(objectname) %(refname)" --exclude="refs/pull"'
      176.52 ± 8.19 times faster than 'git for-each-ref --format="%(objectname) %(refname)" | grep -vE "^[0-9a-f]{40} refs/pull/"'

(Comparing stock git and this patch isn't quite fair, since an earlier
commit in this series adds a naive implementation of the `--exclude`
option. `git.prev` is built from the previous commit and includes this
naive implementation).

Using the jump list is fairly straightforward (see the changes to
`refs/packed-backend.c::next_record()`), but constructing the list is
not. To ensure that the construction is correct, add a new suite of
tests in t1419 covering various corner cases (overlapping regions,
partially overlapping regions, adjacent regions, etc.).

Co-authored-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-07-10 14:48:55 -07:00