kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Tree: 5c49c11686

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Junio C Hamano	0a5280a9f4	git-bisect: allow bisecting with only one bad commit. This allows you to say: git bisect start git bisect bad $bad git bisect next to start bisection without knowing a good commit. This would have you try a commit that is half-way since the beginning of the history, which is rather wasteful if you already know a good commit, but if you don't (or your history is short enough that you do not care), there is no reason not to allow this. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Junio C Hamano	4f50671699	t6030: add a bit more tests to git-bisect Verify that git-bisect does not start before getting one bad and one good commit. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Christian Couder	38a47fd6e3	Bisect: teach "bisect start" to optionally use one bad and many good revs. One bad commit is fundamentally needed for bisect to run, and if we beforehand know more good commits, we can narrow the bisect space down without doing the whole tree checkout every time we give good commits. This patch implements: git bisect start [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<pathspec>...] as a short-hand for this command sequence: git bisect start git bisect bad $bad git bisect good $good1 $good2... On the other hand, there may be some confusion between revs (<bad> and <good>...) and <pathspec>... if -- is not used and if an invalid rev or a pathspec that looks like a rev is given. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Christian Couder	a17c410100	Bisect: implement "git bisect run <cmd>..." to automatically bisect. This idea was suggested by Bill Lear (Message-ID: <17920.38942.364466.642979@lisa.zopyra.com>) and I think it is a very good one. This patch adds a new test file for "git bisect run", but there is currently only one basic test. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago