Since log message in a commit object is defined to be binary
blob, it could be something without an empty line between the
title line and the body text. Be careful to format such into
a form suitable for e-mail submission. There must be an empty
line between the headers and the body.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This would help sorting by subject in MUA work saner even though
MUA is too dumb to attempt sorting numbered subjects sanely.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Before GIT version at the end of output we used a 3-dash marker;
but 3-dash marker is special and should not be overused.
Instead, use "-- " which is a standard practice in e-mails to
signal the beginning of trailing garbage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The attempt to help 3-way fallback by recording the tree object
id for the entire pre-image was unnecessary, and we already have
an better alternative in the form of per-blob "index" lines.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Prepending asterisk to the output was just adding noise, and
making scripts like proposed git-send-mail by Andreas Ericsson
do unnecessary work.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Now all the users of this script detect its exit status and die,
complaining that it is outside git repository. So move the code
that dies from all callers to git-sh-setup script.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Luben Tuikov noticed that sometimes being able to say
'git-format-patch <commit>' to format the change a single commit
introduces relative to its parent is handy.
This patch does not support that directly, but it makes sense to
interpret a single argument "rev" to mean "rev^1..rev".
With this, the backward compatibility syntaxes still apply:
- "format-patch master" means "format-patch master..HEAD"
- "format-patch origin master" means "format-patch origin..master"
- "format-patch origin.." means "format-patch origin..HEAD"
But "format-patch a b c d e" formats the changes these five
commits introduce relative to their respective parents. Earlier
it rejected these arguments not in "one..two" form.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I noticed format-patch loses authorship information of Lukas' patch
when I run git tools with LC_LANG set to ja_JP. It turns out that
the sed script to set environment variables were not working on his
name (encoded in UTF-8), which is unfortunate but technically correct.
Force sed invocation under C locale because we always want literal byte
semantics.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Refactored fetch options into separate fetch-options.txt.
Made git-merge use merge-options.
Made git-fetch use fetch-options.
Made git-pull use merge-options and fetch-options.
Added --help option to git-pull and git-format-patch scripts.
Rewrote Documentation/Makefile to dynamically determine
include dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This enhances set of revs you can give format-patch.
Originally, format-patch took either one rev, or two revs:
format-patch rev1
format-patch rev1 rev2
The first format was a short-hand for "format-patch rev1 HEAD"
(i.e. rev2==HEAD). What this meant was to find commits that are
in branch rev2 that has not been merged to branch rev1.
The above notation is still supported, but now it takes sequence
of "from1..to1 from2..to2 ...". In short, the second format has
become a short-hand for "format-patch rev1..rev2". Commits in
to1 but not in from1, to2 but not in from2, ... are formatted as
emailable patches.
With this, cherry-picking from other branch can be written as:
git-format-patch -k --stdout master..branch1 master..branch2 |
git-am -k -3
which is generally faster than traditional cherry-pick (which
always did 3-way merge) if patches apply cleanly, and still
falls back on 3-way merge if some of them do not.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This new flag generates the mbox formatted output to the standard
output, instead of saving them into a file per patch and implies --mbox.
It also fixes a corner case where the commit does not have *any* message.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
There was a leftover use of sed that attempted to remove the commit ID
output from git-diff-tree, which turned into an expensive no-op when
git-diff-tree output header format changed about three months ago.
Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This switches the logic to pick which commits to include in the output
from git-rev-list to git-cherry; as a side effect, 'format-patch ^up mine'
would stop working although up..mine would continue to work.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
As promised, this is the "big tool rename" patch. The primary differences
since 0.99.6 are:
(1) git-*-script are no more. The commands installed do not
have any such suffix so users do not have to remember if
something is implemented as a shell script or not.
(2) Many command names with 'cache' in them are renamed with
'index' if that is what they mean.
There are backward compatibility symblic links so that you and
Porcelains can keep using the old names, but the backward
compatibility support is expected to be removed in the near
future.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
In case of a commit with an empty message there is no
mandatory empty line between headers and body
[jc: This makes --mbox output valid even when the commit message does
not have anything but its first line, which the one I wrote botched.
One side-effect is that it adds an extra blank line at the end even if
it has more than one lines, which will be eaten by the receiving end.
As Marco says, this is a stop-gap measure. This script needs to be
split into two, one that gets the format specifier and a commit ID to
write to its standard output, and another that drives that one reading
from rev-list. I'll fix things properly when that happens by
rewriting the former part in Perl or something more reasonable than
the current shell, sed and grep mishmash.]
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@yahoo.it>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Avoid that git-format-patch writes out patch series
information on stderr when there are no errors
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@yahoo.it>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Since git-commit-script has a "--signoff" option, use that in
git-format-patch-script, too (and since partial option names are
supported,"--sign" is still valid).
Also, if the message already contains the S-O-B line, silently ignore the
"--signoff" request.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This adds the option "--sign" to git-format-patch-script which adds
a Signed-off-by: line automatically.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Although these commands take only begin and end, not necessarily
generic SHA1 expressions rev-parse supports, supporting a..b
notation is good for consistency. This commit adds such without
breaking backward compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Some implementations of wc pad the line number with white space, which
expr does not grok as a number.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Add --mbox option to export patches in a format resembling UNIX
mbox, so that later they can be concatenated and fed to
applymbox.
Add --check to look for lines that introduce bogus whitespaces.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- avoid duplicating [PATCH] in the commit message body if the
original commit has it already (happens for commits done from
mails via applymbox).
- check if the commit author is different from the one who is
running the script, and emit an appropriate "From:" and
"Date: " lines to the output.
- with '--date', emit "Date: " line to preserve the original
author date even for the user's own commit.
- teach mailinfo to grok not just "From: " but "Date: ".
The patch e-mail output by format-patch starts with the first
line from the original commit message, prefixed with [PATCH],
and optionally a From: line if you are reformatting a patch
obtained from somebody else, a Date: line from the original
commit if (1) --date is specified or (2) for somebody else's
patch, and the rest of the commit message body.
Expected use of this is to move the title line from the commit
to Subject: when sending it via an e-mail, and leave the From:
and the Date: lines as the first lines of your message.
The mailinfo command has been changed to read Date: (in addition
to From: it already understands) and do sensible things when
running applymbox.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
If it is fed a commit with more than one leading blank lines,
the sed scripts git-format-patch-script used looped forever.
Using git-stripspace upfront makes the sed script somewhat
simpler to work around this problem.
Also use git-rev-parse so that we can say
$ git-format-patch-script HEAD^^^^
to prepare the latest four patches for e-mail submission.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This is the script I use to prepare patches for e-mail submission.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Junio C Hamano