It does not usually make sense to record a commit that has the exact
same tree as its sole parent commit and that is why git-commit prevents
you from making such a mistake, but when data from foreign scm is
involved, it is a different story. We are equipped to represent such an
(perhaps insane, perhaps by mistake, or perhaps done on purpose) empty
change, and it is better to represent it bypassing the safety valve for
native use.
This is primarily for use by foreign scm interface scripts.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It does not usually make sense to record a commit that has the exact
same tree as its sole parent commit and that is why git-commit prevents
you from making such a mistake, but when data from foreign scm is
involved, it is a different story. We are equipped to represent such an
(perhaps insane, perhaps by mistake, or perhaps done on purpose) empty
change, and it is better to represent it bypassing the safety valve for
native use.
This is primarily for use by foreign scm interface scripts.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Normally, it should not be allowed to generate an empty commit. A merge
commit generated with git 'merge -s ours' does not change the tree (along
the first parent), but merges are not "empty" even if they do not change
the tree. Hence, commit 8588452ceb allowed to amend a merge commit that
does not change the tree, but 4fb5fd5d30 disallowed it again in an
attempt to avoid that an existing commit is amended such that it becomes
empty. With this change, a commit can be edited (create a new one or amend
an existing one) either if there are changes or if there are at least two
parents.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Normally, it should not be allowed to generate an empty commit. A merge
commit generated with git 'merge -s ours' does not change the tree (along
the first parent), but merges are not "empty" even if they do not change
the tree. Hence, we should be careful not to forbid this case.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The code tries to collapse identical leading components
between the prefix and the path. So if we're in "dir1", the
path "dir1/file" should become just "file". However, we were
ending up with "../dir1/file". The included test expected
the wrong output.
The "len" parameter to quote_path can be negative to mean
"this is a NUL terminated string". Simply count it so that
the loop can rely on it being the length of the path.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git status shares the same usage information as git commit since it
shows what would be committed if the same options are given. However,
when displaying the usage information for git status it should say it
is for git status not git commit.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce fmt_name() specifically meant for formatting the name and
email pair, to add signed-off-by value. This reverts parts of
13208572fb (builtin-commit: fix --signoff)
so that an empty datestamp string given to fmt_ident() by mistake will
error out as before.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* wc/rebase-insn:
Mention that git-rm can be an appropriate resolution as well as git-add.
revert/cherry-pick: Allow overriding the help text by the calling Porcelain
Previusly, there was only a 16x16 image, which looked very distorted.
Here we add a 32x32 version, and also make the image sharper.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The install-sh script as shipped with automake requires a space between
the -m switch and its argument. Since this is also the regular way of
doing it with other install implementations this change inserts the
missing space.
Signed-off-by: Robert Schiele <rschiele@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Any program using getopt or getopt_long will stop processing options
once a non-option argument has been encountered, if POSIXLY_CORRECT is
set. Therefore, reorder the command-line arguments to put options
first, so that the msgfmt call works in this scenario.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This program dumps (parts of) a git repository in the format that
fast-import understands.
For clarity's sake, it does not use the 'inline' method of specifying
blobs in the commits, but builds the blobs before building the commits.
Since signed tags' signatures will not necessarily be valid (think
transformations after the export, or excluding revisions, changing
the history), there are 4 modes to handle them: abort (default),
ignore, warn and strip. The latter just turns the tags into
unsigned ones.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update list of build configuration variables, add references
to gitweb/INSTALL, add description of runtime and per-repository
runtime configuration.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The current git-stash behaviour is very error prone to typos. For example,
if you typed "git-stash llist", git-stash would think that you wanted to
save to a stash named "llist", but in fact, you meant "git-stash list".
Signed-off-by: Kevin Leung <kevinlsk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Even though commit-tree would default to the current time if the incoming
e-mail message somehow did not record the timestamp, it is safer to catch
the breakage sooner.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These changes make the automatic prefix highlighting work with the "Add
untracked" subcommand in git-add--interactive by explicitly handling
arrays, hashes and strings internally (previously only arrays and hashes
were handled).
In addition, prefixes which have special meaning for list_and_choose
(things like "*" for "all" and "-" for "deselect) are explicitly
excluded (highlighting these prefixes would be misleading).
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we consider if a path has been totally rewritten, we did not
touch changes from symlinks to files or vice versa. But a change
that modifies even the type of a blob surely should count as a
complete rewrite.
While we are at it, modernise diffcore-break to be aware of gitlinks (we
do not want to touch them).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These are three types of cleanups here:
1. remove newline from die message (die/report adds it
already)
2. typo: s/merger/merge/
3. the old "* no commit message? aborting commit." is now
prepended with "fatal: ", making the asterisk look a
little funny. Let's just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The categorized list of commands in git(7) and the list of common
commands in "git help" output were maintained separately, which was
insane. This consolidates them to a single command-list.txt file.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
8951d7c1f1 (Build in ls-remote) made
peek-remote as a synonym to ls-remote by enhancing the latter, but
at the same time actually _removed_ it, before we officially gave
removal notice. This was bad.
Resurrect it for v1.5.4.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* cr/tag-options:
git-tag: test that -s implies an annotated tag
"git-tag -s" should create a signed annotated tag
builtin-tag: accept and process multiple -m just like git-commit
Make builtin-tag.c use parse_options.
If you run "git-svn rebase" while sitting on a topic branch, there is
no need to create a "master" branch if one didn't exist already. The
branch was created implicitly by the automatic checkout after fetching,
which in the case of rebase isn't actually necessary anyway.
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
show-externals can be used by scripts to provide svn:externals-like
functionality. For example, a script can list all of the externals and then
use check out the listed URLs at the appropriate paths, similar to what the svn
client does. Said script (or perhaps git-svn itself, in the future) could
simply invoke svn export on the paths, or it could go one further, using
git-svn clone and even git-submodule together to better integrate externals
checkouts.
The implementation is shamelessly copied from show-ignores. A more general
command to list user-specified properties is probably a better idea.
Signed-off-by: Vineet Kumar <vineet@doorstop.net>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Digest::MD5 is loaded regardless of the package in which it's
declared, so move its 'use' statement and the md5sum() function
into the main package.
Signed-off-by: David D. Kilzer <ddkilzer@kilzer.net>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Add support for pulling the real author of a commit from the From:
and first Signed-off-by: fields of the SVN commit message.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Previously, git-svn first read the .git/config file for settings as if
current working directory was the repository top-directory, and after
that made sure to cd into top-directory. The result was a silent
failur to read configuration settings. This patch changes the order
these two things are done.
Signed-off-by: Gustaf Hendeby <hendeby@isy.liu.se>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
* maint:
Replace the word 'update-cache' by 'update-index' everywhere
cvsimport: fix usage of cvsimport.module
t7003-filter-branch: Fix test of a failing --msg-filter.
cvsimport: miscellaneous packed-ref fixes
cvsimport: use rev-parse to support packed refs
Add basic cvsimport tests
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Jeff King wrote:
>
> I think it will get worse, because you are simultaneously calculating
> all of the similarity scores bit by bit rather than doing a loop. Though
> perhaps you mean at the end you will end up with a list of src/dst pairs
> sorted by score, and you can loop over that.
Well, after thinking about this a bit, I think there's a solution that may
work well with the current thing too: instead of looping just *once* over
the list of rename pairs, loop twice - and simply refuse to do copies on
the first loop.
This trivial patch does that, and turns Kumar's test-case into a perfect
rename list.
It's not pretty, it's not smart, but it seems to work. There's something
to be said for keeping it simple and stupid.
And it should not be nearly as expensive as it may _look_. Yes, the loop
is "(i = 0; i < num_create * num_src; i++)", but the important part is
that the whole array is sorted by rename score, and we have a
if (mx[i].score < minimum_score)
break;
in it, so uthe loop actually would tend to terminate rather quickly.
Anyway, Kumar, the thing to take away from this is:
- git really doesn't even *care* about the whole "rename detection"
internally, and any commits you have done with renames are totally
independent of the heuristics we then use to *show* the renames.
- the rename detection really is for just two reasons: (a) keep humans
happy, and keep the diffs small and (b) help automatic merging across
renames. So getting renames right is certainly good, but it's more of a
"politeness" issue than a "correctness" issue, although the merge
portion of it does matter a lot sometimes.
- the important thing here is that you can commit your changes and not
worry about them being somehow "corrupted" by lack of rename detection,
even if you commit them with a version of git that doesn't do rename
detection the way you expected it. The rename detection is an
"after-the-fact" thing, not something that actually gets saved in the
repository, which is why we can change the heuristics _after_ seeing
examples, and the examples magically correct themselves!
- try out the two patches I've posted, and see if they work for you. They
pass the test-suite, and the output for your example commit looks sane,
but hey, if you have other test-cases, try them out.
Here's Kumar's pretty diffstat with both my patches:
Makefile | 6 +++---
board/{cds => freescale}/common/cadmus.c | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/common/cadmus.h | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/common/eeprom.c | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/common/eeprom.h | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/common/ft_board.c | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/common/via.c | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/common/via.h | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8541cds/Makefile | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8541cds/config.mk | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8541cds/init.S | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8541cds/mpc8541cds.c | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8541cds/u-boot.lds | 4 ++--
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8548cds/Makefile | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8548cds/config.mk | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8548cds/init.S | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8548cds/mpc8548cds.c | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8548cds/u-boot.lds | 4 ++--
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8555cds/Makefile | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8555cds/config.mk | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8555cds/init.S | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8555cds/mpc8555cds.c | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8555cds/u-boot.lds | 4 ++--
23 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
and here it is before:
Makefile | 6 +-
board/cds/mpc8548cds/Makefile | 60 -----
board/cds/mpc8555cds/Makefile | 60 -----
board/cds/mpc8555cds/init.S | 255 --------------------
board/cds/mpc8555cds/u-boot.lds | 150 ------------
board/{cds => freescale}/common/cadmus.c | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/common/cadmus.h | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/common/eeprom.c | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/common/eeprom.h | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/common/ft_board.c | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/common/via.c | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/common/via.h | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8541cds/Makefile | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8541cds/config.mk | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8541cds/init.S | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8541cds/mpc8541cds.c | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8541cds/u-boot.lds | 4 +-
.../mpc8541cds => freescale/mpc8548cds}/Makefile | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8548cds/config.mk | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8548cds/init.S | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8548cds/mpc8548cds.c | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8548cds/u-boot.lds | 4 +-
.../mpc8541cds => freescale/mpc8555cds}/Makefile | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8555cds/config.mk | 0
.../mpc8541cds => freescale/mpc8555cds}/init.S | 0
board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8555cds/mpc8555cds.c | 0
.../mpc8541cds => freescale/mpc8555cds}/u-boot.lds | 4 +-
27 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 534 deletions(-)
so it certainly makes the diffs prettier.
Linus
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Kumar Gala had a case in the u-boot archive with multiple renames of files
with identical contents, and git would turn those into multiple "copy"
operations of one of the sources, and just deleting the other sources.
This patch makes the git exact rename detection prefer to spread out the
renames over the multiple sources, rather than do multiple copies of one
source.
NOTE! The changes are a bit larger than required, because I also renamed
the variables named "one" and "two" to "target" and "source" respectively.
That makes the logic easier to follow, especially as the "one" was
illogically the target and not the soruce, for purely historical reasons
(this piece of code used to traverse over sources and targets in the wrong
order, and when we fixed that, we didn't fix the names back then. So I
fixed them now).
The important part of this change is just the trivial score calculations
for when files have identical contents:
/* Give higher scores to sources that haven't been used already */
score = !source->rename_used;
score += basename_same(source, target);
and when we have multiple choices we'll now pick the choice that gets the
best rename score, rather than only looking at whether the basename
matched.
It's worth noting a few gotchas:
- this scoring is currently only done for the "exact match" case.
In particular, in Kumar's example, even after this patch, the inexact
match case is still done as a copy+delete rather than as two renames:
delete mode 100644 board/cds/mpc8555cds/u-boot.lds
copy board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8541cds/u-boot.lds (97%)
rename board/{cds/mpc8541cds => freescale/mpc8555cds}/u-boot.lds (97%)
because apparently the "cds/mpc8541cds/u-boot.lds" copy looked
a bit more similar to both end results. That said, I *suspect* we just
have the exact same issue there - the similarity analysis just gave
identical (or at least very _close_ to identical) similarity points,
and we do not have any logic to prefer multiple renames over a
copy/delete there.
That is a separate patch.
- When you have identical contents and identical basenames, the actual
entry that is chosen is still picked fairly "at random" for the first
one (but the subsequent ones will prefer entries that haven't already
been used).
It's not actually really random, in that it actually depends on the
relative alphabetical order of the files (which in turn will have
impacted the order that the entries got hashed!), so it gives
consistent results that can be explained. But I wanted to point it out
as an issue for when anybody actually does cross-renames.
In Kumar's case the choice is the right one (and for a single normal
directory rename it should always be, since the relative alphabetical
sorting of the files will be identical), and we now get:
rename board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8541cds/init.S (100%)
rename board/{cds => freescale}/mpc8548cds/init.S (100%)
which is the "expected" answer. However, it might still be better to
change the pedantic "exact same basename" on/off choice into a more
graduated "how similar are the pathnames" scoring situation, in order
to be more likely to get the exact rename choice that people *expect*
to see, rather than other alternatives that may *technically* be
equally good, but are surprising to a human.
It's also unclear whether we should consider "basenames are equal" or
"have already used this as a source" to be more important. This gives them
equal weight, but I suspect we might want to just multiple the "basenames
are equal" weight by two, or something, to prefer equal basenames even if
that causes a copy/delete pair. I dunno.
Anyway, what I'm just saying in a really long-winded manner is that I
think this is right as-is, but it's not the complete solution, and it may
want some further tweaking in the future.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier, 'git prune' would prune all loose unreachable objects.
This could be quite dangerous, as the objects could be used in
an ongoing operation.
This patch adds a mode to expire only loose, unreachable objects
which are older than a certain time. For example, by
git prune --expire 14.days
you can prune only those objects which are loose, unreachable
and older than 14 days (and thus probably outdated).
The implementation uses st.st_mtime rather than st.st_ctime,
because it can be tested better, using 'touch -d <time>' (and
omitting the test when the platform does not support that
command line switch).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Junio C Hamano